Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
ZHANG Zhi-jie, WEN Fei, ZHANG Ya-qun, ZHOU Jing, FENG Ai-ping. CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE ANALYSIS OF NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION LOAD IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN ON A REGIONAL SCALE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 81-88,142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209011
Citation: ZHANG Zhi-jie, WEN Fei, ZHANG Ya-qun, ZHOU Jing, FENG Ai-ping. CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE ANALYSIS OF NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION LOAD IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN ON A REGIONAL SCALE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 81-88,142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209011

CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE ANALYSIS OF NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION LOAD IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN ON A REGIONAL SCALE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209011
  • Received Date: 2021-11-30
    Available Online: 2022-11-09
  • Grasping the characteristics and sources of non-point source pollution load in the Gansu section of the Yellow River Basin is an important basis for improving the level of water pollution control on a regional scale. Based on the DPeRS model, this study selected four pollution indicators of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, ammonia nitrogen and chemical oxygen demand, from the five major pollution types, farmland runoff, urban runoff, livestock and poultry breeding, rural life, and soil erosion. Pollution load estimation, pollution source analysis and spatial distribution analysis were carried out on non-point source pollution of nine cities(prefectures) and 58 districts(counties). The results showed that: from the model estimation results, the average non-point source pollution load of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, ammonia nitrogen and chemical oxygen demand in the entire basin in 2018 was 65.6,11.8,19.1, 77.2 kg/km2. From the regional scale analysis, the area with the highest non-point source pollution load of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in the Yellow River Basin of Gansu was Anning District, Lanzhou, which accounted for 10.83% and 5.16% of the total load of the entire basin respectively; the area with the highest non-point source pollution load of ammonia nitrogen and chemical oxygen demand was Linxia City in Linxia Prefecture, respectively, accounted for 26.23% and 56.56% of the total load of the entire basin. From the analysis of pollution sources, the primary pollution sources of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, ammonia nitrogen and chemical oxygen demand were farmland runoff, soil erosion, farmland runoff, and livestock and poultry farming. From the spatial distribution analysis, the total non-point source pollution load of each district(county) of the Yellow River Basin presented a distribution characteristic of middle-high and low sides. The areas with heavier pollution load were mainly concentrated in local areas such as the Lanzhou section of the Yellow River, the Linxia section of the Daxia River, and the Tianshui section of the Weihe River.
  • [1]
    杨奇奇,靳峰,张富,等.甘肃黄河流域生态环境现状及防治对策[J].中国水土保持,2021(4):26-30.
    [2]
    李家科,彭凯,郝改瑞,等.黄河流域非点源污染负荷定量化与控制研究进展[J].水资源保护,2021,37(1):90-102.
    [3]
    梁冬梅.小流域面源污染特征与控制技术研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2014.
    [4]
    高康宁.兰州段黄河流域农业面源污染分析研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2009.
    [5]
    华维霞.2007—2012年黄河兰州段农业非点源污染研究[D].西安:西北师范大学,2015.
    [6]
    刘全諹,齐明亮,马啸宙,等.基于遥感和GIS的洮河流域面源污染流域尺度模拟及防治对策研究[J].干旱区地理,2020,43(3):706-714.
    [7]
    康启燕.祖厉河流域农业面源污染特征研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2016.
    [8]
    任艺彬,巨天珍,卢造权,等.庆阳市马莲河、蒲河流域总氮总磷污染特征及其控制策略[J].湖北农业科学,2016,55(17):4460-4464.
    [9]
    韩柳.湟水流域面源污染负荷分析与模拟研究[D].西安:长安大学,2020.
    [10]
    LI H Z,ZHANG M X. A review on the calculation of non-point source pollution loads[J]. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science,2019,344:012138.
    [11]
    冯爱萍,王雪蕾,徐逸,等.基于DPeRS模型的海河流域面源污染潜在风险评估[J].环境科学,2020,41(10):4555-4563.
    [12]
    杨艳春,闫莉,程伟.黄河流域非点源污染估算研究[J].人民黄河,2011,33(11):66-68.
    [13]
    HENRI C V, HARTER T, DIAMANTOPOULOS E. On the conceptual complexity of non-point source management:impact of spatial variability[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2020,24(3):1189-1209.
    [14]
    WANG X L,WANG Q,WU C Q,et al. A method coupled with remote sensing data to evaluate non-point source pollution in theXin’anjiang catchment of China[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2012,430:132-143.
    [15]
    王谦,冯爱萍,于学谦,等.DPeRS模型在重点流域面源污染优控单元划分中的应用:以吉林省为例[J].环境与可持续发展,2016,41(4):111-115.
    [16]
    殷守敬,吴传庆,王晨,等.综合遥感与地面观测的巢湖水体富营养化评价[J].中国环境监测,2018,34(1):157-164.
    [17]
    JOY T A,MUTHUKRISHNA V K. Assessing non-point source pollution models:a review[J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies,2018,27(5):1913-1922.
    [18]
    WU B F. Watershed remote sensing:methodology and a paradigm in Hai Basin[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing,2011,15(2):201-223.
    [19]
    王雪蕾,王新新,朱利,等.巢湖流域氮磷面源污染与水华空间分布遥感解析[J].中国环境科学,2015,35(5):1511-1519.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]YANG Zhixuan, LI Lanqing, LIU Huanjia, YANG Ying, XU Mengyuan, JIA Mengke, LIU Hengzhi. SEASONAL VARIATION, SOURCE AND LIGHT EXTINCTION CONTRIBUTION OF WATER-SOLUBLE INORGANIC IONS OF PM2.5 IN THE NORTHERN SUBURB OF ANYANG, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 71-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406009
    [2]TIAN Weichao, CHEN Rongxu, TIAN Shimin, WANG Xin, LIU Jiaxin. EFFECT OF POLYPLOID ARUNDO DONAX L. ON POLLUTION CONTROL OF SLOPE RUNOFF IN HILLY AREA IN WEST HENAN PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 60-65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412008
    [3]LIU Xiaorui, WANG Zhimin, WANG Yinlong. POLLUTION REDUCTION OF INFLOW RIVERS OF THE TIEGANG RESERVOIR IN BAO’AN DISTRICT, SHENZHEN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 26-32. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410004
    [4]XU Yuanqian, FU Guangyu, SHENG Haozhe, YUE Libo, SUN Peng, LUO Yilin, CAO Jiahui, CAO Xia, CHEN Yang. PM2.5 POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT IN A TYPICAL INDUSTRIAL CITY OF HENAN PROVINCE DURING AUTUMN AND WINTER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 136-144. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412017
    [5]WANG Yan, WANG Jie, XIE Zijian, LI Chunhua, YE Chun, MIAO Kexin, WEI Weiwei, ZHENG Ye. NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTIONS IN TYPICAL RIVER BASINS IN HILLY AND MOUNTAINOUS AREAS AND PLAIN RIVER NETWORK AREA IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 33-40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410005
    [6]GU Xuedian, LIU Dongmei, LI Yuting, ZHANG Shangjun, CHEN Yidi, FENG Yujie, REN Nanqi. RESEARCH ON GREEN AND LOW CARBON TREATMENT PATH OF URBAN WATER POLLUTION IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 27-33. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412004
    [7]LÜ Zhiwen, LI Yuqing, YANG Jingjing, CAO Xiaoqiang, ZHANG Jian, LIU Huaqing, WANG Gang. PREPARATION OF SOLID WASTE-BASED POROUS MATERIALS BY PHYSICAL FOAMING TO CAPTURE AND STORE CO2[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 38-46. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306006
    [8]HUANG Yajie, CUI Yanzhi, LIU Haidong, BIAN Huafeng, LI Junchao, ZHOU Yan. ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL DIFFERENCES AND COUNTERMEASURES OF PRECISION OF THE RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE TREATMENT IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 47-53,156. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306007
    [9]LI Hongliang, TAO Jie, LI Lanqing, ZHAO Wenpeng, XU Mengyuan, JIA Mengke, YANG Ying, LIU Huanjia. POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF WATER-SOLUBLE IONS IN PM2.5 IN XINXIANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 117-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308015
    [10]ZHANG Xiuhong, LI Renge, ZHAO Yueshuai, GAO Linting, NING Bo. ANALYSIS OF DIFFUSE POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS IN AGRICULTURAL SPACE IN XI'AN BASED ON DPeRS MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 142-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312017
    [11]GAO Wei, CHEN Yan, YAN Changan, LIU Yong. SOURCE IDENTIFICATION OF PHOSPHORUS IN VARIOUS DISTURBED RIVERS BASED ON LAM MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 55-62. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206007
    [12]HAO Shuran, CHEN Zhuo, XU Ao, WU Yinhu, LI Guoqiang, NI Xinye, HU Hongying. ANALYSIS OF WATER REUSE SITUATIONS AND POTENTIALS IN MAIN CITIES IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 1-8,79. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210001
    [13]HAN Kun, LIU Ruhai, XU Hongxia, WANG Yan, SHAO Long, LIU Xiaoyu. CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCES APPORTIONMENT OF WATER-SOLUBLE IONS IN DUSTFALL IN QINGDAO[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 111-117,193. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203017
    [14]XIE Wei, XU Jiao, LIN Zhiguo, YAN Di, ZHANG Yinglei. RESEARCH ON REAL-TIME SOURCE APPORTIONMENT METHOD OF VOCs BASED ON BP NEURAL NETWORK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 231-238. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212031
    [15]WANG Xuelian, LIU Bo, ZHAO Changsen, HUANG Zhenfang, PAN Xu. STUDY ON CALCULATION METHOD SYSTEM OF POLLUTANT LOAD FROM NON-POINT SOURCE INTO RIVERS IN BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 166-172,211. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203025
    [16]YIN Jingchen, DING Han, LI Zeli, LI Xue, LI Guoguang, WANG Yuqiu. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION SIMULATION BASED ON SPARROW MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 253-260,294. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206032
    [17]ZHANG Zi-yang, QI Hao, ZHANG Xiao-ran, LI Hai-yan. INFLUENCING MECHANISM OF PERMEABLE PAVEMENT TYPE ON REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF HEAVY METALS FROM RUNOFF[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 41-46,88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102007
    [18]LIANG Shuai, HAN Bing, NIU Ze-pu, ZHAO Ling-dong, GU Jin-yi, WANG Wan-wan, ZHANG Li-feng, ZHANG Yang. SOURCE, MIGRATION AND ECOTOXICOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF MICRO-PLASTICS IN FRESHWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 1-9,70. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112001
    [19]WANG Cheng, CAO Jing-yuan, DUAN Xiao-lin, CHEN Hao, YAN Yu-long, PENG Lin. CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCES ANALYSIS OF CARBONACEOUS COMPONENTS IN PM2.5 IN WINTER IN FOUR CITIES OF SHANXI PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 114-121. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106017
    [20]GUO Min-peng, HOU Jing-ming, FU De-yu, KANG Yong-de, SHI Bao-shan, LI Chang-hao. HIGH PERFORMANCE NUMERICAL SIMULATION METHOD FOR NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION TRANSFER PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 160-166,173. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008027
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 李文婧,周凌峰,赵晓丽,吴小伟,刘玲玲,刘文丰,吴丰昌. 黄河流域水环境问题研究现状、挑战与展望. 环境科学研究. 2024(01): 32-41 .
    2. 李登辉,黄邦杰,张宗尧,刘小尘,杜宏伟,孙洪伟,房怀阳,方晓航. 城镇面源污染控制典型案例研究:以东江沙河流域茶亭生态调蓄塘湿地为例. 环境工程. 2024(06): 35-42 . 本站查看
    3. 武磊,高祖桥,谢旭红,王逸飞,申娜,张旭阳,李美静,李常斌. 甘肃省黄河流域土壤侵蚀及其驱动机制. 水土保持通报. 2024(03): 221-230 .
    4. 周添红,苏思霖,马凯,杜森,辛惠娟. 典型区域土地利用/景观格局对黄河上游水体TN的影响. 环境科学. 2024(10): 5768-5776 .
    5. 刘小蕊,王志民,汪银龙. 深圳宝安区铁岗水库入库河流污染削减研究. 环境工程. 2024(10): 26-32 . 本站查看
    6. 王浩闻,贾云飞,赵瑞雪. 科技创新视角下黄河流域农业高质量发展形势与对策. 科学管理研究. 2023(03): 130-139 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.5 %FULLTEXT: 11.5 %META: 86.3 %META: 86.3 %PDF: 2.1 %PDF: 2.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 18.2 %其他: 18.2 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %[]: 0.6 %[]: 0.6 %上海: 0.4 %上海: 0.4 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %兰州: 0.6 %兰州: 0.6 %北京: 10.0 %北京: 10.0 %十堰: 1.3 %十堰: 1.3 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南平: 0.2 %南平: 0.2 %南通: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %商丘: 1.9 %商丘: 1.9 %嘉兴: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %天津: 3.2 %天津: 3.2 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %宜春: 0.2 %宜春: 0.2 %宣城: 0.9 %宣城: 0.9 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广州: 1.5 %广州: 1.5 %廊坊: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.4 %张家口: 1.9 %张家口: 1.9 %怀化: 0.2 %怀化: 0.2 %成都: 1.7 %成都: 1.7 %扬州: 2.4 %扬州: 2.4 %新乡: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 1.5 %昆明: 1.5 %晋中: 0.2 %晋中: 0.2 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.9 %杭州: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %武汉: 0.9 %武汉: 0.9 %济源: 0.4 %济源: 0.4 %淮安: 0.4 %淮安: 0.4 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %温州: 0.9 %温州: 0.9 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %漯河: 5.3 %漯河: 5.3 %烟台: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %盐城: 0.2 %盐城: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %福州: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %绍兴: 1.3 %绍兴: 1.3 %芒廷维尤: 17.7 %芒廷维尤: 17.7 %芝加哥: 2.4 %芝加哥: 2.4 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.9 %衢州: 0.9 %西宁: 2.6 %西宁: 2.6 %西安: 0.6 %西安: 0.6 %西雅图: 0.4 %西雅图: 0.4 %运城: 2.1 %运城: 2.1 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 1.3 %邯郸: 1.3 %郑州: 3.2 %郑州: 3.2 %重庆: 0.9 %重庆: 0.9 %银川: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %长治: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %香港: 0.4 %香港: 0.4 %其他其他[]上海东莞临汾保定兰州北京十堰南京南宁南平南通呼和浩特哈尔滨商丘嘉兴天津太原宜春宣城常德广州廊坊张家口怀化成都扬州新乡无锡昆明晋中晋城朝阳杭州武汉济源淮安深圳温州湖州漯河烟台盐城石家庄福州绍兴芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安西雅图运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆银川长沙长治青岛香港

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (403) PDF downloads(13) Cited by(10)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return