Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
WANG Zhaoyue, ZHAO Xiaying, TANG Linhui, LIU Yu, CHENG Huiyu, PAN Yirong, YAN Xu, WANG Xu. RESEARCH ADVANCES IN CARBON EMISSION MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT OF URBAN DRAINAGE AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 77-82,161. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206010
Citation: LI Hai-dan, ZHENG Li-ping, ZHOU Han, SUN Yu-can, ZHANG Tao, CHEN Tan, YANG Ting, ZHANG Bing. REVIEW ON SPATIAL-TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COMPONENTS IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 126-134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209017

REVIEW ON SPATIAL-TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COMPONENTS IN CHINA

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209017
  • Received Date: 2021-11-02
    Available Online: 2022-11-09
  • The components of municipal solid waste(MSW) is the basis for selecting disposal methods, which are closely related to regions, seasons and residents' living habits. This paper systematically reviews the temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of MSW in China in recent years. In recent 20 years, kitchen waste accounts for the highest proportion(close to or even more than 50%) in urban MSW of China, the proportion of recyclables increased(from about 22% to about 30%), and the low heating value of MSW shows an upward trend(more than 6000 kJ/kg). Kitchen waste accounts for a high proportion of MSW in the first quarter of a year(about 61% in cities), and in the third and fourth quarters, the proportion of ash and soil increases(up to 29% in rural areas) with lower moisture content and higher heating value(up to 6600 kJ/kg in cities). Nationwide, there are significant differences in the proportion of MSW in various regions. The proportion of kitchen waste decreases from the east(65%) to the west(50%), the proportion of recyclables decreases from the south(25%) to the north(17%), and that of ash and soil decreases from the north(27%) to the south(11%). The heat value of MSW is positively correlated with the level of the region's economic development. The conclusion can provide data support for the treatment of MSW according to local conditions.
  • [1]
    北方建筑.《生活垃圾分类标志》标准发布[J].北方建筑,2019,4 (6):79.
    [2]
    CHENG H F,HU Y A.Municipal solid waste (MSW) as a renewable source of energy:current and future practices in China[J].Bioresource Technology,2010,101(11):3816-3824.
    [3]
    TROSCHINETZ A,MIHELCIC J R.Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries[J].Waste Management,2009,29(2):915-923.
    [4]
    李兵.生活垃圾深度分选及设备优化组合技术研究[D].上海:同济大学,2006.
    [5]
    赵蔚蔚.大连市城市中心区生活垃圾调查与分析[J].环境卫生工程,2006,14(6):29-31.
    [6]
    国家统计局.第二次全国污染源普查公报[EB/OL].第二次全国污染源普查 (mee.gov.cn),2020.
    [7]
    李春芸.北京市城区生活垃圾理化特性调查研究[D].北京:北京工业大学,2015.
    [8]
    温冬,郑凤才,王明飞.垃圾分类政策实施后对北京市现有焚烧设施的影响及对策[J].环境卫生工程,2020,28 (5):88-92.
    [9]
    李建新,王永川,张美琴,等.国内城市生活垃圾特性及其处理技术研究[J].热力发电,2006 (1):11-14,71.
    [10]
    荣波,潘明,李彦富,等.北京市生活垃圾成分分析及对应处理方式对策研究[J].环境保护,2004 (10):30-33.
    [11]
    北京市人民政府.北京市人民政府关于印发《北京市“十三五”时期能源发展规划》的通知[EB/OL].北京市人民政府门户网站(beijing.gov.cn),2017.
    [12]
    徐振威,吴晓晖.生活垃圾分类对垃圾主要参数的影响分析[J].环境卫生工程,2021,29 (1):26-31.
    [13]
    奚慧.上海市生活垃圾全程分类体系建设现状分析及对策建议[J].环境卫生工程,2020,28 (3):80-85.
    [14]
    吕永.广州市生活垃圾回收利用现状分析及利用率提升途径研究[J].广东科技,2021,30 (2):66-70.
    [15]
    陶雪峰,黄涛,杨海静,等.成都市中心城区生活垃圾调查与分析[J].广东农业科学,2009 (1):94-96.
    [16]
    杜林洋.成都市生活垃圾分类回收分析及解决方案[D].成都:西南交通大学,2018.
    [17]
    AGRINHO A,SEMIAO V.Estimation of residual MSW heating value as a function of waste component recycling[J].Waste Management,2008,28(12):2675-2683.
    [18]
    BURNLEY S J.A review of municipal solid waste composition in the United Kingdom[J].Waste Management,2007,27(10):1274-1285.
    [19]
    张丽,王桂琴,王典.北京市城六区居住小区生活垃圾产生量调查分析[J].环境卫生工程,2018,26 (1):59-62.
    [20]
    吕永.华南城市生活垃圾热值估算模型分析[J].中国资源综合利用,2020,38 (1):82-85.
    [21]
    房科靖,熊祖鸿,鲁敏,等.垃圾热值的研究进展[J].新能源进展,2019,7 (4):359-364.
    [22]
    魏潇潇,王小铭,李蕾,等.1979—2016年中国城市生活垃圾产生和处理时空特征[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(10):3833-3843.
    [23]
    阚宝鹏.青岛市城市生活垃圾处理现状、理化特性及处置方式研究[D].青岛:青岛大学,2017.
    [24]
    黄昌付.深圳市生活垃圾理化组分的统计学研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2012.
    [25]
    程炬,董晓丹.上海市生活垃圾理化特性浅析[J].环境卫生工程,2017,25 (4):36-40.
    [26]
    王延涛,曹阳.我国城市生活垃圾焚烧发电厂垃圾热值分析[J].环境卫生工程,2019,27 (5):41-44.
    [27]
    张丽,王桂琴,白亚璇,等.北京市居住小区生活垃圾组分影响因素分析[J].中国资源综合利用,2019,37 (10):135-138.
    [28]
    李志龙.我国典型村镇生活垃圾产生特征及处置模式研究[D].南昌:南昌大学,2016.
    [29]
    卞荣星,孙英杰,李卫华,等.农村生活垃圾产生特性及处理处置对策研究[J].环境工程,2014,32 (12):100-102

    ,171.
    [30]
    张静,仲跻胜,邵立明,等.海南省琼海市农村生活垃圾产生特征及就地处理实践[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28 (11):2422-2427.
    [31]
    陈昆柏,何闪英,冯华军.浙江省农村生活垃圾特性研究[J].能源工程,2010 (1):39-43.
    [32]
    段雄伟,高海硕,黎华寿,等.广东省农村生活垃圾组分及其污染特性分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2013,32 (7):1486-1492.
    [33]
    陈浩,雷坤平,马春兰,等.石河子市城市生活垃圾的组成及理化性质分析[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38 (23):12666-12668.
    [34]
    徐永锋,杨学军,周金顺,等.昆明市春季生活垃圾分析及处理[J].可再生能源,2008 (1):93-96.
    [35]
    邵华伟,徐万里,孔江江,等.乌鲁木齐市生活垃圾调查及评价[J].环境卫生工程,2009,17 (5):10-12.
    [36]
    温冬,郑凤才,王明飞.垃圾分类政策实施后对北京市现有焚烧设施的影响及对策[J].环境卫生工程,2020,28 (5):88-92.
    [37]
    陈婉.强制分类后上海垃圾特性发生明显变化[J].环境经济,2019 (17):36-37.
    [38]
    余淑蓉,谢小明.厨余垃圾能源化处置及预处理方案讨论[J].能源与环境,2021 (1):89-90,106.
    [39]
    陈倩倩.宁波市不同区分类垃圾理化特性与温室气体排放特征研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2018.
    [40]
    杜林洋.成都市生活垃圾分类回收分析及解决方案[D].成都:西南交通大学,2018.
    [41]
    马铮铮.沈阳市生活垃圾调查及处置方式研究[J].环境卫生工程.2010,18 (2):13-14

    ,18.
    [42]
    晏卓逸,岳波,高红,等.我国村镇生活垃圾可燃组分基本特征及其时空差异[J].环境科学,2017,38 (7):3078-3084.
    [43]
    黄明星,刘丹.四川省城市生活垃圾的组成及特性[J].中国环境监测,2012,28 (5):121-123.
    [44]
    谢冰.东北地区垃圾堆场的垃圾降解行为及稳定化研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2010.
    [45]
    崔俊丽,刘鸿雁,陈泽渊,等.贵阳市生活垃圾产生处置现状及资源化利用[J].贵州大学学报(自然科学版),2016,33 (4):128-132.
    [46]
    李美叶,郑振涛.济南市生活垃圾性状变化趋势及处理技术多元化转型分析[J].环境卫生工程,2014,22 (4):62-64.
    [47]
    李晓东,陆胜勇,徐旭,等.中国部分城市生活垃圾热值的分析[J].中国环境科学,2001,21 (2):61-65.
    [48]
    张海龙,李祥平,齐剑英,等.华南某市生活垃圾组成特征分析[J].环境科学,2015,36 (1):325-332.
    [49]
    袁慧芳,韩雅娇,周秋丹,等.西安市生活垃圾组成及现状分析[J].广东化工,2013,40 (21):125-126.
    [50]
    张兴庆.特大型城市生活垃圾分类组团转运与资源转化关键技术及应用[R].重庆市环卫集团有限公司,2020-05-24.
    [51]
    韩智勇,费勇强,刘丹,等.中国农村生活垃圾的产生量与物理特性分析及处理建议[J].农业工程学报,2017,33 (15):1-14.
    [52]
    石峰,范立建,吕实波,等.2006年山东省农村垃圾和污水处理状况调查[J].预防医学论坛,2008,14(9):774-775

    ,778.
    [53]
    吴和岩,张建鹏,潘尚霞,等.2011年广东省农村垃圾和污水现状调查[J].环境与健康杂志,2012,29(3):251-253.
    [54]
    韩智勇,梅自力,孔垂雪,等.西南地区农村生活垃圾特征与群众环保意识[J].生态与农村环境学报,2015,31(3):314-319.
    [55]
    丁森林,王洁,郭洪生.河北省农村生活废弃物处理现状及模式研究[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(34):19471-19473.
    [56]
    满国红,任飞荣.辽宁省乡镇及农村居民生活垃圾现状调查[J].环境卫生工程,2013,21 (1):44-45.
    [57]
    单华伦,朱伟,张春雷,等.发达农村生活垃圾特性调查及治理技术探讨[J].江苏环境科技,2006,19 (6):3-5.
    [58]
    段丽杰,盛连喜,王志平.长春市生活垃圾处理现状分析与对策探讨[J].环境卫生工程,2004,12(3):168-170.
    [59]
    国家统计局.人均GDP[DB/OL].国家数据 (stats.gov.cn),2018.
    [60]
    吴林,汪晶,邓方昕.重庆市生活垃圾焚烧发电厂颗粒物特征研究[J].能源环境保护,2021,35 (3):75-80.
    [61]
    FAN Y B,LI S J,LI Y B,et al.Recycling of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash in foam ceramic materials for exterior building walls[J].Journal of Building Engineering,2021,44:103427.
    [62]
    杨荣.城市生活垃圾填埋场堆体非均质性及渗流场与稳定性分析[D].西安:西安理工大学,2020.
    [63]
    赵振振,张红亮,殷俊,等.对我国城市生活垃圾分类的分析及思考[J].资源节约与环保,2021 (8):128-131.
    [64]
    黄本生,李晓红,王里奥,等.重庆市主城区生活垃圾理化性质分析及处理技术[J].重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2003,26(9):9-13.
    [65]
    HUI Y,WANG L A,SU F W,et al.Urban solid waste management in Chongqing:challenges and opportunities[J].Waste management (New York,N.Y.),2006,26 (9):1052-1062.
    [66]
    银燕春,刘育辰,王莉淋,等.成都城镇生活垃圾特性及处理方案[J].环境工程学报.2016,10 (10):5964-5970.
    [67]
    KHAN S,ANJUM R,RAZA S T,et al.Technologies for municipal solid waste management:current status,challenges,and future perspectives[J].Chemosphere,2022,288 (P1).
    [68]
    何品晶,章骅,吕凡,等.我国小城镇生活垃圾处理的现状、基础条件与适宜模式[J].农业资源与环境学报,2015,32 (2):116-120.
    [69]
    王延涛,曹阳.我国城市生活垃圾焚烧发电厂垃圾热值分析[J].环境卫生工程,2019,27 (5):41-44.
    [70]
    方银娥,陈宗良,潘凤开.城镇生活垃圾热解反应的主要影响因素分析[J].节能与环保,2021 (7):45-46.
    [71]
    ZHAO Y,CHRISTENSEN T H,LU W J,et al.Environmental impact assessment of solid waste management in Beijing City,China[J].Waste Management (New York,N.Y.),2011,31 (4):793-799.
    [72]
    刘祚屹,瞿群,吴艳林,等.非法倾倒的生活垃圾组分及其污染物排放估算:以南方某城镇为例[J].吉林工程技术师范学院学报,2020,36 (5):89-94.
    [73]
    DICKELLA G P J,GHOSH S K,ONOGAWA K.Source separation in municipal solid waste management:practical means to its success in Asian cities[J].Waste Management & Research:the Journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association,ISWA,2021,10:1-11.
    [74]
    王健.生活垃圾可燃组分的分选及干基制备工艺研究[J].中国环保产业,2019,12 (5),45-48.
    [75]
    程伟.北京城区和农村地区生活垃圾组成特性的对比分析[J].再生资源与循环经济,2020,13 (1):17-22.
    [76]
    袁寅强,杨旭.我国生活垃圾焚烧发电技术现状及展望[J].节能技术,2021,39 (3):285-288.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]GU Yonggang, YU Lei, ZHANG Shuhan, MENG Qingyi. EVALUATION OF ENTROPY INCREASE INHIBITION EFFECT OF TREATMENT OF INFERIOR V-CLASS WATER BODIES IN TYPICAL RURAL RIVER COURSES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 128-134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402015
    [2]WANG Hang, WANG Xiankai, CHEN Xiang, LI Kun, QIAO Xueyuan, LIU Feng, DONG Bin. CARBON EMISSION ANALYSIS OF COLLABORATIVE TREATMENT OF MUNICIPAL ORGANIC SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 66-72. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402008
    [3]GANG Qinyan, MA Xiaoqian, LIU Chao, WANG Han, WANG Yayi. RESEARCH ON CARBON EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION LEACHATE TREATMENT SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 31-39. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404004
    [4]WU Yiqi, YIN Xiaoqing. STUDY ON STANDARDS ON CARBON EMISSION IN MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 146-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411016
    [5]LI Jingnan, WANG Qunhui, LIANG Baorui, WANG Wanqing, LIU Junjie. EFFECTS OF GARDEN WASTE ON EMISSION REDUCTION AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY IN COASTAL SALINE SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 95-101. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401013
    [6]YU Jie, ZHANG Yong, LI Qingyao. DECOUPLING EFFECT AND DRIVING MECHANISM OF CARBON EMISSION REDUCTION IN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY: A TWO-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 150-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310019
    [7]WU Qixian, XIE Xinyan, CHEN Yun, JIN Ziyi. ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING CARBON EMISSIONS OF URBAN RAIL TRANSIT PROJECTS BASED ON PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 133-140. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310017
    [8]WANG Zhiqiang, LI Kehui, REN Jin'ge, ZHANG Qi. INFLUENTIAL FACTORS AND SCENARIO FORECAST OF CARBON EMISSIONS OF CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN SHANDONG PROVINCE BASED ON LMDI-SD MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 108-116. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310014
    [9]WANG Zhiqi, LI Jianguo, PENG Binbin, XIANG Wanli. DRIVING FACTORS AND DECOUPLING EFFECT ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION CARBON EMISSIONS IN WESTERN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 213-222. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310025
    [10]MA Tao, GUO Yuehua, WANG Weiwei, CAO Jingguo. CARBON EMISSION CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS FOR CURED-IN-PLACE REHABILITATION OF URBAN DRAINAGE PIPELINE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 54-58,63. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311011
    [11]WANG Shuo, LU Yunping, LIU Shuyang, CHEN Kangli. CARBON EMISSIONS OF URBAN AND INDUSTRIAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS OF SUZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 173-184. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310021
    [12]LIU Jie, GE Xiao, ZHAO Zhenyu. RESEARCH ON SPATIO-TEMPORAL EVOLUTION OF CARBON ARRANGEMENT IN NORTH CHINA CITIES AND ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 204-212,222. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310024
    [13]ZHAO Gang, TANG Jianguo, XU Jingcheng, LUO Jingyang, JIANG Ming, YUAN Xianchen, ZHOU Chuanting. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON ENERGY AND CARBON EMISSION OF TYPICAL SLUDGE TREATMENT PROJECTS IN CHINA AND THE UNITED STATES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 9-16. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212002
    [14]LUO Yuli, PAN Yirong, MA Jiaxin, WANG Jiayuan, LI Chunyao, CHEN Zhenpeng, WANG Xu. RESEARCH ADVANCES ON CARBON EMISSION OF WASTEWATER RESOURCE RECOVERY AND VALORIZATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 83-91,187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206011
    [15]SUN Yao, LI Xiaojing, LI Junqi, WANG Wenliang, XUE Chonghua, WANG Jianlong, WANG Wenhai. DISCUSSION ON EXISTING PROBLEMS AND COUNTERMEASURES IN SPONGE CITY MONITORING AND EVALUATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 182-187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204026
    [16]SU Yue-huan, ZHANG Yu, DUAN Hua-bo, LI Qiang-feng. RESEARCH ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND EMISSION REDUCTION POTENTIAL OF METRO CONSTRUCTION: A CASE STUDY IN SHENZHEN, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 184-192,236. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205027
    [17]ZHANG Xing, QIAN Zhen-qing, ZHANG De-feng, ZHU Tao, YUAN Qian-cheng, YE Ze-fu. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF COOKING FUME EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(1): 37-41,20. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202001005
    [18]YIN Ding-kun, CHEN Zheng-xia, YANG Meng-qi, JIA Hai-feng, XU Ke, WANG Teng-xu. EVALUATION OF RUNOFF CONTROL EFFECT IN SPONGE CITY CONSTRUCTION BASED ON ONLINE MONITORING+SIMULATION MODELING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 151-157. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004027
    [19]ZHANG Li, XIE Zi-xuan, CAO Li-bin, WU Qiong, CAI Bo-feng. DISCUSSION ON EVALUATION METHOD ON CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS PEAKING FOR CHINESE CITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 1-5,43. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011001
    [20]LI Han, WANG Jian-long, FENG Cui-min, CAI Zhi-wen, HE Cun-gang, LIU Yan. MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF STORMWATER CONTROL EFFECT VIA LOW-IMPACT DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 145-150. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004026
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 赵大洲,武宇杰,叶成秀,付依玮,邵怡菲,任泽宇. 生物质吸附剂去除重金属离子的研究进展. 皮革与化工. 2025(01): 17-21 .
    2. 郑凯远,陈红,绳俊,蔡冬清,薛罡,曾可佳,于鑫,叶沁辉. 污水处理厂碳排放核算方法的标准研究与修正建议. 东华大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(01): 134-144 .
    3. 刘小明. 电炉炼钢中CO_2排放量监测及控制研究. 山西冶金. 2024(02): 94-96 .
    4. 涂倩倩,沈鹏飞,刘鸣燕,张梓璇,余波,杨凯. 城镇污水处理厂碳排放核算方法及特征. 净水技术. 2024(06): 52-62 .
    5. 武成辉,周婧,马锦钰,霍冠峰. 非二氧化碳温室气体排放量化方法研究进展. 广东化工. 2024(20): 103-106 .
    6. 宣干,唐柏杨,李雨婷,张熙彤,刘伟京,操家顺,罗景阳,冯骞. 城镇污水收集系统直接碳排放的监测方法研究进展. 环境工程. 2024(11): 13-21 . 本站查看
    7. 娄明月,刘广兵,刘伟京,孟溪,施梦琦,郭明辰. 基于厌氧碳循环理论的污水收集典型单元碳排放核算方法研究. 环境工程. 2024(11): 61-71 . 本站查看
    8. 唐柏杨,宣干,杨诗瑶,刘伟京,薛朝霞,操家顺,罗景阳,冯骞. 重新审视化粪池的温室效应:回顾与展望. 环境工程. 2023(07): 14-21 . 本站查看
    9. 姚怡帆,荆玉姝,王丽艳,刘长青. 基于集成模型的污水处理厂出水总氮预测方法. 工业水处理. 2023(09): 187-194 .
    10. 佟素娟,薛同来. 基于PSO-ACO算法的再生水厂出水总磷预测模型研究. 现代盐化工. 2023(04): 35-37 .
    11. 欧阳伊雯,庞蘅洺,叶红丽,庞惠月,王照晴,高小峰,陆嘉麒. 重庆市城镇污水处理系统的碳排放特征及减污降碳措施建议. 环境工程学报. 2023(09): 2841-2847 .
    12. 张芳. 基于水质+水位检测的城镇排水管网排查重点研究. 工程技术研究. 2022(16): 148-150 .
    13. 孙锐,陈菊香. 基于AHP-FCE模型的污水处理厂运营管理综合评价与优化——以克拉玛依市A污水处理厂为例. 工程技术研究. 2022(18): 201-204+208 .

    Other cited types(7)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 17.4 %FULLTEXT: 17.4 %META: 78.7 %META: 78.7 %PDF: 3.9 %PDF: 3.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.9 %其他: 14.9 %其他: 0.8 %其他: 0.8 %Central District: 0.4 %Central District: 0.4 %Perth Amboy: 1.2 %Perth Amboy: 1.2 %[]: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %上海: 4.8 %上海: 4.8 %东莞: 1.2 %东莞: 1.2 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %乌兰察布: 0.2 %乌兰察布: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.2 %伊春: 0.2 %伊春: 0.2 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %六安: 0.2 %六安: 0.2 %北京: 6.0 %北京: 6.0 %南京: 1.6 %南京: 1.6 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %四平: 0.4 %四平: 0.4 %天津: 1.4 %天津: 1.4 %宁波: 0.4 %宁波: 0.4 %宣城: 1.0 %宣城: 1.0 %宿州: 0.4 %宿州: 0.4 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %广州: 1.2 %广州: 1.2 %庆阳: 0.2 %庆阳: 0.2 %张家口: 1.4 %张家口: 1.4 %成都: 1.7 %成都: 1.7 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %昆明: 1.4 %昆明: 1.4 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 0.8 %杭州: 0.8 %松原: 0.6 %松原: 0.6 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %泰安: 0.2 %泰安: 0.2 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %济源: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %深圳: 2.3 %深圳: 2.3 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %濮阳: 0.2 %濮阳: 0.2 %白银: 0.2 %白银: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %福州: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 28.5 %芒廷维尤: 28.5 %芝加哥: 1.7 %芝加哥: 1.7 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %西宁: 12.0 %西宁: 12.0 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %运城: 1.6 %运城: 1.6 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %郑州: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %长春: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长沙: 1.2 %长沙: 1.2 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %香港: 0.6 %香港: 0.6 %马鞍山: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %其他其他Central DistrictPerth Amboy[]上海东莞临汾乌兰察布乌鲁木齐伊春保定六安北京南京南昌合肥哈尔滨四平天津宁波宣城宿州常州常德广州庆阳张家口成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州松原格兰特县武汉泰安济南济源深圳温州湖州漯河濮阳白银石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义郑州长春长沙青岛香港马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (662) PDF downloads(15) Cited by(20)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return