Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 40 Issue 9
Nov.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2022  >  40(9): 167-172
NIU Ming-fen, LIU Xin-zhi, GUO Ying-da, LI Gang, LI Bo-lin, GUO Shu-hai. WASHING-THERMAL DESORPTION REMEDIATION OF PARAFFIN AND NAPHTHENIC BASED CRUDE OIL CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 167-172. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209022
Citation: NIU Ming-fen, LIU Xin-zhi, GUO Ying-da, LI Gang, LI Bo-lin, GUO Shu-hai. WASHING-THERMAL DESORPTION REMEDIATION OF PARAFFIN AND NAPHTHENIC BASED CRUDE OIL CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 167-172. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209022
shu

WASHING-THERMAL DESORPTION REMEDIATION OF PARAFFIN AND NAPHTHENIC BASED CRUDE OIL CONTAMINATED SOIL

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209022

  • 1. School of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Shenyang Jinzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China;

  • 2. Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;

  • 3. National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Contaminated Soil Remediation by Bio-physicochemical Synergistic Process, Shenyang 110016, China;

  • 4. Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China

  • Received Date: 2021-11-16
    Available Online: 2022-11-09
    Abstract
  • The properties of crude oil will directly affect the selection of polluted soil remediation technology. Paraffin and naphthenic based crude oil contaminated soils were selected, and the coupling technology of soil washing and thermal desorption were adopted to investigate the desorption ratios of petroleum and energy consumption. The particular concern was focused on the screening effect of washing pretreatment on soil particle size, desorption rate of petroleum pollutants, the effect of thermal desorption remediation on reagent washed soil, etc. The results showed that after water washing pretreatment, the desorption rate of petroleum adsorbed by large particle size sand in soil was about 59.83% and 36.42%, much higher than the clay component. Anionic sodium α-16 olefin sulfonate and isomeric alcohol ethoxylate were used during washing process. The desorption rates of petroleum in paraffin based and naphthenic crude oil contaminated soil were 46.5% and 39.8% respectively. Anionic sodium α-16 olefin sulfonate had a stronger desorption ability. Naphthenic based crude oil contaminated soil was remediated by thermal desorption, the desorption time of clay component after washing was shorter than the raw contaminated soil. The content of petroleum was decreased to 0.26% after thermal desorption at 400 ℃ for 3 hours. The washing-thermal desorption coupling technology was adopted for field test, and the petroleum content of large particle size sand after washing was 1.56%, and 0.57% for the dewatered clay by thermal desorption. The energy consumption of washing-thermal desorption was lower than the single thermal desorption technology.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(21)
  • [1]
    陈敏.石油污染土壤修复技术研究进展[J].广东化工,2020,47(23):100-101

    ,84.
    [2]
    刘仁华,朱开贞,孙加山,等.热脱附技术分类及应用[J].广州化工,2021,49(13):23-26.
    [3]
    张亚峰,安路阳,王风贺.有机污染场地土壤热解吸技术研究进展[J].环境保护科学,2021,47(1):124-135.
    [4]
    王开阳,刘龙杰,邵志国,等.热脱附处理技术在石油污染土壤中的研究进展[J].山西化工,2020,40(4):22-25.
    [5]
    龙飞,郭斌,王欣.石油污染土壤热脱附技术的研究现状与展望[J].山东化工,2020,49(24):70-72.
    [6]
    WANG B,WU A J,LI X D,et al.Progress in fundamental research on thermal desorption remediation of organic compound-contaminated soil[J].Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy,2021,2:83-95.
    [7]
    杨振,柳林杉,刘明杰,等.油浸泥土热脱附修复小试实验条件的探索[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(10):2320-2327.
    [8]
    许优,顾海林,詹明秀,等.有机污染土壤异位直接热脱附装置节能降耗方案[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(9):2074-2082.
    [9]
    FALCIGLIA P P,GIUSTRA M G.Low-temperature thermal desorption of diesel polluted soil:influence of temperature and soil texture on contaminant removal kinetics[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2011,185(1):392-400.
    [10]
    鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.
    [11]
    牟炳昶.土壤有机质的测定(改进的重铬酸钾法)[J].内蒙古水利科技,1987(4):31-32.
    [12]
    王秀颖,高晓飞,刘和平,等.土壤水稳性大团聚体测定方法综述[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(3):106-113.
    [13]
    陈翠玲.吸管法测定土壤机械组成及土壤微团聚体吸样时间的探讨[J].河南职业技术师范学院学报,1994,22(4):69-70.
    [14]
    王如刚,王敏,牛晓伟,等.超声-索氏萃取-重量法测定土壤中总石油烃含量[J].分析化学,2010,38(3):417-420.
    [15]
    蒲海源,刁长军,罗治江,等.石油族组分分离及分析方法研究现状[J].辽宁化工,2012,41(12):1322-1326.
    [16]
    ZHANG T,CHENG J J,TAN H Y,et al.Particle-size-based elution of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil by surfactant mixture[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2022,302(PA):113983-113983.
    [17]
    赵宇光,梁成华,杜立宇,等.长期定位施肥设施土壤微团聚体磷素吸附解吸特征性探讨[J].北方园艺,2009(5):1-4.
    [18]
    WANG X S.Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in particle-size fractions of urban topsoils[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2013,70(6):2855-2864.
    [19]
    LI Y.Effects of particle shape and size distribution on the shear strength behavior of composite soils[J].Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2013,72(3/4):371-381.
    [20]
    余锦涛,马晓宇,张长波.黏性土壤淋洗修复过程中粒径高效分级系统的研发及应用[J].环境工程,2021,39(6):160-166.
    [21]
    王琦,郭书海,李刚,等.表面活性剂-无机电解质-石油烃的匹配性与石油污染土壤清洗性能[J].环境工程,2021,39(3):195-203

    ,110.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]DONG Yihua, ZHANG Xueying, ZHANG Xinyue, LI Liang. EVALUATION OF FARMLAND NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL TECHNOLOGY IN LIAOHE RIVER BASIN BASED ON AHP-FCE METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 150-157. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312018
    [2]SHI Nian, SU Kuizu. COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF AEROBIC SLUDGE GRANULATION PROCESS BASED ON FUZZY MATHEMATICS METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 162-170,181. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206021
    [3]CAO Wen-ping, LIU Xi-kun, ZHAO Tian-qing, TIAN Li, LIU Yong. EVALUATION OF WATER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OF PAN'AN LAKE WETLAND BASED ON PRESSURE-STATE-RESPONSE (PSR) MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 231-237,245. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105032
    [4]SONG Jing-hui, LIU Han-hu, FU Bo, CHENG Han-yu, ZHANG Shuang-sheng. A SECONDARY COMPREHREHENSIVE FUZZY EVALUATION MODEL OF EUTROPHICATION BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD: A CASE STUDY OF JIULI WETLAND PARK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 126-132. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009021
    [5]LI Yong, CONG Yi, JIA Jia. FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF URBAN AIR QUALITY IN FENWEI PLAIN BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 236-243,206. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008039
    [6]LING Yu-nan, LIU Ying, PENG Jia-bin, ZHONG Rui-sen, HUANG Yue, LIU Tie, CHENG Yong, ZHANG Yong, JIANG Li-xin, YU Mei-yan. ANALYSIS OF MINIMUM ECOLOGICAL WATER LEVEL AND WATER SURPLUS IN XIAOHU LAKE DISTRICT IN BOSTEN LAKE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 26-32,60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010005
    [14]Zhang Qi, Jing Zhaoxia, Liu Yi, Liu Xinyu, Wang Yan. APPLICATION OF FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION METHOD ON NORMAL SAMPLES IN WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN CHAOHU LAKE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 110-112. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503023
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 肖粤，贺秋华，王明明，李星，钟甜甜，刘陈. 某关停冶炼企业遗留场地重金属生态与人体健康风险评价. 南华大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(06): 19-26 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 13.6 %FULLTEXT: 13.6 %META: 84.1 %META: 84.1 %PDF: 2.3 %PDF: 2.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.3 %其他: 14.3 %China: 1.3 %China: 1.3 %Kao-sung: 0.3 %Kao-sung: 0.3 %上海: 1.9 %上海: 1.9 %东莞: 5.5 %东莞: 5.5 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %临沂: 0.6 %临沂: 0.6 %丽水: 0.3 %丽水: 0.3 %乌鲁木齐: 1.0 %乌鲁木齐: 1.0 %乐山: 0.3 %乐山: 0.3 %保定: 0.6 %保定: 0.6 %克孜勒苏: 0.3 %克孜勒苏: 0.3 %克拉玛依: 2.3 %克拉玛依: 2.3 %北京: 5.5 %北京: 5.5 %十堰: 0.3 %十堰: 0.3 %南京: 3.2 %南京: 3.2 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %厦门: 0.3 %厦门: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %哈密: 0.3 %哈密: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.6 %天津: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %巴音郭楞: 1.0 %巴音郭楞: 1.0 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %张家口: 4.5 %张家口: 4.5 %张家界: 0.3 %张家界: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %成都市金牛区: 0.3 %成都市金牛区: 0.3 %扬州: 2.3 %扬州: 2.3 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %昆明: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %晋城: 1.3 %晋城: 1.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 1.3 %杭州: 1.3 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济源: 0.6 %济源: 0.6 %淮北: 0.3 %淮北: 0.3 %深圳: 0.6 %深圳: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %湖州: 1.3 %湖州: 1.3 %漯河: 1.9 %漯河: 1.9 %石嘴山: 0.3 %石嘴山: 0.3 %石家庄: 1.6 %石家庄: 1.6 %聊城: 0.3 %聊城: 0.3 %自贡: 0.3 %自贡: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 14.3 %芒廷维尤: 14.3 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %苏州: 1.3 %苏州: 1.3 %葫芦岛: 0.6 %葫芦岛: 0.6 %衡阳: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.3 %衢州: 1.3 %衢州: 1.3 %襄阳: 0.3 %襄阳: 0.3 %西宁: 6.5 %西宁: 6.5 %西安: 1.0 %西安: 1.0 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 3.2 %运城: 3.2 %通辽: 0.3 %通辽: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邢台: 0.3 %邢台: 0.3 %邯郸: 1.0 %邯郸: 1.0 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州市新密: 0.3 %郑州市新密: 0.3 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %银川: 0.3 %银川: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %其他ChinaKao-sung上海东莞临汾临沂丽水乌鲁木齐乐山保定克孜勒苏克拉玛依北京十堰南京南昌南通厦门台州哈密唐山嘉兴天津巴音郭楞常德张家口张家界成都成都市金牛区扬州拉贾斯坦邦昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉济南济源淮北深圳温州湖州漯河石嘴山石家庄聊城自贡芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州葫芦岛衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安贵阳运城通辽遵义邢台邯郸郑州郑州市新密重庆银川长春长沙长治青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (249) PDF downloads(8) Cited by(1)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return