WASHING-THERMAL DESORPTION REMEDIATION OF PARAFFIN AND NAPHTHENIC BASED CRUDE OIL CONTAMINATED SOIL

NIU Ming-fen; LIU Xin-zhi; GUO Ying-da; LI Gang; LI Bo-lin; GUO Shu-hai

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202209022

Volume 40 Issue 9

Nov. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2022 > 40(9): 167-172

JIE Ya-wei, XU Ran-yun, DING Wei, JIANG Yi-heng, ZHANG Ben, LIU Hong-yuan. AOX FORMATION DURING THE ADVANCED OXIDATION OF PHENOL WASTEWATER CONTAINING CHLORIDE ION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 1-8. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205001

Citation:

NIU Ming-fen, LIU Xin-zhi, GUO Ying-da, LI Gang, LI Bo-lin, GUO Shu-hai. WASHING-THERMAL DESORPTION REMEDIATION OF PARAFFIN AND NAPHTHENIC BASED CRUDE OIL CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 167-172. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209022

Citation:

PDF( 1556 KB)

WASHING-THERMAL DESORPTION REMEDIATION OF PARAFFIN AND NAPHTHENIC BASED CRUDE OIL CONTAMINATED SOIL

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209022

NIU Ming-fen^1,2,
LIU Xin-zhi^1,2,
GUO Ying-da³,
LI Gang^{3,2
,
,},
LI Bo-lin⁴,
GUO Shu-hai^3,2

1. School of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Shenyang Jinzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China;
2. Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
3. National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Contaminated Soil Remediation by Bio-physicochemical Synergistic Process, Shenyang 110016, China;
4. Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, China

Received Date: 2021-11-16
Available Online: 2022-11-09

Abstract

Abstract

The properties of crude oil will directly affect the selection of polluted soil remediation technology. Paraffin and naphthenic based crude oil contaminated soils were selected, and the coupling technology of soil washing and thermal desorption were adopted to investigate the desorption ratios of petroleum and energy consumption. The particular concern was focused on the screening effect of washing pretreatment on soil particle size, desorption rate of petroleum pollutants, the effect of thermal desorption remediation on reagent washed soil, etc. The results showed that after water washing pretreatment, the desorption rate of petroleum adsorbed by large particle size sand in soil was about 59.83% and 36.42%, much higher than the clay component. Anionic sodium α-16 olefin sulfonate and isomeric alcohol ethoxylate were used during washing process. The desorption rates of petroleum in paraffin based and naphthenic crude oil contaminated soil were 46.5% and 39.8% respectively. Anionic sodium α-16 olefin sulfonate had a stronger desorption ability. Naphthenic based crude oil contaminated soil was remediated by thermal desorption, the desorption time of clay component after washing was shorter than the raw contaminated soil. The content of petroleum was decreased to 0.26% after thermal desorption at 400 ℃ for 3 hours. The washing-thermal desorption coupling technology was adopted for field test, and the petroleum content of large particle size sand after washing was 1.56%, and 0.57% for the dewatered clay by thermal desorption. The energy consumption of washing-thermal desorption was lower than the single thermal desorption technology.
- petroleum contaminated soil,
- soil washing,
- thermal desorption,
- coupling technology

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	陈敏.石油污染土壤修复技术研究进展[J].广东化工,2020,47(23):100-101 ,84.
[2]	刘仁华,朱开贞,孙加山,等.热脱附技术分类及应用[J].广州化工,2021,49(13):23-26.
[3]	张亚峰,安路阳,王风贺.有机污染场地土壤热解吸技术研究进展[J].环境保护科学,2021,47(1):124-135.
[4]	王开阳,刘龙杰,邵志国,等.热脱附处理技术在石油污染土壤中的研究进展[J].山西化工,2020,40(4):22-25.
[5]	龙飞,郭斌,王欣.石油污染土壤热脱附技术的研究现状与展望[J].山东化工,2020,49(24):70-72.
[6]	WANG B,WU A J,LI X D,et al.Progress in fundamental research on thermal desorption remediation of organic compound-contaminated soil[J].Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy,2021,2:83-95.
[7]	杨振,柳林杉,刘明杰,等.油浸泥土热脱附修复小试实验条件的探索[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(10):2320-2327.
[8]	许优,顾海林,詹明秀,等.有机污染土壤异位直接热脱附装置节能降耗方案[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(9):2074-2082.
[9]	FALCIGLIA P P,GIUSTRA M G.Low-temperature thermal desorption of diesel polluted soil:influence of temperature and soil texture on contaminant removal kinetics[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2011,185(1):392-400.
[10]	鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.
[11]	牟炳昶.土壤有机质的测定(改进的重铬酸钾法)[J].内蒙古水利科技,1987(4):31-32.
[12]	王秀颖,高晓飞,刘和平,等.土壤水稳性大团聚体测定方法综述[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(3):106-113.
[13]	陈翠玲.吸管法测定土壤机械组成及土壤微团聚体吸样时间的探讨[J].河南职业技术师范学院学报,1994,22(4):69-70.
[14]	王如刚,王敏,牛晓伟,等.超声-索氏萃取-重量法测定土壤中总石油烃含量[J].分析化学,2010,38(3):417-420.
[15]	蒲海源,刁长军,罗治江,等.石油族组分分离及分析方法研究现状[J].辽宁化工,2012,41(12):1322-1326.
[16]	ZHANG T,CHENG J J,TAN H Y,et al.Particle-size-based elution of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil by surfactant mixture[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2022,302(PA):113983-113983.
[17]	赵宇光,梁成华,杜立宇,等.长期定位施肥设施土壤微团聚体磷素吸附解吸特征性探讨[J].北方园艺,2009(5):1-4.
[18]	WANG X S.Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in particle-size fractions of urban topsoils[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2013,70(6):2855-2864.
[19]	LI Y.Effects of particle shape and size distribution on the shear strength behavior of composite soils[J].Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2013,72(3/4):371-381.
[20]	余锦涛,马晓宇,张长波.黏性土壤淋洗修复过程中粒径高效分级系统的研发及应用[J].环境工程,2021,39(6):160-166.
[21]	王琦,郭书海,李刚,等.表面活性剂-无机电解质-石油烃的匹配性与石油污染土壤清洗性能[J].环境工程,2021,39(3):195-203 ,110.

Relative Articles

[1]	DU Jiamin, WEI Yuanyuan, DING Chao, ZHU Haochuan, LIU Weijing, TANG Baiyang, YANG Shiyao, FENG Qian. RESEARCH ON LAYOUT OF INTERCEPTION COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW DETENTION TANKS BASED ON THEIR LIFE CYCLE CARBON EMISSIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 50-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411006
[2]	YU Feng, WANG Kejia, ZHANG Wenlong, LI Yi. PREDICTION OF COAGULANT DOSAGE FOR IN-SITU TURBIDITY CONTROL IN WATER ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION BASED ON BP NEURAL NETWORK OPTIMIZED BY GENETIC ALGORITHM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 154-163. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304022
[3]	LIU Yuxuan, GAO Yahong, WANG Zhenbei, HU Qian, QI Fei, SUN Dezhi. REVIEW OF OVERFLOW POLLUTION CONTROL OF URBAN COMBINED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 32-47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312004
[4]	WANG Jianlong, ZHANG Changhe, XI Guangpeng. A NOVEL VOLUME OPTIMIZATION METHOD FOR DETENTION TANKS FOR FLOODING IMMIGRATION BASED ON MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 166-173. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306022
[5]	PENG Zhouyang, JIN Xi, SANG Wenjiao. OPTIMIZATION OF DESIGN OF TERMINAL FLOW INTERCEPTION AND STORAGE FACILITIES OF COMBINED DRAINAGE SYSTEM BASED ON NSGA-Ⅲ ALGORITHM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 143-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208020
[6]	ZHENG Qiongqi, LIN Yiyuan, YIN Hailong, XU Zuxin, SU Lei, WU Shanshan. SOURCE TRACKING OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE INTO RIVERS USING HYDRODYNAMIC DIFFUSION WAVE MODEL AND GENETIC ALGORITHM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 63-69. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206008
[7]	HE Jun-chao, LI Ming-ming, LIU Rui, BAI Wei-lan, WANG Qi. RESEARCH ON MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL SYSTEM OF COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW POLLUTION IN CHINA AND OVERSEAS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 42-49. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104008
[8]	ZHANG Zi-yang, QI Hao, ZHANG Xiao-ran, LI Hai-yan. INFLUENCING MECHANISM OF PERMEABLE PAVEMENT TYPE ON REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF HEAVY METALS FROM RUNOFF[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 41-46,88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102007
[9]	LONG Jia, WANG Si-si, FENG Meng-ke. APPLICATION STATUS AND EVALUATION OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANTS IN BEIJING LID FACILITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 89-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004016
[10]	GE Jin-jin, ZHANG Wen-hai, YANG Yong, PENG Wen-qi, QU Xiao-dong. STUDY ON THE METHOD TO SOLVE WATER RESOURCE CONFLICTS: A CASE STUDY OF THE JINJIANG RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 47-52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010008
[11]	LI Han, WANG Jian-long, FENG Cui-min, CAI Zhi-wen, HE Cun-gang, LIU Yan. MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF STORMWATER CONTROL EFFECT VIA LOW-IMPACT DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 145-150. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004026
[12]	YANG Zheng, LI Jun-qi, WANG Wen-liang, CHE Wu, JU Chen-tao, ZHAO Yang. THE ADVANCED RECOGNITION OF LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AND SPONGE CITY CONSTRUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 10-15,38. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004003
[17]	INTEGRATED OPTIMIZATION OF COMBINED SEWER SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 57-61. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412009

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(28)

1.	吴姬，王婧，符式锦. 海口市城乡环境梯度带土壤重金属富集特征. 热带作物学报. 2025(02): 503-513 .
2.	邵璐，刘洪，欧阳渊，张景华，高文龙，刘小念，宋雯洁，吴君毅，苏悦. 三峡库区典型岩石土壤中重（类）金属迁移富集特征研究及风险评价. 西北地质. 2025(01): 204-218 .
3.	陈佳，范萍萍，龙文涛，邰良. 土壤侵蚀对重金属迁移的作用规律与机制研究进展. 水土保持研究. 2024(01): 460-470 .
4.	占楠彪，谷端银，李婷，崔秀敏，娄燕宏，诸葛玉平. 中轻度重金属污染农田土壤的时空特征及改良. 农业环境科学学报. 2024(02): 294-307 .
5.	葛磊，方凤满，周浩，姚有如，谭华荣，王飞，林跃胜. 菜子湖湿地不同类型土壤重金属的垂直分布特征及迁移规律. 环境化学. 2024(03): 933-941 .
6.	闫金霞，杨家哲，杜正浩. 垃圾堆放场土壤重金属分布特征及污染评价. 山东化工. 2024(05): 231-236 .
7.	张锦明，张建泽，王洲瑜，汪世轩，赵东阳，阿不都艾尼·阿不里. 基于PMF模型的吉木萨尔县土壤重金属空间分布特征与来源解析. 新疆大学学报(自然科学版)(中英文). 2024(03): 354-363+374 .
8.	贾少宁，申发，颜宁，王若菲，刘苏慧，于洋，栗云召，杨继松，于君宝. 黄河三角洲不同土地利用方式下土壤重金属分析评价. 鲁东大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 193-202 .
9.	丰土根，郑柳钦，张箭，韦扬. 重金属-有机物复合污染土风险评价新方法. 环境工程. 2023(07): 222-228 . 本站查看
10.	高梦绯，郑顺安，刘昌华，郜允兵，高戈，赵亚楠. 基于多因素融合的耕地土壤重金属污染风险评价. 环境工程. 2023(08): 233-241 . 本站查看
11.	阮彦楠，吕本春，王志远，王应学，王伟，陈检锋，尹梅，陈华，付利波. 云南某区典型农田土壤重金属污染和潜在生态风险评价. 安徽农业科学. 2023(21): 65-72 .
12.	陈海英，虎啸，覃昆，魏腾川，白薇. 巴中市巴州区水田与旱地土壤重金属富集与垂直分布特征. 四川农业科技. 2023(12): 56-59 .
13.	陈敏毅，宋清梅，叶权运，游学睿，吴颖欣. 华南典型金属制品遗留生产场地重金属空间分布特征. 生态环境学报. 2023(12): 2228-2235 .
14.	黄钟霆，易盛炜，陈贝贝，彭锐，石雪芳，李峰. 典型锰矿区周边农田土壤-农作物重金属污染特征及生态风险评价. 环境科学. 2022(02): 975-984 .
15.	毛盼，王明娅，孙昂，陈纯，冯茜茜，韩桥，王明仕. 某典型废弃硫酸场地土壤重金属污染特征与评价. 环境化学. 2022(02): 511-525 .
16.	丰土根，郑柳钦，张箭，张福海，宋健. 废弃农药厂重金属污染土风险评价及焙烧修复效果研究. 环境工程. 2022(02): 132-138 . 本站查看
17.	陈锐，杜双杰，徐伟，竹涛. 南京城郊某典型退耕农用地土壤重金属含量特征与污染评价分析. 环境工程. 2022(03): 102-110+165 . 本站查看
18.	朱迪，张朝晖，王智慧. 农田-泥炭藓系统重金属富集特征与生态风险评价. 环境科学. 2022(04): 2115-2123 .
19.	姜宇，郭庆军，邓义楠. 长江流域沉积物和土壤重金属分布规律研究进展. 生态学杂志. 2022(04): 804-812 .
20.	张瀚丹，刘新会，王宇静，段林帅，董璐. 土壤剖面重金属污染对微生物群落结构的影响. 环境科学与技术. 2022(04): 184-191 .
21.	王磊，周璐瑶，胡静博，蔡佳坊，王伟，肖万川，何妙妙. 再生水灌溉对稻田重金属分布的影响. 排灌机械工程学报. 2022(08): 842-849 .
22.	李延雪，张梦竹，舒莎莎，邹君晗，焦伟，周峻宇. 基于富集因子法与MLR-APCS模型应用的农田土壤重金属人为来源定量识别. 环境工程. 2022(09): 173-177+232 . 本站查看
23.	赵家印，杨地，杨湘智，张宁，刘宇，王蒙蒙，吴云成，陈秋会，田伟. 云南省某煤矿开采遗址周边农用地土壤重金属污染评价及源解析研究. 生态与农村环境学报. 2022(11): 1473-1481 .
24.	陆音，肖昕，徐蕾，梁妍，栾慧君，塞古，李俊池，郭春滢. 煤矿开采裂缝对土壤中重金属分布的影响. 环境科技. 2022(06): 1-5+12 .
25.	孟婷婷，刘金宝，董浩，王博，张国剑. 城市绿地不同管理方式土壤重金属污染及生态风险评价. 环境工程. 2022(12): 217-223 . 本站查看
26.	马晓慧，郝春明，王梦露，朱云燕. 峰峰煤矿塌陷区典型农田土壤剖面重金素元素化学风化规律. 科学技术与工程. 2021(03): 1202-1210 .
27.	浦江，张翠萍，刘淑娟，杨小燕，赵斌，李淑英，陆轶峰，王媛媛，周元清. 杞麓湖径流区不同湿地沉积物重金属污染特征及潜在生态风险评价. 农业资源与环境学报. 2021(05): 755-763 .
28.	王多兵，张猛，韩冬雅，陈锦，朱鹏鹏，肖立权. 湖南典型煤矿区地表水——土壤系统重金属污染特征、来源及风险. 应用化工. 2021(S2): 94-100+112 .