Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 40 Issue 11
Nov.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
GUO Lin, CAO Shumiao, YUAN Xunfeng, LIU Jun. THE METHOD OF HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATED SOIL IN TAILINGS POND BASED ON PHYTO-ELECTROKINETIC OF SIMULATED REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 152-158. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211021
Citation: GUO Lin, CAO Shumiao, YUAN Xunfeng, LIU Jun. THE METHOD OF HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATED SOIL IN TAILINGS POND BASED ON PHYTO-ELECTROKINETIC OF SIMULATED REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 152-158. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211021

THE METHOD OF HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATED SOIL IN TAILINGS POND BASED ON PHYTO-ELECTROKINETIC OF SIMULATED REMEDIATION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211021
  • Received Date: 2021-01-25
    Available Online: 2023-03-24
  • The remediation process of heavy metal contaminated soil in tailings ponds is complicated and slow. To reduce the remediation cycle and accelerate the development of intelligence and refinement of soil remediation technology, the mechanism and law of the phyto-electrokinetic method were used, and the evaluation index system of soil remediation variables was established flexibly. A new GRA-RF model for soil simulated remediation was established by combining a random forest classifier and GRA simulation algorithm, and then the simulated remediation and experimental repair were compared. The results showed that:1) the highest grade value in remediation variables was the voltage gradient (0.092), followed successively by current value (0.078), soil humidity (0.074), power-on time (0.069), dynamic pH level of the soil (0.066), electrode space (0.063), electrode arrangement way (0.06), additive type (0.057), and electrode material (0.053). The weight values of the other variables were lower than the average. The size of the remediation variables would be changed following the importance order of the variables until the optimal repair effect was obtained; 2) the remediation efficiency of the simulation was higher than that of the experiment for 8 samples. The relative errors of remediation environment, for A1 to A4 were 2.22%, 4.72%, 8.75%, 3.89% and from B1 to B4 were 9.91%, 8.28%, 6.74% and 5.63% respectively. The remediation effect of Cd, Cu and Pb in environment A were better than Cd, Cu and Pb, while Zn had an opposite remediation effect; 3) by comparing the error rate of the algorithm, it was found that GRA-RF model was better than Random-RF. This method more precisely simulated the process of enhanced remediation of contaminated soil. The efficiency of soil remediation was improved by optimizing the remediation variables, it laid a foundation for making and improving soil remediation schemes.
  • loading
  • [1]
    徐一芃,黄益宗,张利田,等.镉砷污染土壤修复技术的文献计量分析[J].环境工程学报,2020,14(10):2882-2894.
    [2]
    郑燊燊,申哲民,陈学军,等.电动修复Cd污染土壤的DBLM模型[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(2):443-448.
    [3]
    金晶炜,许岳飞,熊俊芬,等.应用灰色关联度法评价砷污染土壤修复效果[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(6):213-216.
    [4]
    HAO A F, WANG R Y, YE X M. Design of soil pollution and restoration simulation system based on LabVIEW and PLC[J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2014, 529:693-696.
    [5]
    王兵,谢红丽,任宏洋,等.基于层次分析法的石油污染土壤修复植物评价[J].安全与环境学报,2019,19(3):985-991.
    [6]
    马科峰,王海芳,卢静,等.电动力强化植物修复土壤重金属的研究进展[J].应用化工,2019,48(3):709-712

    ,716.
    [7]
    魏树和,徐雷,韩冉,等.重金属污染土壤的电动-植物联合修复技术研究进展[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,43(1):154-160.
    [8]
    张鑫,刘建林,王聪.南水北调中线水源地商洛尾矿库安全风险评价[J].金属矿山, 2017(3):157-161.
    [9]
    王涛,李惠民,史晓燕.重金属污染农田土壤修复效果评价指标体系分析[J].土壤通报,2016,47(3):725-729.
    [10]
    肖艳桐,张瑞雪,吴攀.土壤重金属分析常用空间插值法研究进展[J].环境科学与技术,2019,42(3):198-205.
    [11]
    肖文丹,叶雪珠,徐海舟,等.直流电场与添加剂强化东南景天修复镉污染土壤[J].土壤学报,2017,54(4):927-937.
    [12]
    杨维鸽,赵培,党丽丽,等.秦岭山区不同闭矿年限尾矿库植被恢复调查[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(4):281-287.
    [13]
    朱凰榕,周良华,阳峰,等.两种景天修复Cd/Zn污染土壤效果的比较[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(2):403-410.
    [14]
    肖尚,房至一,董洪良,等.基于改进型VSM-HowNet融合相似度算法研究[J].吉林大学学报(信息科学版),2018,36(6):674-680.
    [15]
    申远,黄志良,胡彪,等.基于Doc2Vec和深度神经网络的战场态势智能推送研究[J].智能计算机与应用,2020,10(1):50-55.
    [16]
    石旭亮,刘怀山.基于小波变换和短时傅里叶变换的混合时频分析方法研究[C]//中国地球物理学会,2014:241-245.
    [17]
    李苍柏,肖克炎,李楠,等.支持向量机、随机森林和人工神经网络机器学习算法在地球化学异常信息提取中的对比研究[J].地球学报,2020,41(2):309-319.
    [18]
    郭正红,马辛华,兰安怡. 基于层次分析法权重和灰色服务器负载预测的云计算on-line迁移策略[J].计算机测量与控制,2015,23(3):1002-1004

    ,1007.
    [19]
    赵培,王群盈,刘志鹏.秦岭山区沟渠植物和土壤CNP生态化学计量特征[J].山地学报,2017,35(5):753-760.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (124) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return