A REVIEW OF MEMBRANE BIOFOULING CONTROL IN WATER TREATMENT BASED ON QUORUM SENSING

CHEN Xinyu; HOU Bingqian; GENG Ru; ZHOU Xiangtong; WU Zhiren; WEI Jing

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202211033

Volume 40 Issue 11

Nov. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2022 > 40(11): 251-259

CHEN Xinyu, HOU Bingqian, GENG Ru, ZHOU Xiangtong, WU Zhiren, WEI Jing. A REVIEW OF MEMBRANE BIOFOULING CONTROL IN WATER TREATMENT BASED ON QUORUM SENSING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 251-259. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211033

Citation:

CHEN Xinyu, HOU Bingqian, GENG Ru, ZHOU Xiangtong, WU Zhiren, WEI Jing. A REVIEW OF MEMBRANE BIOFOULING CONTROL IN WATER TREATMENT BASED ON QUORUM SENSING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 251-259. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211033

Citation:

PDF( 6545 KB)

A REVIEW OF MEMBRANE BIOFOULING CONTROL IN WATER TREATMENT BASED ON QUORUM SENSING

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211033

CHEN Xinyu¹,
HOU Bingqian¹,
GENG Ru¹,
ZHOU Xiangtong^1,2,
WU Zhiren^1,2,
WEI Jing^{1,2,3
,
,}

1. School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China;
2. Institute of Environmental Health and Ecological Security, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China;
3. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Technology and Material of Water Treatment, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China

Received Date: 2021-10-19
Available Online: 2023-03-24

Abstract

Abstract

Biofouling is a critical challenge in the membrane-based water treatment process. Biofilm formation is regulated by bacterial quorum sensing. Inhibition of quorum sensing is an emerging technology for membrane biofouling control. Mechanism of quorum sensing and research on biofilm formation involving quorum sensing was introduced in this work. By interfering with and blocking the circuits of cell-cell communication, expression of the target quorum-sensing-controlled gene can be prevented, and the specific group behavior of bacteria can be inhibited. Research on biofouling control of water treatment membranes based on quorum sensing and quorum quenching is reviewed. The application of quorum sensing inhibitors in membrane-based water treatment systems, and studies on the immobilization of inhibitors as well as membrane modification are overviewed. An outlook of future research on membrane biofouling control based on quorum sensing tactics is proposed.
- membrane separation technology,
- quorum sensing,
- water treatment,
- biofouling,
- biofilm

FullText(HTML)

References(62)

References

[1]	LIU C, WANG W J, YANG B, et al. Separation, anti-fouling, and chlorine resistance of the polyamide reverse osmosis membrane:from mechanisms to mitigation strategies[J]. Water Research, 2021, 195:116976.
[2]	BASSLER B L. Small talk:cell-to-cell communication in bacteria[J]. Cell, 2002, 109(4):421-424.
[3]	NEALSON K H, PLATT T, HASTINGS J W. Cellular control of the synthesis and activity of the bacterial luminescent system[J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 1970, 104(1):313-322.
[4]	FUUQUA W C, WINANS S C, GREENBERG E P. Quorum sensing in bacteria:the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators[J]. Journal of Bacteriology, 1994, 176(2):269-275.
[5]	PARSEK M R, VAL D L, HANZELKA B L, et al. Acyl homoserine-lactone quorum-sensing signal generation[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1999, 96(8):4360-4365.
[6]	DICKSCHAT J S. Quorum sensing and bacterial biofilms[J]. Natural Product Reports, 2010, 27(3):343-369.
[7]	READING N C, SPERANDIO V. Quorum sensing:the many languages of bacteria[J]. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2006, 254(1):1-11.
[8]	STURME M H J, KLEEREBEZEM M, NAKAYAMA J, et al. Cell to cell communication by autoinducing peptides in gram-positive bacteria[J]. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 2002, 81(1/2/3/4):233-243.
[9]	欧兴坤,李文桂. 铜绿假单胞菌群体感应系统las/rhl蛋白的研制现状[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志,2021,16(8):988-990.
[10]	万佳宏,常佳伟,魏彦琴,等. 金黄色葡萄球菌Agr群体感应系统及其抗毒力治疗研究进展[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志,2020,15(1):115-118.
[11]	张莉萍,甄向凯,欧阳松应. 噬菌体群体感应系统及其分子机理研究进展[J]. 微生物学通报,2021,48(9):3261-3270.
[12]	CELIS M D, AGUIRRE-SERRANO L, BELDA I, et al. Acylase enzymes disrupting quorum sensing alter the transcriptome and phenotype of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the composition of bacterial biofilms from wastewater treatment plants[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 799:149401.
[13]	NAHAR S, JEONG H L, KIM Y, et al. Inhibitory effects of Flavourzyme on biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and virulence genes of foodborne pathogens Salmonella Typhimurium and Escherichia coli[J]. Food Research International, 2021, 147:110461.
[14]	PARSEK M R, GREENBERG E P. Sociomicrobiology:the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms[J]. Trends in Microbiology, 2005, 13(1):27-33.
[15]	PALUCH E, REWAK-SOROCZYŃSKA J, JEDRUSIK I, et al. Prevention of biofilm formation by quorum quenching[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2020, 104(5):1871-1881.
[16]	DAVIES D G, PARSEK M R, PEARSON J P, et al. The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm[J]. Science, 1998, 280(5361):295-298.
[17]	MUKHERJEE S, MOUSTAFA D, SMITH C D, et al. The RhlR quorum-sensing receptor controls Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis and biofilm development independently of its canonical homoserine lactone autoinducer[J]. PLOS Pathogens, 2017, 13(7):e1006504.
[18]	VUONG C, SAENZ H L, GÖTZ F, et al. Impact of the agr quorum-sensing system on adherence to polystyrene in Staphylococcus aureus[J]. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000,6:1688-1693.
[19]	HAMMER B K, BASSLER B L. Quorum sensing controls biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae[J]. Molecular Microbiology, 2003, 50(1):101-114.
[20]	EBERL L, WINSON M K, STERNBERG C, et al. Involvement of N-acyl-L-homoserine lactone autoinducers in controlling the multicellular behaviour of Serratia liquefaciens[J]. Molecular Microbiology, 1996, 20(1):127-136.
[21]	CROSSMAN L, DOW J M. Biofilm formation and dispersal in Xanthomonas campestris[J]. Microbes and Infection, 2004, 6(6):623-629.
[22]	EICKHOOF M J, BASSLER B L. SnapShot:bacterial quorum sensing[J]. Cell, 2018, 174(5):1328-e1.
[23]	ZHANG L H. Quorum quenching and proactive host defense[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2003, 8(5):238-244.
[24]	YOU J L, XUE X L, CAO L X, et al. Inhibition of Vibrio biofilm formation by a marine actinomycete strain A66[J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2007, 76(5):1137-1144.
[25]	AUGUSTINE N, KUMAR P, THOMAS S. Inhibition of Vibrio cholerae biofilm by AiiA enzyme produced from Bacillus spp[J]. Arch Microbiol, 2010, 192(12):1019-1022.
[26]	LIN Y H, XU J L, HU J Y, et al. Acyl-homoserine lactone acylase from Ralstonia strain XJ12B represents a novel and potent class of quorum-quenching enzymes[J]. Molecular Microbiology, 2003, 47(3):849-860.
[27]	MICHELS J J, ALLAIN E J, BORCHARDT S A, et al. Degradation pathway of homoserine lactone bacterial signal molecules by halogen antimicrobials identified by liquid chromatography with photodiode array and mass spectrometric detection[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2000, 898(2):153-165.
[28]	HENTZER M, WU H, ANDERSEN J B, et al. Attenuation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence by quorum sensing inhibitors[J]. The Embo Journal, 2014, 22(15):3803-3815.
[29]	ZENG Z R, QIAN L, CAO L X, et al. Virtual screening for novel quorum sensing inhibitors to eradicate biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2008, 79(1):119-126.
[30]	DING X, YIN B, QIAN L, et al. Screening for novel quorum-sensing inhibitors to interfere with the formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm[J]. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2011, 60:1827-1834.
[31]	FAKHRI H, SHAHI A, OVEZ S, et al. Bioaugmentation with immobilized endophytic Penicillium restrictum to improve quorum quenching activity for biofouling control in an aerobic hollow-fiber membrane bioreactor treating antibiotic-containing wastewater[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2021, 210:111831.
[32]	XU B, NG T C A, HUANG S, et al. Quorum quenching affects biofilm development in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR):from macro to micro perspective[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 344(Pt B):126183.
[33]	TEPLITSKI M, MATHESIUS U, RUMBAUGH K P. Perception and Degradation of N-acyl homoserine lactone quorum sensing signals by mammalian and plant cells[J]. Chemical Reviews, 2011, 111(1):100-116.
[34]	PONNUSAMY K, PAUL D, KWEON J H. Inhibition of quorum sensing mechanism and Aeromonas hydrophila biofilm formation by vanillin[J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2009, 26(8):1359-1363.
[35]	KATEBIAN L, HOFFMANN M R, JIANG S C. Incorporation of quorum sensing inhibitors onto reverse osmosis membranes for biofouling prevention in seawater desalination[J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2018, 35(4):261-269.
[36]	XU H J, LIU Y. Reduced microbial attachment by D-amino acid-inhibited AI-2 and EPS production[J]. Water Research, 2011, 45(17):5796-5804.
[37]	SIDDIQUI M F, SAKINAH M, SINGH L, et al. Targeting N-acyl-homoserine-lactones to mitigate membrane biofouling based on quorum sensing using a biofouling reducer[J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2012, 161(3):190-197.
[38]	KAPPACHERY S, PAUL D, YOON J, et al. Vanillin, a potential agent to prevent biofouling of reverse osmosis membrane[J]. Biofouling, 2010, 26(6):667-672.
[39]	ZHANG J, RUI X, WANG L, et al. Polyphenolic extract from Rosa rugosa tea inhibits bacterial quorum sensing and biofilm formation[J]. Food Control, 2014, 42:125-131.
[40]	GUTIERREZ-PACHECO M M, GONZALEZ-AGUILAR G A, MARTINEZ-TELLEZ M A, et al. Carvacrol inhibits biofilm formation and production of extracellular polymeric substances of Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum[J]. Food Control, 2018, 89:210-218.
[41]	DONG Y H, XU J L, LI X Z, et al. AiiA, an enzyme that inactivates the acylhomoserine lactone quorum-sensing signal and attenuates the virulence of Erwinia carotovora[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000, 97(7):3526-3531.
[42]	PARK S Y, KANG H O, JANG H S, et al. Identification of Extracellular N-acylhomoserine lactone acylase from a Streptomyces sp. and its application to quorum quenching[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 71(5):2632-2641.
[43]	UROZ S, CHHABRA S R, CÁMARA M, et al. N-Acylhomoserine lactone quorum-sensing molecules are modified and degraded by Rhodococcus erythropolis W2 by both amidolytic and novel oxidoreductase activities[J]. Microbiology, 2005, 151(10):3313-3322.
[44]	YEON K M, CHEONG W S, OH H S, et al. Quorum sensing:a new biofouling control paradigm in a membrane bioreactor for advanced wastewater treatment[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2009, 43(2):380-385.
[45]	YEON K M, LEE C H, KIM J. Magnetic enzyme carrier for effective biofouling control in the membrane bioreactor based on enzymatic quorum quenching[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2009, 43(19):7403-7409.
[46]	LEE B, YEON K M, SHIM J, et al. Effective antifouling using quorum-quenching acylase stabilized in magnetically-separable mesoporous silica[J]. Biomacromolecules, 2014, 15(4):1153-1159.
[47]	JIANG W, XIA S, LIANG J, et al. Effect of quorum quenching on the reactor performance, biofouling and biomass characteristics in membrane bioreactors[J]. Water Resarch, 2013, 47(1):187-196.
[48]	KIM J H, CHOI D C, YEON K M, et al. Enzyme-immobilized nanofiltration membrane to mitigate biofouling based on quorum quenching[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2011, 45(4):1601-1607.
[49]	KIM T H, LEE I, YEON K M, et al. Biocatalytic membrane with acylase stabilized on intact carbon nanotubes for effective antifouling via quorum quenching[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 554:357-365.
[50]	ZHU Z Y, WANG L, LI Q Q. A bioactive poly (vinylidene fluoride)/graphene oxide@acylase nanohybrid membrane:enhanced anti-biofouling Based on Quorum Quenching[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 547:110-122.
[51]	OH H S, YEON K M, YANG C S, et al. Control of membrane biofouling in mbr for wastewater treatment by quorum quenching bacteria encapsulated in microporous membrane[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2012, 46(9):4877-4884.
[52]	CHEONG W S, LEE C H, MOON Y H, et al. Isolation and identification of indigenous quorum quenching bacteria, Pseudomonas sp. 1A1, for biofouling control in MBR[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(31):10554-10560.
[53]	KAMPOURIS I D, KARAYANNAKIDIS P D, BANTI D C, et al. Evaluation of a novel quorum quenching strain for MBR biofouling mitigation[J]. Water Research, 2018, 143(15):56-65.
[54]	HAM S Y, KIM H S, CHA E, et al. Mitigation of membrane biofouling by a quorum quenching bacterium for membrane bioreactors[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 258:220-226.
[55]	OH H S, KIM S R, CHEONG W S, et al. Biofouling inhibition in MBR by Rhodococcus sp. BH4 isolated from real MBR plant[J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2013, 97(23):10223-10231.
[56]	WEERASEKARA N A, CHOO K H, LEE C H. Biofouling control:bacterial quorum quenching versus chlorination in membrane bioreactors[J]. Water Research, 2016, 103(15):293-301.
[57]	KIM S R, OH H S, JO S J, et al. Biofouling control with bead-entrapped quorum quenching bacteria in membrane bioreactors:physical and biological effects[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 47(2):836-842.
[58]	LEE S H, LEE S, LEE K, et al. More efficient media design for enhanced biofouling control in a membrane bioreactor:quorum quenching bacteria entrapping hollow cylinder[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2016, 50(16):8596-8604.
[59]	LEE S, PARK S K, KWON H, et al. Crossing the border between laboratory and field:bacterial quorum quenching for anti-biofouling strategy in an MBR[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2016, 50(4):1788-1795.
[60]	OH H S, TAN C H, LOW J H, et al. Quorum quenching bacteria can be used to inhibit the biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes[J]. Water Research, 2017, 112:29-37.
[61]	SHAH S S A, LEE K, PARK H, et al. Live membrane filters with immobilized quorum quenching bacterial strains for anti-biofouling[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2022, 641:119895.
[62]	YU H R, LIANG H, QU F S, et al. Biofouling control by biostimulation of quorum-quenching bacteria in a membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment[J]. Biotechnology Bioengineering, 2016, 113(12):2624-2632.

Relative Articles

[1]	WU Yulun, LI Zemin, CHENG Xiaoqian, QIU Guanglei, WEI Chaohai. PREDICTION OF NITROGEN REMOVAL PERFORMANCE AND IDENTIFICATION OF KEY PARAMETERS OF PARTIAL NITRIFICATION/PARTIAL DENITRIFICATION-ANAMMOX PROCESS BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 180-190. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409017
[2]	SUN Zhaoyun, DU Yaohui, PEI Lili, LIU Ying, WU Yulong. AN AIR QUALITY INDEX PREDICTION METHOD BASED ON INVERSE VARIANCE MULTI-MODEL FUSION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 197-204. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302026
[3]	ZHANG Tao, WANG Xiahui, BI Erping, HUANG Guoxin, YANG Ruijie. GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY EVALUATION AND RISK CONTROL IN A CERTAIN AREA IN NORTHERN GUANGDONG PROVINCE BASED ON BP NEURAL NETWORK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 270-277. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312034
[4]	SU Hao, FENG Li, ZHANG Liqiu. INFLUENCE OF RESIDUAL NANOPARTICLES IN MUNICIPAL SEWAGE ON FORMATION OF CHLORINATION DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 33-40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308005
[5]	YUAN Ye, GAO Jun, ZHANG Lulu, CHEN Tianming, DING Cheng. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON INFLUENCING FACTORS AND THEIR PREDICTION MODELS OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE GENERATION IN MUNICIPAL SEWAGE PIPELINES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 69-77. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311013
[6]	HUANG Yanpeng, WANG Yuanhao, WANG Chao, LIU Weijiang, WANG Hong, LV Guangfeng, LIN Sijie, HU Qing. CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS AND ZONING CONTROL OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTION BASED ON SELF-ORGANIZING MAPS AND K-MEANS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 31-41,47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206004
[7]	XU Runze, CAO Jiashun, FANG Fang. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON N₂O RECYCLING AND DATA-DRIVEN MODELING IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESSES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 107-115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206014
[8]	LI Simin, YANG Hui, FU Yujie, XIAO Feng, GUO Jianning, LIN Chuanggui. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND RESEARCHES ON OZONE/CERAMIC MEMBRANE PROCESS IN WATER TREATMENT FIELD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 212-220. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203031
[9]	DONG Hao, SUN Lin, OUYANG Feng. PREDICTION OF PM_2.5 CONCENTRATION BASED ON INFORMER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 48-54,62. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206006
[10]	LIU Yanbiao, QIAO Jianzhi, YOU Shijie. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON APPLICATIONS OF MACHINE LEARNING IN CARBON-BASED ENVIRONMENTAL FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 182-187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206023
[11]	HU Xiangang, LI Jiawei, LI Jiaqiang, JIN Hongye, YU Fubo. SCIENTIFIC QUESTIONS ON THE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF NANOMATERIALS BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 171-181. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206022
[12]	HU Song, LIU Guohong, HE Ying, YAN Jiachen, CHEN Hanle, YAN Xiliang, YAN Bing. PREDICTION ON PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION EFFICIENCY OF ORGANIC PHOTOVOLTAIC MATERIALS USING END-TO-END DEEP LEARNING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 188-193. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206024
[13]	RUI Dongni, MA Yanyan, YE Lin. APPLICATION OF MACHINE LEARNING METHODS IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 145-153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206019
[14]	HUANG Chun-tao, FAN Dong-ping, LU Ji-fu, LIAO Qi-feng. PREDICTION OF PM_2.5 AND PM₁₀ CONCENTRATION IN GUANGZHOU BASED ON DEEP LEARNING MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 135-140. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112020
[15]	HE Zhe-xiang, LI Lei. AN AIR POLLUTANT CONCENTRATION PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON WAVELET TRANSFORM AND LSTM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 111-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103016
[16]	LI Zhi-sheng, LIANG Xi-guan, JIN Yu-kai, ZHANG Hua-gang, OU Yao-chun. A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON EDICTIVE EFFECT OF PM_2.5 IN BEIJING BASED ON TREE MODELS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 106-113. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106016
[17]	WU Fan, NIU Dong-jie. REVIEW ON PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE PRODUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 128-133. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104020
[18]	LOU Dai, ZHANG Guang-zhi, REN Fu-min, XI Cheng-gang. ESTABLISHMENT OF QUANTITATIVE PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON CHARACTERISTICS OF WASTE GENERATED IN UNDERGROUND PIPELINE GALLERY CONSTRUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 9-14,38. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003002

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	王程程，李磊，宋乐山，张颖，刘思，何超群. 三维电催化氧化法处理含P204废水的试验研究. 工业用水与废水. 2024(04): 31-36 .
2.	朱昊，刘汉飞，高源，黄益平，费孝诚，韩卫清. 盐分对电催化降解性能与机理的影响. 化工进展. 2024(S1): 571-580 .
3.	李荣，王海曼. Ti-SnO_2-Sb电极的改性、制备及其在有机废水处理中的应用. 辽宁化工. 2024(11): 1767-1769 .

Other cited types(0)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (262) PDF downloads(11)