Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 40 Issue 12
Nov.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2022  >  40(12): 128-133
HE Yuan-pu, FAN Hai-tao, LIU Guo-hua, QI Lu, XU Xiang-long, SHAO Yu-ting, WANG Hong-chen. STATUS AND TREND OF AERATION CONTROL STRATEGY DURING BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 34-41,121. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106006
Citation: ZHUANG Guijia, LIU Lifan, HUANG Xiao, GAO Jingsi, ZHU Jia. NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PERFORMANCE OF AAO-BIOFILM PROCESS FOR ELECTROPLATING WASTEWATER TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 128-133. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212017
shu

NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PERFORMANCE OF AAO-BIOFILM PROCESS FOR ELECTROPLATING WASTEWATER TREATMENT

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212017

  • 1. School of Civil and Traffic Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510643, China;

  • 2. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen 518055, China;

  • 3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

  • Received Date: 2022-03-02
    Available Online: 2023-03-23
    Abstract
  • To improve the pollutant removal efficiency of electroplating wastewater, the removal efficiencies of organic matter, nitrogen and phosphorus by anaerobic anoxic aerobic (AAO)-biofilm coupling process were discussed. The experimental results showed that the AAO-biofilm process owned good operation performance for treating refractory organic matters in electroplating wastewater, and the COD removal rate was stable at about 89%. The majority of nitrogen was removed through nitrification in the aerobic tank and denitrification in the anoxic tank. The nitrogen removal rate of the system reached 70%~80% after 60 days operation. Refractory organics affected the removal efficiency of NH4+-N and COD and made a time gap between them. The change of NH4+-N lagged behind COD. The phosphorus removal performance of the AAO-biofilm process tended to be stable after 50 days operation, the effluent concentration was less than 1 mg/L, and the removal rate was more than 65%. Phosphorus was mainly removed through anaerobic release and aerobic absorption of the functional microorganisms.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(33)
  • [1]
    LI J C, LI M, WANG S, et al. Key role of pore size in Cr(Ⅵ) removal by the composites of 3-dimensional mesoporous silica nanospheres wrapped with polyaniline[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 729:139009.
    [2]
    YEN H Y,KANG S F,LIN C P. Effective reuse of electroplating rinse wastewater by combining PAC with H2O2-UV Process[J]. Water Environment Research, 2015, 87(4):312-320.
    [3]
    国家质检总局. GB 21900-2008,电镀污染物排放标准[S]. 2008.
    [4]
    张晓霞,熊仁久,周家中,等. 浙江某工业废水处理厂升级改造运行效果解析[J]. 中国给水排水, 2021, 37(5):37-42

    , 50.
    [5]
    夏超,周浩然,周家中,等. MBBR工艺用于工业废水强化去除氮素的研究分析[J]. 工业用水与废水, 2020, 51(4):25-29.
    [6]
    孙振江,佟毅,刘桂文,等. 基于改性填料的MBBR工艺高负荷处理淀粉糖废水的应用研究[J]. 生物加工过程, 2021, 19(3):288-293.
    [7]
    汪银梅. 膜法A2/O2工艺处理高氨氮含量废水工程设计[J]. 水处理技术, 2016, 42(12):130-132

    , 137.
    [8]
    蒋维卿,么兴荣,王帆,等. 生物膜耦合工艺在污水处理中的应用[J]. 净水技术, 2021, 40(10):94-100

    , 149.
    [9]
    FERNANDO M S. Biofilm development, activity and the modification of carrier material surface properties in moving-bed biofilm reactors (mbbrs) for wastewater treatment[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2018, 48(1/2/3/4/5/6):439-470.
    [10]
    王永磊,刘宇雷,王尚,等. A2O生物膜工艺强化生物脱氮和污泥减量研究[J]. 工业水处理, 2021, 41(3):72-76.
    [11]
    行业标准-环保. 厌氧-缺氧-好氧活性污泥法 污水处理工程技术规范[S]. 2010.
    [12]
    蒋杭城,马艺鸣,刘秀红,等. Fe对污水和污泥处理过程中微生物和工艺性能的影响[J]. 环境工程, 2016, 34(11):1-6

    , 54.
    [13]
    任丽飞,杨新萍,张雯雯. 外源Ca2+对SBR启动期活性污泥胞外多聚物的动态影响[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(6):2470-2476.
    [14]
    张兰河,张宇,王旭明,等. Ca2+与Mg2+对SBR运行效果和活性污泥性能的影响[J]. 化学工程, 2014, 42(8):1-5.
    [15]
    龚文静,潘伟亮,曹云鹏,等. MBBR工艺的应用研究及发展前景[J]. 应用化工, 2021, 50(3):780-783

    , 788.
    [16]
    王子龙. MBBR-A2/O工艺处理城镇生活污水实验研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳建筑大学, 2020.
    [17]
    范琦,李广,秦娟娟,等. A/A/O-MBBR耦合工艺处理城镇污水效能研究[J]. 辽宁化工, 2021, 50(3):289-291.
    [18]
    张文艺,赵斌成,毛林强,等. MBBR-A2O/MBR处理农村生活污水动力学研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(1):351-359.
    [19]
    王翥田,车明凤,韩萍. HYBAS工艺的脱氮效能及同步硝化反硝化分析[J]. 中国给水排水, 2018,34(15):59-63.
    [20]
    潘伟亮,吴齐叶,王清钰,等. 移动床生物膜反应器处理农村污水中试研究[J]. 水处理技术, 2020, 46(10):103-107.
    [21]
    傅金祥,陈正清,赵玉华,等. 挂膜方式对曝气生物滤池的影响[J]. 水处理技术, 2006,32(8):42-45.
    [22]
    HJ/T 399-2007. 水质 化学需氧量的测定 快速消解分光光度法[S]. 北京:国家环境保护总局,2007.
    [23]
    HJ 535-2009. 水质 氨氮的测定 纳氏试剂分光光度法[S]. 北京:环境保护部, 2009.
    [24]
    HJ 636-2012. 水质 总氮的测定 碱性过硫酸钾消解紫外分光光度法[S]. 北京:环境保护部,2012.
    [25]
    GB 11893-1989. 水质 总磷的测定 钼酸铵分光光度法[S].北京:国家技术监督局. 1989.
    [26]
    SL 84-1994.硝酸盐氮的测定(紫外分光光度法)[S].北京:水利部, 1995.
    [27]
    GB 7480-87.水质 硝酸盐氮的测定 酚二磺酸分光光度法[S].北京:国家环境保护局,1987.
    [28]
    李洋,孙萌萌,孟祥龙,等. 生物法处理锌镍合金电镀废水方法研究[J]. 水处理技术, 2020, 46(2):84-88.
    [29]
    刘智颖,汪晓军,陈振国,等. 配位-化学氧化-曝气生物滤池组合工艺处理高质量浓度的含氰电镀废水[J]. 电镀与环保, 2016, 36(2):46-49.
    [30]
    张娜,王琳. A2/O淹没式生物膜工艺处理城镇污水的研究[J]. 水处理技术, 2012, 38(2):65-68.
    [31]
    PHANWILAI supaporn,KANGWANNARAKUL Naluporn, NOOPHAN pongsak (lek), et al. Nitrogen removal efficiencies and microbial communities in full-scale IFAS and MBBR municipal wastewater treatment plants at high COD:N ratio[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2020, 14(6):251-263.
    [32]
    黄崇,袁林江,牛晚霞,等. 投加填料对微生物群落结构的影响及对水质的变化研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(1):207-213.
    [33]
    冯翠杰,王淑梅,陈少华. 复合生物膜-活性污泥反应器同步脱氮除磷[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(9):3106-3114.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]HE Guofu, CHEN Min, GU Jiayan, CAI Jingli, XIE Liping, XUE Wenjin, HU Yingying. Research progress of carbon capture technology in sewage treatment based on CiteSpace metrological analysis[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2025, 43(1): 70-79. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202501008
    [2]WANG Jianhui, LIAO Wanshan, LI Huimin, FENG Dong, GUO Zhiwei, Mohamed S. Mahmoud, ZHANG Bing, GAO Xu, SHEN Yu, CHEN Youpeng. A DATA ENHANCEMENT METHOD FOR SUPPORTING INTELLIGENT MANAGEMENT OF WWTPs UNDER DATA DEFICIENCY CONDITIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 153-159. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406018
    [3]WANG Qinyi, SHENG Yangyue, SONG Ningning, ZHANG Junqi, ZENG Songxi, QIAN Xiaoyong, QIU Kaipei, LIU Qizhen. PROGRESS OF CH4 AND N2O MONITORING IN FULL-SCALE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 51-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310008
    [4]YAN Lu, CHEN Yun, GUO Yuanhui, HOU Maoxiang, LIU Zuohui. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF SELF-ACTUATED MICRO/NANOROBOTS IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 93-103,114. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311016
    [5]LU Huimin, CHEN Zhuo, NI Xinye, WU Yinhu, HU Hongying. ANALYSIS OF WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE IN JAPAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 237-242. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303032
    [6]ZHANG Jiao, XIAO Kang, LIANG Shuai, HUANG Xia. MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGIES FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND RECLAMATION IN CHINA:APPLICATION AND CHALLENGES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 1-6,153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203001
    [7]WU Baimiao, ZHANG Yimei, LI Shuai, GUO Wenjin, GUO Xiaoqian, WANG Senyao, LIANG Xi, GENG Xuewen. COMPREHENSIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON CARBON NEUTRALIZATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS BASED ON HYBRID LCA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 130-137. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206017
    [8]GAO Song, QIU Yong, MENG Fanlin, ZHANG Xiaying, PAN Deli, WANG Kaijun. STATE-OF-ART AND TRENDS OF DATA ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESSES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 194-203. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206025
    [9]XU Runze, CAO Jiashun, FANG Fang. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON N2O RECYCLING AND DATA-DRIVEN MODELING IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESSES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 107-115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206014
    [10]WU Yuxing, WANG Xiaodong, CHEN Ning, YANG Benliang, YAN Tingliang, HUANG Qing. FULL-SCALE STUDY OF AN INTELLIGENT CARBON DOSING CONTROL SYSTEM IN A TYPICAL URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 212-218,271. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206027
    [11]RUI Dongni, MA Yanyan, YE Lin. APPLICATION OF MACHINE LEARNING METHODS IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 145-153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206019
    [12]WANG Qian, DENG Qiaosi, WU Wei, AI Fangyi, DU Junli, ZHANG Yuanhe, BAI Fan, LEI Mingming, QU Ruihua, GAN Yang, DU Weiwei. OPERATION DIAGNOSIS AND CARBON SOURCE OPTIMIZATION OF YONGCHUAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT USING PROCESS MODELING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 219-225. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206028
    [13]YIN Fengjun, XU Zeyu, LIU Hong. THINKING ON CONSTRUCTING AN INTELLIGENT CONTROL SCHEME OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT BASED ON THE COMBINATION OF MECHANISM AND DATA-DRIVEN MODELS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 138-144. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206018
    [14]JING Yu-shu, MOU Run-zhi, JIANG Yi-ming, LIU Zhang-qing, YANG Yan-dong. REDUCING ENERGY AND CHEMICALS CONSUMPTION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS BY ACCURATE AERATION CONTROL: A CASE STUDY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 141-145,165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205020
    [15]XU Yi, YANG Shi-hong, YOU Guo-xiang, HOU Jun. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIORS AND TOXICITY EFFECT OF NANOCERIA IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 7-13,75. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109002
    [16]LI Rui-cheng. ANALYSIS ON DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS OF A LARGE-SCALE SEMI-UNDERGROUND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 109-115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007017
    [17]LI Yi-huan, XI Lei-lei, ZHONG Yi-jie, HU Yu, ZHANG Hui-min, WU Zhen-yu. OPERATION EFFECT AND CONTROL SCHEME OPTIMIZATION OF AN INVERTED A2/O PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 76-81,26. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003013
    [18]ZHANG Shuang, YANG Qing, LIU Xiu-hong, CUI Bin, LIU Zhi-bin. RESEARCH PROGRASS ON STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS AND APPLICATION OF EXPERT SYSTEM IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 25-31,99. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007004
    [19]Yang Bei Bai Xue Gu Haixin, . THE PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF MAGNETIC ABSORBENT IN WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 25-29. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504006
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 肖梅. 基于神经网络的污水处理鼓风机曝气控制方法. 自动化与仪器仪表. 2025(02): 116-120 .
    2. 阳鑫，张劲，刘志. 改进粒子群模糊PID算法对污水处理曝气控制的优化. 科学技术与工程. 2025(07): 3064-3070 .
    3. 张新政，邓梓萱，张涛，胡勇，陈荣，李玉友，李大鹏，潘杨，孔哲. 升流式厌氧污泥床处理二甲基甲酰胺废水研究. 能源环境保护. 2024(01): 159-166 .
    4. 赵秉举. 基于人工智能的微型生活污水处理过程控制与优化. 智能建筑与智慧城市. 2024(03): 174-176 .
    5. 阳鑫，张劲，冯学高，刘志. 基于CiteSpace的中国污水处理智能控制领域的研究热点与趋势分析. 四川环境. 2024(02): 132-138 .
    6. 李云辉，张振健，陈柳宇，张鸣，蒋路漫，周振. 夏冬两季AAO工艺微孔曝气系统性能测定与评价. 净水技术. 2024(04): 104-113 .
    7. 何新忠. 新型曝气控制系统和模型在污水处理中的应用. 清洗世界. 2024(05): 45-47 .
    8. 张新政，范煜秦，薛意，张涛，陈荣，李大鹏，潘杨，李玉友，孔哲. 厌氧膜生物反应器处理酰胺工业废水的碳中和潜力——能源回收与碳减排. 环境工程学报. 2024(09): 2637-2646 .
    9. 孙猛，杨佳林，肖彭誉，李金珊，王启镔，刘刚，霍明昕. 城市污水低碳和资源化技术进展与新趋势. 环境工程学报. 2023(06): 1748-1760 .
    10. 于怀星，袁丁，何梓灏. 短程精准曝气智能控制系统在污水处理厂中的应用. 环境工程. 2023(11): 165-171 . 本站查看
    11. 王丽，刘丽红，陈明月，石益广，王飒，刘钢. 污水处理智能控制技术及其在精准曝气中的应用. 净水技术. 2022(S1): 1-7+19 .
    12. 朱明君，任亮，杨忠莲，徐连红，仲雨叶，朱光灿. 小型一体化农村生活污水处理设施进水负荷特征与运行优化研究. 低碳世界. 2022(07): 10-14 .

    Other cited types(7)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.1 %FULLTEXT: 8.1 %META: 88.1 %META: 88.1 %PDF: 3.8 %PDF: 3.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.8 %其他: 11.8 %其他: 0.7 %其他: 0.7 %Canton: 0.1 %Canton: 0.1 %China: 2.8 %China: 2.8 %Edinburg: 0.1 %Edinburg: 0.1 %Ottawa: 0.1 %Ottawa: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %San Lorenzo: 0.2 %San Lorenzo: 0.2 %Viet Nam: 0.2 %Viet Nam: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %上海: 4.2 %上海: 4.2 %东莞: 5.0 %东莞: 5.0 %东营: 0.1 %东营: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %九江: 0.1 %九江: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.4 %加利福尼亚州: 0.4 %北京: 5.8 %北京: 5.8 %北海: 0.4 %北海: 0.4 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %南京: 2.2 %南京: 2.2 %南昌: 0.4 %南昌: 0.4 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %周口: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %哈密尔顿: 0.1 %哈密尔顿: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %天津: 1.1 %天津: 1.1 %太原: 1.0 %太原: 1.0 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %宁波: 0.4 %宁波: 0.4 %安康: 0.2 %安康: 0.2 %宜春: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宣城: 1.5 %宣城: 1.5 %密蘇里城: 1.3 %密蘇里城: 1.3 %崇左: 0.1 %崇左: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %常州: 0.9 %常州: 0.9 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 3.8 %广州: 3.8 %廊坊: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.4 %张家口: 1.1 %张家口: 1.1 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %恩施: 0.1 %恩施: 0.1 %成都: 1.6 %成都: 1.6 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %拉斯维加斯: 0.1 %拉斯维加斯: 0.1 %无锡: 0.4 %无锡: 0.4 %日喀则: 0.1 %日喀则: 0.1 %日照: 0.1 %日照: 0.1 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %晋城: 0.2 %晋城: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 2.6 %杭州: 2.6 %株洲: 0.1 %株洲: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %檀香山: 0.2 %檀香山: 0.2 %武汉: 3.8 %武汉: 3.8 %江门: 0.4 %江门: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %泉州: 0.2 %泉州: 0.2 %济南: 0.7 %济南: 0.7 %济源: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %深圳: 0.7 %深圳: 0.7 %湖州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.5 %湘潭: 0.4 %湘潭: 0.4 %滨州: 0.2 %滨州: 0.2 %漯河: 0.5 %漯河: 0.5 %潍坊: 0.4 %潍坊: 0.4 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %玉溪: 0.1 %玉溪: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %百色: 0.4 %百色: 0.4 %盐城: 1.2 %盐城: 1.2 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 0.4 %福州: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %肇庆: 0.1 %肇庆: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 8.2 %芒廷维尤: 8.2 %芜湖: 0.5 %芜湖: 0.5 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %苏克: 0.1 %苏克: 0.1 %苏州: 0.9 %苏州: 0.9 %蚌埠: 0.4 %蚌埠: 0.4 %衢州: 0.7 %衢州: 0.7 %西宁: 10.4 %西宁: 10.4 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %达州: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %运城: 1.2 %运城: 1.2 %遵义: 0.1 %遵义: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %都伯林: 0.2 %都伯林: 0.2 %重庆: 1.6 %重庆: 1.6 %镇江: 2.2 %镇江: 2.2 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长沙: 0.9 %长沙: 0.9 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阜阳: 0.1 %阜阳: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.5 %阳泉: 0.5 %阿克苏: 0.1 %阿克苏: 0.1 %青岛: 1.0 %青岛: 1.0 %韶关: 0.1 %韶关: 0.1 %香港: 0.1 %香港: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %其他其他CantonChinaEdinburgOttawaRochesterSan LorenzoViet Nam[]上海东莞东营临汾九江信阳兰州加利福尼亚州北京北海匹兹堡南京南昌厦门台州合肥周口呼和浩特哈密尔顿哈尔滨嘉兴大连天津太原威海宁波安康宜春宣城密蘇里城崇左巴音郭楞常州平顶山广州廊坊张家口徐州恩施成都扬州拉斯维加斯无锡日喀则日照昆明晋城朝阳杭州株洲格兰特县檀香山武汉江门沈阳泉州济南济源深圳湖州湘潭滨州漯河潍坊烟台玉溪珠海百色盐城石家庄福州秦皇岛纽约绍兴肇庆芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏克苏州蚌埠衢州西宁西安贵阳达州运城遵义邯郸郑州都伯林重庆镇江长春长沙长治阜阳阳泉阿克苏青岛韶关香港马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (252) PDF downloads(18) Cited by(19)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return