A WATER-ENERGY-CARBON FOOTPRINT NEXUS MODEL FOR LARGE SPORTS VENUES AND ITS UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS

LU Yao; WANG Hongyan; LI Yanfeng; PANG Mingxin; WAN Dandan

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202212022

Volume 40 Issue 12

Nov. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2022 > 40(12): 165-172

LI Haiyan, QIANG Yu, HU Yanjiao, LIU Jing, QIN Fanxin. EFFECT OF MODIFIED NANO-TIO2 ON ARSENIC SPECIES AND ENZYME ACTIVITY IN ARSENIC CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 136-142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208019

Citation:

LU Yao, WANG Hongyan, LI Yanfeng, PANG Mingxin, WAN Dandan. A WATER-ENERGY-CARBON FOOTPRINT NEXUS MODEL FOR LARGE SPORTS VENUES AND ITS UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 165-172. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212022

Citation:

PDF( 10630 KB)

A WATER-ENERGY-CARBON FOOTPRINT NEXUS MODEL FOR LARGE SPORTS VENUES AND ITS UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212022

Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

Received Date: 2022-04-08
Available Online: 2023-03-23

Abstract

Abstract

A water-energy-carbon footprint nexus model was proposed to be used for calculating the energy consumption and carbon footprint of sports venues. Meanwhile, the uncertainty of the water system carbon footprint of sports venues was analyzed, and the definition of the characteristic emission factors was proposed. By analyzing the characteristics of most kinds of sports venues, the emission factor method was adopted in the model including domestic water system, air conditioning water system and sports water system of sports venues, in which the energy consumption and carbon emission of water intake, water supply, water use and drainage were analyzed. The numerical uncertainty analysis was carried out by combining data quality evaluation with random analysis. The scenario uncertainty analysis was performed by scenario analysis and sensitivity analysis for identifying and quantifying the influencing factors. A case study of the National Sliding Centre in Yanqing Area of 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic Games was conducted. The results showed that the carbon emissions of ice making and heating were the highest at 161.2 t CO₂ and 114.3 t CO₂ respectively in the operation stage. The carbon emissions were reduced by 65.4% under the scenario of advanced technology+clean energy, and the coefficient of variation was 0.183~0.187. The research indicated the measures of adopting green electricity, water-saving sanitary wares, recycling water and improving energy efficiency achieved stable emission reduction effect.
- water-energy-carbon footprint,
- uncertainty analysis,
- sports venues,
- life cycle assessment,
- building water cycle

FullText(HTML)

References(25)

References

[1]	中华人民共和国水利部. 中国水资源公报.2017[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,2018.
[2]	中华人民共和国水利部. 中国水资源公报.2018[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,2019.
[3]	中华人民共和国水利部. 中国水资源公报.2019[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,2020.
[4]	臧宏宽, 杨威杉, 张静, 等. 京津中国冀城市群二氧化碳排放达峰研究[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 38(11):19-24 ,77.
[5]	CHEN S Q, CHEN B. Urban energy-water nexus:a network perspective[J]. Applied Energy, 2016,184:905-914.
[6]	ALEXANDER T D, MELISSA M B. The regional energy & water supply scenarios (REWSS) model, part Ⅰ:framework, procedure, and validation[J]. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2014, 7:227-236.
[7]	余娇.基于"水-能-碳"关联的郑州市水系统碳排放研究[D].郑州:华北水利水电大学, 2020.
[8]	VALEK A M, SUŠNIK J, GRAFAKOS S. Quantification of the urban water-energy nexus in México City, México, with an assessment of water-system related carbon emissions[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 590:258-268.
[9]	吴美玲.山西省水-能-碳排放关系研究和政策协同控制[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2019.
[10]	孟凡鑫, 刘耕源, 杨志峰, 等. 城市能-水-碳多要素环境管理的研究现状与问题[C]//.中国管理科学学会环境管理专业委员会2017年年会论文集, 2017:9-16.
[11]	黄娜, 王洪涛, 范辞冬,等. 基于不确定度和敏感度分析的LCA数据质量评估与控制方法[J]. 环境科学学报, 2012,32(6):1529-1536.
[12]	FENG H B, ZHAO J F, ZHANG H N, et al. Thurairajah, uncertainties in whole-building life cycle assessment:a systematic review[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022,50:104191.
[13]	王婧婕, 张凯山.成都市居民生活方式碳排放的不确定性分析[J].环境工程, 2016,34(增刊1):926-930.
[14]	姜珊.水-能源纽带关系解析与耦合模拟[D].北京:中国水利水电科学研究院, 2017.
[15]	呼永锋, 梁梅, 张永祥,等.A²/O+MBR工艺运行效果与碳排放特征研究[J].中国环境科学, 2021,41(9):4439-4446.
[16]	郝晓地, 王向阳, 曹达啟, 等. 污水有机物中化石碳排放CO₂辨析[J]. 中国给水排水, 2018, 34(2):13-17.
[17]	赵亚涛, 南新元, 贾爱迪.基于情景分析法的煤电行业碳排放峰值预测[J].环境工程, 2018,36(12):177-181.
[18]	HUIJBREGTS M A J, GILIJAMSE W, RAGAS A M J, et al. Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment:a case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2003, 37(11):2600-2608.
[19]	HONG J K, SHEN G Q, PENG Y, et al. Uncertainty analysis for measuring greenhouse gas emissions in the building construction phase:a case study in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 129:183-195.
[20]	ZHANG X C, WANG F L. Stochastic analysis of embodied emissions of building construction:a comparative case study in China[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2017, 151(sep.):574-584.
[21]	XIANG X Z, JIA S F. China's water-energy nexus:assessment of water-related energy use[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2019, 144:32-38.
[22]	FAN Y P, GUO E H, ZHAI Y Z, et al. Life cycle energy analysis of reclaimed water reuse projects in Beijing[J]. Water Environment Research A Research Publication of the Water Environment Federation, 2017, 90(jan.):13-20.
[23]	中华人民共和国生态环建部.2019年度减排项目中国区域电网基准线排放因子[EB/OL]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/ydqhbh/wsqtkz/202012/t20201229_815386. shtml. 2020-12-29.
[24]	朱永霞.社会水循环全过程能耗评价方法研究[D].北京:中国水利水电科学研究院, 2017.
[25]	王明晖. 大型公建水系统碳排放量化评价及减排关键技术研究[D].济南:山东建筑大学, 2012.

Relative Articles

[1]	SUN Yueyin, HUANG Qiong, ZHOU Jie, YU Xiaomeng, ZHU Jie, GU Mingyang, XU Lirui, YANG Bo, TAO Tao. PREPARATION OF VISIBLE LIGHT CATALYST AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF FORMALDEHYDE DEGRADATION OVER SILVER-BISMUTH MODIFIED TiO₂ NANOMATERIAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 146-155. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302020
[2]	LI Geng, LI Haibo, LI Yinghua, CHEN Xi. SOLIDIFICATION/STABILIZATION OF As IN SOIL USING BIOCHAR LOADED WITH FERRIC MANGANESE BINARY OXIDES(FMBO)[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 118-125. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203018
[3]	YUAN Mingzhu, DING Lei, LI Shuang, LI Yonglian. COMPARATIVE STUDY ON REMOVAL OF ARSENIC AND ANTIMONY FROM SPENT EDTA SOIL WASHING SOLUTION BY IRON/ALUMINUM COAGULATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 121-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204017
[4]	LV Zijuan, WANG Huawei, WU Yajing, SUN Yingjie, WANG Yanan. EFFECT OF PHASE TRANSFORMATION OF NANO-ZERO-VALENT IRON ON STABILIZATION AND POTENTIAL TOXICITY OF ARSENIC IN CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 24-31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203005
[5]	WANG Zhenhua, WU Juan, SONG Jianguo, BAI Jie. EFFECTS OF THERMAL HYDROLYSATES FROM MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE ON SOIL ENZYME ACTIVITY AND SPINACH GROWTH[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 126-131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203019
[6]	TAN Hui, LIN Hua, DING Na, SHI En-ze, GAN Shu-ping. CHARACTERIZATION OF RHIZOSPHERE ENVIRONMENT OF LEERSIA HEXANDRA SWARTZ UNDER CONTAMINATION OF Ni AND Cr[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 109-116. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205016
[7]	WANG Hua-wei, WU Ya-jing, XU Rong, SUN Ying-jie, LI Shu-peng, WANG Ya-nan, ZHONG Chen-yu, SHI Chang-fei. STABILIZATION OF ARSENIC IN CONTAMINATED SOILS USING BIOLOGICAL Mn OXIDE (Bio-MnO_x)[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 205-210,216. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109029
[8]	QIU Ya-qun, LI Yi-hua, PENG Pei-qin, LI Er-ping, YU Zhen-hua. EFFECT OF CHELATING AGENT ON PTERIS VITTATA FOR REMEDIATION OF ARSENIC-CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 204-209,119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103029
[9]	ZHOU Ying, WANG Xue-mei, JIANG Yu-zhuo, ZHAO Yun-feng, JI Hong-bing. SPECIATION AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF ARSENIC AND MERCURY IN SOIL AROUND A GOLD MINING AREA IN PINGGU DISTRICT, BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 203-210,164. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108028
[10]	YU Gao, CHEN Fen, ZHAO Cheng-gang, HOU Jian-wei, DENG Xiao-mei. PASSIVATION AND REMEDIATION OF MERCURY CONTAMINATED SOIL BY POLYMER AND PASSIVATOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 174-179,186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104026
[11]	ZHOU Li-wei, WANG Hang, LIU Yang-sheng. EFFECT OF ELECTRODE-ORIENTATED ELECTROKINETIC ENHANCEMENT ON PHYTOREMEDIATION ON ARSENIC CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 228-233. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010036
[12]	ZHOU Li-jun, LIN Xiao-bing, WU Lin, HUANG Qian-ru, YU Ying, ZHANG Hong-yan, GUO Nai-jia, ZHANG Yun, LIU Hui. DIFFERENCES ANALYSIS ON PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTITES,MICROBIAL AND ENZYME ACTIVITIES OF CADMIUM CONTAMINATED PADDY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 202-206,227. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010032
[13]	CHEN Mei-feng, LI Xin-li, YANG Pei-lin, LUO Qian, QIN Fan-xin. STABILIZATION OF AS CONTAMINATED SOILS BY MODIFIED NANO-TITANIUM DIOXIDE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 222-227. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010035
[20]	Peng Gangzhi Xu Jianxia Wang Jianzhu, . RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL ENZYME ACTIVITY AND INORGANIC PHOSPHORUS FORMS IN HIGH PHOSPHORUS REGION OF XIANGXI RIVER WATERSHED[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(6): 116-120. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201506026