Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 40 Issue 12
Nov.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2022  >  40(12): 187-195,230
Zhang Lihua, Dai Xuefang, Bao Yuhai, Wu Jiechun, Yu Changshui. INVERSION OF CHLOROPHYLL-A CONCENTRATION BASED ON TM REMOTESENSING IMAGE IN WULIANGSUHAI LAKE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(6): 133-138. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201506030
Citation: SONG Huiping, AN Quan, SHEN Wuyan, FENG Zhengjun, FU Yuanhong, JIN Dapeng. PREPARATION OF SOLID WASTE-BASED SOIL CONDITIONERS AND THEIR ECOLOGICAL REMEDIATION EFFECTS ON THE MINING AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 187-195,230. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212025
shu

PREPARATION OF SOLID WASTE-BASED SOIL CONDITIONERS AND THEIR ECOLOGICAL REMEDIATION EFFECTS ON THE MINING AREA

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212025

  • 1. Shanxi Yellow River Laboratory, Institute of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;

  • 2. Shanxi Dadi Minji Ecological Environment Co., Ltd, Taiyuan 030012, China;

  • 3. Shanxi Qinghuan Nengchuang Environmental Technology Co., Ltd, Taiyuan 030012, China

  • Received Date: 2022-02-24
    Available Online: 2023-03-23
    Abstract
  • In China, the output of coal gangue is large, and the utilization rate is low. A large amount of accumulation has not been reasonably utilized, resulting in the wasting of land resources and environmental pollution. In this paper, coal gangue was used as the main raw material, and porous materials were obtained by adding aluminum powder for foaming and curing, and then fermented with waste organic matter and carbon-containing auxiliary materials to make solid waste-based soil conditioners. The soil physicochemical properties of spraying solid waste-based soil conditioner (SWSC), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and solid waste-based soil conditioner coupled with mycorrhizal fungi (SWSC+AMF), and their effects on the growth of typical plants in the mining area were compared. The accumulation of heavy metals in plants under different treatments was compared. A proportion of gangue and cement at 85%∶15% was best for making the porous material. Chicken manure and weathered coal were selected as organic matter and carbon excipients. When the ratio of porous particles, chicken manure and weathered coal was 4∶2∶4, the prepared solid waste-based soil conditioner was the best. When the mass ratio of porous particles, chicken manure and weathered coal was 4∶2∶4, the prepared solid waste-based soil agent conditioner was the best. The whole process of preparation and application of soil conditioners was evaluated for heavy metal safety, and the heavy metal content met the limit values in the corresponding national standards. The content of organic matter in the soil sprayed with SWSC+AMF was 35.2 mg/kg, the content of available potassium and available phosphorus was 261 mg/kg and 278 mg/kg, and the content of alkaline phosphatase could reach 293.07 mg/kg. Moreover, spraying SWSC+AMF could promote the growth of plant height and root length, which can effectively reduce the accumulation of Cd, Pb and Ni element in Elymus grass, and improve soil structure and fertility.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(38)
  • [1]
    黄伟, 杨凯, 张乾, 等.橡胶补强填料中煤矸石活化改性的研究进展[J].洁净煤技术,2022,28(1):166-174.
    [2]
    LIU H B, LIU Z L. Recycling utilization patterns of coal mining waste in China[J]. Resources Conservation & Recycling, 2010, 54(6):1331-1340.
    [3]
    程蓉, 廖祥文, 舒荣波, 等. 利用硅酸盐细菌制备煤矸石矿物肥料[J]. 矿产综合利用, 2017(6):115-118.
    [4]
    LONG J, ZHANG S X, LUO K L. Selenium in Chinese coal gangue:distribution, availability, and recommendations[J]. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2019, 149:140-150.
    [5]
    张殿云, 秦宪英, 邵淑杰, 等. 利用煤矸石生产生物复合肥料研究[C]//2003年内蒙古自治区自然科学学术年会论文集. 呼和浩特:内蒙古科学技术出版社, 2003:68-70.
    [6]
    BLAGODATSKAYA E, KUZYAKOV Y. Active microorganisms in soil:critical review of estimation criteria and approaches[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2013, 67(67):192-211.
    [7]
    王顺, 陈敏, 陈孝杨, 等. 煤矸石充填重构土壤水分再分布与剖面气热变化试验研究[J].水土保持学报, 2017, 31(4):93-98

    ,126.
    [8]
    黄俊达.土壤在中国海绵城市建设中的作用研究进展综述[J]. 风景园林, 2017(9):106-112.
    [9]
    毕银丽, 龚云丽, 杨惠惠, 等. 微生物复垦区接菌沙棘叶绿素含量光谱估测[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2021,50(1):190-196.
    [10]
    苏迪, 高宏宇, 廖洪强,等. 孔土壤与天然土壤特性对比研究[J].矿产保护与利用,2020,40(3):106-109.
    [11]
    宋慧平, 傅垣洪, 冯政君,等. 一种固废基多孔材料、制备及用于煤矸石山生态修复方法[P].2021-10-11.
    [12]
    国家质量监督检验检疫总局,国家标准化管理委员会. 轻集料及其试验方法. 第2部分:轻集料试验方法:GB/T 17431.2-2010

    [S]. 2010.
    [13]
    卢锦斌, 张利敏, 徐秀容, 等. 改良凯氏定氮法的研究进展[J]. 家畜生态学报, 2020, 41(12):84-87.
    [14]
    韩张雄, 李敏, 杨树俊, 等.土壤中有效磷的快速测定方法[J]. 农业与技术, 2021, 41(13):33-35.
    [15]
    徐国华, 鲍士旦. 不同作物的吸钾能力及其与根系参数的关系[J].南京农业大学学报, 1995, 18(1):49-52.
    [16]
    郝国辉, 邵劲松. 土壤有机质含量测定方法的改进研究[J].农业环境学报, 2014, 31(2):202-204.
    [17]
    鲁如坤. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
    [18]
    苏文渐. 生活垃圾焚烧飞灰浸出毒性适宜方法的研究[J]. 广东化工, 2018, 45(19):64-65.
    [19]
    生态环境部,国家市场监督管理局.土壤环境质量 农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行):GB 15618-2018[S]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2018.
    [20]
    国家环境保护总局,国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 危险废物鉴别标准:浸出毒性鉴别:GB 5085.3-2007[S]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2007.
    [21]
    黄晓红, 顾黄辉, 许福涛, 等. 浅析NY 525-2012《有机肥料》技术指标标识方法的修订[J].上海蔬菜, 2015 (5):21-23.
    [22]
    高科, 郭宗昊, 薛晨, 等. 生物炭与炭基肥对采煤塌陷复垦区土壤硝化和反硝化微生物群落的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8):2949-2957.
    [23]
    陈伏生, 曾德慧, 陈广生, 等. 风沙土改良剂对白菜生理特性和生长状况的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2003,17(2):152-155.
    [24]
    EVELIN H, GIRI B. Contribution of Glomus intraradices inoculation to nutrient acquisition and mitigation of ionic imbalance in NaCl-stressed Trigonella foenum-graecum[J]. Mycorrhiza, 2011, 22(16):203-217.
    [25]
    ZHANG L, XU M G, LIU Y, et al. Carbon and phosphorus exchange may enable cooperation between an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and a phosphate-solubilizing bacterium[J]. New Phytologist, 2016, 210(2):1022-1032.
    [26]
    祁娟, 姚拓, 白小明, 等. 复合菌肥替代部分磷肥对苜蓿草地生产力及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(10):118-128.
    [27]
    李莹飞, 耿玉清, 周红娟, 等. 基于不同方法测定土壤酸性磷酸酶活性的比较[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(1):98-104.
    [28]
    杜倩, 黄容, 李冰, 等. 生物炭还田对植烟土壤活性有机碳及酶活性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(6):1440-1450.
    [29]
    悦飞雪, 李继伟. 生物炭和AM真菌提高矿区土壤养分有效性的机理[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(8):1325-1334.
    [30]
    李立青, 张明生, 梁作盼, 等. 丛枝菌根真菌促进入侵植物紫茎泽兰的生长和对本地植物竞争效应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(1):79-86.
    [31]
    孙吉庆,刘润进, 李敏, 等. 丛枝菌根真菌提高植物抗逆性的效应及其机制研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2012, 48(9):845-852.
    [32]
    SONG X M, RAZAVI B S, LUDWIG B, et al. Combined biochar and nitrogen application stimulates enzyme activity and root plasticity[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 735(3):139393.
    [33]
    BONA E, CANTAMESSA S, MASSAN, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting pseudomonads improve yield, quality and nutritional value of tomato:a field study[J]. Mycorrhiza, 2016, 27(5):1-11.
    [34]
    FAN H M, WANG X M, SUN X, et al. Effects of humic acid derived from sediments on growth, photosynthesis and chloroplast ultrastructure in chrysanthemum[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2014, 177(6):118-123.
    [35]
    陈保冬, 张莘, 伍松林, 等.丛枝菌根影响土壤-植物系统中重金属迁移转化和累积过程的机制及其生态应用[J]. 岩矿测试, 2019, 38(1):1-25.
    [36]
    RASK AK, JOHANSEN JL, K R, et al. Differences in arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation influence cadmium uptake in plants[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2019, 162(6):223-229.
    [37]
    CHEN B D, LI X L, TAO H Q, et al. The role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in zinc uptake by red clover growing in a calcareous soil spiked with various quantities of zinc[J]. Chemosphere, 2003, 50(9):839-846.
    [38]
    SUN J Q, LIU R J, LI M, et al. Advances in the study of increasing plant stress resistance and mechanisms by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2012(4):845-852.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]CHEN Yuntao, XIAO Yao, WANG Jiannan, GAO Zhongshuai, CUI Mei, HUANG Renliang. SYNTHESIS OF ORGANIC-INORGANIC COMPOSITE CURING AGENT AND ITS SOLIDIFICATION EFFECT ON HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATED DREDGED SILT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 82-91. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403010
    [2]LIANG Lichen, YAN Xiaofei, WANG Lili, JIANG Hao, XU Yuanshun. SOIL HEAVY METAL POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF A SIMPLE DOMESTIC GARBAGE LANDFILL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 177-187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410021
    [3]ZHANG Wuju, MA Wenzhuo, PAN Jian, ZHU Deqing, YANG Congcong, GUO Zhengqi. PRELIMINARY STUDY ON PREPARATION PROCESS OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE CERAMSITE FROM IRON ORE TAILINGS AND COAL GANGUE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 94-102. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406011
    [4]ZHANG Yibing, LIANG Yiqun, ZHANG Yuan, FANG Yinxiang, NIU Hongya, FAN Jingsen. SOURCE APPORTIONMENT AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN PM2.5 IN THE FENGFENG MINING AREA IN 2017—2019[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 242-250. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308031
    [5]QIAN Jiangbo, CHEN Di, WANG Xiahui, LI Xilin, HUANG Guoxin. RISK DIAGNOSIS OF HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN REGIONAL SOIL BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 296-303. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312037
    [6]GAO Mengfei, ZHENG Shun'an, LIU Changhua, GAO Yunbing, GAO Ge, ZHAO Ya'nan. RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN FARMLAND SOIL BASED ON MULTI-FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 233-241. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308030
    [7]LU Ailing, ZHU Dongyun, ZHANG Hong, CAO Han, ZHANG Jing. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON REMEDIATION OF HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATED SOIL BY EICP COMBINED WITH BIOCHAR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 176-180. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308022
    [8]ZHAO Manman, XU Xiuyue, WANG Ningning, CHEN Hao, ZHAO Ruirui, CHEN Guanglong, CHEN Fan. EFFECT OF DOSING STRAW AND FLY ASH ON ENRICHMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN RYEGRASS IN COAL GANGUE CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 221-226,287. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312027
    [9]HUANG Guoxin, LIU Ruiping, YANG Ruijie, ZHANG Tao, ZHANG Qiulei, WANG Xiahui, TIAN Zi, WANG Yipeng. RESEARCH PROCESS OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL AND THEIR APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FARMLAND SOIL HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 216-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201031
    [10]GUO Lin, CAO Shumiao, YUAN Xunfeng, LIU Jun. THE METHOD OF HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATED SOIL IN TAILINGS POND BASED ON PHYTO-ELECTROKINETIC OF SIMULATED REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 152-158. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211021
    [11]ZHENG Ying-yi, LIU Jie, JIANG Ping-ping, YOU Shao-hong, ZHOU Shu-lin, YU Guo. POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN FARMLAND SOILS AROUND AN ABANDONED SMELTER IN HECHI, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 238-245. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105033
    [12]MA Tao, SONG Jiang-min, LIU Qun-qun, SHENG Yan-qing. COMPARISON OF ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN DREDGED SEDIMENT TREATED BY DIFFERENT METHODS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 141-146,152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102023
    [13]QIU Jun-jie, ZHENG Liu-gen, CHEN Xiao-yang, CHEN Yong-chun. EFFECTS OF FLY ASH INCORPORATION ON HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS AND AIR PERMEABILITY OF COAL GANGUE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 131-137,186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109019
    [14]DOU Wei-qiang, AN Yi, QIN Li, LIN Da-song, DONG Ming-ming. CHARACTERISTICS OF VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION AND MIGRATION OF HEAVY METALS IN FARMLAND SOILS AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 166-172. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102027
    [15]WU Qi-hao, JIANG Xin-quan, MA Xiao-li, CHEN Ping, CHEN Jing-run. CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF HEAVY METAL POLLUTION AND MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY IN SOIL OF A SEWAGE IRRIGATION AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 231-235,174. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009037
    [16]LIU Chun-yue, WANG Hui, BAI Ming-yue, ZHAO Yue-ming, WU Hao, WANG Xiao-xu, ZHAO Si-cong. RISK ASSESSMENT AND CHARACTERISTICS OF HEAVY METALS IN SURFACE SOIL OF OLD TOWN OF SHENYANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(1): 167-171. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202001027
    [17]XU Si-han, WANG Min-yan, ZHANG Jin, DIAO Han-jie, LI Yan-ming, SHAN Sheng-dao, CAO Yu-cheng. EFFECT OF PYROLYSIS TIME ON CHARACTERISTICS AND HEAVY METAL ECOLOGICAL RISKS IN BIOCHAR MADE FROM WASTEWATER SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 162-167. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003027
    [20]Xu Yanzhe Fang Zhanqiang, . ADVANCES ON REMEDIATION OF HEAVY METAL IN THE SOIL BY BIOCHAR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 156-159. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502035
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 7.8 %FULLTEXT: 7.8 %META: 89.9 %META: 89.9 %PDF: 2.3 %PDF: 2.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 13.6 %其他: 13.6 %United States: 0.3 %United States: 0.3 %Wixom: 0.6 %Wixom: 0.6 %上海: 11.6 %上海: 11.6 %东莞: 2.0 %东莞: 2.0 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %九江: 0.3 %九江: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %包头: 1.2 %包头: 1.2 %北京: 9.5 %北京: 9.5 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %厦门: 0.3 %厦门: 0.3 %台州: 0.9 %台州: 0.9 %合肥: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %吉安: 0.6 %吉安: 0.6 %呼和浩特: 2.0 %呼和浩特: 2.0 %哈尔滨: 1.2 %哈尔滨: 1.2 %唐山: 0.6 %唐山: 0.6 %圣保罗: 0.6 %圣保罗: 0.6 %埃克塞特: 0.3 %埃克塞特: 0.3 %大同: 0.3 %大同: 0.3 %大连: 0.6 %大连: 0.6 %天津: 1.7 %天津: 1.7 %太原: 2.3 %太原: 2.3 %奥兰多: 0.3 %奥兰多: 0.3 %安康: 0.3 %安康: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %密蘇里城: 0.6 %密蘇里城: 0.6 %常州: 0.6 %常州: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %弗吉: 0.3 %弗吉: 0.3 %张家口: 0.9 %张家口: 0.9 %成都: 1.2 %成都: 1.2 %扬州: 0.9 %扬州: 0.9 %昆明: 2.0 %昆明: 2.0 %晋中: 0.6 %晋中: 0.6 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %榆林: 0.3 %榆林: 0.3 %武汉: 4.3 %武汉: 4.3 %沈阳: 0.9 %沈阳: 0.9 %泰州: 0.6 %泰州: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %济源: 0.6 %济源: 0.6 %湛江: 0.3 %湛江: 0.3 %漯河: 1.4 %漯河: 1.4 %瑟普赖斯: 0.3 %瑟普赖斯: 0.3 %盘锦: 0.3 %盘锦: 0.3 %红河: 0.3 %红河: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 10.1 %芒廷维尤: 10.1 %芝加哥: 2.6 %芝加哥: 2.6 %菏泽: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.3 %西宁: 0.6 %西宁: 0.6 %西安: 2.6 %西安: 2.6 %贵阳: 0.9 %贵阳: 0.9 %赤峰: 0.3 %赤峰: 0.3 %运城: 2.6 %运城: 2.6 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %郑州: 0.9 %郑州: 0.9 %鄂尔多斯: 0.9 %鄂尔多斯: 0.9 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %银川: 2.0 %银川: 2.0 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %长治: 0.6 %长治: 0.6 %香港: 0.9 %香港: 0.9 %马鞍山: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.3 %鹤岗: 0.3 %鹤岗: 0.3 %龙岩: 0.6 %龙岩: 0.6 %其他United StatesWixom上海东莞临汾九江兰州包头北京南京厦门台州合肥吉安呼和浩特哈尔滨唐山圣保罗埃克塞特大同大连天津太原奥兰多安康宣城密蘇里城常州常德广州廊坊弗吉张家口成都扬州昆明晋中晋城朝阳杭州榆林武汉沈阳泰州济南济源湛江漯河瑟普赖斯盘锦红河芒廷维尤芝加哥菏泽西宁西安贵阳赤峰运城遵义郑州鄂尔多斯重庆银川长沙长治香港马鞍山鹤岗龙岩

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (311) PDF downloads(12) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return