MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING METHOD OPTIMIZATION AND SCHEME EVALUATION OF WATER ENVIRONMENTAL CARRYING CAPACITY IN THE BAIYANGDIAN LAKE BASIN

CHEN Wenting; SU Jing; ZHANG Huihui; ZHENG Mingxia; XI Beidou

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202301015

Volume 41 Issue 1

Jan. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2023 > 41(1): 120-131

CHEN Wenting, SU Jing, ZHANG Huihui, ZHENG Mingxia, XI Beidou. MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING METHOD OPTIMIZATION AND SCHEME EVALUATION OF WATER ENVIRONMENTAL CARRYING CAPACITY IN THE BAIYANGDIAN LAKE BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 120-131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301015

Citation:

CHEN Wenting, SU Jing, ZHANG Huihui, ZHENG Mingxia, XI Beidou. MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING METHOD OPTIMIZATION AND SCHEME EVALUATION OF WATER ENVIRONMENTAL CARRYING CAPACITY IN THE BAIYANGDIAN LAKE BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 120-131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301015

Citation:

CHEN Wenting, SU Jing, ZHANG Huihui, ZHENG Mingxia, XI Beidou. MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING METHOD OPTIMIZATION AND SCHEME EVALUATION OF WATER ENVIRONMENTAL CARRYING CAPACITY IN THE BAIYANGDIAN LAKE BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 120-131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301015

PDF( 5398 KB)

MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING METHOD OPTIMIZATION AND SCHEME EVALUATION OF WATER ENVIRONMENTAL CARRYING CAPACITY IN THE BAIYANGDIAN LAKE BASIN

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301015

1. School of Water Resources and Environment, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;
2. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Simulation and Control of Groundwater Pollution, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;
3. Geological Engineering Department, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China

Received Date: 2022-05-08
Available Online: 2023-03-23

Abstract

Abstract

In order to solve the multi-attribute complex decision-making problems of water environmental carrying capacity in the Baiyangdian Lake Basin, a five-dimensional complex property decision-making index evaluation system based on population, economy, water ecology, water resources and water pollution was proposed in this study (includes 28 indicators). The ideal point method based on the new dominance relationship (TOPSIS), vlse kriterijumska optimizacija I kompromisno resenje method (VIKOR) and improved osculating value method was applied to the optimization of the multi-attribute decision-making method and scheme selection of the water environmental carrying capacity in the Baiyangdian Lake Basin. The results showed that:1) the variation coefficient attribute weighting method realized the quantification of multi-level and complex factors affecting water environmental carrying capacity, and we found that the main factors affecting the water environmental carrying capacity of the Baiyangdian Lake Basin were the amount of groundwater resources, the proportion of paper making and paper products industry, the proportion of textile industry, and the amount of water transferred into the lake. 2) Among the three multi-attribute decision-making methods, the improved osculating value method was simpler in calculation and theory, so it was the optimal decision method. It could not only deal with the multifaceted complex properties such as economic, social, environmental and technical standards involved in the decision-making of water environmental carrying capacity management, but also better realize the evaluation and optimization of multi-attribute decision-making scheme of water environmental carrying capacity. 3) The consistency of scheme ranking results of the three methods reached 83.3%, indicating that the optimal scheme was the ideal type scheme (F₁₂), the sub-optimal scheme was the sustainable type scheme (F₁₁), and the worst scheme was the low-speed economic development scheme (F₂). Considering the actual situation of the Baiyangdian Lake Basin, the scale of the primary and secondary industries can be appropriately reduced in 2030. Tertiary industries such as high-end, high-tech industries and service industries should be vigorously developed, and the eco-tourism should be appropriately developed. In addition, it was essential to upgrade or close down industries with high water consumption and heavy pollution such as textiles, paper making and paper products within a specified period of time, increase the amount of water diverted from other regions, and implement stricter water environmental protection measures such as raising the standard of sewage treatment plant's effluent to level Ⅳ of GB 3838-2002 Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water when necessary, in order to achieve the purpose of improving the environment, which can provide a basis for managers to make efficient decisions.
- the Baiyangdian Lake Basin,
- water environmental carrying capacity,
- TOPSIS method,
- dominance relationship,
- VIKOR method,
- improved osculating value method,
- multiple attribute decision making

FullText(HTML)

References(58)

References

[1]	李清龙, 闫新兴.水环境承载力量化方法研究进展与展望[J].地学前缘, 2005, 12(特刊):43-48.
[2]	张姗姗, 张落成, 董雅文, 等.基于水环境承载力评价的产业选择:以扬州市北部沿湖地区为例[J].生态学报, 2017, 37(17):5853-5860.
[3]	柏义生, 陈涛, 梁静, 等.信阳市水环境承载力评价及优化对策建议[J].环境工程, 2019, 37(10):78-82.
[4]	梁静, 吕晓燕, 于鲁冀, 等.基于环境容量的水环境承载力评价与预测:以郑州市为例[J].环境工程, 2017, 35(11):159-167.
[5]	高洁.西藏自治区水土资源承载力监测预警初步研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2018.
[6]	潘军峰.流域水环境承载力理论及应用:以永定河上游为例[D].西安:西安理工大学, 2005.
[7]	赵卫, 刘景双, 孔凡娥.水环境承载力研究述评[J].水土保持研究, 2007, 14(1):47-50.
[8]	赵松源.基于RBF神经网络模型的松辽流域水环境承载力评价研究[D].长春:吉林大学, 2018.
[9]	李清龙, 张焕祯, 王路光, 等.水环境承载力及其影响因素[J].河北工业科技, 2004, 21(6):30-32.
[10]	胡若漪.基于系统动力学的水环境承载力及其影响因素研究:以辽源市为例[D].长春:吉林大学, 2015.
[11]	YANG Z Y, SONG J X, CHENG D D, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and scenario simulation for the water resources carrying capacity in Xi'an city, China[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 230:221-233.
[12]	ZUO Q T, GUO J H, MA J X, et al. Assessment of regional-scale water resources carrying capacity based on fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making and scenario simulation[J].Ecological Indicators, 2021, 130:1-10.
[13]	ZOLGHADR-ASLI B, BOZORG-HADDAD O, ENAYATI M, et al. A review of 20year applications of multiattribute decisionmaking in environmental and water resources planning and management[J].Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021, 23:14379-14404.
[14]	吴华军.老府河水污染控制方案多属性决策研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学, 2006.
[15]	CHACON-HURTADO J C, SCHOLTEN L. Decisi-o-rama:An open-source Python library for multi-attribute value/utility decision analysis[J].Environmental Modelling and Software, 2021, 135:1-12.
[16]	杨志城, 杨羽君, 何毅, 等.多属性决策在中药研发及生产中的应用[J].中成药, 2021, 43(4):988-993.
[17]	MARTTUNEN M, LIENERT J, BELTON V. Structuring problems for multi-criteria decision analysis in practice:a literature review of method combinations[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 263(1):1-17.
[18]	LIANG D C, XU Z S, LIU D, et al.Method for three-way decisions using ideal TOPSIS solutions at Pythagorean fuzzy information[J].Information Sciences, 2018, 435:282-295.
[19]	黄贤峰.基于一种新的优势关系的多属性决策方法[J].湖北民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 39(2):205-210.
[20]	WANG D L, SHI Y H, WAN K D. Integrated evaluation of the carrying capacities of mineral resource-based cities considering synergy between subsystems[J].Ecological Indicators, 2020, 108:1-13.
[21]	CHEN L Y, WANG T C. Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing project:the strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2009, 120(1):233-242.
[22]	SHAKERI H, NAZIF S.Development of an algorithm for risk-based management of wastewater reuse alternatives[J].Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination, 2018, 8(1):38-57.
[23]	ZHAN J M, JIANG H B, YAO Y Y. Three-way multi-attribute decision-making based on outranking relations[J].IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2021, 29(10):2844-2858.
[24]	RIBAS J R, DIAZ J I P. Assessment of sustainable use of a multipurpose reservoir through the multicriteria approach:the case of Corumbá Ⅳ Reservoir, Brazil[J].Water Resources Management, 2019, 33(2):591-602.
[25]	徐冬梅, 徐梦臣, 王文川, 等.VIKOR法在城市供水方案优选中的应用[J].人民长江, 2020, 51(2):116-118 , 159.
[26]	杨文海, 路志强.基于改进密切值法的城市供水方案综合评价[J].人民长江, 2013, 44(7):16-19.
[27]	苏超, 方崇, 麻荣永.TOPSIS模型在城市防洪体系综合评价中的应用[J].人民长江, 2011, 42(21):7-10.
[28]	GRECO S, MATARAZZO B, SLOWINSKI R. Rough approximation by dominance relations[J].International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2002, 17(2):153-171.
[29]	陈继光.水环境质量评价的VIKOR算法应用研究[J].节水灌溉, 2014, (1):45-46, 49.
[30]	白洁, 王欢欢, 刘世存, 等.流域水环境承载力评价:以白洋淀流域为例[J].农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(5):1070-1076.
[31]	保定市统计局.保定经济统计年鉴[R].保定, 2013-2019.
[32]	河北省国土资源厅.河北省土地调查统计年鉴[R].石家庄, 2012-2017.
[33]	保定市水利局.保定市水资源公报[R].保定, 2012-2017.
[34]	卢静.三江平原水安全系统预警及调控研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2016.
[35]	曾现进, 李天宏, 温晓玲.基于AHP和向量模法的宜昌市水环境承载力研究[J].环境科学与技术, 2013, 36(6):200-205.
[36]	杨维, 刘萍, 郭海霞.水环境承载力研究进展[J].中国农村水利水电, 2008(12):66-69.
[37]	郭婉娥.Elman与GRNN神经网络模型在水环境承载力评价中的应用:以文山州区域水环境承载力评价为例[J].水资源与水工程学报, 2013, 24(4):184-194.
[38]	黄涛珍, 宋胜帮.淮河流域水环境承载力评价研究[J].中国农村水利水电, 2013(4):45-49.
[39]	王志芸.泸沽湖流域水环境承载力研究[J].环境科学导刊, 2010, 29(2):39-44.
[40]	汪嘉杨, 翟庆伟, 郭倩, 等.太湖流域水环境承载力评价研究[J].中国环境科学, 2017, 37(5):1979-1987.
[41]	郑志宏, 余艳旭.水环境承载力评价研究述评[J].水利科技与经济, 2016, 22(2):64-67.
[42]	胡荣祥, 徐海波, 任小松, 等.BP神经网络在城市水环境承载力预测中的应用, 人民黄河, 2012, 34(8):79-81.
[43]	高方述.典型湖区水环境承载力与调控方案研究:以洪泽湖西部湖滨为例[D].江苏:南京师范大学, 2014.
[44]	徐建伟.基于水资源水环境双重约束的产业结构优化方法研究:以常州市为例[D].北京:中国环境科学研究院, 2016.
[45]	刘丹, 王烜, 曾维华, 等.基于ARMA模型的水环境承载力超载预警研究[J].水资源保护, 2019, 35(1):52-69.
[46]	陈文婷, 郑明霞, 夏青, 等.基于产业细化和多要素约束的白洋淀流域水环境承载力系统动力学模拟与调控[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(2):345-357.
[47]	陈文婷, 夏青, 苏婧, 等.基于时差相关分析和模糊神经网络的白洋淀流域水环境承载力评价预警[J].环境工程, 2022, 40(6):261-271.
[48]	保定市生态环境局.保定市环统数据[R].保定, 2012-2017.
[49]	河北省生态环境厅.河北省环统数据[R].石家庄, 2018.
[50]	WANG W J, ZHAN J M, ZHANG C. Three-way decisions based multiple-attribute decision making with probabilistic dominance relations[J].Information Sciences, 2021, 559:75-96.
[51]	袁宇, 关涛, 闫相斌, 等.基于混合VIKOR方法的供应商选择决策模型[J].控制与决策, 2014, 29(3):551-560.
[52]	钟登华, 赵江浩, 任炳昱, 等.基于动态VIKOR扩展方法的混凝土重力坝施工方案多属性决策研究[J].水力发电学报, 2017, 36(4):1-10.
[53]	方曦, 李治东, 熊焰, 等.基于模糊VIKOR法的企业决策情报评价及应用[J].情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(3):49-52 , 44.
[54]	伍晓榕, 张树有, 裘乐淼, 等.面向绿色制造的加工工艺参数决策方法及应用[J].机械工程学报, 2013, 49(7):91-100.
[55]	吉瑞博, 王志红, 周中健, 等.基于多决策变量协同设计的供水管网多目标优化模型研究[J].给水排水, 2019, 55(3):125-131.
[56]	杨文海, 王丽芳, 王坤, 等.改进密切值法在水环境质量评价中的应用[J].水资源与水工程学报, 2005, 16(2):69-74.
[57]	胡永宏.对TOPSIS法用于综合评价的改进[J].数学的实践与认识, 2002, 32(4):572-575.
[58]	李传哲, 崔英杰, 叶许春, 等.白洋淀流域水资源演变特征与水安全保障对策[J].中国水利, 2021(15):36-39.