Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
YU Tianzhi, LIU Yuntao, CAO Di, FANG Lijun, WANG Yingchao, MA Guangbiao, CAO Zihao. STUDY ON POLLUTION CONTROL FACTORS AND THEIR INFLUENCING LAWS ON HEAVY METAL MIGRATION IN THE SHAYING RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 30-36,52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302005
Citation: YU Tianzhi, LIU Yuntao, CAO Di, FANG Lijun, WANG Yingchao, MA Guangbiao, CAO Zihao. STUDY ON POLLUTION CONTROL FACTORS AND THEIR INFLUENCING LAWS ON HEAVY METAL MIGRATION IN THE SHAYING RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 30-36,52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302005

STUDY ON POLLUTION CONTROL FACTORS AND THEIR INFLUENCING LAWS ON HEAVY METAL MIGRATION IN THE SHAYING RIVER BASIN

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302005
  • Received Date: 2021-11-16
    Available Online: 2023-05-25
  • Publish Date: 2023-02-01
  • Based on the study of water environmental pollution in the Shaying River basin, the heavy metal pollution characteristics of water samples in different water periods and in different reaches of the main river and the tributaries were analyzed by using the calculation methods of different pollution evaluation indexes, and the control factors of water environmental pollution and the influencing laws on their migration were discussed separately, to provide a theoretical basis for the prevention and control of water environmental pollution in Shaying River basin. The results showed that the overall pollution of The Shaying River basin was slightly polluted by Mn and Mo in the dry season. The overall pollution of the Shaying River basin was controlled by the pollution of the upper tributary Yinghe River and the tributary Beiru River. The main controlling factors of pollution of the Yinghe River and the Beiru River were Mn and Mo. The main source of pollution was the discharge of mineral and industrial sewage, which migrated and transformed downstream from the upper reaches to the lower reaches, presenting a mild pollution level of the whole basin. And the polution level was mainly affected by pH value, dissolved oxygen (DO) and temperature (T) value.
  • [1]
    管永波.沙颍河某段流域污染现况及健康风险评价[D].郑州:郑州大学, 2012.
    [2]
    伍娟丽,王永刚,王旭,等.通州区河流沉积物重金属污染评价[J].水生态学杂志,2020,41(1):71-78.
    [3]
    马迎群,时瑶,秦延文,等.浑河上游(清原段)水环境中重金属时空分布及污染评价[J].环境科学,2014,35(1):108-116.
    [4]
    余杨,吕雅宁,王伟杰,等.乐安河中下游重金属时空分布特征及风险评价[J].环境科学,2020,41(2):691-701.
    [5]
    孟婉,刘扬,朱士江,等.洞庭湖流域沉积物重金属分布特征及其生态风险[J].南水北调与水利科技(中英文),2021,19(4):739-749,767.
    [6]
    简敏菲,徐鹏飞,熊建秋,等.乐安河-鄱阳湖段湿地表土重金属污染风险及水生植物群落多样性评价[J].生态与农村环境学报,2013,29(4):415-421.
    [7]
    徐慧韬,徐秀丽,王丽平.温州主要入海河流6种重金属的空间分布及风险评估[J].水生态学杂志,2021,42(1):42-48.
    [8]
    王秀,王振祥,潘宝,等.南淝河水-沉积物中重金属的分布规律、环境评价与溯源研究[J].环境工程,2017,35(4):134-138.
    [9]
    王辉,赵悦铭,刘春跃,等.辽河干流沉积物重金属污染特征及潜在生态风险评价[J].环境工程,2019,37(11):65-69

    ,165.
    [10]
    廉欢,高柏,李志勇,等.临水河表层沉积物中的重金属污染评价[J].环境工程,2017,35(8):159-162.
    [11]
    张茜,冯民权,郝晓燕.漳泽水库沉积物重金属污染特征与生态风险评价[J].环境工程,2019,37(1):11-17.
    [12]
    申中华,祝子惠,翟代廷,等.河流底泥中砷汞镉污染评价及其形态分布研究[J].石家庄:河北地质大学学报,2020,43(4):53-59.
    [13]
    刘昭,周宏,陈丽,等.鄂西典型锰矿区河流表层沉积物中重金属的空间分布特征与污染评价[J].安全与环境工程,2020,27(3):110-117.
    [14]
    张涛,何锦,李敬杰,等.蛤蟆通河流域地下水化学特征及控制因素[J].环境科学,2018,39(11):4981-4990.
    [15]
    黄奇波,覃小群,刘朋雨,等.乌江中上游段河水主要离子化学特征及控制因素[J].环境科学,2016,37(5):1779-1787.
    [16]
    刘松韬,张东,李玉红,等.伊洛河流域河水来源及水化学组成控制因素[J].环境科学,2020,41(3):1184-1196.
    [17]
    黄子晏,丁婷婷,杜士林,等.沙颍河流域抗生素污染特征与生态风险评价[J].环境监控与预警,2020,12(5):117-123

    ,131.
    [18]
    杜士林. 沙颍河流域水环境优控污染物筛选及潜在生态风险评价研究[D].桂林:桂林理工大学,2020.
    [19]
    钟明,万云,万安,等.沙颍河流域沉积物重金属污染特征及生态风险评价[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(7):1857-1864.
    [20]
    丁婷婷,李强,杜士林,等.沙颍河流域水环境重金属污染特征及生态风险评价[J].环境化学,2019,38(10):2386-2401.
    [21]
    左其亭,罗增良,石永强,等.沙颍河流域主要参数与自然地理特征[J].水利水电技术,2016,46(12):66-72.
    [22]
    郝守宁,彭文启,吴文强,等.沙颍河流域面源污染负荷空间分布特征研究[J].人民长江,2014,45(17):6-9.
    [23]
    于刚.沙颍河周口段水质现状分析与研究[J].治淮,2014(11):9-10.
    [24]
    吴洋洋,刘运涛,张东,等.沙颍河流域人为输入对水体水化学组成的影响[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(2):427-441.
    [25]
    国家环境保护总局,国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 地表水环境质量标准:GB 3838-2002[S].
    [26]
    何苗,刘桂建,吴蕾,等.巢湖流域丰水期可溶态重金属空间分布及污染评价[J/OL].环境科学:1-17[2021-10-29

    ].https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202103064.
    [27]
    王漫漫. 太湖流域典型河流重金属风险评估及来源解析[D].南京:南京大学,2016.
    [28]
    张章,王秋侠,胡渭平.洛南某钼矿开采区域地表水Pb、As、Cd、Mo污染健康风险评价[J].河南科学,2016,34(4):577-580.
    [29]
    张婉军,辛存林,于奭,等.柳江流域河流溶解态重金属时空分布及污染评价[J].环境科学,2021,42(9):4234-4245.
    [30]
    黄宏伟,肖河,王敦球,等.漓江流域水体中重金属污染特征及健康风险评价[J].环境科学,2021,42(4):1714-1723.
    [31]
    王丹,孟鑫,张洪,等.梁子湖沉积物重金属污染现状分析及风险评价[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(6):1901-1909.
    [32]
    杨帆. 赣南钨矿区尾砂库重金属污染及富集植物研究[D].南昌:南昌大学,2007.
    [33]
    尚小龙.乐安河水环境关键因子对重金属迁移转化的影响[D]. 南昌:江西师范大学, 2014.
    [34]
    邓瑜衡,赵军.沉积物中重金属的迁移转化影响机制研究[J].环境工程,2017,35(4):179-182.
    [35]
    于常武,许士国,陈国伟,等.水体中钼污染物的迁移转化研究进展[J].环境污染与防治,2008(9):70-74.
    [36]
    于常武. 碱性钼尾矿及其影响水体中重金属迁移转化规律研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2010.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LI Zishan, HU Zhiwen, MEI Chuang, BAI Jinjing, ZENG Yan, XIAO Rongbo, WANG Peng, HUANG Fei. EFFECT OF COMBINATION OF RICE STRAW BIOCHAR AND BACILLUS CEREUS ON TRANSFORMATION OF SOIL HEAVY METAL SPECIATIONS AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 165-176. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410020
    [2]LI Ganyu, CUI Xingtao. CHARACTERISTICS OF HEAVY METAL ELEMENTS POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC DUST-FALL IN TANGSHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 278-287. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312035
    [3]SHI Yan, ZOU Long, LIANG Yanjie, LIN Zhang, CHAI Liyuan. THE WHOLE-LIFE CYCLE PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF HEAVY METAL POLLUTION: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 29-35. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309004
    [4]GUO Yake, GAO Yanyan, QIAN Hui, TANG Shunqi, WANG Haike, SHI Xiaoxin. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN THE CHU RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 112-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301014
    [5]GAO Mengfei, ZHENG Shun'an, LIU Changhua, GAO Yunbing, GAO Ge, ZHAO Ya'nan. RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN FARMLAND SOIL BASED ON MULTI-FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 233-241. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308030
    [6]ZHANG Yaning, ZHU Weihuang, DONG Ying, WU Xijun, LIU Jing. EFFECT OF REDOX CONDITION AND MICROBIAL ACTION ON HEAVY METALS TRANSFORMATION IN RESERVOIR SEDIMENTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 101-108. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306014
    [7]TU Degang, FENG Tao, YANG Guodong, LUO Weiwei, NIE Beili. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AN ABANDONED MACHINERY PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 217-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204031
    [8]WANG Jinnan, WU Yufeng, LI Liangzhong, YU Lu, YANG Mengchuan, LI Bin, GUO Lianjie. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF BARRIER TECHNOLOGIES FOR SITE COMBINED HEAVY METAL POLLUTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 244-253. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204034
    [9]GUO Lin, CAO Shumiao, YUAN Xunfeng, LIU Jun. THE METHOD OF HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATED SOIL IN TAILINGS POND BASED ON PHYTO-ELECTROKINETIC OF SIMULATED REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 152-158. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211021
    [10]XIONG Jianfang, QIAO Fu, LIU Zhongyan, LIU Yao, HAO Bolin, JIANG Wei, XU Lele, LU Liqiong. RAPID AND NON-DESTRUCTIVE DETECTION FOR SHELLFISH CONTAMINATED BY HEAVY METAL BASED ON HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 141-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210019
    [11]ZHANG Yuchen, CHEN Xiaoduo, GUI Si, SU Hua, ZHANG Weifang, LIU Changqing, WU Chunshan, ZHENG Yuyi. MINERAL COMPONENTS AND HEAVY METAL POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS IN WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN FUZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 102-109. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208014
    [12]CUI Feijian, QIN Guangxiong, ZENG Hailong, HUANG Zhiwei, LI Wenjing, YANG Hanjie, HU Yanfang, FANG Huaiyang, ZENG Fantang, DU Hongwei. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND HEAVY METAL IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF HEAVILY POLLUTED TRIBUTARIES OF SHAHE RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 110-116. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201016
    [13]LIU Zhao, ZHOU Hong, LIU Wei, CAO Wen-jia, LAN Sheng-tao. HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION PROPERTIES ANALYSIS AND PRIMARY HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN GROUNDWATER IN THE QINGJIANG RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 196-203. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105028
    [14]DOU Wei-qiang, AN Yi, QIN Li, LIN Da-song, DONG Ming-ming. CHARACTERISTICS OF VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION AND MIGRATION OF HEAVY METALS IN FARMLAND SOILS AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 166-172. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102027
    [15]PAN Jun, LI Rui-fang, MENG Xiang-tao, YE Meng-xing. BIOGEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF NITROGEN MIGROGEN MIGRATION AND TRANSFORMATION IN SUBSURFACE FLOW BELT DRIVEN BY RIVER COLLECTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 62-68. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108008
    [16]ZHANG Fu-xiang, CUI Song, ZHU Qian-de, GAO Shang, LI Kun-yang. POLLUTION CHARACTERISTIC AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT OF QIXING RIVER WETLAND[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 68-75. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010011
    [17]YE Chun-mei, WU Jian-qiang, HUANG Shen-fa, SHA Chen-yan, XU Zhi-hao, WANG Jing, ZHOU Dong, SUN Hai-tong, HAN Li-ming. SOLIDIFICATION/STABILIZATION OF HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT BY COMPOUD MATERIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 125-130,51. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008021
    [18]WEI Wei-wei, LI Chun-hua, YE Chun, ZHENG Pei-ru, DAI Wan-qing, HUANG Xiao-yi, SHEN Guo-hui. EFFECT OF DECOMPOSITION OF HYDRRILLA VERTICILLATA ON PHOSPHORUS TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSFORMATION IN WATER-SEDIMENT-HYDRILLA VERTICILLATA SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 108-114. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006017
    [19]Yang Long Sun Changhong Li Shanshan Liu Guizhong, . COMPARATIVE STUDY ON HEAVY METAL POLLUTION OF SURFACE DUST IN TYPICAL INDUSTRIES ENVIRONMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 122-125. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502027
    [20]SIMULATION EXPERIMENT OF SINTERING CEMENT USING HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 91-94. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412016
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 王兴明,胡雨琴,范廷玉,董众兵,梁淑英,董鹏,储昭霞,邓瑞来. 淮南光伏沉陷塘微量元素变化特征及健康风险评价. 环境化学. 2025(01): 273-287 .
    2. 陈俐,黄涛,孟靖华,左欢欢. 市政给水管网中重金属污染水源的迁移规律分析及治理方法研究. 环境科学与管理. 2025(03): 73-78 .
    3. 陈嘉超,陈志辉,朱雅娴,许海民,徐浩元,杜玉洁,杨文澜. 零价铁材料去除废水中重金属的研究进展. 供水技术. 2024(02): 26-33 .
    4. 孙福鑫,宋莹. 降雨淋溶作用下铜矿尾矿库土壤的重金属迁移规律研究. 有色金属(矿山部分). 2024(04): 142-148 .
    5. 谢志磊,谢非,苏益娴,李亮,周兴军,吕昌伟. 内蒙古自治区PM_(2.5)中金属元素的地球化学特征及其健康风险. 环境化学. 2024(11): 3760-3776 .

    Other cited types(6)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 17.0 %FULLTEXT: 17.0 %META: 81.7 %META: 81.7 %PDF: 1.2 %PDF: 1.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 22.3 %其他: 22.3 %上海: 0.9 %上海: 0.9 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %北京: 0.9 %北京: 0.9 %十堰: 0.6 %十堰: 0.6 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %合肥: 0.9 %合肥: 0.9 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %大同: 0.3 %大同: 0.3 %天津: 0.6 %天津: 0.6 %常州: 0.9 %常州: 0.9 %常德: 0.9 %常德: 0.9 %平顶山: 0.3 %平顶山: 0.3 %广州: 0.6 %广州: 0.6 %张家口: 0.9 %张家口: 0.9 %成都: 1.5 %成都: 1.5 %扬州: 0.9 %扬州: 0.9 %昆明: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 2.8 %杭州: 2.8 %湖州: 1.9 %湖州: 1.9 %漯河: 3.4 %漯河: 3.4 %芒廷维尤: 25.7 %芒廷维尤: 25.7 %芝加哥: 1.9 %芝加哥: 1.9 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %蚌埠: 1.5 %蚌埠: 1.5 %衡阳: 0.9 %衡阳: 0.9 %衢州: 1.5 %衢州: 1.5 %西宁: 13.0 %西宁: 13.0 %西安: 0.6 %西安: 0.6 %贵阳: 1.2 %贵阳: 1.2 %运城: 1.5 %运城: 1.5 %连云港: 0.3 %连云港: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邢台: 0.3 %邢台: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.6 %邯郸: 0.6 %郑州: 3.4 %郑州: 3.4 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %长沙: 0.9 %长沙: 0.9 %阜阳: 0.3 %阜阳: 0.3 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %其他上海东莞临汾保定北京十堰南京合肥呼和浩特大同天津常州常德平顶山广州张家口成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州湖州漯河芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州蚌埠衡阳衢州西宁西安贵阳运城连云港遵义邢台邯郸郑州重庆长沙阜阳青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (262) PDF downloads(4) Cited by(11)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return