Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
HU Mengjie, ZHONG Lei, CAI Xiaoxian, QING Jinwu, SUN Yuru, LI Gaoyuan, RUAN Haihua, CHEN Guanyi. METABOLIC MECHANISM OF MICROBIAL DEGRADATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AND ITS RESEARCH PROGRESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 234-246. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302031
Citation: LIAO Jie, XIE Wei, LIU Chaoxiang, FAN Hongyong. EFFECTS OF INITIAL ALKALINITY AND TEMPERATURE ON ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION PROCESS OF PIGGERY WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 53-59,65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302008

EFFECTS OF INITIAL ALKALINITY AND TEMPERATURE ON ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION PROCESS OF PIGGERY WASTEWATER

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302008
  • Received Date: 2022-06-16
    Available Online: 2023-05-25
  • Publish Date: 2023-02-01
  • The anaerobic fermentation process of piggery wastewater at different initial alkalinity levels (3503, 5500, 7500 mg/L, as CaCO3) and temperature (20, 35, 50℃) was studied by sequential batch experiment. The characteristics of its influences on pH, volatile fatty acids, gas production, biogas slurry nutrients, heavy metal content, antibiotics and resistance genes were investigated. The results revealed that the initial alkalinity adjustment could delay the initiation of the hydrolysis and acidification stage of anaerobic fermentation, strengthen the process of acid production and increase total acid production. The highest pH maintenance ability was presented with the operation of the highest level of alkalinity. The initial alkalinity regulation was suitable for anaerobic fermentation at moderate and high temperature with the purpose of producing acid. 35℃ and 50℃ was conducive to releasing nutrients from fermentation substrates, and the highest nutrient concentration was (1365.14±124.38)~(1471.71±135.29) mg/L at 50℃. Anaerobic fermentation at 50℃ was more conducive to the reduction of soluble heavy metals (Cu,Zn) in biogas slurry, and the reduction ratios were (81.53±9.51)~(86.04±7.72)% and (96.48±8.73)~(97.81±10.29)%, respectively. Anaerobic fermentation could reduce the concentrations of antibiotics (oxytetracycline and norfloxacin) in biogas slurry, and the highest reduction rate was (14.61±1.39)~(56.26±5.24)% and (23.83±3.21)~(85.84±17.35)% at 50℃ compared with 20℃ and 35℃, respectively. The relative abundance of resistance genes were decreased at 50℃ and appropriate initial alkalinity regulation effectively. The results of this research could provide a reference for the optimization of the anaerobic fermentation process of livestock wastewater.
  • [1]
    范洪勇,张婷凤,廖杰,等. 畜禽固液粪污好氧-异位协同消纳技术研究[J]. 环境工程,2018,36(7):102-106.
    [2]
    FAN H Y, LIAO J, ABASS O K, et al. Effects of compost characteristics on nutrient retention and simultaneous pollutant immobilization and degradation during co-composting process[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 275:61-69.
    [3]
    李敏,陈滢,刘敏,等. 畜禽养殖废水沼液生物脱氮的影响因素研究[J]. 环境工程,2015,33(4):20-24.
    [4]
    ALVAREZ R, VILLCA S, LIDEN G. Biogas production from llama and cow manure at high altitude[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2006,30(1):66-75.
    [5]
    ULUDAG-DEMIRER S, DEMIRE G N, FREAR C, et al. Anaerobic digestion of dairy manure with enhanced ammonia removal[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2008,86(1):193-200.
    [6]
    蒋玲燕.污水处理厂污泥厌氧消化优化设计与运行探讨[J].给水排水,2015,51(2):32-35.
    [7]
    祁国平,李维维,牛永健,等.碱度NaOH投加量对土霉素菌渣减量化试验研究[J].环境工程,2020,38(11):140-144

    ,151.
    [8]
    赵明明,李夕耀,李璐凯,等. 碱度类型及浓度对剩余污泥中温厌氧消化的影响[J].中国环境科学,2019,5(5):1954-1960.
    [9]
    张玉鹏.碱度对甲烷发酵系统主要功能菌群代谢的影响与机制[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2014.
    [10]
    胡贵川.厌氧发酵技术处理畜禽养殖废水的研究进展[J].贵州农业科学,2021,49(7):67-74.
    [11]
    KIN M,AHN Y H,SPEECE R E. Comparative process stability and efficiency of anaerobic digestion; mesophilie vs. thermophilic[J].Water Research,2002,36(17):4369-4385.
    [12]
    何顺,李忠棠,谭松凡,等.污泥协同香蕉秸秆中温厌氧发酵中pH对产酸的影响[J]. 环境工程,2019,37(2):153-157.
    [13]
    张彤,翟宁宁,王晓娇,等.初始pH值和物料配比对高温混料厌氧发酵进程的影响[J].环境科学学报,2016, 36(7):2571-2579.
    [14]
    SUNG S,LIU T. Ammonia inhibition on thermophilic anaerobic digestion[J].Chemosphere,2003,53(1):43-52.
    [15]
    刘艳军,张月强,于成鹏,等.畜禽粪便厌氧发酵产气特性研究[J].现代农业科技,2021(18):174-176,179.
    [16]
    关正军,李文哲,郑国香,等.牛粪固液分离液两相厌氧发酵技术[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(7):300-305.
    [17]
    徐玉璐,乔子茹,储思琴,等.污泥资源化过程中新兴污染物的赋存与控制研究进展[J].环境工程,2021,39(9):146-153.
    [18]
    国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
    [19]
    DARJA P, FRANC P, ANDREJA G. Kinetics of methane production during anaerobic fermentation of chicken manure with sawdust and fungi pre-treated wheat straw[J]. Waste Management, 2020, 102:170-178.
    [20]
    卢振威,孔德望,张克强, 等.不同温度下猪粪厌氧发酵的氨胁迫效应[J].环境工程学报,2021, 15(10):3297-3305.
    [21]
    CHEN Z M, WAND Q, MA J W, et al. Fungal community composition change and heavy metal accumulation in response to the long-term application of anaerobically digested slurry in a paddy soil[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 96:110453.
    [22]
    YUAN Y Y, HU X Y, CHEN H B, et al. Advances in enhanced volatile fatty acid production from anaerobic fermentation of waste activated sludge[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 694:133741.
    [23]
    宫亚斌, 姚建刚, 谭婧. 餐厨垃圾中温与中高温过渡区厌氧产沼效率研究[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(3):132-138.
    [24]
    CHEN H B, CHANG S. Dissecting methanogenesis for temperature-phased anaerobic digestion:impact of temperature on community structure, correlation, and fate of methanogens[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 306:123104.
    [25]
    KOVALOVSZKIA A, TREUA L, ELLEGAARD L, et al. Modeling temperature response in bioenergy production:novel solution to a common challenge of anaerobic digestion[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 263:114646.
    [26]
    吴美容,张瑞,周俊,等.温度对产甲烷菌代谢途径和优势菌群结构的影响[J]. 化工学报,2014,65(5):1602-1605.
    [27]
    孟晓山,张玉秀,隋倩雯,等.氨氮浓度对猪粪厌氧消化及产甲烷菌群结构的影响[J].环境工程学报,2018,12(8):2346-2356.
    [28]
    魏勃. 氨态氮对产甲烷菌的抑制及有机负荷提高引发的厌氧反应器微生物群落演替[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2016.
    [29]
    ZHENG X R, LIU Y Q, HUANG J M, et al. The influence of variables on the bioavailability of heavy metals during the anaerobic digestion of swine manure[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 195:110457.
    [30]
    KOKI M, DAI H, SAKAE T, et al. Microbiology of nitrogen cycle in animal manure compost[J]. Microbial Biotechnology, 2011, 4(6):700-709.
    [31]
    李轶,宫兴隆,郭敬阳,等.不同预处理玉米秸秆对猪粪厌氧发酵重金属镉钝化效果[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(11):254-260.
    [32]
    周阳思雨.重金属形态在生物质厌氧发酵体系中分布于转化研究[D].厦门:厦门大学,2017.
    [33]
    CHENG D L, NGO H H,GUO W S, et al. Removal process of antibiotics during anaerobic treatment of swine wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020,300:122707.
    [34]
    强虹,杨祎楠,李娜,等.金霉素浓度对鸡粪中温厌氧消化特性及抗生素降解的影响[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(10):181-190.
    [35]
    LI C X, ZHANG G Y, ZHANG Z K, et al. Hydrothermal pretreatment for biogas production from anaerobic digestion of antibiotic mycelial residue[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2015,279:530-537.
    [36]
    袁学华. 畜禽粪便好氧堆肥和厌氧发酵过程中典型抗生素消减研究进展[J].池州学院学报,2021,35(6):32-36.
    [37]
    BIYENSA G, ESTER F P, STEFANIA C, et al. Manure anaerobic digestion effects and the role of pre-and post-treatments on veterinary antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes removal efficiency[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 721:137532.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LI Yuping, FAN Baoyun, DONG Kangran, WAN Jinzhong, AI Yingbo, WANG Baotian. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THERMAL REMEDIATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATED SOILS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 242-249. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404028
    [2]ZENG Jinyong, KE Shuizhou, YUAN Huizhou, ZHU Liang, MA Jingwei, YUAN Jiajia. EFFECTS OF CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO ON DENITRIFICATION PERFORMANCE AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY IN AN MBBR SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 100-110. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404012
    [3]ZHAO Gang, JIANG Ming, WEI Zhicheng, WANG Feng, LUO Jingyang, TANG Jianguo. IMPACTS OF SEWAGE CONCENTRATION ON METHANE EMISSION AND MICROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS IN SEWAGE COLLECTION SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 22-30. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404003
    [4]DING Ning, ZUO Shiwei, ZHANG Ruibo, WANG Zhaohui, LI Kewen, SHANG Ershun. SOLUBILIZER DESIGN FOR INTENSIFYING REMEDIATION OF SOIL WITH PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON POLLUTANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 177-183. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401023
    [5]BI Xinqi, GONG Zhiwei, MA Jie, ZHOU Lichang, JIANG Jinqi, GUO Gang. EFFECTS OF AEROBIC/ANAEROBIC ENVIRONMENTS ON MICROBIAL DEGRADATION EFFICIENCY OF TYPICAL MICROPLASTICS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 88-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407009
    [6]ZHU Lijun, WANG Huan, LI Shaofeng, LU Lu. HORIZONTAL CARBON FIBER BRUSH COUPLING BIOELECTRICHEMICAL SYSTEM TO STRENGTHEN TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON DEGRADATION AND EXPAND INFLUENCE RADIUS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 159-165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307022
    [7]XU Jinlan, YANG Zhengli. IMPACTS OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BIODEGRADATION IN OIL-CONTAMINATED SOIL AFTER PRE-OXIDATION WITH THREE BATCHS H2O2 ADDITION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 122-130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302017
    [8]LIU Chao, ZHANG Xuemeng, CHEN Chuang, YIN Yue, HUANG Haining, CHEN Yinguang. BIOLOGICAL MECHANISM OF AMMONIA INHIBITION DURING ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 156-165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309019
    [9]LI Hongcheng, SU Qu, ZHANG Wuzhu, ZHANG Yao, XIANG Luojing. ISOLATION, IDENTIFICATION AND DEGRADATION CHARACTERISTICS OF STRAINS FOR REMEDIATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON UNDER ARSENIC STRESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 166-174. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307023
    [10]LIU Xiaodong, YU Tianfei, AI Jiamin, LI Jing, ZHANG Baobao, JIANG Yingying, DENG Zhenshan. INFLUENCE OF PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION ON SOIL MICROBIAL COMMUNITY AND ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF OIL-DEGRADING BACTERIA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 61-68. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207009
    [11]SHI Wenwen, WEI Xing, ZHOU Jinlong, LEI Mi, ZENG Yanyan. ADSORPTION OF PETROLEUM POLLUTANTS ON DIFFERENT TEXTURE SOILS IN XINJIANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 127-133. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204018
    [12]ZHAO Zi-xuan, QIU Wei-hua, WANG Pan. THE AEROBIC DEGRADATION OF NUTRITIONAL COMPLEXED KITCHEN WASTE BY MIXED MICROBIAL FLORA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 92-99. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104015
    [13]XUE Zhen-kun, ZUO Rui, WANG Jin-sheng, CHEN Min-hua, MENG Li, JIN Chao. MICROORGANISM COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND MICROBIOLOGICAL DETERIORATION IN HETEROGENEOUS SITES CONTAMINATED WITH PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 188-196. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108026
    [14]LIU Er-yan, XUE Fei, XU Shi-hong, LI Deng-xin. EFFECT OF MICROWAVE AND LYSOZYME JOINT TREATMENT ON THE DEWATERING PERFORMANCE OF PRINTING AND DYEING SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 13-17,42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005003
    [15]BAI Dong-rui, ZHANG Tao, ZHAN Yu-yu, YANG Ting, XIONG Ying, HU Xin-yi, LIU Yan-ting, CHEN Tan, WANG Hong-tao, JIN Jun, LIU Ying, WANG Ying. PROGRESS IN OILY SLUDGE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 207-212,146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008034
    [16]ZHENG Jin, WANG Xin-yu, LI Jie, SONG Quan-wei, LI Hong-li, WANG Xiao-ling, TIAN Pei-ting. BIOREMEDIATION OF CRUDE OIL IN CONTAMINATED SOIL BY MICROORGANISMS IMMOBILIZED WITH HUMIC ACID-MODIFIED BIOFUEL ASH[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 34-40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008006
    [20]Zhang Dan Jiang Lin Xia Tianxiang Jia Xiaoyang Zheng Di Zhang Lina Fan Yanling Liu Hui, . THE MIGRATION AND BIODEGRADATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN SOILS-GROUNDWATER SYSTEM: A REVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(7): 1-6.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 刘杰,孙先锋,赵敏,吴蔓莉,韩宇星. 复合菌群构建及其石油烃降解特性. 化学工程. 2024(02): 17-22 .
    2. 王开明,曾飞虎,解文丽,陈小华,林若兰. 一株海洋碳九芳烃降解菌的筛选及降解性能研究. 延安职业技术学院学报. 2024(01): 102-108 .
    3. 陈丽艳,陈鋆玮,于鑫鑫,丁纯洁,孙银玲,郑宏宇,赵娢,王伟明. 桔梗经米泔水炮制后挥发性成分及桔梗皂苷D的含量变化. 中国中医药科技. 2024(03): 408-412 .
    4. 车其芷,屈楠楠. 生物修复技术与复合菌种协同降解石油烃污染物的研究进展. 化工管理. 2024(13): 88-92 .
    5. 苟欢欢,刘慧博,徐凯,李元昊,雷波,杨开静. 过氧化物类芬顿体系修复有机污染物的研究进展. 现代农业科技. 2024(11): 133-138+153 .
    6. 罗娜,穆红梅. 油藏微生物在油气开发中的应用及展望. 中国地质调查. 2024(03): 9-16 .
    7. 叶顺云,邓华,胡乐宁,张俊渝,黄紫薇,王威,黄瑞,付佳慧. 富微孔型生物炭对2, 4-二氯苯酚的吸附性能. 环境工程. 2024(08): 25-34 . 本站查看
    8. 李亚君,张宁,张鹏飞,张瑞昌,周鸣,章春芳,魏学锋. 具有降解原油和产生生物表面活性剂双功能菌株的特性. 中国环境科学. 2024(09): 5293-5302 .
    9. 邓雯,许永利. 基于CiteSpace的石油污染盐碱地可视化分析. 南方农机. 2024(19): 41-45 .
    10. 陈红初,张婷娣,付玉丰,茹金涛,秦传玉. 高效柴油降解菌的筛选及其对烷烃组分的降解. 中国环境科学. 2024(10): 5723-5732 .
    11. 宋佳宇,李昀照,李兴春,李丹丹,王庆宏,史权,陈春茂. 石油污染胁迫下土壤潜在降污固碳微生物互作关系研究. 环境科学研究. 2023(07): 1392-1403 .
    12. 李虹呈,苏趋,张武竹,张耀,向罗京. 砷胁迫下石油烃降解菌的分离、鉴定及其降解特性. 环境工程. 2023(07): 166-174 . 本站查看
    13. 常晓宇,季蕾,黄玉杰,宋繁永,王加宁. 石油烃微生物降解基因及其工程菌应用研究进展. 中国环境科学. 2023(08): 4305-4315 .

    Other cited types(11)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.8 %FULLTEXT: 11.8 %META: 85.6 %META: 85.6 %PDF: 2.6 %PDF: 2.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 12.6 %其他: 12.6 %上海: 3.4 %上海: 3.4 %东莞: 5.3 %东莞: 5.3 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %伊利诺伊州: 0.2 %伊利诺伊州: 0.2 %佛山: 0.3 %佛山: 0.3 %保定: 0.5 %保定: 0.5 %克拉玛依: 1.0 %克拉玛依: 1.0 %兰州: 0.8 %兰州: 0.8 %北京: 6.2 %北京: 6.2 %南京: 1.3 %南京: 1.3 %南充: 0.3 %南充: 0.3 %南昌: 0.8 %南昌: 0.8 %台北: 0.3 %台北: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.8 %哈尔滨: 0.8 %喀什: 0.2 %喀什: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大庆: 0.6 %大庆: 0.6 %大连: 0.3 %大连: 0.3 %天津: 1.6 %天津: 1.6 %太原: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %威海: 0.5 %威海: 0.5 %安康: 0.2 %安康: 0.2 %宝鸡: 1.3 %宝鸡: 1.3 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %常州: 0.3 %常州: 0.3 %常德: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %广州: 1.8 %广州: 1.8 %庆阳: 0.3 %庆阳: 0.3 %张家口: 1.8 %张家口: 1.8 %成都: 1.8 %成都: 1.8 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %拉萨: 0.3 %拉萨: 0.3 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 1.0 %昆明: 1.0 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 3.9 %杭州: 3.9 %武汉: 1.8 %武汉: 1.8 %汉中: 0.3 %汉中: 0.3 %汕头: 0.2 %汕头: 0.2 %沈阳: 1.0 %沈阳: 1.0 %洛阳: 1.6 %洛阳: 1.6 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %济宁: 0.2 %济宁: 0.2 %淮北: 0.3 %淮北: 0.3 %深圳: 0.6 %深圳: 0.6 %温州: 1.1 %温州: 1.1 %渭南: 0.5 %渭南: 0.5 %湖州: 0.8 %湖州: 0.8 %湘潭: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.2 %湛江: 0.6 %湛江: 0.6 %滨州: 0.2 %滨州: 0.2 %漯河: 1.9 %漯河: 1.9 %潍坊: 3.1 %潍坊: 3.1 %烟台: 0.8 %烟台: 0.8 %牛津: 0.2 %牛津: 0.2 %盐城: 0.3 %盐城: 0.3 %石家庄: 1.3 %石家庄: 1.3 %福州: 1.1 %福州: 1.1 %舟山: 0.5 %舟山: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 10.2 %芒廷维尤: 10.2 %芝加哥: 1.3 %芝加哥: 1.3 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.5 %荆州: 0.5 %萨拉戈萨: 0.3 %萨拉戈萨: 0.3 %衡水: 0.8 %衡水: 0.8 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %西宁: 3.1 %西宁: 3.1 %西安: 1.0 %西安: 1.0 %贵阳: 0.8 %贵阳: 0.8 %运城: 1.0 %运城: 1.0 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %郑州: 2.1 %郑州: 2.1 %重庆: 1.1 %重庆: 1.1 %长春: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %长治: 1.0 %长治: 1.0 %青岛: 1.5 %青岛: 1.5 %鹤壁: 0.5 %鹤壁: 0.5 %其他上海东莞临汾伊利诺伊州佛山保定克拉玛依兰州北京南京南充南昌台北台州合肥呼和浩特哈尔滨喀什大同大庆大连天津太原威海安康宝鸡宣城常州常德广州庆阳张家口成都扬州拉萨无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉汉中汕头沈阳洛阳济南济宁淮北深圳温州渭南湖州湘潭湛江滨州漯河潍坊烟台牛津盐城石家庄福州舟山芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州萨拉戈萨衡水衢州襄阳西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邢台郑州重庆长春长沙长治青岛鹤壁

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (171) PDF downloads(6) Cited by(24)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return