Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
GONG Shengyan, LIAN Haifeng, QUE Xiang, LIU Jinfu, TAN Fanglin. AIR POLLUTION STUDY BASED ON APEI IN FUJIAN, CHINA FROM 2013 TO 2018[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 73-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302011
Citation: GONG Shengyan, LIAN Haifeng, QUE Xiang, LIU Jinfu, TAN Fanglin. AIR POLLUTION STUDY BASED ON APEI IN FUJIAN, CHINA FROM 2013 TO 2018[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 73-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302011

AIR POLLUTION STUDY BASED ON APEI IN FUJIAN, CHINA FROM 2013 TO 2018

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302011
  • Received Date: 2022-02-26
    Available Online: 2023-05-25
  • Publish Date: 2023-02-01
  • In order to accurately measure the air pollution in Fujian province at the regional (county, city) scale, the APEI index was constructed. Based on high-resolution air pollution data set and nighttime light data, the spatio-temporal variation characteristics of air pollution degree and its influencing factors in 78 counties and cities of Fujian province from 2013 to 2018 were analyzed. Results showed that:1) air pollution degree in the counties and cities in the north of the center of Fujian province is low, and air pollution degree in the coastal counties and cities in the east of Fujian province is serious. In the past 6 years, 78.21% of counties and cities in Fujian province reduced their air pollution; 2) the serious air pollution in the eastern coastal areas of the province is mainly manifested in two kinds of air pollutants, NO2 and PM10, both exceeding the average level of the province; 3) from the time series variation trend of atmospheric pollutants, O3 shows a U-shaped change; PM2.5 and PM10 have similar changes, decreasing year by year from 2014 to 2018 by 23.15% and 12.21% respectively. CO changes in an inverted U shape. SO2 and NO2 decreased, respectively; 4) the six kinds of air pollutants showed obvious seasonal fluctuation; 5) spatio-temporal heterogeneity of the impact of night light on APEI was analyzed by using spatiotemporal weighted regression (STWR) model. It was found that the negative influence area continued to expand from 2014 to 2018. The regression coefficients of 34 counties and cities were all positive in five years, indicating that these counties and cities are prone to air pollution caused by human activities; 6) air quality index (AQI) and air quality composite index (AQCI) are used to evaluate the ranking of the comprehensive air pollution degree in Fujian province in the past six years, and it was found that APEI index could better tell the relationship between the real concentration.
  • [1]
    沈楠驰,周丙锋,李珊珊,等.2015-2019年天津市大气污染物时空变化特征及成因分析[J].生态环境学报,2020,29(9):1862-1873.
    [2]
    ZHANG F Y, SHI Y, FANG D K, et al. Monitoring history and change trends of ambient air quality in China during the past four decades[J]. Pubmed, 2020, 260:110031.
    [3]
    汪行东. 城市人口规模、城市密度与环境污染:基于主要城市2003-2014年空气质量面板数据的研究[J]. 湖南第一师范学院学报, 2019, 19(3):85-90

    , 104.
    [4]
    董夏燕, 何庆红. 空气污染与中老年人心理健康的关系研究[J]. 中国经济问题, 2019(5):50-61.
    [5]
    董佳丹, 陈晓玲, 蔡晓斌, 等. 基于中国大气环境监测站点的2015-2019年大气质量状况时空变化分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(10):1983-1995.
    [6]
    YANG Y, LAN H F, LI J. Spatial econometric analysis of the impact of socioeconomic factors on PM2.5 concentration in China's inland cities:a case study from Chengdu plain economic zone[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 17(1):74.
    [7]
    HERRERA-MURILLO J, SOTO-MURILLO T, ROJAS-MARIN J F, el at. Water-soluble anions in PM10 samples collected in the metropolitan area of costa rica:temporal and spatial variations[J]. Atmosphere, 2021, 12(10):1264.
    [8]
    YAN D, LEI Y L, SHI Y K, et al. Evolution of the spatiotemporal pattern of PM2.5 concentrations in China:a case study from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2018, 183:225-233.
    [9]
    王成等, 曹靖原, 段小琳, 等. 山西省四城市冬季PM2.5中碳质组分特征及来源分析[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(6):114-121.
    [10]
    高振翔, 叶剑, 周红根, 等. 江苏省PM2.5和PM10时空变化特征及其与气象因子的关系[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(7):51-58.
    [11]
    李岚淼, 李龙国, 李乃稳. 城市雾霾成因及危害研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35(12):92-97

    ,104.
    [12]
    魏文静, 谢炳庚, 周楷淳, 等. 2013-2018年山东省大气PM2.5和PM10污染时空变化及其影响因素[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 38(12):103-111.
    [13]
    高婵娟, 赵啟超, 丁若男, 等. 2018年吉林市大气污染物浓度变化及其与气象因素的相关性分析[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(5):71-79.
    [14]
    李杨, 刘永和, 王西岳, 等. 焦作市PM2.5和PM10时空变化特征及其与气象因子的关系[J/OL]. 环境工程:1-13[2022-04-27

    ]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2097.X.20220424.1431.008.html.
    [15]
    WEN X, CHEN W W, CHEN B, et al. Does the prohibition on open burning of straw mitigate air pollution:an empirical study in Jilin Province of China in the post-harvest season[J]. Elsevier Ltd, 2020,264:110451.
    [16]
    SONG Y, LI Z R, YANG T T, et al. Does the expansion of the joint prevention and control area improve the air quality?:evidence from China's Jing-Jin-Ji region and surrounding areas[J].Elsevier Besloten Vennootschap,2020,706:136034.
    [17]
    LIU T, WANG C L, WANG Y Y, et al. Impacts of model resolution on predictions of air quality and associated health exposure in Nanjing, China[J]. Pubmed, 2020,249:126515.
    [18]
    王长梅,万大娟,王开心,等.长沙市PM2.5浓度时空分布特征及影响因子分析[J].科学技术与工程,2021,21(12):5157-5165.
    [19]
    王贤彬, 黄亮雄. 夜间灯光数据及其在经济学研究中的应用[J]. 经济学动态, 2018, 59(10):75-87.
    [20]
    QUE X, MA X G, MA C, et al. A spatiotemporal weighted regression model (STWR v1. 0) for analyzing local nonstationarity in space and time[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 2020, 13(12):6149-6164.
    [21]
    BRUNSDON C, FOTHERINGHAM A S, CHARLTON M E. Geographically weighted regression:a method for exploring spatial nonstationarity[J]. Geographical Analysis, 1996, 28(4):281-298.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]FEI Tingting, DING Xiaoting, QUE Xiang, LIN Jin, LIN Jian, WANG Ziwei, LIU Jinfu. SPATIOTEMPORAL HETEROGENEITY ANALYSIS OF ENERGY CARBON EMISSION EFFICIENCY IN CHINA BASED ON SBM-DEA AND STWR MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 188-200. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410022
    [2]ZHENG Haitao, LIU Jianguo, LUO Tao, CHENG Xueling, TAO Bangyi, LIU Cheng, HUANG Kan, SONG Xiaoquan, SHAO Shiyong, CAO Nianwen, XIANG Yan, ZHANG Tianshu, CHEN Bing, LIU Nana, JIN Xiang, LONG Wenrui, LIU Jiaxin, LI Qilong, MA Yubin, WU Lin, JIN Jiangbo, XU Manman, XU Ziqiang, WU Xiaoqing, BI Cuicui, LIU Qing, LI Junmin, HAN Chenghui, HAN Yong, QIN Fuqiang, ZHANG Chengxin, TAN Wei, WANG Bingbing, WANG Mian, CHENG Yin, LI Hao, WANG Guang, YUN Long. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON INTEGRATED THREE-DIMENSIONAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY FOR ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION IN COASTAL OCEAN BOUNDARY LAYER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 1-16. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403001
    [3]CHEN Fang, HU Jun, XU Lizhong, HUANG Weilong, GUO Eryang, RAO Qinghua. SPATIOTEMPORAL AGGREGATION CHANGE PATTERN OF PM2.5 AND O3 CONCENTRATION IN FUJIAN PROVINCE,CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 171-182. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407019
    [4]GUO Yajun, WANG Hualan, LI Mingxuan, LI Ruohan. ANALYSIS OF AIR POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS IN EXPRESSWAY AREAS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 166-171. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312020
    [5]ZHANG Qing, ZHAO Liya, GUO Zhiwei, QI Kai. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTANTS IN WUHAN FROM 2017 TO 2020[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 82-90. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302012
    [6]ZUO Penglai, GAO Qiang, ZHANG Yun, HAN Jiahui, TONG Yali, LIU Ping, GAO Jiajia. RESEARCH ON VERIFICATION FOR AIR POLLUTANTS ULTRA-LOW EMISSION TECHNOLOGIES OF COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 224-230. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212030
    [7]XIAO Kai, REN Xue-chang, CHEN Ren-hua. ANALYSIS OF TRANSMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND POTENTIAL SOURCES OF AIR POLLUTANTS IN JIAYUGUAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 92-101,109. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109014
    [8]YU Zhen-dong, XU Wei. CURRENT SITUATION AND COUNTERMEASURES OF AIR POLLUTION EMISSION CONTROL OF COKING INDUSTRY IN THE FENWEI PLAIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 111-116,186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101017
    [9]ZHANG Ya-ru, CHEN Yong-jin, GUO Qing-chun, SUN Hao. ANALYSIS ON TEMPO-SPATIAL VARIATION AND PREDICTION OF AIR POLLUTANTS IN JINAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 114-121. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002016
    [10]ZHAO Bin, LIU Bin. APPLICATION OF STACKING IN GROUND-LEVEL PM2.5 CONCENTRATION ESTIMATING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 153-159. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002022
    [17]Ding Wenshan Cai Liangcai Shao Bin Ding Fei, . RESEARCH ON AIRPORT AIR POLLUTION STATUS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 69-72. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503014
    [18]Shi Lingling, Li Xiaomin, Liu Jing, Xu Yaxuan, Li Xing. AIR POLLUTION SITUATION OF HENAN PROVINCE AND ITS CONTROLLING MEASURES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(5): 104-108. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201505022
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 孟德友,蔡河章,王宏. 泉州市2017-2021年大气污染特征及新冠疫情的影响. 环境科学与技术. 2023(08): 66-76 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.5 %FULLTEXT: 14.5 %META: 80.4 %META: 80.4 %PDF: 5.0 %PDF: 5.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 25.1 %其他: 25.1 %临汾: 0.6 %临汾: 0.6 %保定: 0.6 %保定: 0.6 %北京: 2.2 %北京: 2.2 %南京: 1.7 %南京: 1.7 %厦门: 1.7 %厦门: 1.7 %台州: 3.9 %台州: 3.9 %合肥: 1.1 %合肥: 1.1 %呼和浩特: 0.6 %呼和浩特: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.6 %大同: 0.6 %大同: 0.6 %常德: 1.7 %常德: 1.7 %平顶山: 1.1 %平顶山: 1.1 %广州: 0.6 %广州: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %成都: 2.2 %成都: 2.2 %扬州: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %昆明: 2.8 %昆明: 2.8 %晋城: 1.1 %晋城: 1.1 %朝阳: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %格兰特县: 0.6 %格兰特县: 0.6 %武汉: 1.1 %武汉: 1.1 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %温州: 1.7 %温州: 1.7 %湖州: 1.7 %湖州: 1.7 %漯河: 2.8 %漯河: 2.8 %福州: 2.8 %福州: 2.8 %绵阳: 1.1 %绵阳: 1.1 %芒廷维尤: 24.0 %芒廷维尤: 24.0 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %衢州: 1.7 %衢州: 1.7 %西宁: 1.7 %西宁: 1.7 %贵阳: 2.2 %贵阳: 2.2 %运城: 2.8 %运城: 2.8 %遵义: 0.6 %遵义: 0.6 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %长沙: 1.1 %长沙: 1.1 %长治: 0.6 %长治: 0.6 %阿克苏: 0.6 %阿克苏: 0.6 %其他临汾保定北京南京厦门台州合肥呼和浩特嘉兴大同常德平顶山广州张家口成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州格兰特县武汉济南温州湖州漯河福州绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥衢州西宁贵阳运城遵义郑州重庆长沙长治阿克苏

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (143) PDF downloads(9) Cited by(3)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return