Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
JIA Jinming, REN Fumin, HU Shuxin, GUO Changhong, LIU Junshi, MA Li, LU Tong, CUI Can, LIU Guotao, ZHANG Boyu. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION RISK ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE IN MAJOR URBAN CLUSTERS IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 98-105. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302014
Citation: JIA Jinming, REN Fumin, HU Shuxin, GUO Changhong, LIU Junshi, MA Li, LU Tong, CUI Can, LIU Guotao, ZHANG Boyu. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION RISK ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE IN MAJOR URBAN CLUSTERS IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 98-105. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302014

REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION RISK ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE IN MAJOR URBAN CLUSTERS IN CHINA

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302014
  • Received Date: 2022-06-04
    Available Online: 2023-05-25
  • Publish Date: 2023-02-01
  • In response to the lack of systematic environmental risk assessment of construction waste in China and the neglection of regional environmental chemical background values, the enrichment factor method, combined with geochemical background values, selecting four factors including environmental chemical background, regional categories, urban cluster development, elemental characteristics and four major urban clusters, including Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Huang-Huai-Huai River, Yangtze River Delta and Chang-Zhu-Tan, as the examples, five types of construction waste, the environmental pollution risk analysis was carried out on five types of construction waste and eight heavy metal elements. The results showed that:1) the pollution of heavy metal elements in construction waste was closely related to the development process of urban agglomerations; 2)the enrichment of different heavy metal elements was regional and influenced by the geochemical background values; 3) the introduction of heavy metals in the production process of construction materials had a direct impact on the total content of heavy metal elements in construction waste.
  • [1]
    董浩,曾波,唐飞,等. 建筑垃圾资源化处置技术[J]. 建筑技术,2021,52(7):805-809.
    [2]
    王波,孙嘉,王静峰,等. 建筑垃圾处置政策与对策研究[J]. 建筑经济,2021,42(6):8-13.
    [3]
    潘文佳,张宏,庄玮,等. 我国建筑垃圾资源化利用概述[J]. 建筑技术,2021,52(7):780-784.
    [4]
    仇梦璇,刘蓬,刘琳,等. 磁湖底泥重金属生态风险评价及溯源分析[J]. 湖北大学学报(自然科学版),2021,43(6):653-660.
    [5]
    赵兴树,陈永军. 生活垃圾填埋场地下水污染物识别与质量评价研究[J]. 建筑工程技术与设计,2018(20):1897.
    [6]
    解惠婷,张承中,徐峰,等. 典型生活垃圾焚烧厂周边土壤中汞污染特征研究[C]//2013.
    [7]
    吴晓文. 坡地建筑施工垃圾物堆放引发周边环境污染效果研究[J]. 环境科学与管理,2019,44(1):35-40.
    [8]
    曲亚军. 中华人民共和国多目标区域地球化学图集长江三角洲地区[R].国土资源部中国地质调查局,2011.
    [9]
    李莉.中华人民共和国多目标区域地球化学图集:河南省黄淮海平原经济区[R].国土资源部中国地质调查局,2014.
    [10]
    国土资源部中国地质调查局. 中华人民共和国多目标区域地球化学图集. 河北省平原区及近岸海域[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2012.
    [11]
    国土资源部中国地质调查局. 中华人民共和国多目标区域地球化学图集. 河北省平原区及近岸海域[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2018.
    [12]
    骆检兰. 中华人民共和国多目标区域地球化学图集:湖南省洞庭湖区[R].湖南省地质调查院,2010.
    [13]
    杜国栋,雷梅,周广东,等. 便携式X射线荧光仪测定土壤中镍的精度[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2015(3):809-813.
    [14]
    唐晓勇,倪晓芳,商照聪,等. 土壤中铁对砷的便携式X射线荧光光谱仪分析基体效应研究与校正[J]. 冶金分析,2021,41(1):69-74.
    [15]
    韩平,王纪华,陆安祥,等. 便携式X射线荧光光谱分析仪测定土壤中重金属[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析,2012,32(3):826-829.
    [16]
    CÉLINE LELIōVRE, ASMAA ROUWANE, ISABELLE POIRIER, et al. ED-XRF:a promising method for accurate and rapid quantification of metals in a bacterial matrix[J]. Environmental Technology,2021,42(25/26/27/28):4466-4474.
    [17]
    PANCHUK, VITALY, YAROSHENKO, IRINA, LEGIN, ANDREY, et al. Application of chemometric methods to XRF-data-A tutorial review[J]. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2018,1040:19-32.
    [18]
    刘华兰,陈再辉,刘正华,等. 浅谈日用陶瓷重金属的危害源及控制[J]. 中国陶瓷工业,2014(4):28-31.
    [19]
    王红梅,孟影. 资源型重工业城市经济增长与环境质量相关性研究[J]. 经济问题,2011(6):9-13.
    [20]
    郭卫社, 王百泉, 李沿宗, 等. 盾构渣土无害化处理、资源化利用现状与展望[J]. 隧道建设, 2020,40(8):1-24.
    [21]
    阴江宁,肖克炎. 中国锰矿资源潜力分析及成矿预测[J]. 中国地质,2014(5):1424-1437.
    [22]
    李春支. 水泥窑协同处置垃圾焚烧飞灰职业病危害因素防治研究[D]. 北京:首都经济贸易大学,2018.
    [23]
    刘淑娟,何润华,黄梓铃,等. 陶瓷生产基地周边地区土壤重金属潜在生态环境风险评价[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,51(4):626-628.
    [24]
    刘坤庭. 环境友好型下的产品艺术化:在陶瓷产品中重金属危害[J]. 陶瓷科学与艺术,2014,48(6):59-61.
    [25]
    吴龙,金铨,龚立科,等. 杭州地区稻田土壤中镉、铅、汞、砷、铬和镍的污染状况[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志,2017,27(11):1621-1630.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]YIN Leyi, HUANG Guoxin, NIU Haobo, CHEN Jian, XIE Yueqing, YANG Lihu, LIU Ling. GROUNDWATER POLLUTION DYNAMIC RISK ASSESSMENT BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND RISK SCREENING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 199-205. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401026
    [2]LIU Mingkun, DANG Xiaoqing, XIE Dongming, LE Wenyi, FENG Xiaofeng, ZHENG Huachun, LI Shijie, WANG Zhijian. INFLUENCE OF ELECTRODE CONFIGURATION AND PARAMETERS ON ELECTRIC FIELD AND DUST REMOVAL PERFORMANCE OF POROUS ELECTRODE ESP[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 122-130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403015
    [3]YAN Cailian, LIN Xiuli, HU Longji, LIU Jingxian. NUMERICAL SIMULATION ANALYSIS OF FILTRATION VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION OF CYLINDRICAL AND PLEATED FILTER BAGS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 225-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403028
    [4]DU Chuan, LI Houen, CHEN Suyun. APPLICATION OF NUMERICAL SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY IN EXTRACTION AND TREATMENT OF POLLUTED GROUNDWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 102-108. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307014
    [5]ZHANG You, ZHAO Tingting, DU Ranli, LI Huashan, KONG Xiangcheng, XUE Jianliang. NUMERICAL SIMULATION ANALYSIS OF FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF DESCENDING FILM EVAPORATION OF SALT-CONTAINING WASTEWATER IN COAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 17-22,31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306003
    [6]LI Jian, WU Chunmao, QI Zhanfeng. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF AIRFLOW DISTRIBUTION AND STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION IN AN ELECTROSTATIC OIL MIST PURIFIER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 202-208. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308026
    [7]LI Debo, CHEN Zhaoli, CHEN Zhihao, FENG Yongxin, HUANG Zigan, WEI Chen, MA Xiaoqian. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF MIXED FIRING OF AGED REFUSE AND AIR DISTRIBUTION OPTIMIZATION IN A MSW INCINERATION FURNACE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 113-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211016
    [8]ZHANG Yun. ADVANCES IN NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF GROUNDWATER IN-SITE CHEMICAL REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 197-204,217. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205029
    [9]ZHENG Kaixuan, HUANG Junlong, LUO Xingshen, WANG Hongtao, CHEN Tan. APPLICATION PROGRESS OF NUMERICAL SIMULATION IN PERMEABLE REATIVE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 22-30. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206003
    [10]LI Wenjun, ZHENG Chenghang, WANG Yifan, ZHAO Zhongyang, LIU Chang, WU Weihong, LIU Shaojun. NUMERICAL SIMULATION ON SPRAY EVAPORATION PROCESS FOR SMALL-SCALE QUENCH TOWER IN LIMITED SPACE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 50-56,78. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204008
    [11]SHUAI Qifan, LU Jiangang, LI Jiansheng. ANALYSIS ON STRUCTURAL SIMULATION, OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATION EFFECT OF A REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 146-153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202023
    [12]LIU Pengyu, LI Debo, LIU Yanfeng, QUE Zhengbin, MIAO Jianjie, CHEN Zhaoli. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SCR DENITRIFICATION SYSTEM IN A COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 224-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210029
    [13]HAN Xiao-dong, SUN Ye. SITE SELECTION OF WASTE TRANSFER STATION BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF ODOR DISPERSION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 130-135. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103018
    [14]NIE Peng-fei, GAO Zhi, MENG De-run, ZHANG Hong-bo, ZHANG Qing. APPLICATION OF CFD IN A DOUBLE STAGE DESULFURIZATION SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 119-124,130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108016
    [15]ZHOU Chuan, WU Qi-rong, YU Jiang-tao, QIN Fu-chu. NUMERICAL SIMULATION FOR FGD WASTEWATER EVAPORATION IN THE FLUE DUCT OF A 2×350 MW COAL-FIRED UNIT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 96-101. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005017
    [16]ZHAO Kun, LI Ruo-hua, CHENG Wen-long, YANG Yuan-ping, YUE Shu-bo. NUMERICAL SIMULATION STUDY ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF SEWAGE DISCHARGE ON ESTUARY WATER FUNCTIONAL AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 33-40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010006
    [17]QU Guang-fei, AN Zhi, NING Ping, XIE Ruo-song. GENERAL SURVEY ON APPLICATION OF NUMERICAL SIMULATION IN SEWAGE BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 99-104,179. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003017
    [18]Mao Rui, Liu Genfan, Deng Xiang, Fan Ning. NUMERICAL SIMULATION STUDY ON STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF BAG FILTER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 77-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503016
    [19]Ding Zhijiang Lu Mingyuan Xiao Lichun, . NUMERICAL SIMULATION METHOD OF GAS FLOW DISTRIBUTION IN ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR FOR CONVERTER GAS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 92-96. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504019
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 王国栋. 初雨截流的分流制排水体制下污水处理提质增效工程设计. 水利技术监督. 2025(03): 206-209+285 .
    2. 罗艳,曾祥国,高艳,刘欢,李志一,杨婷婷. 排水管网污水BOD与COD指标的相关性研究. 中国设备工程. 2025(04): 110-112 .
    3. 张勇,赖莉. 系统化监测在农村生活污水处理提质增效中的应用. 价值工程. 2024(22): 140-143 .
    4. 王宇龙,高萌. 自动监测技术分析聚氯乙烯生产废水的处理方法. 塑料助剂. 2024(04): 40-43+59 .
    5. 朱艳旭,张春杰,祝佳佳,钟振兴. 智慧排水管网系统建设——以豫南某市中心城区为例. 城市道桥与防洪. 2024(08): 101-104+17 .
    6. 朱恩国. 深圳市龙岗区排水管网提质增效方案设计与实践研究. 工程技术研究. 2024(18): 181-183 .
    7. 王小星. 污水处理过程中污染物监测方法的优化研究. 生态与资源. 2024(12): 25-27 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 12.6 %FULLTEXT: 12.6 %META: 83.0 %META: 83.0 %PDF: 4.4 %PDF: 4.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 9.1 %其他: 9.1 %其他: 0.6 %其他: 0.6 %China: 1.9 %China: 1.9 %上海: 1.9 %上海: 1.9 %东莞: 3.8 %东莞: 3.8 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %北京: 3.8 %北京: 3.8 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %南宁: 0.3 %南宁: 0.3 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %厦门: 0.6 %厦门: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %唐山: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %大同: 0.3 %大同: 0.3 %大连: 0.3 %大连: 0.3 %天津: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %太原: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %宁波: 0.3 %宁波: 0.3 %宜春: 0.6 %宜春: 0.6 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %弗吉: 0.3 %弗吉: 0.3 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %成都: 0.6 %成都: 0.6 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %攀枝花: 0.3 %攀枝花: 0.3 %无锡: 1.3 %无锡: 1.3 %昆明: 1.6 %昆明: 1.6 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 1.6 %杭州: 1.6 %榆林: 0.3 %榆林: 0.3 %武汉: 1.3 %武汉: 1.3 %沈阳: 0.9 %沈阳: 0.9 %沧州: 0.9 %沧州: 0.9 %济源: 0.3 %济源: 0.3 %海口: 0.3 %海口: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %潍坊: 0.9 %潍坊: 0.9 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 30.3 %芒廷维尤: 30.3 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %苏州: 0.9 %苏州: 0.9 %衢州: 0.6 %衢州: 0.6 %西宁: 8.8 %西宁: 8.8 %西安: 2.5 %西安: 2.5 %西雅图: 0.3 %西雅图: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 2.2 %运城: 2.2 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %里昂: 6.6 %里昂: 6.6 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %金华: 0.3 %金华: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %其他其他China上海东莞临汾兰州北京南京南宁南昌南通厦门合肥唐山大同大连天津太原宁波宜春宣城常德弗吉张家口成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦攀枝花无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州榆林武汉沈阳沧州济源海口淄博湖州潍坊烟台石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安西雅图贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州里昂重庆金华长治青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (232) PDF downloads(9) Cited by(7)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return