Source Journal of CSCD
Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Volume 41 Issue 2
Feb.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHOU Jun. IMPROVEMENT AND ECONOMIC BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF A TYPICAL TREATMENT PROCESS FOR DECORATION WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 181-187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302024
Citation: ZHOU Jun. IMPROVEMENT AND ECONOMIC BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF A TYPICAL TREATMENT PROCESS FOR DECORATION WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 181-187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302024

IMPROVEMENT AND ECONOMIC BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF A TYPICAL TREATMENT PROCESS FOR DECORATION WASTE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302024
  • Received Date: 2022-04-15
    Available Online: 2023-05-25
  • Publish Date: 2023-02-01
  • Decoration waste has the characteristics of multiple and complex components and large fluctuation of waste properties. The treatment process should be determined by on-site diligence in the waste source area. Taking a typical decoration waste project in Shanghai as an example, its process route is "two-stage crushing+multi-stage sorting", and there is a significant difference between the actual and the designed material balance after the primary screening unit. The utilization rate of the back-end sorting equipment was at a low level. The practical process improvement measures included material diversion or adjusting the upper sieve plate specification. After the improvement, the proportion of the actual receiving and processing load of the three box-type air separators with the same specification was close, and the material distribution uniformity tended to be reasonable. In terms of economic benefits, the operation cost of the treatment line was converted to about 114.49 yuan/t, of which the labour cost, residue incineration disposal cost and residue landfill disposal cost accounted for 20.69%, 19.22% and 14.11% respectively; the operating income was about 26.45 yuan/t, mainly from the sale of recycled brick products and recycled aggregates. The operation cost and product quality of brick making line were significantly affected by the cement mixing ratio. When the cement mixing ratio increased from 10% to 20%, the average compressive strength of recycled standard bricks increased from 13.9 MPa to 18.1 MPa; when the optimum cement mixing ratio was 15%, it was difficult for the brick making line to maintain the balance of revenue and expenditure. The decoration waste project had low investment income and economic benefit without government support, which is the main bottleneck of the industry development in this field.
  • loading
  • [1]
    段珍华, 黄冬丽, 肖建庄, 等. 建筑装修垃圾成分调研及资源化处置模式探讨[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(10):171-177.
    [2]
    荣玥芳, 张新月, 张典, 等. 基于绿色发展理念的建筑垃圾源头减量规划研究[J]. 北京建筑大学学报, 2022, 38(1):9-17.
    [3]
    张敏, 董莉, 刘景洋, 等. 基于物质流分析的建筑垃圾产生量预测[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2021, 11(5):869-878.
    [4]
    刘会友. 房屋装修垃圾的危害与处置探究[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2005(3):24-27.
    [5]
    于丹凤, 李小月, 段华波, 等. 城市拆除和装修建筑垃圾重金属浸出特性分析[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(1):153-157.
    [6]
    陈天, 何玉安, 魏正康. 装潢建筑垃圾处理现状及其分拣分类处理工艺[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36:199-203.
    [7]
    薛骁. 上海市建筑装修垃圾组分分析与新型建材利用技术[J]. 山东工业技术, 2020(5):112-121.
    [8]
    赵钰, 王巧稚, 卫俊, 等. 基于武汉市房屋竣工面积预测的装修垃圾产生量测算方法研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2021, 29(2):10-15.
    [9]
    冷发光, 何更新, 张仁瑜, 等. 国内外建筑垃圾资源化现状及发展趋势[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2009, 17(1):33-35.
    [10]
    夏伟东, 陆沈磊. 关于城市装修垃圾现状及处置的思考[J]. 江苏建材, 2018(3):56-58.
    [11]
    郝粼波. 浅析装修垃圾预处理技术应用及其在我国的发展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2020, 28(4):95-98

    , 104.
    [12]
    汪振双, 孙剑书, 周焱鑫, 等. 建筑垃圾资源化处理PPP项目风险评价指标体系研究[J]. 工程管理学报, 2021, 35(3):58-63.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (219) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return