Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
HU Mengjie, ZHONG Lei, CAI Xiaoxian, QING Jinwu, SUN Yuru, LI Gaoyuan, RUAN Haihua, CHEN Guanyi. METABOLIC MECHANISM OF MICROBIAL DEGRADATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AND ITS RESEARCH PROGRESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 234-246. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302031
Citation: ZHOU Jun. IMPROVEMENT AND ECONOMIC BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF A TYPICAL TREATMENT PROCESS FOR DECORATION WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 181-187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302024

IMPROVEMENT AND ECONOMIC BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF A TYPICAL TREATMENT PROCESS FOR DECORATION WASTE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302024
  • Received Date: 2022-04-15
    Available Online: 2023-05-25
  • Publish Date: 2023-02-01
  • Decoration waste has the characteristics of multiple and complex components and large fluctuation of waste properties. The treatment process should be determined by on-site diligence in the waste source area. Taking a typical decoration waste project in Shanghai as an example, its process route is "two-stage crushing+multi-stage sorting", and there is a significant difference between the actual and the designed material balance after the primary screening unit. The utilization rate of the back-end sorting equipment was at a low level. The practical process improvement measures included material diversion or adjusting the upper sieve plate specification. After the improvement, the proportion of the actual receiving and processing load of the three box-type air separators with the same specification was close, and the material distribution uniformity tended to be reasonable. In terms of economic benefits, the operation cost of the treatment line was converted to about 114.49 yuan/t, of which the labour cost, residue incineration disposal cost and residue landfill disposal cost accounted for 20.69%, 19.22% and 14.11% respectively; the operating income was about 26.45 yuan/t, mainly from the sale of recycled brick products and recycled aggregates. The operation cost and product quality of brick making line were significantly affected by the cement mixing ratio. When the cement mixing ratio increased from 10% to 20%, the average compressive strength of recycled standard bricks increased from 13.9 MPa to 18.1 MPa; when the optimum cement mixing ratio was 15%, it was difficult for the brick making line to maintain the balance of revenue and expenditure. The decoration waste project had low investment income and economic benefit without government support, which is the main bottleneck of the industry development in this field.
  • [1]
    段珍华, 黄冬丽, 肖建庄, 等. 建筑装修垃圾成分调研及资源化处置模式探讨[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(10):171-177.
    [2]
    荣玥芳, 张新月, 张典, 等. 基于绿色发展理念的建筑垃圾源头减量规划研究[J]. 北京建筑大学学报, 2022, 38(1):9-17.
    [3]
    张敏, 董莉, 刘景洋, 等. 基于物质流分析的建筑垃圾产生量预测[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2021, 11(5):869-878.
    [4]
    刘会友. 房屋装修垃圾的危害与处置探究[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2005(3):24-27.
    [5]
    于丹凤, 李小月, 段华波, 等. 城市拆除和装修建筑垃圾重金属浸出特性分析[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(1):153-157.
    [6]
    陈天, 何玉安, 魏正康. 装潢建筑垃圾处理现状及其分拣分类处理工艺[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36:199-203.
    [7]
    薛骁. 上海市建筑装修垃圾组分分析与新型建材利用技术[J]. 山东工业技术, 2020(5):112-121.
    [8]
    赵钰, 王巧稚, 卫俊, 等. 基于武汉市房屋竣工面积预测的装修垃圾产生量测算方法研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2021, 29(2):10-15.
    [9]
    冷发光, 何更新, 张仁瑜, 等. 国内外建筑垃圾资源化现状及发展趋势[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2009, 17(1):33-35.
    [10]
    夏伟东, 陆沈磊. 关于城市装修垃圾现状及处置的思考[J]. 江苏建材, 2018(3):56-58.
    [11]
    郝粼波. 浅析装修垃圾预处理技术应用及其在我国的发展[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2020, 28(4):95-98

    , 104.
    [12]
    汪振双, 孙剑书, 周焱鑫, 等. 建筑垃圾资源化处理PPP项目风险评价指标体系研究[J]. 工程管理学报, 2021, 35(3):58-63.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LI Yuping, FAN Baoyun, DONG Kangran, WAN Jinzhong, AI Yingbo, WANG Baotian. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THERMAL REMEDIATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATED SOILS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 242-249. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404028
    [2]ZENG Jinyong, KE Shuizhou, YUAN Huizhou, ZHU Liang, MA Jingwei, YUAN Jiajia. EFFECTS OF CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO ON DENITRIFICATION PERFORMANCE AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY IN AN MBBR SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 100-110. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404012
    [3]ZHAO Gang, JIANG Ming, WEI Zhicheng, WANG Feng, LUO Jingyang, TANG Jianguo. IMPACTS OF SEWAGE CONCENTRATION ON METHANE EMISSION AND MICROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS IN SEWAGE COLLECTION SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 22-30. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404003
    [4]DING Ning, ZUO Shiwei, ZHANG Ruibo, WANG Zhaohui, LI Kewen, SHANG Ershun. SOLUBILIZER DESIGN FOR INTENSIFYING REMEDIATION OF SOIL WITH PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON POLLUTANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 177-183. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401023
    [5]BI Xinqi, GONG Zhiwei, MA Jie, ZHOU Lichang, JIANG Jinqi, GUO Gang. EFFECTS OF AEROBIC/ANAEROBIC ENVIRONMENTS ON MICROBIAL DEGRADATION EFFICIENCY OF TYPICAL MICROPLASTICS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 88-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407009
    [6]ZHU Lijun, WANG Huan, LI Shaofeng, LU Lu. HORIZONTAL CARBON FIBER BRUSH COUPLING BIOELECTRICHEMICAL SYSTEM TO STRENGTHEN TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON DEGRADATION AND EXPAND INFLUENCE RADIUS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 159-165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307022
    [7]XU Jinlan, YANG Zhengli. IMPACTS OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BIODEGRADATION IN OIL-CONTAMINATED SOIL AFTER PRE-OXIDATION WITH THREE BATCHS H2O2 ADDITION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 122-130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302017
    [8]LIU Chao, ZHANG Xuemeng, CHEN Chuang, YIN Yue, HUANG Haining, CHEN Yinguang. BIOLOGICAL MECHANISM OF AMMONIA INHIBITION DURING ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 156-165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309019
    [9]LI Hongcheng, SU Qu, ZHANG Wuzhu, ZHANG Yao, XIANG Luojing. ISOLATION, IDENTIFICATION AND DEGRADATION CHARACTERISTICS OF STRAINS FOR REMEDIATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON UNDER ARSENIC STRESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 166-174. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307023
    [10]LIU Xiaodong, YU Tianfei, AI Jiamin, LI Jing, ZHANG Baobao, JIANG Yingying, DENG Zhenshan. INFLUENCE OF PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION ON SOIL MICROBIAL COMMUNITY AND ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF OIL-DEGRADING BACTERIA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 61-68. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207009
    [11]SHI Wenwen, WEI Xing, ZHOU Jinlong, LEI Mi, ZENG Yanyan. ADSORPTION OF PETROLEUM POLLUTANTS ON DIFFERENT TEXTURE SOILS IN XINJIANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 127-133. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204018
    [12]ZHAO Zi-xuan, QIU Wei-hua, WANG Pan. THE AEROBIC DEGRADATION OF NUTRITIONAL COMPLEXED KITCHEN WASTE BY MIXED MICROBIAL FLORA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 92-99. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104015
    [13]XUE Zhen-kun, ZUO Rui, WANG Jin-sheng, CHEN Min-hua, MENG Li, JIN Chao. MICROORGANISM COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND MICROBIOLOGICAL DETERIORATION IN HETEROGENEOUS SITES CONTAMINATED WITH PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 188-196. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108026
    [14]LIU Er-yan, XUE Fei, XU Shi-hong, LI Deng-xin. EFFECT OF MICROWAVE AND LYSOZYME JOINT TREATMENT ON THE DEWATERING PERFORMANCE OF PRINTING AND DYEING SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 13-17,42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005003
    [15]BAI Dong-rui, ZHANG Tao, ZHAN Yu-yu, YANG Ting, XIONG Ying, HU Xin-yi, LIU Yan-ting, CHEN Tan, WANG Hong-tao, JIN Jun, LIU Ying, WANG Ying. PROGRESS IN OILY SLUDGE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 207-212,146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008034
    [16]ZHENG Jin, WANG Xin-yu, LI Jie, SONG Quan-wei, LI Hong-li, WANG Xiao-ling, TIAN Pei-ting. BIOREMEDIATION OF CRUDE OIL IN CONTAMINATED SOIL BY MICROORGANISMS IMMOBILIZED WITH HUMIC ACID-MODIFIED BIOFUEL ASH[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 34-40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008006
    [20]Zhang Dan Jiang Lin Xia Tianxiang Jia Xiaoyang Zheng Di Zhang Lina Fan Yanling Liu Hui, . THE MIGRATION AND BIODEGRADATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN SOILS-GROUNDWATER SYSTEM: A REVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(7): 1-6.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 刘杰,孙先锋,赵敏,吴蔓莉,韩宇星. 复合菌群构建及其石油烃降解特性. 化学工程. 2024(02): 17-22 .
    2. 王开明,曾飞虎,解文丽,陈小华,林若兰. 一株海洋碳九芳烃降解菌的筛选及降解性能研究. 延安职业技术学院学报. 2024(01): 102-108 .
    3. 陈丽艳,陈鋆玮,于鑫鑫,丁纯洁,孙银玲,郑宏宇,赵娢,王伟明. 桔梗经米泔水炮制后挥发性成分及桔梗皂苷D的含量变化. 中国中医药科技. 2024(03): 408-412 .
    4. 车其芷,屈楠楠. 生物修复技术与复合菌种协同降解石油烃污染物的研究进展. 化工管理. 2024(13): 88-92 .
    5. 苟欢欢,刘慧博,徐凯,李元昊,雷波,杨开静. 过氧化物类芬顿体系修复有机污染物的研究进展. 现代农业科技. 2024(11): 133-138+153 .
    6. 罗娜,穆红梅. 油藏微生物在油气开发中的应用及展望. 中国地质调查. 2024(03): 9-16 .
    7. 叶顺云,邓华,胡乐宁,张俊渝,黄紫薇,王威,黄瑞,付佳慧. 富微孔型生物炭对2, 4-二氯苯酚的吸附性能. 环境工程. 2024(08): 25-34 . 本站查看
    8. 李亚君,张宁,张鹏飞,张瑞昌,周鸣,章春芳,魏学锋. 具有降解原油和产生生物表面活性剂双功能菌株的特性. 中国环境科学. 2024(09): 5293-5302 .
    9. 邓雯,许永利. 基于CiteSpace的石油污染盐碱地可视化分析. 南方农机. 2024(19): 41-45 .
    10. 陈红初,张婷娣,付玉丰,茹金涛,秦传玉. 高效柴油降解菌的筛选及其对烷烃组分的降解. 中国环境科学. 2024(10): 5723-5732 .
    11. 宋佳宇,李昀照,李兴春,李丹丹,王庆宏,史权,陈春茂. 石油污染胁迫下土壤潜在降污固碳微生物互作关系研究. 环境科学研究. 2023(07): 1392-1403 .
    12. 李虹呈,苏趋,张武竹,张耀,向罗京. 砷胁迫下石油烃降解菌的分离、鉴定及其降解特性. 环境工程. 2023(07): 166-174 . 本站查看
    13. 常晓宇,季蕾,黄玉杰,宋繁永,王加宁. 石油烃微生物降解基因及其工程菌应用研究进展. 中国环境科学. 2023(08): 4305-4315 .

    Other cited types(11)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.8 %FULLTEXT: 11.8 %META: 85.6 %META: 85.6 %PDF: 2.6 %PDF: 2.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 12.6 %其他: 12.6 %上海: 3.4 %上海: 3.4 %东莞: 5.3 %东莞: 5.3 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %伊利诺伊州: 0.2 %伊利诺伊州: 0.2 %佛山: 0.3 %佛山: 0.3 %保定: 0.5 %保定: 0.5 %克拉玛依: 1.0 %克拉玛依: 1.0 %兰州: 0.8 %兰州: 0.8 %北京: 6.2 %北京: 6.2 %南京: 1.3 %南京: 1.3 %南充: 0.3 %南充: 0.3 %南昌: 0.8 %南昌: 0.8 %台北: 0.3 %台北: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.8 %哈尔滨: 0.8 %喀什: 0.2 %喀什: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大庆: 0.6 %大庆: 0.6 %大连: 0.3 %大连: 0.3 %天津: 1.6 %天津: 1.6 %太原: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %威海: 0.5 %威海: 0.5 %安康: 0.2 %安康: 0.2 %宝鸡: 1.3 %宝鸡: 1.3 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %常州: 0.3 %常州: 0.3 %常德: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %广州: 1.8 %广州: 1.8 %庆阳: 0.3 %庆阳: 0.3 %张家口: 1.8 %张家口: 1.8 %成都: 1.8 %成都: 1.8 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %拉萨: 0.3 %拉萨: 0.3 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 1.0 %昆明: 1.0 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 3.9 %杭州: 3.9 %武汉: 1.8 %武汉: 1.8 %汉中: 0.3 %汉中: 0.3 %汕头: 0.2 %汕头: 0.2 %沈阳: 1.0 %沈阳: 1.0 %洛阳: 1.6 %洛阳: 1.6 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %济宁: 0.2 %济宁: 0.2 %淮北: 0.3 %淮北: 0.3 %深圳: 0.6 %深圳: 0.6 %温州: 1.1 %温州: 1.1 %渭南: 0.5 %渭南: 0.5 %湖州: 0.8 %湖州: 0.8 %湘潭: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.2 %湛江: 0.6 %湛江: 0.6 %滨州: 0.2 %滨州: 0.2 %漯河: 1.9 %漯河: 1.9 %潍坊: 3.1 %潍坊: 3.1 %烟台: 0.8 %烟台: 0.8 %牛津: 0.2 %牛津: 0.2 %盐城: 0.3 %盐城: 0.3 %石家庄: 1.3 %石家庄: 1.3 %福州: 1.1 %福州: 1.1 %舟山: 0.5 %舟山: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 10.2 %芒廷维尤: 10.2 %芝加哥: 1.3 %芝加哥: 1.3 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.5 %荆州: 0.5 %萨拉戈萨: 0.3 %萨拉戈萨: 0.3 %衡水: 0.8 %衡水: 0.8 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %西宁: 3.1 %西宁: 3.1 %西安: 1.0 %西安: 1.0 %贵阳: 0.8 %贵阳: 0.8 %运城: 1.0 %运城: 1.0 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %郑州: 2.1 %郑州: 2.1 %重庆: 1.1 %重庆: 1.1 %长春: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %长治: 1.0 %长治: 1.0 %青岛: 1.5 %青岛: 1.5 %鹤壁: 0.5 %鹤壁: 0.5 %其他上海东莞临汾伊利诺伊州佛山保定克拉玛依兰州北京南京南充南昌台北台州合肥呼和浩特哈尔滨喀什大同大庆大连天津太原威海安康宝鸡宣城常州常德广州庆阳张家口成都扬州拉萨无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉汉中汕头沈阳洛阳济南济宁淮北深圳温州渭南湖州湘潭湛江滨州漯河潍坊烟台牛津盐城石家庄福州舟山芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州萨拉戈萨衡水衢州襄阳西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邢台郑州重庆长春长沙长治青岛鹤壁

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (299) PDF downloads(11) Cited by(24)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return