Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 41 Issue 2
Feb.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2023  >  41(2): 197-204
HU Mengjie, ZHONG Lei, CAI Xiaoxian, QING Jinwu, SUN Yuru, LI Gaoyuan, RUAN Haihua, CHEN Guanyi. METABOLIC MECHANISM OF MICROBIAL DEGRADATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AND ITS RESEARCH PROGRESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 234-246. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302031
Citation: SUN Zhaoyun, DU Yaohui, PEI Lili, LIU Ying, WU Yulong. AN AIR QUALITY INDEX PREDICTION METHOD BASED ON INVERSE VARIANCE MULTI-MODEL FUSION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 197-204. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302026
shu

AN AIR QUALITY INDEX PREDICTION METHOD BASED ON INVERSE VARIANCE MULTI-MODEL FUSION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302026

  • School of Information Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China

  • Received Date: 2022-04-27
    Available Online: 2023-05-25
  • Publish Date: 2023-02-01
    Abstract
  • The prediction of air quality is of great significance for formulating environmental governance policies. Aiming at the problems of instability and weak generalization ability of the single model method, a multi-model fusion prediction method of air quality index (AQI) based on the inverse variance weight distribution method and fusion of three single model methods was proposed. Firstly, taking Beijing as an example, the air quality index prediction dataset was constructed. Secondly, five models, LSTM, GRU, Bi-LSTM, ARIMA and MLR, were constructed to predict the dataset, and the prediction results of these models were compared. Finally, in the multi-model fusion method, the inverse variance method was used to calculate the weight of three monomer models with high prediction accuracy, and the inverse variance fusion prediction model was constructed according to the calculated weight. Compared with the three monomer models with higher prediction accuracy and the weighted average fusion prediction model, the prediction accuracy, R2 of the inverse variance fusion prediction model for air quality index was improved by 3.9%, 3.4%, 1.6% and 0.5% respectively, reaching 0.933. The results showed that the proposed inverse variance fusion prediction model integrated the advantages of each monomer prediction model, which could improve the prediction accuracy of air quality index.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(23)
  • [1]
    LIU H, YIN S, CHEN C, et al. Data multi-scale decomposition strategies for air pollution forecasting:a comprehensive review[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 277:124023.
    [2]
    DINCER N G, AKKU Z. A new fuzzy time series model based on robust clustering for forecasting of air pollution[J]. Ecological Informatics, 2018, 43:157-164.
    [3]
    MIRI M, ALAHABADI A, EHRAMPUSH M H, et al. Mortality and morbidity due to exposure to ambient particulate matter[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2018, 165:307-313.
    [4]
    赵文成, 王访. 基于多尺度交叉趋势样本熵的城市空气质量指数分析[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 38(2):91-98.
    [5]
    LIU H, YAN G X, DUAN Z, et al. Intelligent modeling strategies for forecasting air quality time series:a review[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2021, 102:106957.
    [6]
    QIAO X, YING Q, LI X, et al. Source apportionment of PM2.5 for 25 Chinese provincial capitals and municipalities using a source-oriented Community Multiscale Air Quality model[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 612:462-471.
    [7]
    JEONG J I, PARK R, WOO J H, et al. Source contributions to carbonaceous aerosol concentrations in Korea[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45(5):1116-1125.
    [8]
    LI C, HSU N C, TSAY S C. A study on the potential applications of satellite data in air quality monitoring and forecasting[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45(22):3663-3675.
    [9]
    史凯赫, 丁日佳, 吴利丰, 等.预测空气质量的新型灰色系统多变量模型构建:以石家庄市为例[J]. 系统科学学报, 2023(2):75-81.
    [10]
    ZHANG L Y, LIN J N, QIU R Z, et al. Trend analysis and forecast of PM2.5 in Fuzhou, China using the ARIMA model[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 95:702-710.
    [11]
    LIU B C, ARIHANT B, CHANG P C, et al. Urban air quality forecasting based on multi-dimensional collaborative Support Vector Regression (SVR):a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Shijiazhuang[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(7):0179763.
    [12]
    徐乔王, 胡红萍, 白艳萍, 等. 基于MEA_SVM空气质量指数预测[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 33(12):150-155.
    [13]
    LI X, PENG L, YAO X J, et al. Long short-term memory neural network for air pollutant concentration predictions:method development and evaluation[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 231:997-1004.
    [14]
    SHARMA E, DEO R C, PRASAD R, et al. A hybrid air quality early-warning framework:an hourly forecasting model with online sequential extreme learning machines and empirical mode decomposition algorithms[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 709:135934.
    [15]
    YAN R, LIAO J Q, YANG J, et al. Multi-hour and multi-site air quality index forecasting in Beijing using CNN, LSTM, CNN-LSTM, and spatiotemporal clustering[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 169(4):114513.
    [16]
    LIU B, YU X, CHEN J, et al. Air pollution concentration forecasting based on wavelet transform and combined weighting forecasting model[J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2021, 12(8):101144.
    [17]
    GREFF K, SRIVASTAVA R K, KOUTNÍK J, et al. LSTM:a search space odyssey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks & Learning Systems, 2016, 28(10):2222-2232.
    [18]
    ZHANG B, ZHANG H, ZHAO G, et al. Constructing a PM2.5 concentration prediction model by combining auto-encoder with Bi-LSTM neural networks[J]. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2019, 124:104600.
    [19]
    HUANG G Y, LI X Y, ZHANG B, et al. PM2.5 concentration forecasting at surface monitoring sites using GRU neural network based on empirical mode decomposition[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 768(3):144516.
    [20]
    ALABDULRAZZAQ H, ALENEZI M, RAWAJFIH Y, et al. On the accuracy of ARIMA based prediction of COVID-19 spread[J]. Results in Physics, 27:104509.
    [21]
    杜展鹏, 王明净, 严长安, 等. 基于绝对主成分-多元线性回归的滇池污染源解析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2020, 40(3):1130-1137.
    [22]
    谭小钰, 刘芳, 马俊杰, 等. 基于DBN与T-S时变权重组合的光伏功率超短期预测模型[J]. 太阳能学报, 2021, 42(10):42-48.
    [23]
    裴莉莉, 孙朝云, 户媛姣, 等. 基于多特征因子的路用集料粒径计算神经网络模型[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(6):77-86.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]LI Yuping, FAN Baoyun, DONG Kangran, WAN Jinzhong, AI Yingbo, WANG Baotian. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THERMAL REMEDIATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATED SOILS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 242-249. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404028
    [2]ZENG Jinyong, KE Shuizhou, YUAN Huizhou, ZHU Liang, MA Jingwei, YUAN Jiajia. EFFECTS OF CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO ON DENITRIFICATION PERFORMANCE AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY IN AN MBBR SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 100-110. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404012
    [3]ZHAO Gang, JIANG Ming, WEI Zhicheng, WANG Feng, LUO Jingyang, TANG Jianguo. IMPACTS OF SEWAGE CONCENTRATION ON METHANE EMISSION AND MICROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS IN SEWAGE COLLECTION SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 22-30. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404003
    [4]DING Ning, ZUO Shiwei, ZHANG Ruibo, WANG Zhaohui, LI Kewen, SHANG Ershun. SOLUBILIZER DESIGN FOR INTENSIFYING REMEDIATION OF SOIL WITH PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON POLLUTANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 177-183. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401023
    [5]BI Xinqi, GONG Zhiwei, MA Jie, ZHOU Lichang, JIANG Jinqi, GUO Gang. EFFECTS OF AEROBIC/ANAEROBIC ENVIRONMENTS ON MICROBIAL DEGRADATION EFFICIENCY OF TYPICAL MICROPLASTICS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 88-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407009
    [6]ZHU Lijun, WANG Huan, LI Shaofeng, LU Lu. HORIZONTAL CARBON FIBER BRUSH COUPLING BIOELECTRICHEMICAL SYSTEM TO STRENGTHEN TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON DEGRADATION AND EXPAND INFLUENCE RADIUS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 159-165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307022
    [7]XU Jinlan, YANG Zhengli. IMPACTS OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BIODEGRADATION IN OIL-CONTAMINATED SOIL AFTER PRE-OXIDATION WITH THREE BATCHS H2O2 ADDITION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 122-130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302017
    [8]LIU Chao, ZHANG Xuemeng, CHEN Chuang, YIN Yue, HUANG Haining, CHEN Yinguang. BIOLOGICAL MECHANISM OF AMMONIA INHIBITION DURING ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 156-165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309019
    [9]LI Hongcheng, SU Qu, ZHANG Wuzhu, ZHANG Yao, XIANG Luojing. ISOLATION, IDENTIFICATION AND DEGRADATION CHARACTERISTICS OF STRAINS FOR REMEDIATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON UNDER ARSENIC STRESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 166-174. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307023
    [10]LIU Xiaodong, YU Tianfei, AI Jiamin, LI Jing, ZHANG Baobao, JIANG Yingying, DENG Zhenshan. INFLUENCE OF PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION ON SOIL MICROBIAL COMMUNITY AND ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF OIL-DEGRADING BACTERIA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 61-68. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207009
    [11]SHI Wenwen, WEI Xing, ZHOU Jinlong, LEI Mi, ZENG Yanyan. ADSORPTION OF PETROLEUM POLLUTANTS ON DIFFERENT TEXTURE SOILS IN XINJIANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 127-133. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204018
    [12]ZHAO Zi-xuan, QIU Wei-hua, WANG Pan. THE AEROBIC DEGRADATION OF NUTRITIONAL COMPLEXED KITCHEN WASTE BY MIXED MICROBIAL FLORA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 92-99. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104015
    [13]XUE Zhen-kun, ZUO Rui, WANG Jin-sheng, CHEN Min-hua, MENG Li, JIN Chao. MICROORGANISM COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND MICROBIOLOGICAL DETERIORATION IN HETEROGENEOUS SITES CONTAMINATED WITH PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 188-196. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108026
    [14]LIU Er-yan, XUE Fei, XU Shi-hong, LI Deng-xin. EFFECT OF MICROWAVE AND LYSOZYME JOINT TREATMENT ON THE DEWATERING PERFORMANCE OF PRINTING AND DYEING SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 13-17,42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005003
    [15]BAI Dong-rui, ZHANG Tao, ZHAN Yu-yu, YANG Ting, XIONG Ying, HU Xin-yi, LIU Yan-ting, CHEN Tan, WANG Hong-tao, JIN Jun, LIU Ying, WANG Ying. PROGRESS IN OILY SLUDGE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 207-212,146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008034
    [16]ZHENG Jin, WANG Xin-yu, LI Jie, SONG Quan-wei, LI Hong-li, WANG Xiao-ling, TIAN Pei-ting. BIOREMEDIATION OF CRUDE OIL IN CONTAMINATED SOIL BY MICROORGANISMS IMMOBILIZED WITH HUMIC ACID-MODIFIED BIOFUEL ASH[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 34-40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008006
    [20]Zhang Dan Jiang Lin Xia Tianxiang Jia Xiaoyang Zheng Di Zhang Lina Fan Yanling Liu Hui, . THE MIGRATION AND BIODEGRADATION OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN SOILS-GROUNDWATER SYSTEM: A REVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(7): 1-6.
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 刘杰，孙先锋，赵敏，吴蔓莉，韩宇星. 复合菌群构建及其石油烃降解特性. 化学工程. 2024(02): 17-22 .
    2. 王开明，曾飞虎，解文丽，陈小华，林若兰. 一株海洋碳九芳烃降解菌的筛选及降解性能研究. 延安职业技术学院学报. 2024(01): 102-108 .
    3. 陈丽艳，陈鋆玮，于鑫鑫，丁纯洁，孙银玲，郑宏宇，赵娢，王伟明. 桔梗经米泔水炮制后挥发性成分及桔梗皂苷D的含量变化. 中国中医药科技. 2024(03): 408-412 .
    4. 车其芷，屈楠楠. 生物修复技术与复合菌种协同降解石油烃污染物的研究进展. 化工管理. 2024(13): 88-92 .
    5. 苟欢欢，刘慧博，徐凯，李元昊，雷波，杨开静. 过氧化物类芬顿体系修复有机污染物的研究进展. 现代农业科技. 2024(11): 133-138+153 .
    6. 罗娜，穆红梅. 油藏微生物在油气开发中的应用及展望. 中国地质调查. 2024(03): 9-16 .
    7. 叶顺云，邓华，胡乐宁，张俊渝，黄紫薇，王威，黄瑞，付佳慧. 富微孔型生物炭对2, 4-二氯苯酚的吸附性能. 环境工程. 2024(08): 25-34 . 本站查看
    8. 李亚君，张宁，张鹏飞，张瑞昌，周鸣，章春芳，魏学锋. 具有降解原油和产生生物表面活性剂双功能菌株的特性. 中国环境科学. 2024(09): 5293-5302 .
    9. 邓雯，许永利. 基于CiteSpace的石油污染盐碱地可视化分析. 南方农机. 2024(19): 41-45 .
    10. 陈红初，张婷娣，付玉丰，茹金涛，秦传玉. 高效柴油降解菌的筛选及其对烷烃组分的降解. 中国环境科学. 2024(10): 5723-5732 .
    11. 宋佳宇，李昀照，李兴春，李丹丹，王庆宏，史权，陈春茂. 石油污染胁迫下土壤潜在降污固碳微生物互作关系研究. 环境科学研究. 2023(07): 1392-1403 .
    12. 李虹呈，苏趋，张武竹，张耀，向罗京. 砷胁迫下石油烃降解菌的分离、鉴定及其降解特性. 环境工程. 2023(07): 166-174 . 本站查看
    13. 常晓宇，季蕾，黄玉杰，宋繁永，王加宁. 石油烃微生物降解基因及其工程菌应用研究进展. 中国环境科学. 2023(08): 4305-4315 .

    Other cited types(11)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.8 %FULLTEXT: 11.8 %META: 85.6 %META: 85.6 %PDF: 2.6 %PDF: 2.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 12.6 %其他: 12.6 %上海: 3.4 %上海: 3.4 %东莞: 5.3 %东莞: 5.3 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %伊利诺伊州: 0.2 %伊利诺伊州: 0.2 %佛山: 0.3 %佛山: 0.3 %保定: 0.5 %保定: 0.5 %克拉玛依: 1.0 %克拉玛依: 1.0 %兰州: 0.8 %兰州: 0.8 %北京: 6.2 %北京: 6.2 %南京: 1.3 %南京: 1.3 %南充: 0.3 %南充: 0.3 %南昌: 0.8 %南昌: 0.8 %台北: 0.3 %台北: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.8 %哈尔滨: 0.8 %喀什: 0.2 %喀什: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大庆: 0.6 %大庆: 0.6 %大连: 0.3 %大连: 0.3 %天津: 1.6 %天津: 1.6 %太原: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %威海: 0.5 %威海: 0.5 %安康: 0.2 %安康: 0.2 %宝鸡: 1.3 %宝鸡: 1.3 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %常州: 0.3 %常州: 0.3 %常德: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %广州: 1.8 %广州: 1.8 %庆阳: 0.3 %庆阳: 0.3 %张家口: 1.8 %张家口: 1.8 %成都: 1.8 %成都: 1.8 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %拉萨: 0.3 %拉萨: 0.3 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 1.0 %昆明: 1.0 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 3.9 %杭州: 3.9 %武汉: 1.8 %武汉: 1.8 %汉中: 0.3 %汉中: 0.3 %汕头: 0.2 %汕头: 0.2 %沈阳: 1.0 %沈阳: 1.0 %洛阳: 1.6 %洛阳: 1.6 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %济宁: 0.2 %济宁: 0.2 %淮北: 0.3 %淮北: 0.3 %深圳: 0.6 %深圳: 0.6 %温州: 1.1 %温州: 1.1 %渭南: 0.5 %渭南: 0.5 %湖州: 0.8 %湖州: 0.8 %湘潭: 0.2 %湘潭: 0.2 %湛江: 0.6 %湛江: 0.6 %滨州: 0.2 %滨州: 0.2 %漯河: 1.9 %漯河: 1.9 %潍坊: 3.1 %潍坊: 3.1 %烟台: 0.8 %烟台: 0.8 %牛津: 0.2 %牛津: 0.2 %盐城: 0.3 %盐城: 0.3 %石家庄: 1.3 %石家庄: 1.3 %福州: 1.1 %福州: 1.1 %舟山: 0.5 %舟山: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 10.2 %芒廷维尤: 10.2 %芝加哥: 1.3 %芝加哥: 1.3 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.5 %荆州: 0.5 %萨拉戈萨: 0.3 %萨拉戈萨: 0.3 %衡水: 0.8 %衡水: 0.8 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.2 %西宁: 3.1 %西宁: 3.1 %西安: 1.0 %西安: 1.0 %贵阳: 0.8 %贵阳: 0.8 %运城: 1.0 %运城: 1.0 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %郑州: 2.1 %郑州: 2.1 %重庆: 1.1 %重庆: 1.1 %长春: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长沙: 1.0 %长沙: 1.0 %长治: 1.0 %长治: 1.0 %青岛: 1.5 %青岛: 1.5 %鹤壁: 0.5 %鹤壁: 0.5 %其他上海东莞临汾伊利诺伊州佛山保定克拉玛依兰州北京南京南充南昌台北台州合肥呼和浩特哈尔滨喀什大同大庆大连天津太原威海安康宝鸡宣城常州常德广州庆阳张家口成都扬州拉萨无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉汉中汕头沈阳洛阳济南济宁淮北深圳温州渭南湖州湘潭湛江滨州漯河潍坊烟台牛津盐城石家庄福州舟山芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州萨拉戈萨衡水衢州襄阳西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邢台郑州重庆长春长沙长治青岛鹤壁

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (181) PDF downloads(10) Cited by(24)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return