Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
XU Rui, YANG Wei, YANG Zhe, CHENG Qian-lan, GU Li-ting, GUO Sheng. HIGH-EFFICIENT REMOVAL OF TETRACYCLINE HYDROCHLORIDE BASED ON PEROXYMONOSULFATE ACTIVATED BY CuO/EXPANDED GRAPHITE COMPOSITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 48-54,47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002006
Citation: QIU Fuguo, XIA Xin, WANG Xiaoqian, LÜ Huadong. Hg(Ⅱ) ADSORPTION PERFORMANCE BY WATER TREATMENT RESIDUAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 34-41. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303005

Hg(Ⅱ) ADSORPTION PERFORMANCE BY WATER TREATMENT RESIDUAL

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303005
  • Received Date: 2021-12-20
    Available Online: 2023-05-26
  • Publish Date: 2023-03-01
  • Water treatment residual(WTR) can be used as a potential adsorbent to remove heavy metal ions from aqueous solution. The effects of pH value, initial concentration of Hg(Ⅱ), sludge size and temperature on the adsorption performance of WTR as the adsorbent were studied. The kinetics of the adsorption process and adsorption isotherm model were determined, and then its adsorption mechanism was explored. The results showed that the pH of the solution had a great influence on the adsorption of Hg(Ⅱ) by WTR and the adsorption capacity was largest at pH=8.0. A smaller particle size was conductive to the adsorption of Hg(Ⅱ), and the adsorption capacity increased with the increase of initial Hg(Ⅱ) concentration. The adsorption of Hg(Ⅱ) by WTR complied with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model, and the equilibrium isotherm complied with the Langmuir isotherm model, the maximum adsorption capacity was 69.13 mg/g at a temperature of 25 ℃ and pH of 7.0. A higher temperature was conducive to the adsorption of Hg(Ⅱ). It was found that intraparticle diffusion was the rate-limiting step of Hg (Ⅱ) adsorption, by analyzing the changes in the specific surface area and pore size distribution of the WTR before and after adsorption.
  • [1]
    BECKERS F, RINKLEBE J. Cycling of mercury in the environment:sources, fate, and human health implications:a review[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology,2017,47(9):693-794.
    [2]
    RANI L, SRIVASTAV A L, KAUSHAL J. Bioremediation:an effective approach of mercury removal from the aqueous solutions[J]. Chemosphere,2021,280:130654.
    [3]
    CHALKIDIS A, JAMPAIAH D, ARYANA A, et al. Mercury-bearing wastes:sources, policies and treatment technologies for mercury recovery and safe disposal[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2020,270:110945.
    [4]
    LIU Z Y, SUN Y, XU X R, et al. Preparation, characterization and application of activated carbon from corn cob by KOH activation for removal of Hg (Ⅱ) from aqueous solution[J]. Bioresource Technology,2020,306:123154.
    [5]
    尚谦,张长水.含汞废水的污染特征及处理[J].有色金属加工,1997(5):52-65.
    [6]
    余江鸿,李俞良,杨斌,等.新型脱汞试剂对铅锌冶炼制酸废水中汞的影响[J]. 甘肃冶金,2019,41(3):14-17

    ,24.
    [7]
    ZHOU Z Z, DREISINGER D. An investigation of mercury stabilization techniques through hypochlorite leaching and thiosulfate/selenosulfate precipitation[J]. Hydrometallurgy,2017,169:468-477.
    [8]
    FABRE E, ROCHA A, CARDOSO S P, et al. Purification of mercury-contaminated water using new AM-11 and AM-14 microporous silicates[J]. Separation and Purification Technology,2020,239:116438.
    [9]
    CHANDRASHEKHAR NAYAK M, ISLOOR A M, INAMUDDIN, et al. Polyphenylsulfone/multiwalled carbon nanotubes mixed ultrafiltration membranes:fabrication, characterization and removal of heavy metals Pb2+, Hg2+ and Cd2+ from aqueous solutions[J]. Arabian Journal of Chemistry,2020,13(3):4661-4672.
    [10]
    ZÚÑIGA-MURO N M, BONILLA-PETRICIOLET A, MENDOZA-CASTILLO D I, et al. Recovery of grape waste for the preparation of adsorbents for water treatment:mercury removal[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering,2020,8(3):103738.
    [11]
    LONG C, LI X, JIANG Z X, et al. Adsorption-improved MoSe2 nanosheet by heteroatom doping and its application for simultaneous detection and removal of mercury (Ⅱ)[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2021,413:125470.
    [12]
    MORA ALVAREZ N M, PASTRANA J M, LAGOS Y, et al. Evaluation of mercury (Hg2+) adsorption capacity using exhausted coffee waste[J]. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy,2018,10:60-70.
    [13]
    FABRE E, LOPES C B, VALE C, et al. Valuation of banana peels as an effective biosorbent for mercury removal under low environmental concentrations[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2020,709:135883.
    [14]
    郭家玮. 给水厂污泥-地聚物基免烧砖与透水混凝土的制备及其性能研究[D].广州:广东工业大学,2021.
    [15]
    朱亚琴,徐乐中,李大鹏.给水厂污泥处置与资源化利用[J].广东化工,2011,38(12):92-93

    ,76.
    [16]
    SHRESTHA S, KULANDAIVELU J, SHARMA K, et al. Effects of dosing iron- and alum-containing waterworks sludge on sulfide and phosphate removal in a pilot sewer[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2020,387:124073.
    [17]
    XU D, SHI X Q, LEE L Y, et al. Role of metal modified water treatment residual on removal of Escherichia coli from stormwater runoff[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2019,678:594-602.
    [18]
    CHIANG Y W, GHYSELBRECHT K, SANTOS R M, et al. Adsorption of multi-heavy metals onto water treatment residuals:sorption capacities and applications[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2012,200/201/202:405-415.
    [19]
    王格格. 污泥基生物炭的制备及对Hg2+吸附性能的研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆大学, 2016.
    [20]
    HU X L, CHEN C H, ZHANG D W, et al. Kinetics, isotherm and chemical speciation analysis of Hg(Ⅱ) adsorption over oxygen-containing MXene adsorbent[J]. Chemosphere,2021,278:130206.
    [21]
    MOHAMMADNIA E, HADAVIFAR M, VEISI H. Kinetics and thermodynamics of mercury adsorption onto thiolated graphene oxide nanoparticles[J]. Polyhedron,2019,173:114139.
    [22]
    van TRUONG T, KIM D. Phosphate removal using thermally regenerated Al adsorbent from drinking water treatment sludge[J]. Environmental Research,2021,196:110877.
    [23]
    KIM C S, RYTUBA J J, BROWN G E. EXAFS study of mercury(Ⅱ) sorption to Fe-and Al-(hydr)oxides[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2004, 271(1):1-15.
    [24]
    ALOMAR M K, ALSAADI M A, JASSAM T M, et al. Novel deep eutectic solvent-functionalized carbon nanotubes adsorbent for mercury removal from water[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,2017,497:413-421.
    [25]
    ELKHATIB E, MOHAREM M, MAHDY A, et al. Sorption, release and forms of mercury in contaminated soils stabilized with water treatment residual nanoparticles[J]. Land Degradation & Development,2016, 28(2):752-761.
    [26]
    PARK J, WANG J J, ZHOU B, et al. Removing mercury from aqueous solution using sulfurized biochar and associated mechanisms[J]. Environmental Pollution,2019,244:627-635.
    [27]
    黄京晶.改性水葫芦粉对废水中Hg2+的吸附研究[D].重庆:西南大学, 2016.
    [28]
    JIAO J, ZHAO J B, PEI Y S. Adsorption of Co(Ⅱ) from aqueous solutions by water treatment residuals[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2017,52(2):232-239.
    [29]
    SHEN C, ZHAO Y Q, LI W X, et al. Global profile of heavy metals and semimetals adsorption using drinking water treatment residual[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2019,372:1019-1027.
    [30]
    IMLA SYAFIQAH M S, YUSSOF H W. Adsorption of mercury from aqueous solutions using palm oil fuel ash as an adsorbent-batch studies[J]. IOP Conference Series:Materials Science and Engineering,2018,334(1):012039.
    [31]
    ANITHA D, RAMADEVI A, SEETHARAMAN R. Activated Mangosteen shell in removal of mercury ion from aqueous solution[J].Materials Today:Proceedings,2021,45(2):658-662.
    [32]
    仇付国,童诗雨,吕华东. 给水厂污泥对Cr(Ⅵ)的吸附特性研究[J].水处理技术,2022,48(5):59-64.
    [33]
    HOVSEPYAN A, BONZONGO J J. Aluminum drinking water treatment residuals (Al-WTRs) as sorbent for mercury:Implications for soil remediation[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2009,164(1):73-80.
    [34]
    QUIÑONES K D, HOVSEPYAN A, OPPONG-ANANE A, et al. Insights into the mechanisms of mercury sorption onto aluminum based drinking water treatment residuals[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2016,307:184-192.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LE Jihang, WANG Wenlong, WU Qianyuan, CHEN Zhuo, WU Yinhu, JIA Haifeng, LIU Fanghua, WANG Fang, HU Hongying. Quality and risk characteristics of effluent from wastewater treatment plants in central area of Luzhou[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2025, 43(1): 135-143. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202501015
    [2]WANG Fangzhou, WEI Yanfeng, ZHU Fangfang, XIA Ziyuan, GOU Min, TANG Yueqin. ENRICHMENT AND STABILITY OF ENDOGENOUS MICROBIAL COMMUNITY IN CRUDE OIL PHASE OF RESERVOIR-PRODUCED FLUID[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 41-49. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410006
    [3]ZHAO Yong, HAO Guizhen, XU Li, XIONG Xiaoying, ZHANG Xuanmo, WANG Jiawei. ENHANCED NITROGEN REMOVAL BY AEROBIC GRANULAR SLUDGE AND EVOLUTION OF MICROBIAL COMMUNITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 135-143. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407015
    [4]GE Xinyue, LIU Qidi, LIU Siyuan, HOU Jun, YOU Guoxiang. REVIEW OF ANTIBIOTIC DEGRADATION EFFICACY AND EVOLUTION MECHANISM OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE GENES IN ICPB REACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 1-14. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407001
    [5]LI Feifei, SU Zhiguo, CAO Feng, MU Qinglin, HUANG Bei, CHEN Lüjun, WEN Donghui. CONTRIBUTION OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE FROM SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS TO ANTIBIOTIC POLLUTION IN COASTAL WATER: A CASE STUDY OF HANGZHOU BAY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 1-8. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404001
    [6]YU Hong, SHI Lingling. EFFECTS OF MICROPLASTICS ON MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES AND FUNCTIONAL GENES IN SOIL WITH DIFFERENT AGGREGATE-FRACTION LEVELS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 167-174. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402020
    [7]LI Yunong, WEN Donghui. IMPACTS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS EFFLUENT ON MICROBIAL COMMUNITY OF RECEIVING WATER BODIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 167-179. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409016
    [8]ZHANG Chi, SHA Hongjü, WANG Chao, LÜ Ze, HU Xiaomin. MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ENHANCEMENT BY ELECTRIC FIELD AT ROOM TEMPERATURE AND HIGH NITROGEN LOAD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 39-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305006
    [9]WANG Shuo, LU Yunping, LIU Shuyang, CHEN Kangli. CARBON EMISSIONS OF URBAN AND INDUSTRIAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS OF SUZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 173-184. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310021
    [10]XIE Chengcheng, LIU Gang. ROAD MAP FOR CUSTRUCTING CARBON NEUTRAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 181-186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309022
    [11]MA Dachao, DENG Xiushan, DENG Xiuquan, ZHANG Xuan, LIANG Zhengwu, FENG Qingge. PROCESS PROPERTIES AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY SUCCESSION DURING THE STATICAL BIO-DRYING OF FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 106-111,133. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204015
    [12]XIE Mingde, FENG Mei, TANG Yiming, YI Xiaoying, LIU Dan. ANALYSIS ON MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURES AND DIVERSITY IN AGED REFUSE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 42-46. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202007
    [13]LIU Bin, HE Jie, LI Xueyan. CHARACTERISTICS OF SIMULTANEOUS TREATMENT OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS IN PYRITE BIOFILTER AND ITS MICROBIAL COMMUNITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 32-37,138. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203006
    [14]CHEN Weidong, WEN Donghui. ADVANCES IN SPATIAL-TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION AND ASSEMBLY MECHANISMS OF MICROBIAL COMMUNITY IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 1-13,39. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208001
    [15]LI Yong, YUAN Hui-zhou, KE Shui-zhou, ZHU Liang, LI Zhan-peng. EFFECTS OF MICROBIAL CARRIERS ON PERFORMANCE AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF MBBR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 100-106. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112015
    [16]SUN Xing, HU Kai, LEI Chen-yu, CHEN Wei. EFFECT OF FREEZING/THAWING PRETREATMENT ON EXCESS SLUDGE DISINTEGRATION AND TREATMENT EFFICIENCY OF MICROBIAL ELECTROLYSIS CELL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 147-155. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104023
    [17]GUO Yue-hong, WANG Jian-sheng, ZHANG Xue-hong, ZHANG Xing-feng, GAO Bo. EFFECTS OF HUMIC ACID ON CHROMIUM SPECIATION, MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES AND ENZYME ACTIVITIES IN RED SOIL TREATMENT SYSTEM PLANTED WITH LEERSIA HEXANDRA SWARTZ[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 234-242. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112035
    [18]WAN Ming-yue, DU Ji-ming, LI Jun, LI Yi, WANG Long-fei. INFLUENCE OF FLOWING AND STATIC WATER CONDITIONS ON MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES OF BIOFILMS ATTACHED ON SURFACE OF HYDRAULIC CONCRETE STRUCTURES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 35-40,69. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002004
    [19]WANG Kun, KE Shui-zhou, YUAN Hui-zhou, ZHU Jia, LI Jia-wan. EFFECT OF AMMONIA-NITROGEN CONCENTRATION ON MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN A MBBR PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 119-125. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009020
    [20]SHEN Jie, JIN Wei. REVIEW ON EFFECT OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT ON RECEIVING WATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 92-98,115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003016
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 谢金伶,蒲佳兴,李思域,黄丽,龚小波. 钴锰硫化物活化过硫酸盐强化降解盐酸四环素. 中国环境科学. 2023(02): 544-551 .
    2. 胡锋平,龙兰兰,陈钧杰,许莉,许高平. KOH改性碳纳米管负载钴活化过硫酸盐降解BPA的机理研究. 现代化工. 2023(09): 91-96 .
    3. 王琪,王卫,李强,黄懿,陈诗,夏强,陈刚. 负载铜丝瓜络生物炭活化过硫酸盐降解四环素. 环境科学与技术. 2023(09): 38-44 .
    4. 逯延军,董艳慧,赵平歌,李侃. 复合型纳米铁还原法处理抗生素废水研究. 应用化工. 2021(07): 1847-1849 .
    5. 韩爽,肖鹏飞. 过硫酸盐活化技术在四环素类抗生素降解中的应用进展. 环境化学. 2021(09): 2873-2883 .
    6. 占鹏,朱建华,彭小明,胡锋平,王晓英,龙兰兰,许莉,许高平. Fe、N共掺杂材料的制备以及高效降解四环素. 高校化学工程学报. 2021(06): 1090-1098 .
    7. 王俊丽,许琳,武彦芳,赵强. Ag_2CO_3/EG复合材料增强可见光催化性能和稳定性. 实验室研究与探索. 2020(12): 15-17+25 .

    Other cited types(8)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.5
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.5 %FULLTEXT: 14.5 %META: 82.3 %META: 82.3 %PDF: 3.2 %PDF: 3.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 26.6 %其他: 26.6 %其他: 0.8 %其他: 0.8 %Central District: 0.8 %Central District: 0.8 %上海: 2.4 %上海: 2.4 %东莞: 0.8 %东莞: 0.8 %保定: 0.8 %保定: 0.8 %北京: 2.4 %北京: 2.4 %南京: 2.4 %南京: 2.4 %台州: 3.2 %台州: 3.2 %大同: 1.6 %大同: 1.6 %天津: 2.4 %天津: 2.4 %宣城: 0.8 %宣城: 0.8 %常德: 1.6 %常德: 1.6 %广州: 0.8 %广州: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %杭州: 2.4 %杭州: 2.4 %湘潭: 0.8 %湘潭: 0.8 %漯河: 3.2 %漯河: 3.2 %石家庄: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %芒廷维尤: 25.0 %芒廷维尤: 25.0 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %衢州: 1.6 %衢州: 1.6 %西宁: 3.2 %西宁: 3.2 %贵阳: 2.4 %贵阳: 2.4 %运城: 2.4 %运城: 2.4 %遵义: 0.8 %遵义: 0.8 %邯郸: 1.6 %邯郸: 1.6 %郑州: 3.2 %郑州: 3.2 %重庆: 1.6 %重庆: 1.6 %其他其他Central District上海东莞保定北京南京台州大同天津宣城常德广州张家口昆明晋城杭州湘潭漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥衢州西宁贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (175) PDF downloads(5) Cited by(15)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return