Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 41 Issue 3
Mar.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2023  >  41(3): 185-191
HE Liping, LI Minmin, WU Jianxun, WEI Heng, LI Lina, LIU Xingchang, HE Zhehao, CHEN Yijie, DONG Tianxing, CHEN Shende. APPLICATION OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY IN EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF REAGENT INJECTION OF IN-SITU SITE REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 185-191. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303025
Citation: HE Liping, LI Minmin, WU Jianxun, WEI Heng, LI Lina, LIU Xingchang, HE Zhehao, CHEN Yijie, DONG Tianxing, CHEN Shende. APPLICATION OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY IN EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF REAGENT INJECTION OF IN-SITU SITE REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 185-191. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303025
shu

APPLICATION OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY IN EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF REAGENT INJECTION OF IN-SITU SITE REMEDIATION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303025

  • 1. Yunnan Research Academy of Eco-environmental Sciences, Kunming 650034, China;

  • 2. Ruichang Environmental Technology (Yunnan) Co., Ltd, Kunming 650206, China

  • Received Date: 2021-11-17
    Available Online: 2023-05-26
  • Publish Date: 2023-03-01
    Abstract
  • The effect of agent injection in-situ is the key to the results of site remediation. Therefore, evaluating the effect of agent injection is of great significance to site in-situ remediation. In this paper, the effect of agent injection in the process of in-situ repairing a coking site in Yunnan was evaluated by using the cross-hole earth resistance imaging method (ERT). The transmission and distribution of the repairing agent were estimated according to the underground electrical information and electrical changes before, during and after perfusion. The results showed that the changes in water temperature, pH, conductivity, redox potential, dissolved oxygen and other basic water quality parameters of the groundwater in the monitoring wells before and after the injection, were basically consistent with the electrical changes of the 2D and 3D profiles of the site, indicating that the injection effect of the repair agent was good, and it was confirmed that ERT had good feasibility and applicability in the evaluation of injection effect of the in-situ repairing agents, which can provide a reference for the in-situ repairing of similar sites.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(17)
  • [1]
    张峰. 污染场地原位化学药剂注射修复要点分析[J]. 环境保护科学, 2018, 44(2):123-126.
    [2]
    梁竞, 王世杰, 张文毓, 等. 美国污染场地修复技术对我国修复行业发展的启示[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(6):173-178.
    [3]
    黄廷林, 王堃, 李娜, 等. 原位投菌技术修复微污染水源水的中试研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(7):2256-2260.
    [4]
    陈立, 张发旺, 刘少玉, 等. 中原油田石油污染土壤原位生物修复技术实验研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2011, 5(10):2385-2390.
    [5]
    姜勇, 徐刚, 杨洁, 等. 高密度电法在原位修复土壤过程中的监控研究[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2020, 32(6):18-22.
    [6]
    GOES B J M, MEEKES J A C. An effective electrode configuration for the detedtion of DNAPLs with electrical resistivity tomography[J]. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 2004, 9(3):127-141.
    [7]
    ZHOU B, GREENHALGH S A. A synthetic study on crosshole resistivity imaging using different electrode arrays[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1997, 28(1):1-5.
    [8]
    SUGIMOTO Y. Shallow high-resolution 2-D and 3-D electrical crosshole imaging[J]. The Leading Edge, 1999,18(12):1425-1428.
    [9]
    董路, 叶腾飞, 能昌信, 等. ERT技术在无机酸污染场地调查中的应用[J]. 环境科学研究, 2008, 21(6):67-71.
    [10]
    BENSON A K, PAYNE K L, STUBBEN M A. Mapping groundwater contamination using dc resistivity and VLF geophysical methods:a case study[J]. Geophysics, 1997, 62(1):80-86.
    [11]
    GASPERIKOVAA E, HUBBARDA S S, WATSONC D B, et al. Long-term electrical resistivity monitoring of recharge-induced contaminant plume behavior[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2012, 142/143:33-49.
    [12]
    CASAS A, HIMI M, DIAZ Y, et al. Assessing aquifer vulnerability to pollutants by electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) at a nitrate vulnerable zone in NE Spain[J]. Environmental Geology, 2008, 54:515-520.
    [13]
    SENDRÒS A, DIAZ Y, HIMI M, et al. An evaluation of aquifer vulnerability in two nitrate sensitive areas of Catalonia (NE Spain) based on electrical resistivity methods[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014, 71:77-84.
    [14]
    DAILY W, RAMIREZ A, LABRECQUE D, et al. Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement[J]. Water Resources Research, 1992, 28:1429-1442.
    [15]
    JOHNSON T C, SLATER L D, NTARLAGIANIS D, et al. Monitoring groundwater-surface water interaction using time-series and time-frequency analysis of transient three-dimensional electrical resistivity changes[J]. Water Resources Research, 2012, 48:W07506.
    [16]
    薛禹群, 张幼宽. 地下水污染防治在我国水体污染控制与治理中的双重意义[J]. 环境科学学报, 2009, 29(3):474-481.
    [17]
    杨杰, 师学明, 李立. 延时性高密度电法监测土壤中盐水溶液扩散过程的初步研究[J]. 工程勘察, 2013, 41(10):90-94.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]CAO Xiuqin, LI Songyue, YANG Chao, HONG Guoyuan. RESEARCH ON INTERCEPTING CAPACITY OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF INTERCEPTING FACILITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(8): 51-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202408007
    [2]YAN Cailian, LIN Xiuli, HU Longji, LIU Jingxian. NUMERICAL SIMULATION ANALYSIS OF FILTRATION VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION OF CYLINDRICAL AND PLEATED FILTER BAGS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 225-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403028
    [3]CEN Hailin, WANG Xihui, WANG Guoqiang. RESEARCH OF SPOILER IN THE CARTRIDGE DUST-COLLECTOR BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND ORTHOGONAL EXPERIMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 206-213,228. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307028
    [4]LIU Pengyu, LI Debo, LIU Yanfeng, QUE Zhengbin, MIAO Jianjie, CHEN Zhaoli. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SCR DENITRIFICATION SYSTEM IN A COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 224-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210029
    [5]GUO Zirui, CHI Riguang. OPTIMIZATION OF THE PHYSICS PRESSURE UNDER ADD MODE IN PHA PRODUCTION WITH CFD SIMULATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 38-44. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207006
    [6]FENG Lizhong, CONG Riqiang, LIU Yi, QI Yanfang. MICROMIXER IMPROVEMENT AND VERIFICATION FOR AN SCR DENITRATION SYSTEM OF A 330 MW COAL-FIRED POWER UNIT BASED ON CFD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 156-161. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210021
    [7]CHENG Jiao, YANG Lu-lu, LIU Jing-xian. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON BAG DUST FILTER CLEANING AND REGENERATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 166-170,177. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205024
    [8]QI Ya-bing. HYDRODYNAMICS PROPERTIES OF A THREE-PHASE AIR-LIFT INTERNAL-LOOP REACTOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 134-139. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010021
    [9]YUE Wen-yi, DUAN Chao-long, XIE Dong-ming. SIMULATION OF INTERIOR FLOW FIELD IN THE COMPOSITE BAG FILTER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 120-125,95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005021
    [15]Xie Lina, Zhou Jianwei, Xu Wen. CURRENT SITUATION AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES OF TAILINGS MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRALIA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 72-76. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510016
    [16]Mao Rui, Liu Genfan, Deng Xiang, Fan Ning. NUMERICAL SIMULATION STUDY ON STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF BAG FILTER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 77-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503016
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 周良芹，王蓉，范金龙，王佳妮，许腾飞，谭文渊，付大友. NiMgAl-HTLC的制备及其对水体富营养化的抑制性能研究. 硅酸盐通报. 2024(02): 734-745 .
    2. 朱益萍. 青浦区白鹤镇村级河道底泥重金属污染调查与分析. 水资源开发与管理. 2024(04): 53-59 .
    3. 周大量，李柏霖，曾强，胡红娟，吴辰熙. 西凉湖沉积物重金属及营养元素分布特征及污染评价. 湖北农业科学. 2024(07): 53-59+66 .
    4. 张岚，李玲玲，孙士顺，王坤. 付疃河中下游表层沉积物污染状况评价. 环境科技. 2024(04): 51-57 .
    5. 宋炉生，孙振洲，胡晶，邓清海. 废弃铁矿及下游农田土壤重金属污染特征及来源解析. 环境工程. 2024(10): 155-164 . 本站查看
    6. 曾金凤，潘红，张立楠，钟建红，谢水石，周绍梅. 东江源头典型山区小流域农业面源污染解析——以定南县东江流域为例. 人民珠江. 2023(04): 1-9 .
    7. 田丰，邱春生，冯涛，姚慧，王晨晨，王少坡，孙力平. 环境因子对南水北调泵站调节池沉积物氮释放特征的影响研究. 环境污染与防治. 2023(05): 620-625 .
    8. 李文钰，侯精明，刘占衍，张松，栾广学，杜颖恩，韩占涛. 矿渣堆积对河网水质影响的数值模拟分析. 人民黄河. 2023(11): 95-99+105 .
    9. 马占琪. 小型河流典型重金属污染分布特征及风险评价研究. 绿色科技. 2022(18): 134-137 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030405060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 19.6 %FULLTEXT: 19.6 %META: 78.5 %META: 78.5 %PDF: 2.0 %PDF: 2.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 16.3 %其他: 16.3 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %上海: 7.9 %上海: 7.9 %东莞: 1.1 %东莞: 1.1 %临沂: 0.2 %临沂: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %北京: 1.8 %北京: 1.8 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 0.2 %南京: 0.2 %南通: 0.9 %南通: 0.9 %厦门: 1.1 %厦门: 1.1 %台州: 0.9 %台州: 0.9 %合肥: 0.7 %合肥: 0.7 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %天津: 1.6 %天津: 1.6 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %奥卢: 0.4 %奥卢: 0.4 %宁波: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %安卡拉: 1.6 %安卡拉: 1.6 %宜春: 0.4 %宜春: 0.4 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %徐州: 0.5 %徐州: 0.5 %德里: 1.1 %德里: 1.1 %德黑兰: 1.1 %德黑兰: 1.1 %惠州: 0.4 %惠州: 0.4 %成都: 0.5 %成都: 0.5 %扬州: 1.3 %扬州: 1.3 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 1.1 %昆明: 1.1 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 2.0 %杭州: 2.0 %榆林: 0.2 %榆林: 0.2 %武汉: 0.9 %武汉: 0.9 %沈阳: 0.9 %沈阳: 0.9 %沧州: 0.2 %沧州: 0.2 %河池: 0.5 %河池: 0.5 %泰州: 0.5 %泰州: 0.5 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %济源: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %淮安: 0.2 %淮安: 0.2 %温州: 1.4 %温州: 1.4 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %漯河: 8.6 %漯河: 8.6 %石家庄: 1.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %芒廷维尤: 20.3 %芒廷维尤: 20.3 %芝加哥: 2.2 %芝加哥: 2.2 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 1.1 %西宁: 1.1 %西安: 0.9 %西安: 0.9 %辽阳: 0.5 %辽阳: 0.5 %运城: 1.4 %运城: 1.4 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %里昂: 4.3 %里昂: 4.3 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %长沙: 3.2 %长沙: 3.2 %长治: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %鹰潭: 0.2 %鹰潭: 0.2 %龙岩: 0.5 %龙岩: 0.5 %其他其他上海东莞临沂保定北京十堰南京南通厦门台州合肥唐山嘉兴天津太原奥卢宁波安卡拉宜春宣城常州常德广州张家口徐州德里德黑兰惠州成都扬州无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州榆林武汉沈阳沧州河池泰州济南济源淮安温州湖州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡阳衢州西宁西安辽阳运城遵义邯郸郑州里昂重庆银川长沙长治马鞍山鹰潭龙岩

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (189) PDF downloads(5) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return