RESEARCH ON VOCs EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND OZONE FORMATION POTENTIAL OF TYPICAL PETROCHEMICAL PLANTS

FEI Bo; BU Mengya; ZHANG Gangfeng

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202305023

Volume 41 Issue 5

May 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2023 > 41(5): 172-178

FEI Bo, BU Mengya, ZHANG Gangfeng. RESEARCH ON VOCs EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND OZONE FORMATION POTENTIAL OF TYPICAL PETROCHEMICAL PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 172-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305023

Citation:

FEI Bo, BU Mengya, ZHANG Gangfeng. RESEARCH ON VOCs EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND OZONE FORMATION POTENTIAL OF TYPICAL PETROCHEMICAL PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 172-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305023

Citation:

PDF( 2111 KB)

RESEARCH ON VOCs EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND OZONE FORMATION POTENTIAL OF TYPICAL PETROCHEMICAL PLANTS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305023

Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences, Shanghai 200233, China

Received Date: 2021-10-15

Abstract

Abstract

Focusing on the aromatics, olefins and refining production areas of a petrochemical enterprise, a study was conducted to characterize VOCs emission from four production units with a high number of active VOCs components: aromatics continuous reforming, aromatics hydrogen production, olefins catalytic cracking and refining normal-reduced pressure distillation. The VOCs emission from the disorganized fugitive links of the units was collected using Suma canisters, and the 106 VOCs components were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and the maximum incremental reactivity (MIR) of VOCs was used to calculate the contribution of VOCs emissions from each unit to the atmospheric O₃ generation. The results showed that alkanes were the featured VOCs components in the four units, with the mass fraction share ranging from 42.17% to 93.57%. The mass fraction of halogenated hydrocarbons in the olefin cracking unit accounted for 30.08%, and the mass fraction of aromatic hydrocarbons in the normal-reduced pressure distillation unit accounted for 27.83%; propane, ethane, 1,2-dichloroethane and n-heptane were the featured species of VOCs emission from petrochemical industry enterprises; the OFP of the four units ranged from 0.49 to 30.05 mg/m³, in a descending order of refining normal reduced-pressure distillation unit (30.05 mg/m³)>aromatics hydrogen production unit (4.21 mg/m³)>aromatics continuous reforming unit (2.57 mg/m³)>olefin cracking unit (0.49 mg/m³); the contribution of the top 20 species to OFP ranged from 87.89% to 94.47%, with isobutane, propane, n-butane and p,m-xylene as the key active species in the industry. The study showed that the VOCs emitted from different production units of petrochemicals had different complex components and significant differences in their contribution to ozone generation. It is recommended to develop targeted VOCs emission reduction strategies for industry enterprises based on the screened key reactive components.
- petrochemical,
- volatile organic compounds,
- emission characteristics,
- ozone formation potential

FullText(HTML)

References(31)

References

[1]	张鸿宇,王媛,卢亚灵,等.我国臭氧污染控制分区及其控制类型识别[J/OL].中国环境科学:1-10[2021-09-09 ]. https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.20210630.001.
[2]	罗锦程,丁问薇.40年我国大气污染问题的回顾与展望——访中国工程院院士、北京大学环境科学与工程学院教授唐孝炎[J].环境保护,2018,46(20):11-13.
[3]	RUSSELL A, MILFORD J, BERGIN M S, et al. Urban ozone control and atmospheric reactivity of organic gases[J]. Science,1995, 269(5223): 491-495.
[4]	SHAO M, LU S H, LIU Y, et al. Volatile organic compounds measured in summer in Beijing and their role in ground-level ozone formation[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2009, 114(D2): 1-13.
[5]	SATO K, TAKAMI A, ISOZAKI T, et al. Mass spectrometric study of secondary organic aerosol formed from the photo-oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44(8): 1080-1087.
[6]	ODUM J R, JUNGKAMP T P W, GRIFFIN R J, et al. The atmospheric aerosol-forming potential of whole gasoline vapor[J]. Science, 1997, 276(5309): 96-99.
[7]	YUAN B, HU W W, SHAO M, et al. VOC emissions, evolutions and contributions to SOA formation at a receptor site in Eastern China[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2013, 13(17): 8815-8832.
[8]	吕大器,陆思华,谭鑫,等.典型地方炼化企业VOCs排放特征及其对二次污染生成的贡献[J].环境科学研究,2021,34(1):103-113.
[9]	刘志阳,廖程浩,孙西勃,等.石化企业挥发性有机物排放量核算常见问题分析[J].化工环保,2020,40(5):546-550.
[10]	冯云霞,贾润中,肖安山,等.石化企业挥发性有机物成分谱构建及溯源解析[J].石油炼制与化工,2020,51(1):92-96.
[11]	王韵杰,张少君,郝吉明.中国大气污染治理:进展·挑战·路径[J].环境科学研究,2019,32(10):1755-1762.
[12]	张庆阳,郭家康.打赢蓝天保卫战:国外大气污染防治及其借鉴[J].世界环境,2017(6):51-54.
[13]	陈鹏, 张月, 张梁,等. 汽车维修行业挥发性有机物排放特征及大气化学反应活性[J]. 环境科学, 2021,42(8):3604-3614.
[14]	王银海, 董莉, 刘景洋,等. 杨斌.典型溶剂使用行业O₃和SOA生成潜势分析[J]. 现代化工, 2020, 40(11): 14-19.
[15]	田亮, 魏巍, 程水源,等. 典型有机溶剂使用行业VOCs成分谱及臭氧生成潜势[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2017, 17(1): 314-320.
[16]	方莉, 刘继业, 聂磊,等. 北京市典型汽修企业VOCs排放特征与臭氧影响分析[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 38(10): 146-150 ,155.
[17]	高爽, 李时蓓, 伯鑫,等. 铸造行业挥发性有机物排放成分谱及影响[J]. 环境科学, 2021,42(4):1649-1659.
[18]	刘厚凤, 李明燕, 许鹏举,等. 某沿海城市典型行业NMHCs排放特征及对二次污染物生成潜势研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(2): 395-405.
[19]	李婷婷, 梁小明, 卢清,等. 泡沫塑料鞋制造区VOCs污染特征及臭氧生成潜势[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(8): 3260-3267.
[20]	马怡然, 高松, 王巧敏,等. 合成树脂行业挥发性有机物排放成分谱及影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2020, 40(8): 3268-3274.
[21]	LI R M, YAN Y L, PENG L, et al. Segment-based volatile organic compound emission characteristics from different types of coking plants in China[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2020, 21(1): 1-12.
[22]	程水源, 李文忠, 魏巍,等. 炼油厂分季节VOCs组成及其臭氧生成潜势分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2013, 39(3): 438-444 ,46.
[23]	陈文泰, 胡崑, 薛艳,等. 餐饮源挥发性有机物(VOCs)排放特征及对臭氧生成的影响[J]. 南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 12(6): 647-655.
[24]	CARTER W P L, ATKINSON R. Computer modelling study of incremental hydrocarbon reactivity[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 1989, 23(7): 864-880.
[25]	WANG L H, MILFORD J B, CARTER W P L. Reactivity estimates for aromatic compounds. Part 1. uncertainty in chamber-derived parameters[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2000, 34(25): 4337-4348.
[26]	WHITTEN G Z, YARWOOD G. The ozone productivity of N-propyl Bromide: Part 2——an exception to the maximum incremental reactivity scale[J]. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 2008, 58(7):891-901.
[27]	JIANG M Q, LU K D, SU R, et al. Ozone formation and key VOCs in typical Chinese city clusters[J].Chinese Science Bulletin 2018, 63: 1130-1141.
[28]	LU K D, ZHANG Y H, SU H, et al. Oxidant (O₃+NO₂) production processes and formation regimes in Beijing[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2010, 115(D7): D10306.
[29]	TAN Z F, LU K D, JIANG M Q, et al. Exploring ozone pollution in Chengdu, southwestern China: a case study from radical chemistry to O₃-VOC-NO_x sensitivity[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 636: 775-786.
[30]	TAN Z F, LU K D, JIANG M Q, et al. Daytime atmospheric oxidation capacity in four Chinese megacities during the photochemically polluted season: a case study based on box model simulation[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2019, 19(6): 3493-3513.
[31]	WANG H L. Characterization of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and the impact on ozone formation during the photochemical smog episode in Shanghai, China[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2015, 35(6): 1603-1611.

Relative Articles

[1]	WANG Xiaowei, MIN Chaohui, SONG Jun, ZHANG Jinghua, ZHAO Hongbing, CAO Chen, ZHANG Chi, LIU Tianfu, LIU Jingyin, HUANG Xiaoli, CHEN Liang, LIU Xin. EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND WHOLE PROCESS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION PATH FOR VOCs IN RAILWAY TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 102-111. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410013
[2]	XIA Qiongqiong, ZHENG Xingcan, GU Miao, LI Mai, SHANG Wei, TIAN Yongying, HUANG Haiwei, ONG Say Leong. CHARACTERIZATION OF SUMMER GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SEPTIC TANKS AND MEASUMENT OF CH₄ EMISSION FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 240-246. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409023
[3]	ZHANG Yili, LIU Hui, QIAN Xiaoyong. N₂O EMISSION FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS: EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND CONTROL STRATEGIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 9-21. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404002
[4]	YOU Yangyang, LIANG Zengqiang, HUO Ning. A PILOT STUDY ON SOIL REMEDIATION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC CONTAMINATED SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 184-189. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403023
[5]	DONG Wei, GENG Lizhi, FEI Bo. RESEARCH ON CHARACTERISTICS AND REACTIVITY OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS EMISSION FROM A COKING ENTERPRISE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 161-166. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402019
[6]	GUO Songjun, WANG Junhui, CHEN Laiguo, LIANG Xiaoming, LU Qing, ZHU Lihua, LIU Ming. COUNTERMEASURES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IN-DEPTH TREATMENT OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN PRINTING INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 202-209,228. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303027
[7]	XIAO Kai, ZHANG Xiao-wei, HAO Zhi-fei, ZHANG Yong-feng, SUN Jun-min. ANALYSIS OF OZONE FORMATION POTENTIAL AND SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOL FORMATION POTENTIAL OF VOCs IN A COKING PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 19-25,43. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209003
[8]	HE Wan-qing, YU Zhi-qiang, LIU Yi, WANG Tian-yi, YANG Tao. CHARACTERIZATION AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS EMITTED FROM COOKING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 135-142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209018
[9]	YIN Zi-yuan, ZHANG Kai-shan. MODEL ANALYSIS FOR EMISSIONS OF LIGHT-DUTY GASOLINE VEHICLES IN A TYPICAL CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 64-71. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104011
[10]	WANG Ya-qi, CHANG Tian, CHEN Qing-cai. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF COMPOSITION CHARACTERISTICS AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS FROM COOKING FUME[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 90-98. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106014
[11]	LIU Shuai, ZHANG Ya-ni, XUE Ming, CUI Xiang-yu, LI Bing, LI Jun-hua. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON ADSORPTION MATERIALS FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCs)[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 79-89. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106013
[12]	WANG Yu-lin, YUAN Liang, LIU Fa-qiang, YANG Yue. RESEARCH PROCESS IN ABSORPTION METHOD FOR REMOVAL OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(1): 21-27. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202001003
[13]	FANG Li, LIU Ji-ye, NIE Lei, HE Li-juan, WANG Hai-lin. VOCs EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND OZONE IMPACT ANALYSIS OF TYPICAL AUTOMOBILE REPAIR ENTERPRISES IN BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 146-150,155. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010023
[14]	ZHANG Xing, QIAN Zhen-qing, ZHANG De-feng, ZHU Tao, YUAN Qian-cheng, YE Ze-fu. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF COOKING FUME EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(1): 37-41,20. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202001005
[15]	ZHOU Sheng, HUANG Bao-yuan, CHEN Hui-ying, LIN Shao-xiong. POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF PM_2.5 AND O₃ IN THE PEARL RIVER DELTA AND THE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF VOCs COMPONENTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(1): 42-47,92. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202001006

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(5)

1.	杨玉敏，杜延年，时东兴. 再生器处理炼厂挥发性有机物模拟试验研究与技术特征分析. 石油化工. 2025(01): 92-98 .
2.	王子成，郑纯智，张冰洁，石丹，尤惠. 常州市人造板行业VOCs排放特征及臭氧生成潜势研究. 中国资源综合利用. 2024(02): 190-194 .
3.	卜梦雅，张钢锋，杜天君. 典型石化企业地面火炬挥发性有机物及温室气体排放特征与环境影响. 环境工程技术学报. 2024(02): 362-370 .
4.	赵飞，潘帅，张冲冲. 石油化工行业VOCs治理技术综述. 山东化工. 2024(04): 274-276 .
5.	董威，耿立志，费波. 某焦化企业挥发性有机物排放特征及反应活性探究. 环境工程. 2024(02): 161-166 . 本站查看