Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 41 Issue 5
May  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2023  >  41(5): 202-212
LI Xiaolong, ZHANG Tao, ZHAO Jingchen. INFLUENCE MECHANISM OF ABRASIVE RESISTANCE OF ACTIVATED CARBON FOR FLUE GAS PURIFICATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 45-51,60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305007
Citation: LI Yinghao, JIANG Zhao, WANG Hongchen, LIU Guohua, QI Lu. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF ANAEROBIC MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (ANMBR) PROCESS FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 202-212. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305027
shu

RESEARCH PROGRESS OF ANAEROBIC MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (ANMBR) PROCESS FOR MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305027

  • Research Center for Low Carbon Technology of Water Environment, School of Environment & Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

  • Received Date: 2021-10-03
    Abstract
  • Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) has become a powerful technology for municipal wastewater treatment due to its excellent effluent quality and high net productivity potential. However, membrane fouling causes high energy consumption. Besides, operating at ambient temperature will reduce the anaerobic microbial activity and increase the methane solubility, which is not conducive to energy recovery and greenhouse gas emission control. In addition, the widespread existence of sulfate in municipal wastewater also has a significant impact on the process of methane production. For a comprehensive understanding of AnMBR research progress in municipal wastewater treatment, this paper evaluated the process’s efficiency from three aspects: organic matters’ removal, methane yield and sludge production. Then, the main challenges and solutions in the process of technology application were analyzed and discussed. At last, the technical challenges in enhancing AnMBR development from a number of different perspectives were pointed out, aiming to provide a reference for promoting AnMBR treatment of low-concentration municipal wastewater and realizing the recovery of resources and energy in municipal wastewater.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(85)
  • [1]
    HAO X D, BATSTONE D, GUEST J S. Carbon neutrality: An ultimate goal towards sustainable wastewater treatment plants[J]. Water Research, 2015, 87: 413-415.
    [2]
    HAO X D, LIU R B, HUANG X. Evaluation of the potential for operating carbon neutral WWTPs in China[J]. Water Research, 2015, 87: 424-431.
    [3]
    KONG Z, LI L, WU J, et al. Evaluation of bio-energy recovery from the anaerobic treatment of municipal wastewater by a pilot-scale submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) at ambient temperature[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 339: 125551.
    [4]
    SMITH A L, STADLER L B, LOVE N G, et al. Perspectives on anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater: a critical review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 122: 149-159.
    [5]
    MCCARTY P L, BAE J, KIM J. Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer--can this be achieved?[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(17): 7100-7106.
    [6]
    KONG Z, WU J, RONG C, et al. Sludge yield and degradation of suspended solids by a large pilot-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor for the treatment of real municipal wastewater at 25 degrees C[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 759: 143526.
    [7]
    HU Y S, CHENG H, JI J Y, et al. A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment with a focus on multicomponent biogas and membrane fouling control[J]. Environmental Science: Water Researchearch & Technology, 2020, 6(10): 2641-2663.
    [8]
    SHIN C, BAE J. Current status of the pilot-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatments of domestic wastewaters: a critical review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 247: 1038-1046.
    [9]
    MAAZ M, YASIN M, ASLAM M, et al. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: novel configurations, fouling control and energy considerations[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 283: 358-372.
    [10]
    HOFS B, OGIER J, VRIES D, et al. Comparison of ceramic and polymeric membrane permeability and fouling using surface water[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2011, 79(3): 365-374.
    [11]
    KONG Z, WU J, RONG C, et al. Large pilot-scale submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for the treatment of municipal wastewater and biogas production at 25 degrees C[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 319: 124123.
    [12]
    SHIN C, MCCARTY P L, KIM J, et al. Pilot-scale temperate-climate treatment of domestic wastewater with a staged anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor (SAF-MBR)[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 159: 95-103.
    [13]
    CHEN C, GUO W S, NGO H H, et al. Impact of reactor configurations on the performance of a granular anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2017, 121: 131-138.
    [14]
    LIU Z W, ZHU X Z, LIANG P, et al. Distinction between polymeric and ceramic membrane in AnMBR treating municipal wastewater: in terms of irremovable fouling[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019: 588:117229.
    [15]
    ASLAM M, MCCARTY P L, SHIN C, et al. Low energy single-staged anaerobic fluidized bed ceramic membrane bioreactor (AFCMBR) for wastewater treatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 240: 33-41.
    [16]
    JEONG Y, CHO K, KWON E E, et al. Evaluating the feasibility of pyrophyllite-based ceramic membranes for treating domestic wastewater in anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactors[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 328: 567-573.
    [17]
    AN Y, WANG Z W, WU Z C, et al. Characterization of membrane foulants in an anaerobic non-woven fabric membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 155(3): 709-715.
    [18]
    YANG Y, ZANG Y, HU Y S, et al. Upflow anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for wastewater treatment at room temperature and short HRTs: process characteristics and practical applicability[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 383:123186.
    [19]
    OZGUN H, GIMENEZ J B, ERSAHIN M E, et al. Impact of membrane addition for effluent extraction on the performance and sludge characteristics of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors treating municipal wastewater[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 479: 95-104.
    [20]
    KIM J, KIM K, YE H, et al. Anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45: 576-581.
    [21]
    MARTIN-GARCIA I, MONSALVO V, PIDOU M, et al. Impact of membrane configuration on fouling in anaerobic membrane bioreactors[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 382(1/2): 41-49.
    [22]
    JI J Y, SAKUMA S, NI J L, et al. Application of two anaerobic membrane bioreactors with different pore size membranes for municipal wastewater treatment[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 745: 140903.
    [23]
    CHEN C, SUN M Z, LIU Z W, et al. Robustness of granular activated carbon-synergized anaerobic membrane bioreactor for pilot-scale application over a wide seasonal temperature change[J]. Water Research, 2021, 189: 116552.
    [24]
    SHIN C, TILMANS S H, CHEN F, et al. Temperate climate energy-positive anaerobic secondary treatment of domestic wastewater at pilot-scale[J]. Water Research, 2021, 204: 117598.
    [25]
    LEI Z, YANG S M, LI Y Y, et al. Application of anaerobic membrane bioreactors to municipal wastewater treatment at ambient temperature: a review of achievements, challenges, and perspectives[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 267: 756-768.
    [26]
    VELASCO P, JEGATHEESAN V, THANGAVADIVEL K, et al. A focused review on membrane contactors for the recovery of dissolved methane from anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) effluents[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 278:130448.
    [27]
    FOGLIA A, AKYOL Ç, FRISON N, et al. Long-term operation of a pilot-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treating high salinity low loaded municipal wastewater in real environment[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 236:116279.
    [28]
    SONG X Y, LUO W H, HAI F I, et al. Resource recovery from wastewater by anaerobic membrane bioreactors: opportunities and challenges[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 270: 669-677.
    [29]
    SÁRVÁRI HORVÁTH I, TABATABAEI M, KARIMI K, et al. Recent updates on biogas production: a review[J]. Biofuel Research Journal, 2016, 3(2): 394-402.
    [30]
    ASLAM A, KHAN S J, SHAHZAD H M A. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) for municipal wastewater treatment- potential benefits, constraints, and future perspectives: An updated review[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2022, 802:149612.
    [31]
    VINARDELL S, ASTALS S, PECES M, et al. Advances in anaerobic membrane bioreactor technology for municipal wastewater treatment: a 2020 updated review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, 130:109936.
    [32]
    YUE X D, KOH Y K, NG H Y. Effects of dissolved organic matters (DOMs) on membrane fouling in anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactors (AnCMBRs) treating domestic wastewater[J]. Water Research, 2015, 86: 96-107.
    [33]
    QUEK P J, YEAP T S, NG H Y. Applicability of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket and dynamic membrane-coupled process for the treatment of municipal wastewater[J].Applied Microbiology And Biotechnology, 2017, 101(16): 6531-6540.
    [34]
    BUONOCORE E, MELLINO S, de ANGELIS G, et al. Life cycle assessment indicators of urban wastewater and sewage sludge treatment[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 94: 13-23.
    [35]
    COMA M, ROVIRA S, CANALS J, et al. Minimization of sludge production by a side-stream reactor under anoxic conditions in a pilot plant[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 129: 229-235.
    [36]
    HUANG X, GUI P, QIAN Y. Effect of sludge retention time on microbial behaviour in a submerged membrane bioreactor[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2001, 36(10): 1001-1006.
    [37]
    LEITE W R M, GOTTARDO M, PAVAN P, et al. Performance and energy aspects of single and two phase thermophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge[J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 86: 1324-1331.
    [38]
    GIMENEZ J B, MARTI N, ROBLES A, et al. Anaerobic treatment of urban wastewater in membrane bioreactors: evaluation of seasonal temperature variations[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2014, 69(7): 1581-1588.
    [39]
    LETTINGA G, REBAC S, ZEEMAN G. Challenge of psychrophilic anaerobic wastewater treatment[J]. Trends in Biotechnology, 2001, 19(9): 363-370.
    [40]
    GOUVEIA J, PLAZA F, GARRALON G, et al. Long-term operation of a pilot scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for the treatment of municipal wastewater under psychrophilic conditions[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 185: 225-233.
    [41]
    GOUVEIA J, PLAZA F, GARRALON G, et al. A novel configuration for an anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactor (AnSMBR). Long-term treatment of municipal wastewater under psychrophilic conditions[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 198: 510-519.
    [42]
    CALDERON K, RODELAS B, CABIROL N, et al. Analysis of microbial communities developed on the fouling layers of a membrane-coupled anaerobic bioreactor applied to wastewater treatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(7): 4618-4627.
    [43]
    LIM K, EVANS P J, PARAMESWARAN P. Long-term performance of a pilot-scale gas-sparged anaerobic membrane bioreactor under ambient temperatures for holistic wastewater treatment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(13): 7347-7354.
    [44]
    GIMENEZ J B, ROBLES A, CARRETERO L, et al. Experimental study of the anaerobic urban wastewater treatment in a submerged hollow-fibre membrane bioreactor at pilot scale[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(19): 8799-8806.
    [45]
    SHAHID M K, KASHIF A, ROUT P R, et al. A brief review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors emphasizing recent advancements, fouling issues and future perspectives[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 270: 110909.
    [46]
    ANJUM F, KHAN I M, KIM J, et al. Trends and progress in AnMBR for domestic wastewater treatment and their impacts on process efficiency and membrane fouling[J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2021, 21:101204.
    [47]
    MENG F G, ZHANG S Q, OH Y, et al. Fouling in membrane bioreactors: an updated review[J]. Water Research, 2017, 114: 151-180.
    [48]
    CHEN J R, ZHANG M J, LI F Q, et al. Membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor: high filtration resistance of gel layer and its underlying mechanism[J]. Water Research, 2016, 102: 82-89.
    [49]
    YANG Y, BOGLER A, RONEN Z, et al. Initial deposition and pioneering colonization on polymeric membranes of anaerobes isolated from an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR)[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(9): 5832-5842.
    [50]
    ZHOU Z B, MENG F G, HE X, et al. Metaproteomic analysis of biocake proteins to understand membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(2): 1068-1077.
    [51]
    WANG Z W, MA J X, TANG C Y, et al. Membrane cleaning in membrane bioreactors: a review[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 468: 276-307.
    [52]
    RUIGÓMEZ I, VERA L, GONZÁLEZ E, et al. A novel rotating HF membrane to control fouling on anaerobic membrane bioreactors treating wastewater[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 501: 45-52.
    [53]
    ELISEUS A, BILAD M R, NORDIN N, et al. Two-way switch: Maximizing productivity of tilted panel in membrane bioreactor[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 228: 529-537.
    [54]
    SOHN W, GUO W S, NGO H H, et al. A review on membrane fouling control in anaerobic membrane bioreactors by adding performance enhancers[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2021, 40:101867.
    [55]
    LEI Z, YANG S M, LI X, et al. Revisiting the effects of powdered activated carbon on membrane fouling mitigation in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor by evaluating long-term impacts on the surface layer[J]. Water Research, 2019, 167: 115137.
    [56]
    LEI Z, MA Y, WANG J, et al. Biochar addition supports high digestion performance and low membrane fouling rate in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor under low temperatures[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 330: 124966.
    [57]
    RUIGÓMEZ I, GONZÁLEZ E, GUERRA S, et al. Evaluation of a novel physical cleaning strategy based on HF membrane rotation during the backwashing/relaxation phases for anaerobic submerged MBR[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 526: 181-190.
    [58]
    LEE E, ROUT P R, SHIN C, et al. Effects of sodium hypochlorite concentration on the methanogenic activity in an anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 678: 85-93.
    [59]
    HUANG S J, ZHANG H, ALBERT NG T C, et al. Analysis of N-Acy-L-homoserine lactones (AHLs) in wastewater treatment systems using SPE-LLE with LC-MS/MS[J]. Water Research, 2020, 177: 115756.
    [60]
    MA H J, WANG X Z, ZHANG Y, et al. The diversity, distribution and function of N-acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) in industrial anaerobic granular sludge[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 247: 116-124.
    [61]
    LIU J B, ENG C Y, HO J S, et al. Quorum quenching in anaerobic membrane bioreactor for fouling control[J]. Water Research, 2019, 156: 159-167.
    [62]
    XU B Y, ALBERT NG T C, HUANG S, et al. Feasibility of isolated novel facultative quorum quenching consortiums for fouling control in an AnMBR[J]. Water Research, 2020, 169: 115251.
    [63]
    XU B Y, NG T C A, HUANG S T, et al. Effect of quorum quenching on EPS and size-fractioned particles and organics in anaerobic membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment[J]. Water Research, 2020, 179: 115850.
    [64]
    PLEVRI A, MAMAIS D, NOUTSOPOULOS C. Anaerobic MBR technology for treating municipal wastewater at ambient temperatures[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 275: 129961.
    [65]
    WATANABE R, NIE Y, WAKAHARA S, et al. Investigation on the response of anaerobic membrane bioreactor to temperature decrease from 25℃ to 10℃ in sewage treatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 243: 747-754.
    [66]
    OZGUN H, TAO Y, ERSAHIN M E, et al. Impact of temperature on feed-flow characteristics and filtration performance of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket coupled ultrafiltration membrane treating municipal wastewater[J]. Water Research, 2015, 83: 71-83.
    [67]
    DEV S, SAHA S, KURADE M B, et al. Perspective on anaerobic digestion for biomethanation in cold environments[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 103: 85-95.
    [68]
    FINKE N, JORGENSEN B B. Response of fermentation and sulfate reduction to experimental temperature changes in temperate and Arctic marine sediments[J]. The Ism Journal, 2008, 2(8): 815-829.
    [69]
    FERRARI F, BALCAZAR J L, RODRIGUEZ-RODA I, et al. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor for biogas production from concentrated sewage produced during sewer mining[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 670: 993-1000.
    [70]
    SMITH A L, SKERLOS S J, RASKIN L. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater at psychrophilic temperatures ranging from 15℃ to 3℃[J]. Environmental Science: Water Researchearch & Technology, 2015, 1(1): 56-64.
    [71]
    CRONE B C, GARLAND J L, SORIAL G A, et al. Significance of dissolved methane in effluents of anaerobically treated low strength wastewater and potential for recovery as an energy product: a review[J]. Water Research, 2016, 104: 520-531.
    [72]
    SMITH A L, STADLER L B, CAO L, et al. Navigating wastewater energy recovery strategies: a life cycle comparison of anaerobic membrane bioreactor and conventional treatment systems with anaerobic digestion[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(10): 5972-5981.
    [73]
    DOLEJS P, OZCAN O, BAIR R, et al. Effect of psychrophilic temperature shocks on a gas-lift anaerobic membrane bioreactor (Gl-AnMBR) treating synthetic domestic wastewater[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2017, 16: 108-114.
    [74]
    RONGWONG W, GOH K, BAE T H. Energy analysis and optimization of hollow fiber membrane contactors for recovery of dissolve methane from anaerobic membrane bioreactor effluent[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2018, 554: 184-194.
    [75]
    LI X S, DUTTA A, DONG Q R, et al. Dissolved methane harvesting using omniphobic membranes for anaerobically treated wastewaters[J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2019, 6(4): 228-234.
    [76]
    EVANS P J, PARAMESWARAN P, LIM K, et al. A comparative pilot-scale evaluation of gas-sparged and granular activated carbon-fluidized anaerobic membrane bioreactors for domestic wastewater treatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 288: 120949.
    [77]
    SONG X Y, LUO W H, MCDONALD J, et al. Effects of sulphur on the performance of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor: biological stability, trace organic contaminant removal, and membrane fouling[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 250: 171-177.
    [78]
    PRETEL R, ROBLES A, RUANO M V, et al. The operating cost of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treating sulphate-rich urban wastewater[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2014, 126: 30-38.
    [79]
    PETROPOULOS E, YU Y, TABRAIZ S, et al. High rate domestic wastewater treatment at 15℃ using anaerobic reactors inoculated with cold-adapted sediments/soils-shaping robust methanogenic communities[J]. Environmental Science: Water Researchearch & Technology, 2019, 5(1): 70-82.
    [80]
    MUCHA Z, WÓJCIK W, POLUS M, et al. Brief review of operation of anaerobic wastewater treatment with membrane bioreactors[J]. E3S Web of Conferences, 2019, 86(19):00020.
    [81]
    KOBAYASHI T, XU K Q, CHIKU H. Release of extracellular polymeric substance and disintegration of anaerobic granular sludge under reduced sulfur compounds-rich conditions[J]. Energies, 2015, 8(8): 7968-7985.
    [82]
    HARCLERODE M, DOODY A, BROWER A, et al. Life cycle assessment and economic analysis of anaerobic membrane bioreactor whole-plant configurations for resource recovery from domestic wastewater[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 269: 110720.
    [83]
    CHEN R, NIE Y L, HU Y S, et al. Fouling behaviour of soluble microbial products and extracellular polymeric substances in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating low-strength wastewater at room temperature[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2017, 531: 1-9.
    [84]
    FOGLIA A, ANDREOLA C, CIPOLLETTA G, et al. Comparative life cycle environmental and economic assessment of anaerobic membrane bioreactor and disinfection for reclaimed water reuse in agricultural irrigation: a case study in Italy[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 293:126201.
    [85]
    PENA M, DO NASCIMENTO T, GOUVEIA J, et al. Anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactor (AnSMBR) treating municipal wastewater at ambient temperature: operation and potential use for agricultural irrigation[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 282: 285-293.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]XU Jiarui, LIU Hao, LUAN Weihao, WANG Chao, LIU Changqing, YANG Yandong. ADSORPTION PERFORMANCE OF DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTER BY IRON-MODIFIED ACTIVATED CARBON FROM SECONDARY EFFLUENT OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 67-72. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403008
    [2]TAN Yujie, CHEN Yayi, ZHOU Binjie, LU Xueqin, ZHEN Guangyin, HU Weijie. PROMOTING DEWATERABILITY OF WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE BY ACTIVATED CARBON ACTIVATED PERSULFATE OXIDATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 70-74. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405009
    [3]MA Yuhui, ZHANG Yizhong, GUO Jian, HUO Hanxin. PREPARATION OF ACTIVATED CARBON FROM HAWTHORN SEED VIA TWO-STEP PYROLYSIS-CO2 ACTIVATION METHOD FOR ADSORPTION OF LOMEFLOXACIN FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 147-155. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403018
    [4]LIANG Wenjun, LU Dan, HU Wei. EVALUATION OF ADSORPTION PERFORMANCE USING COMMERCIAL ACTIVATED CARBON FOR TYPICAL GASOLINE-VAPOR VOCs AT SERVICE STATIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 65-72. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410009
    [5]SHI En, ZHANG Shuai, ZHANG Miao, LIU Shasha, ZOU Yuliang, ZHANG Xiangzhi. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF SLUDGE-BASED ACTIVATED CARBON PREPARATION PROCESS BASED ON LIFE CYCLE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 40-47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402005
    [6]SONG Na, ZHAO Pan, GUAN Weijie, CHEN Liwei, ZHANG Shuang, WANG Qunhui. EFFECT OF ELECTRO-FERMENTATION ON HIGH TEMPERATURE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTE AND SPENT MUSHROOM SUBSTRATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 145-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307020
    [7]WU Xinming, AN Hao, ZHAO Junyu, OU Zixuan, HAO Liangshan, LI Chao. PREPARATION OF Fe/Mn-PAC CATALYSTS AND DEGRADATION OF REACTIVE BRILLIANT BLUE KN-R BY CATALYTIC OZONATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 32-39. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304005
    [8]YANG Qiling, WANG Ruwei. EVOLUTION CHARACTERISTIC AND KINETIC MODEL FOR FUNCTIONAL GROUPS IN BITUMINOUS COAL DURING PYROLYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 138-144. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307019
    [9]DU Minghui, BI Yingying, DONG Li, WANG Yong, SUN Xiaoming. INFLUENCE MECHANISM OF ACTIVATED CARBON PARTICLE SIZE ON O3-AC TREATMENT OF ORGANIC WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 22-28. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204004
    [10]DANG Xiaoqing, JING Kairui, MA Hongzhou, DONG Haoyun, CAO Li, LI Yu, LIU Xia, LI Shijie. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH ON VACUUM-THERMAL REGENERATION OF ACTIVATED CARBON FOR ADSORPTION OF VOCs AND THE INFLUENCING FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 62-68,130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208008
    [11]LIU Zhuan-nian, TENG Ying-ying, FAN Yi-dan. PREPARATION OF GO/AC/Ti COMPOSITE ELECTRODE AND ITS ADSORPTION ELECTROLYSIS PERFORMANCE ON METHYL ORANGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 143-148. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111018
    [12]CHEN Li, LI Jia-bin, FU Wan-yi, ZHANG Xi-hui. EFFECT OF CERAMIC MEMBRANE COMBINED PROCESS IN TREATMENT OF SLUDGE WATER FROM DRINKING WATER TREATMENT PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(7): 80-87,12. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107009
    [13]LUO Ya-yue, LI Cui-qing, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Chen, SONG Yong-ji, WANG Hong. RESEARCH PROGRESS IN CATALYSTS FOR SELECTIVE CATALYTIC OXIDATION OF NITRIC OXIDE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 101-105,88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101015
    [14]LIU Yan-ling, LI Tian-yu, WANG Xiao-mao, XIE Yue-feng, HUANG Xia. INFLUENCE MECHANISM OF SURFACE PROPERTIES ON FOULING BEHAVIORS OF HIGH-PRESSURE MEMBRANES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(7): 46-53,45. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107005
    [15]ZHU Tao, HAN Yi-wei, WANG Ruo-nan, ZHANG Xing, LIU Hai-bing, LIU Feng. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON VACUUM PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION OF LOW CONCENTRATION COAL-BED METHANE IN TWIN TOWERS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 156-161,46. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010025
    [16]CHEN Mei-feng, LI Xin-li, YANG Pei-lin, LUO Qian, QIN Fan-xin. STABILIZATION OF AS CONTAMINATED SOILS BY MODIFIED NANO-TITANIUM DIOXIDE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 222-227. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010035
    [17]SHAN Wei, WANG Yan, ZHENG Kai-kai, LI Ji. TECHNOLOGY COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS ON COD REMOVAL UPGRADING OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS FOR HIGH PROPORTION OF INDUSTRY WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 32-37,24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007005
    [18]SHI Hui-min, WANG Qun-hui, NI Jin, GAO Ming, WU Chuan-fu. DEGRADATION OF AMOXICILLIN SIMULATED WASTEWATER USING A THREE-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRODES REACTOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 30-35. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005006
    [19]CHEN Wei-gang, WU Hai-xia, FAN Jia-wei. ACTIVATED CARBON HETEROGENEOUS ACTIVATION OF DIFFERENT PERSULFATES TO DEGRADATION AZO DYE ACID ORANGE Ⅱ[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 113-118,57. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008019
    [20]Zhang Xiaoxu, Zhang Hongyu, Li Guoxue, . EFFECT OF ADDITIVE QUANTITY OF STALKS ON H2 S AND NH3 EMISSION DURING KITCHEN WASTE COMPOSTING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 95-99. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501022
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 孟豪，折媛，苗红生，李纪萱，沈正华，邢相栋，张朝晖. 冶炼烟气脱硝用碳基低温NH_3-SCR催化剂研究进展. 功能材料. 2024(08): 8075-8082 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.3 %FULLTEXT: 14.3 %META: 82.6 %META: 82.6 %PDF: 3.1 %PDF: 3.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 18.0 %其他: 18.0 %其他: 0.6 %其他: 0.6 %China: 1.9 %China: 1.9 %保定: 0.6 %保定: 0.6 %北京: 1.9 %北京: 1.9 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %合肥: 1.9 %合肥: 1.9 %嘉兴: 1.2 %嘉兴: 1.2 %大同: 1.2 %大同: 1.2 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %常德: 1.9 %常德: 1.9 %广州: 2.5 %广州: 2.5 %弗吉: 0.6 %弗吉: 0.6 %成都: 1.2 %成都: 1.2 %扬州: 1.2 %扬州: 1.2 %无锡: 1.2 %无锡: 1.2 %昆明: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %杭州: 3.1 %杭州: 3.1 %武汉: 1.9 %武汉: 1.9 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %漯河: 2.5 %漯河: 2.5 %濮阳: 1.2 %濮阳: 1.2 %盐城: 1.9 %盐城: 1.9 %石嘴山: 0.6 %石嘴山: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %胡志明: 1.9 %胡志明: 1.9 %芒廷维尤: 19.3 %芒廷维尤: 19.3 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %西宁: 16.8 %西宁: 16.8 %贵阳: 1.9 %贵阳: 1.9 %运城: 3.1 %运城: 3.1 %连云港: 1.2 %连云港: 1.2 %遵义: 0.6 %遵义: 0.6 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %长沙: 1.9 %长沙: 1.9 %其他其他China保定北京南京合肥嘉兴大同宣城常德广州弗吉成都扬州无锡昆明晋城杭州武汉温州漯河濮阳盐城石嘴山福州胡志明芒廷维尤芝加哥西宁贵阳运城连云港遵义郑州重庆长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (286) PDF downloads(24) Cited by(1)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return