Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
XIE Baohua, YAN Zhenning, ZHANG Shuyan, MEI Baoling, QIAO Peiyang, WANG Xiaojie, LIU Zhanhang, HAN Guangxuan. VEGETATION CHARACTERISTICS AND CONTROL TECHNIQUES OF SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA IN DIFFERENT TIDAL FLAT HABITATS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 1-8,16. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306001
Citation: XIE Baohua, YAN Zhenning, ZHANG Shuyan, MEI Baoling, QIAO Peiyang, WANG Xiaojie, LIU Zhanhang, HAN Guangxuan. VEGETATION CHARACTERISTICS AND CONTROL TECHNIQUES OF SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA IN DIFFERENT TIDAL FLAT HABITATS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 1-8,16. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306001

VEGETATION CHARACTERISTICS AND CONTROL TECHNIQUES OF SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA IN DIFFERENT TIDAL FLAT HABITATS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306001
  • Received Date: 2023-03-02
    Available Online: 2023-09-02
  • Spartina alterniflora is one of the most harmful alien invasive species in the coastal areas of China. It is of great significance to explore efficient and feasible control technology of S. alterniflora to protect the intertidal ecological environment. Based on the long-term field investigation and in-situ experiments in the Yellow River Delta, this study revealed the efficacies of different control techniques of S. alterniflora. From the middle of June, 2018, 2 to 4 times of mowing (the stubble height was less than 3cm, and the interval between adjacent mowing events was approximately 15 days) could eliminate more than 99% of S. alterniflora, and the control efficacy was still as high as 98.8% at the end of the second growing season. Mowing plus ploughing in mid-December resulted in a controlled efficacy of 99.7% at the end of the second growing season. The tidal flat elevation gradually increased from sea to land, and the environmental factors such as soil's physical and chemical properties changed accordingly. The density, plant height and biomass of S. alterniflora increased first and then decreased with the increase of elevation. Considering the growth characteristics, habitat characteristics of S. alterniflora and the efficacies of different control techniques, a control technology system of S. alterniflora suitable for different tidal flat habitats was summarized. In the low tidal flat, middle tidal flat and high tidal flat, mowing close to the ground, mowing plus waterlogging, and mowing plus tilling were recommended, respectively. For S. alterniflora in river channels or ditches, mowing plus tilling or mowing plus waterlogging were recommended according to the factors, such as the width of the channels or ditches. For S. alterniflora on the ditch slope, mowing plus shading was recommended.
  • [1]
    闫振宁, 梅宝玲, 张桂萍, 等. 高程对盐沼湿地互花米草生长与扩散的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(6):1183-1191.
    [2]
    NIE M, LIU W, PENNINGS S C, et al. Lessons from the invasion of Spartina alterniflora in coastal China[J]. Ecology, 2022:e3874-e3874.
    [3]
    徐国万, 卓荣宗, 曹豪, 等. 互花米草生物量年动态及其与滩涂生境的关系[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学学报, 1989, 13(3):230-235.
    [4]
    LIN H J, HSU C B, LIAO S H, et al. Effects of Spartina alterniflora Invasion on the Abundance and Community of Meiofauna in a Subtropical Wetland[J]. Wetlands, 2015, 35(3):547-556.
    [5]
    LI H Y, MAO D H, WANG Z M, et al. Invasion of Spartina alterniflora in the coastal zone of mainland China:control achievements from 2015 to 2020 towards the Sustainable Development Goals[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 323:116242.
    [6]
    苗青, 翟强, 徐树军, 等. 关于互花米草在辽宁分布的商榷[J]. 植物检疫, 2022, 36(4):1-7.
    [7]
    CHUNG C H. Forty years of ecological engineering with Spartina plantations in China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2006, 27(1):49-57.
    [8]
    ADAMS J, VAN WYK E, RIDDIN T. First record of Spartina alterniflora in southern Africa indicates adaptive potential of this saline grass[J]. Biological Invasions, 2016, 18(8):2153-2158.
    [9]
    TAYLOR CM, HASTINGS A. Finding optimal control strategies for invasive species:a density-structured model for Spartina alterniflora[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 41(6):1049-1057.
    [10]
    MAO D H, WANG Z M, DU B J, et al. National wetland mapping in China:a new product resulting from object-based and hierarchical classification of Landsat 8 OLI images[J]. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2020, 164:11-25.
    [11]
    宗影, 阳佳伶, 刘红玉, 等. 互花米草入侵对盐城淤泥质潮滩湿地潮沟系统影响研究[J]. 海洋科学进展, 2023, 41(1):109-122.
    [12]
    ZHANG M, SCHWARZ C, Lin W P, et al. A new perspective on the impacts of Spartina alterniflora invasion on Chinese wetlands in the context of climate change:a case study of the Jiuduansha Shoals, Yangtze Estuary[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 868:161477.
    [13]
    陈潘, 张燕, 朱晓静, 等. 互花米草入侵对鸟类的生态影响[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(7):2282-2290.
    [14]
    REN J L, CHEN J S, XU C L, et al. An invasive species erodes the performance of coastal wetland protected areas[J]. Science Advances, 2021, 7(42):eabi8943.
    [15]
    于冬雪, 韩广轩, 王晓杰, 等. 互花米草入侵对黄河口潮沟形态特征和植物群落分布的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 41(1):42-49.
    [16]
    JIANG S Y, ZHANG C X, CHEN L L, et al. Effects of Smooth Cordgrass Spartina alterniflora Invasion on Macrobenthic Fauna in the Yellow River Delta[J]. Wetlands, 2022, 42(1):13.
    [17]
    程梦雨, 程梦奇, 汪祝方, 等. 不同耐盐植物协同复合填料强化人工湿地净化含盐废水[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(8):7-14.
    [18]
    谢宝华, 路峰, 韩广轩. 入侵植物互花米草的资源化利用研究进展. 中国生态农业学报(中英文)[J], 2019, 27(12):1870-1879.
    [19]
    HEDGE P, KRIWOKEN L K, PATTEN K. A review of Spartina management in Washington State, US[J]. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 2003, 41:82-90.
    [20]
    XIE B, HAN G, QIAO P, et al. Effects of mechanical and chemical control on invasive Spartina alterniflora in the Yellow River Delta, China[J]. PeerJ, 2019, 7:e7655 DOI 10.7717/peerj.7655.
    [21]
    谢宝华, 王安东, 赵亚杰, 等. 刈割加淹水对互花米草萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(2):417-423.
    [22]
    乔沛阳, 王安东, 谢宝华, 等. 除草剂对黄河三角洲入侵植物互花米草的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(15):5627?5634.
    [23]
    秦璐, 宋秀凯, 刘丽娟, 等. 除草剂高效氟吡甲禾灵对海洋生物的急性毒性与水质基准推导[J]. 环境科学研究, 2022:1-14.
    [24]
    谢宝华, 韩广轩. 外来入侵种互花米草防治研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(10):3464-3476.
    [25]
    于彩芬, 许道艳, 刘长安, 等. 海洋保护地内施用除草剂防治互花米草的监管研究[J]. 环境生态学, 2021, 3(9):38-40.
    [26]
    朱晓泾, 袁琳, 赵志远, 等. 环境因子对互花米草定居潮滩的影响分析[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019(6):140-152.
    [27]
    XIE T, WANG Q, NING Z H, et al. Artificial modification on lateral hydrological connectivity promotes range expansion of invasive Spartina alterniflora in salt marshes of the Yellow River delta, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 769:144476.
    [28]
    赵志远, 袁琳, 李伟, 等. 生境异质性及源株密度对互花米草入侵力的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(18):6632-6641.
    [29]
    薛媛媛, 闫丹丹, 戚丽萍, 等. 江苏大丰麋鹿国家级自然保护区互花米草对水盐梯度的生态响应[J]. 环境科学学报, 2022, 42(1):28-35.
    [30]
    赵相健, 赵彩云, 柳晓燕, 等. 不同纬度地区互花米草生长性状及适应性研究[J]. 生态科学, 2015, 34(1):119-128.
    [31]
    李伟, 袁琳, 张利权, 等. 海三棱藨草及互花米草对模拟盐胁迫的响应及其耐盐阈值[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018:37(9):2596-2602.
    [32]
    XUE L, LI X Z, ZHANG Q, et al. Elevated salinity and inundation will facilitate the spread of invasive Spartina alterniflora in the Yangtze River Estuary, China[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2018, 506:144-154.
    [33]
    黄冠闽. 漳江口红树林区互花米草的生长特性及其与秋茄的相对竞争力.[D]. 厦门:厦门大学, 2009.
    [34]
    林贻卿, 谭芳林, 肖华山, 等. 不同时期刈割对互花米草根系生理影响的研究[J]. 湿地科学, 2010(4):371-378.
    [35]
    平原, 张利权. 物理措施控制互花米草的长期效果研究[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2010, 29(1):32-35.
    [36]
    TANG L, GAO Y, WANG J Q, et al. Designing an effective clipping regime for controlling the invasive plant Spartina alterniflora in an estuarine salt marsh[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2009, 35(5):874-881.
    [37]
    李贺鹏, 张利权. 外来植物互花米草的物理控制实验研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, (6):44-55.
    [38]
    李飞飞, 高珂晓, 朱金方, 等. 综合物理防控技术对盐城大丰港互花米草的控制效果[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(24):9637-9644.
    [39]
    RIDDIN T, VAN WYK E, ADAMS J. The rise and fall of an invasive estuarine grass[J]. South African Journal of Botany, 2016, 107:74-79.
    [40]
    PATTEN K, O'CASEY C, METZGER C. Large-scale chemical control of smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) in Willapa Bay, WA:towards eradication and ecological restoration[J]. Invasive Plant Science and Management 2017, 10:284-292.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Libiao, WANG Xuesong, WU Weifeng, ZHOU Huazhen, ZHENG Jiajun, ZHANG Miaojia. EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT AND DISPATCH OPTIMIZATION OF WATER PUMP OPERATIONS AT THE HONGPAN WATER TREATMENT PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 140-145. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411015
    [2]WANG Lei, YU Kun, CHEN Hui, MAO Zhekai, ZHANG Lingqin, XU Yuntao. APPLICATION OF UNMANNED INSPECTION IN WATER SUPPLY PIPELINE NETWORK BASED ON THE FUSION OF FIBER OPTIC SENSING AND VIDEO AI TECHNOLOGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 59-63. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311010
    [3]LIN Yudao, TAO Tao, XIN Kunlun, PU Zhengheng, CHEN Lei. GRAPH DEEP LEARNING: APPLICATION ON SHORT-TERM WATER DEMAND FORECASTING FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 149-153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304021
    [4]SONG Wenke, WANG Shanyue, TAO Tao. A LEAKAGE ZONE IDENTIFICATION METHOD FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS BASED ON VIRTUAL PRESSURE PARTITION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 184-191. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307025
    [5]MEN Yan, LIU Lingjie, ZHU Yaxin, BI Yanmeng, MENG Fansheng, YU Jingjie, WANG Shaopo. EFFECT OF ORGANIC MATTER CONCENTRATION VARIATION ON NITROGEN REMOVAL PERFORMANCE AND BACTERIA COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN A HYBRID SBR ANAMMOX SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 83-90. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308011
    [6]LI Cong, DU Rui, PENG Yongzhen. NITROGEN REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND CARBON SOURCE UTILIZATION CHARACTERISTICS OF PARTIAL DENITRIFICATION COUPLING ANAMMOX PROCESSES WITH DIFFERENT SLUDGE AGGREGATION MODES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 1-9. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309001
    [7]CHEN Xinyu, HOU Bingqian, GENG Ru, ZHOU Xiangtong, WU Zhiren, WEI Jing. A REVIEW OF MEMBRANE BIOFOULING CONTROL IN WATER TREATMENT BASED ON QUORUM SENSING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 251-259. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211033
    [8]LI Ruiting, ZHANG Wenrui, LI Aimin, SHUANG Chendong, ZHOU Qing, SHI Peng. REGULATORY MECHANISM OF INTERFACE PROPERTIES OF ENVIRONMENTAL FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS ON BIOFILM FORMATION AND METABOLIC FUNCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 206-221,178. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207030
    [9]HONG Yiqun, CHEN Liping, GONG Yanfeng, XUE Fangling, ZHOU Yanjie, WANG Shiling. EFFECT OF BIOFILM ON SUSPENDED PARTICLES TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA BASED ON LBM-DEM COUPLING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 101-108. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207015
    [10]WANG Jiaquan, LI Zhirong, HUANG Chuyu, LI Zhaomin, XIN Kunlun. LEAKAGE LOCATION METHODS OF WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORK BASED ON TEMPORAL AND PRESSURE SPATIAL FEATURES WITH PHYSICAL EXPERIMENT VERIFICATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 233-240. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206030
    [11]LI Junyu, LIU Shuming, WU Xue, XIE Tao, JIN Ye. OPTIMIZATION OF URBAN WATER SUPPLY NETWORK BASED ON DYNAMIC PRUNING MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 226-232,153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206029
    [12]LUO Xiao-nan, YANG Yi-qing, ZHANG Nan, MENG Fan-gang. PERFORMANCE OF NITROGEN REMOVAL AND MICROBIAL INTERACTION IN A TWO-STAGE DYNAMIC MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(7): 108-115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107013
    [13]SUN Hao, YU Tong, YIN Hao-shuai, ZHAO Fei, SHI Xue-qing, BI Xue-jun. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON BIOFOULING OF REVERSE OSMOSIS AND ITS MONITORING AND CONTROL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(7): 62-72. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107007
    [14]KANG Xiao-feng, WANG Li-sheng, LIU Chun, LIU Yan-chen, HUANG Xia. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF NITROGEN REMOVAL IN MEMBRANE AERATED BIOFILM REACTOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(7): 38-45. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107004
    [15]WAN Ming-yue, DU Ji-ming, LI Jun, LI Yi, WANG Long-fei. INFLUENCE OF FLOWING AND STATIC WATER CONDITIONS ON MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES OF BIOFILMS ATTACHED ON SURFACE OF HYDRAULIC CONCRETE STRUCTURES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 35-40,69. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002004
    [16]Liu Qiang, Zhao Taixin, Zhao Changshuang, Yan Meng. MICRO-POLLUTED LAKE WATER TREATMENT BY A FLOTATION/POROUS BALL/MEMBRANE INTEGRATED PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 11-14. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501003
    [17]Duan Huajie, Tang Zhijian, Zhang Yuefeng, Zheng Pu, Zhu Guangcan, Wang Guangyuan. SIMULATION ON NITRIFICATION PERFORMANCE IN PULSE TRICKLING FILTER BASED ON BIOFILM MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 53-57. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504012
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.2 %FULLTEXT: 9.2 %META: 88.3 %META: 88.3 %PDF: 2.5 %PDF: 2.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 22.3 %其他: 22.3 %其他: 1.1 %其他: 1.1 %China: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %上海: 3.9 %上海: 3.9 %东莞: 0.7 %东莞: 0.7 %中山: 0.4 %中山: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %北京: 2.5 %北京: 2.5 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 4.6 %南京: 4.6 %厦门: 0.7 %厦门: 0.7 %台北: 0.4 %台北: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %喀什: 1.8 %喀什: 1.8 %大同: 0.7 %大同: 0.7 %天津: 2.8 %天津: 2.8 %宜春: 0.7 %宜春: 0.7 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常德: 0.7 %常德: 0.7 %广州: 1.1 %广州: 1.1 %弗吉: 0.4 %弗吉: 0.4 %张家口: 1.4 %张家口: 1.4 %张家界: 0.4 %张家界: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %扬州: 1.1 %扬州: 1.1 %昆明: 1.1 %昆明: 1.1 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 3.5 %杭州: 3.5 %桂林: 0.4 %桂林: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.4 %河内: 0.4 %河内: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %温州: 0.7 %温州: 0.7 %湘潭: 0.7 %湘潭: 0.7 %漯河: 2.8 %漯河: 2.8 %澳门: 2.1 %澳门: 2.1 %福州: 1.8 %福州: 1.8 %秦皇岛: 0.7 %秦皇岛: 0.7 %绍兴: 1.1 %绍兴: 1.1 %芒廷维尤: 8.9 %芒廷维尤: 8.9 %芝加哥: 3.5 %芝加哥: 3.5 %葫芦岛: 0.4 %葫芦岛: 0.4 %西宁: 7.1 %西宁: 7.1 %西安: 1.1 %西安: 1.1 %西雅图: 0.4 %西雅图: 0.4 %贵阳: 3.9 %贵阳: 3.9 %运城: 1.1 %运城: 1.1 %连云港: 0.4 %连云港: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.7 %邯郸: 0.7 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %重庆: 1.8 %重庆: 1.8 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %马鞍山: 1.1 %马鞍山: 1.1 %其他其他China上海东莞中山保定北京十堰南京厦门台北合肥呼和浩特哈尔滨喀什大同天津宜春常州常德广州弗吉张家口张家界成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州桂林武汉沈阳河内济南温州湘潭漯河澳门福州秦皇岛绍兴芒廷维尤芝加哥葫芦岛西宁西安西雅图贵阳运城连云港遵义邯郸郑州重庆长春长沙马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (542) PDF downloads(43) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return