Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
HUANG Yajie, CUI Yanzhi, LIU Haidong, BIAN Huafeng, LI Junchao, ZHOU Yan. ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL DIFFERENCES AND COUNTERMEASURES OF PRECISION OF THE RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE TREATMENT IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 47-53,156. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306007
Citation: CUI Jing, MIAO Fenghai, ZHANG Yun, ZHANG He, ZHOU Tao. DISSOLUTION AND EXTRACTION OF PROTEIN FROM SLUDGE VIA A COMBINATION OF ULTRASOUND AND DNA EXTRACTION PHENOL REAGENT ADDITION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 71-75,91. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306010

DISSOLUTION AND EXTRACTION OF PROTEIN FROM SLUDGE VIA A COMBINATION OF ULTRASOUND AND DNA EXTRACTION PHENOL REAGENT ADDITION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306010
  • Received Date: 2022-03-28
    Available Online: 2023-09-02
  • Compared with the conventional treatment methods of sludge, the thermal alkali decomposition treatment was a preferred technology because of the high value-added protein products obtained. In this investigation, the mixture material from thermal alkali pretreatment was taken as the raw material, and variables including ultrasonic and chemical addition were investigated. Results showed that, the optimal ultrasonic power, time, initial temperature, pH and the ratio of phenol to DNA extraction reagent were 480 W, 20 min, 38℃, 7.83 and 6%, respectively. Under this condition, the protein dissolution reached 861.71 mg/L, 150% to 200% higher than the control groups. Correlation analysis suggested that except for the ultrasonic time, the effects of other factors on sludge protein concentration were extremely significant. Moreover, the addition of DNA extraction phenol reagent could desorb carbohydrates and proteins inside and outside the cell, and further increase the protein concentration to 861.71 mg/L in the filtrate with the 6% dosage.
  • [1]
    刘子娟,王寅义,徐肖甜,等.剩余污泥碱性发酵产酸及脱水性能研究[J].中国给水排水, 2022, 38(3):92-98.
    [2]
    ODRIOZOLA M, LOUSADA M, SPANJERS H, et al. Effect of sludge characteristics on optimal required dosage of flux enhancer in anaerobic membrane bioreactors[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 619:776-786.
    [3]
    孙洋洋,张雨辰,徐苏云.不同来源剩余污泥有机质赋存特征及厌氧消化潜能[J]. 中国给水排水, 2021, 37(11):17-23.
    [4]
    吴春旭,唐明悦,张鸿涛,等. 我国不同地区市政污泥理化性质及其对脱水性能的影响[J]. 环境工程学报,2021,15(1):271-278.
    [5]
    戴晓虎. 城镇污水处理厂污泥稳定化处理的必要性和迫切性的思考[J]. 给水排水,2017,43(12):1-5.
    [6]
    李超. 酶催化污泥水解提取蛋白质研究[D]. 郑州:郑州大学,2018.
    [7]
    GAO J L, WANG Y C, YAN Y X, et al. Protein extraction from excess sludge by alkali-thermal hydrolysis[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27(8):8628-8637.
    [8]
    张静,赵建伟,孙英杰,等. 热碱预处理后得克隆对污泥厌氧发酵产酸及污泥特性的影响[J]. 中国环境科学,2021,41(3):1255-1263.
    [9]
    李萍,雷莹,李登新. 超声波协同生物法提取剩余污泥中蛋白质的研究[J]. 中国给水排水,2014,30(1):22-25.
    [10]
    夏雄,邓妍,刘威,等. SDS促进复合酶水解法提取剩余污泥蛋白质条件的响应面优化分析[J]. 安全与环境工程,2018,25(6):48-54.
    [11]
    刘改革. 溶菌酶与鼠李糖脂联用强化污泥破解效能及机制研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2020.
    [12]
    郭巧云,郭锦,胡骁,等. 活性污泥总蛋白提取方法的比较[J]. 环境科学与技术,2015,38(6):106-109

    ,176.
    [13]
    FROLUND B, PALMGREN R, KEIDING K, et al. Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin[J]. Water Research, 1996, 30:1749-1758.
    [14]
    国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 4版. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002,258-268.
    [15]
    LIU L Y, RAN B, HUA C. Improved dewaterability of drilling waste sludge by ultrasonic and potassium permanganate co-treatment[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021, 9(6):356-367.
    [16]
    丁静雨. 不同强度超声波促进酶解污泥提取蛋白质的研究[D]. 郑州:郑州大学,2018.
    [17]
    高健磊,李超,闫怡新,等. 超声波强化酶法提取污泥蛋白研究[J]. 四川环境,2018,37(2):38-44.
    [18]
    陆钧皓,李登新. 超声波与复合酶联合提取剩余污泥蛋白的研究[J]. 环境科学与技术,2015,38(10):53-58.
    [19]
    YAN Y, QIN L, GAO J, et al. Protein extraction and sludge dewatering performance of ultrasound-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis of excess sludge[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27(15):18317-18328.
    [20]
    SHI X C, ZHU L, LI B, et al. Surfactant-assisted thermal hydrolysis off waste activated sludge for improved dewaterability, organic release, and volatile fatty acid production[J]. Waste Management, 2021, 124:339-347.
    [21]
    HE Q Y, XU P, ZHANG C, et al. Influence of surfactants on anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge:acid and methane production and pollution removal[J]. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2019, 39(5):746-757.
    [22]
    倪敏,李祥,刘婷婷,等.厌氧氨氧化活性污泥DNA高效提取方法探究[J].环境科学与技术, 2019, 42(10):83-87.
    [23]
    GIAGNONI L, MAGHERINI F, LANDI L, et al. Soil solid phases effects on the proteomic analysis of Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34[J]. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 2012, 48(4):425-433.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Tongliang, ZHENG Tianlong, LI Wenkai, CHENG Wenhu, ZHU Chang, MEN Yingxin, CAO Yingnan, LIU Jianguo, YUAN Hongchao. PRESENT SITUATION AND SUGGESTION OF RURAL SEWAGE TREATMENT IN INNER MONGOLIA AUTONOMOUS REGION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 50-55. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410007
    [2]FENG Yuan, ZHAO Lüxuan, LIU Bingyan, WU Kaiqing, HE Yanfang, LI Li, HUANG Junkai, WENG Rui, LIANG Mingqi. CURRENT SITUATION AND SUGGESTIONS FOR AIR POLLUTION EMISSION CONTROL OF STEEL INDUSTRY IN GUANGXI[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 63-70. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406008
    [3]LIU Yuxin, ZENG Lingwu, FANG Zheng, SUN Dezhi. COMPREHENSIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN THE UPPER AND MIDDLE REACHES OF THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 34-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412005
    [4]GU Xuedian, LIU Dongmei, LI Yuting, ZHANG Shangjun, CHEN Yidi, FENG Yujie, REN Nanqi. RESEARCH ON GREEN AND LOW CARBON TREATMENT PATH OF URBAN WATER POLLUTION IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 27-33. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412004
    [5]GUO Songjun, WANG Junhui, CHEN Laiguo, LIANG Xiaoming, LU Qing, ZHU Lihua, LIU Ming. COUNTERMEASURES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IN-DEPTH TREATMENT OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN PRINTING INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 202-209,228. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303027
    [6]LÜ Zhiwen, LI Yuqing, YANG Jingjing, CAO Xiaoqiang, ZHANG Jian, LIU Huaqing, WANG Gang. PREPARATION OF SOLID WASTE-BASED POROUS MATERIALS BY PHYSICAL FOAMING TO CAPTURE AND STORE CO2[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 38-46. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306006
    [7]JIANG Yanbo, LING Wei, WEI Chunzhong, WEI Yuan, WU Chunfeng, WANG Chao, MENG Fangang. ENHANCEMENT OF COMPOSITE SOLID CARBON SOURCES ON NITROGEN REMOVAL PERFORMANCE OF A RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE TREATMENT PROCESS AND FUNCTIONAL BACTERIAL COMMUNITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 62-70. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210009
    [8]ZHANG Ke, TIAN Shuangchao, DOU Xueyan, ZHANG Chang, DONG Lixin, ZHU Jinliang, XIAO Benyi, LIU Qixin, LIU Jianwei, LIU Junxin. ANAEROBIC/AEROBIC BIOLOGICAL CONTACT OXIDATION PROCESS COUPLED WITH MICROBIAL FUEL CELL TO TREAT RURAL DOMESTIC WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 139-146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203021
    [9]ZHANG Zhi-jie, WEN Fei, ZHANG Ya-qun, ZHOU Jing, FENG Ai-ping. CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE ANALYSIS OF NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION LOAD IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN ON A REGIONAL SCALE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 81-88,142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209011
    [10]HAO Shuran, CHEN Zhuo, XU Ao, WU Yinhu, LI Guoqiang, NI Xinye, HU Hongying. ANALYSIS OF WATER REUSE SITUATIONS AND POTENTIALS IN MAIN CITIES IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 1-8,79. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210001
    [11]SONG Da-gang, LI Hui-bin, WANG Jiu-chen, MEI Zi-li, RAN Yi. BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH TRENDS ON RURAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 16-24,30. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105003
    [12]CHEN An-yao, LUO An-cheng, LIANG Zhi-wei, LIN Qiang, JIA Rui-jie, PING Shao-wei, DU Ping. AN EXPLORATORY RESEARCH ON ONLINE MONITORING METHOD FOR RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 227-233. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108031
    [13]LUO Qi-jin, HE Chen-hui, CHEN Jian-yu, LI Jin-shi, YI Xin-gui. TREATMENT OF RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE BY AUTONOMOUS BREATHING ECOLOGICAL FILTER TECHNOLOGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 58-63. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101008
    [14]ZHANG Ji-ku, SUN Mian. TREATMENT OF RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE BY AN AIR LIFTING A2/O PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 18-23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101002
    [15]LIU Xing, LIU Wen-li, JIANG Xia, GUO Ji-feng, HUANG Wei, LIU Rui, ZHANG Cong. ANALYSIS OF TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE AND STATUS OF TREATMENT FACILITIES IN PLAIN RIVER NETWORK AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 38-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012007
    [17]Gao Yangjun, Geng Chunnv, Cao Yong. THREE ASSESSMENT METHODS ON HEAVY METALS CONTAMINATION IN RIVER SEDIMENTS OF SHANGHAI SUBURBAN AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 121-125. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510027
    [18]Sun Zijie Tian Kan Liu Tao Tian Honghai, . CURRENT SITUATION AND COUNTERMEASURES ON THE DEVELOPMENT ON HEAVY METAL REFERENCE MATERIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 136-140. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503027
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 崔艳智,黄亚捷,李君超,刘海东,贾小梅,周岩. 新时期京津冀农村生活污水协同治理实施路径. 中国环境管理. 2025(01): 30-39 .
    2. 张博,王凌生,和娴娴,张兆祥,栗勇田. 华北地区某沿海县域农村生活污水治理情况及建议. 能源与环境. 2025(01): 97-99+138 .
    3. 陈欣,冯震江,徐俏,夏瑞,马翠梅,夏星辉. 近十年来黄河中下游河水硝酸盐含量和来源变化及影响因素分析. 环境科学学报. 2025(03): 241-250 .
    4. 李海生. 黄河流域生态环境问题系统识别与展望. 环境科学研究. 2024(01): 1-10 .
    5. 李中华,井柳新,洪源,王帅,续衍雪. 基于水质提升的黄河流域城市尺度问题分析及对策研究. 环境科学研究. 2024(01): 51-62 .
    6. 郭钟锐,王东,孙滢斐,付根深. 郑州市新密市的农村污水治理及长效管理机制探索. 水处理技术. 2024(11): 14-19 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.9 %FULLTEXT: 9.9 %META: 86.1 %META: 86.1 %PDF: 4.0 %PDF: 4.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 15.8 %其他: 15.8 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %上海: 4.2 %上海: 4.2 %东京: 0.8 %东京: 0.8 %佛山: 0.3 %佛山: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %兰州: 2.8 %兰州: 2.8 %北京: 6.4 %北京: 6.4 %十堰: 0.6 %十堰: 0.6 %南京: 2.2 %南京: 2.2 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %台州: 0.8 %台州: 0.8 %唐山: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %大同: 0.6 %大同: 0.6 %大连: 0.3 %大连: 0.3 %天津: 2.8 %天津: 2.8 %太原: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %娄底: 1.4 %娄底: 1.4 %安康: 1.1 %安康: 1.1 %宜宾: 0.6 %宜宾: 0.6 %宜春: 0.3 %宜春: 0.3 %宣城: 0.8 %宣城: 0.8 %常德: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %广州: 0.8 %广州: 0.8 %张家口: 0.3 %张家口: 0.3 %成都: 1.1 %成都: 1.1 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %昆明: 3.1 %昆明: 3.1 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %普洱: 0.6 %普洱: 0.6 %杭州: 1.7 %杭州: 1.7 %格兰特县: 0.3 %格兰特县: 0.3 %桂林: 0.6 %桂林: 0.6 %武汉: 5.0 %武汉: 5.0 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %泰安: 0.3 %泰安: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %济南: 1.7 %济南: 1.7 %淄博: 0.6 %淄博: 0.6 %淮安: 1.7 %淮安: 1.7 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %漯河: 2.5 %漯河: 2.5 %烟台: 0.6 %烟台: 0.6 %甘孜: 0.6 %甘孜: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 6.7 %芒廷维尤: 6.7 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %衡阳: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.3 %西宁: 6.4 %西宁: 6.4 %西安: 3.1 %西安: 3.1 %贵阳: 0.6 %贵阳: 0.6 %运城: 1.7 %运城: 1.7 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 9.2 %郑州: 9.2 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %金昌: 0.3 %金昌: 0.3 %银川: 0.3 %银川: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %黄石: 0.6 %黄石: 0.6 %其他其他上海东京佛山保定兰州北京十堰南京南昌南通台州唐山大同大连天津太原娄底安康宜宾宜春宣城常德广州张家口成都扬州昆明晋城普洱杭州格兰特县桂林武汉沈阳泰安洛阳济南淄博淮安深圳漯河烟台甘孜福州芒廷维尤芝加哥衡阳西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆金昌银川长沙长治青岛黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (147) PDF downloads(7) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return