Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
GENG Jiao, WANG Yang, HU Shugang, WEI Yanjie, SUN Fei, YUAN Peng. WQI-BASED WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND SPATIAL-TEMPORAL CHANGE IN PLAIN RIVER NETWORK AREAS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 187-193,209. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306025
Citation: GENG Jiao, WANG Yang, HU Shugang, WEI Yanjie, SUN Fei, YUAN Peng. WQI-BASED WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND SPATIAL-TEMPORAL CHANGE IN PLAIN RIVER NETWORK AREAS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 187-193,209. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306025

WQI-BASED WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND SPATIAL-TEMPORAL CHANGE IN PLAIN RIVER NETWORK AREAS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306025
  • Received Date: 2022-05-10
    Available Online: 2023-09-02
  • Taking the typical small and medium-sized rivers of the plain river network area in Jiashan County of Zhejiang Province as the study area, the water quality index (WQI) method was used for water quality assessment, according to monthly monitoring data of fourteen sections from 2015 to 2020. On this basis, the spatio-temporal variation characteristics of the water quality were explored using the Mann-Kendall (M-K) trend test combined with geographic information system (GIS). The results indicated that the average WQI value was 65.09 in the five years, showing the evaluation level of "medium". The water quality of rivers had obvious spatio-temporal differences i. e., water quality was improved gradually from 2015 to 2020, superior in non-flood season to flood season within intra-annual variation and better in the northern area compared to southern. The main influencing factors of spatio-temporal differences in water quality were precipitation, human activity and land use types. These results would provide critical information for the management of water resources.
  • [1]
    XU J H, LIU R, NI M F, et al. Seasonal variations of water quality response to land use metrics at multi-spatial scales in the Yangtze River basin[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2021, 28(28):37172-37181.
    [2]
    YANG H H, LU G H, YAN Z H, et al. Occurrence, spatial-temporal distribution and ecological risks of pharmaceuticals and personal care products response to water diversion across the rivers in Nanjing, China[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2019, 255(Pt 1):113132.
    [3]
    嵇晓燕, 侯欢欢, 王姗姗, 等. 近年全国地表水水质变化特征[J]. 环境科学, 2022,43(10):4419-4429.
    [4]
    李婧, 唐敏, 梁亦欣. 2015-2018年河南省辖海河流域水质改善效果评价[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 38(5):60-64.
    [5]
    陆志华, 韦婷婷, 王元元, 等.太湖流域水生态环境保护现状、存在问题及面临形势分析[C]//中国水利学会2021学术年会.北京, 2021.
    [6]
    王刚, 沃玉报, 毛劲乔, 等. 基于两步聚类的城市闸控河流水质时空变异特征研究[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(1):117-122.
    [7]
    李延东, 武暕. 辽河流域西辽河水质污染现状及变化趋势[J]. 环境工程, 2016, 34(增刊1):807-809.
    [8]
    汪心雯, 刘子琦, 郭琼琼, 等. 贵州黄洲河流域水质时空分布特征及污染源解析[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(9):69-75.
    [9]
    田瀚鑫, 王佳俊, 周磊, 等. 西藏拉鲁湿地不同时期水质现状及污染评价[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(6):198-206.
    [10]
    刘彦龙, 郑易安. 黄河干流水质评价与时空变化分析[J]. 环境科学, 2022,43(3):1332-1345.
    [11]
    NIHALANI S, MEERUTY A. Water quality index evaluation for major rivers in Gujarat[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(45):63523-63531.
    [12]
    SUTADIAN A D, MUTTIL N, YILMAZ A G, et al. Development of river water quality indices-a review[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2016, 188(1):58.
    [13]
    赵爽, 倪兆奎, 黄冬凌, 等. 基于WQI法的鄱阳湖水质演变趋势及驱动因素研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2020, 40(1):179-187.
    [14]
    SILVA R F C M, de ALMEIDA T, CICERELLI R E, et al. A spatiotemporal analysis of the physicochemical parameters after the operation of the Corumbá Ⅳ reservoir (Midwest Brazil) to support better management decision[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2021, 193(5):247.
    [15]
    NONG X Z, SHAO D G, ZHONG H, et al. Evaluation of water quality in the South-to-North Water Diversion Project of China using the water quality index (WQI) method[J]. Water Research, 2020, 178:115781.
    [16]
    叶焰中, 陈凡, 黄廷林. 基于水质综合指数法对亚热带水源型水库水质评价[J]. 水资源保护, 2022,38(2):116-124.
    [17]
    梁乃森, 钱程, 穆文平, 等. 大牛地气田区地下水水质模糊综合评价[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2020, 47(3):52-59.
    [18]
    杨琴, 汤秋鸿, 张永勇. 淮河流域(河南段)水质时空变化特征及其与土地利用类型的关系[J]. 环境科学研究, 2019, 32(9):1519-1530.
    [19]
    ŞENER Ş, ŞENER E, DAVRAZ A. Evaluation of water quality using water quality index (WQI) method and GIS in Aksu River (SW-Turkey)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 584/585:131-144.
    [20]
    赵小美. 嘉兴市降水量变化特征分析[J]. 浙江水利科技, 2008,1(1):37-38.
    [21]
    中国环境监督总站,辽宁省环境监测中心站. 水质采样技术指导:HJ 494-2009[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2009.
    [22]
    国家环境保护总局,水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 4版. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
    [23]
    PESCE S F, WUNDERLIN D A. Use of water quality indices to verify the impact of Córdoba City (Argentina) on Suqua River[J]. Water Research, 2000, 34(11):2915-2926.
    [24]
    田盼, 王丽婧, 宋林旭, 等. 三峡水库典型支流不同时期的水质污染特征及其影响因素[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(6):2182-2191.
    [25]
    万军芳, 郭新超, 胡恩, 等. 基于WQI和TLI的渭河关中流域城市典型坝控景观河道水质评价[J]. 环境工程, 2022,40(2):66-70.
    [26]
    WU Z S, WANG X L, CHEN Y W, et al. Assessing river water quality using water quality index in Lake Taihu Basin, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 612:914-922.
    [27]
    JEHAN S, ULLAH I, KHAN S, et al. Evaluation of the Swat River, Northern Pakistan, water quality using multivariate statistical techniques and water quality index (WQI) model[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27(31):38545-38558.
    [28]
    SUN W, XIA C Y, XU M Y, et al. Application of modified water quality indices as indicators to assess the spatial and temporal trends of water quality in the Dongjiang River[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 66:306-312.
    [29]
    WU Z S, LAI X J, LI K Y. Water quality assessment of rivers in Lake Chaohu Basin (China) using water quality index[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 121:107021.
    [30]
    苏程佳, 陈晓宏, 谭永强, 等. 潭江水质时空变化特征及其驱动因子[J]. 水资源保护, 2021, 37(4):109-116.
    [31]
    张姝琪, 张洪波, 辛琛, 等. 水文序列趋势及形态变化的表征方法[J]. 水资源保护, 2019, 35(6):58-67.
    [32]
    张汪寿, 李晓秀, 王晓燕, 等. 北运河武清段水污染时空变异特征[J]. 环境科学学报, 2012, 32(4):836-846.
    [33]
    吴蒙, 车越, 金妍. 江南水乡农村水网环境冲突及适应性管理探讨:以浙江省嘉善县为例[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(3):1712-1715.
    [34]
    徐敬. 嘉善县城区活水方案设计[J]. 河南水利与南水北调, 2019, 48(12):19-20.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Libiao, WANG Xuesong, WU Weifeng, ZHOU Huazhen, ZHENG Jiajun, ZHANG Miaojia. EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT AND DISPATCH OPTIMIZATION OF WATER PUMP OPERATIONS AT THE HONGPAN WATER TREATMENT PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 140-145. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411015
    [2]WANG Lei, YU Kun, CHEN Hui, MAO Zhekai, ZHANG Lingqin, XU Yuntao. APPLICATION OF UNMANNED INSPECTION IN WATER SUPPLY PIPELINE NETWORK BASED ON THE FUSION OF FIBER OPTIC SENSING AND VIDEO AI TECHNOLOGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 59-63. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311010
    [3]LIN Yudao, TAO Tao, XIN Kunlun, PU Zhengheng, CHEN Lei. GRAPH DEEP LEARNING: APPLICATION ON SHORT-TERM WATER DEMAND FORECASTING FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 149-153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304021
    [4]SONG Wenke, WANG Shanyue, TAO Tao. A LEAKAGE ZONE IDENTIFICATION METHOD FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS BASED ON VIRTUAL PRESSURE PARTITION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 184-191. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307025
    [5]MEN Yan, LIU Lingjie, ZHU Yaxin, BI Yanmeng, MENG Fansheng, YU Jingjie, WANG Shaopo. EFFECT OF ORGANIC MATTER CONCENTRATION VARIATION ON NITROGEN REMOVAL PERFORMANCE AND BACTERIA COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN A HYBRID SBR ANAMMOX SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 83-90. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308011
    [6]LI Cong, DU Rui, PENG Yongzhen. NITROGEN REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND CARBON SOURCE UTILIZATION CHARACTERISTICS OF PARTIAL DENITRIFICATION COUPLING ANAMMOX PROCESSES WITH DIFFERENT SLUDGE AGGREGATION MODES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 1-9. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309001
    [7]CHEN Xinyu, HOU Bingqian, GENG Ru, ZHOU Xiangtong, WU Zhiren, WEI Jing. A REVIEW OF MEMBRANE BIOFOULING CONTROL IN WATER TREATMENT BASED ON QUORUM SENSING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 251-259. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211033
    [8]LI Ruiting, ZHANG Wenrui, LI Aimin, SHUANG Chendong, ZHOU Qing, SHI Peng. REGULATORY MECHANISM OF INTERFACE PROPERTIES OF ENVIRONMENTAL FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS ON BIOFILM FORMATION AND METABOLIC FUNCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 206-221,178. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207030
    [9]HONG Yiqun, CHEN Liping, GONG Yanfeng, XUE Fangling, ZHOU Yanjie, WANG Shiling. EFFECT OF BIOFILM ON SUSPENDED PARTICLES TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA BASED ON LBM-DEM COUPLING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 101-108. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207015
    [10]WANG Jiaquan, LI Zhirong, HUANG Chuyu, LI Zhaomin, XIN Kunlun. LEAKAGE LOCATION METHODS OF WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORK BASED ON TEMPORAL AND PRESSURE SPATIAL FEATURES WITH PHYSICAL EXPERIMENT VERIFICATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 233-240. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206030
    [11]LI Junyu, LIU Shuming, WU Xue, XIE Tao, JIN Ye. OPTIMIZATION OF URBAN WATER SUPPLY NETWORK BASED ON DYNAMIC PRUNING MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 226-232,153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206029
    [12]LUO Xiao-nan, YANG Yi-qing, ZHANG Nan, MENG Fan-gang. PERFORMANCE OF NITROGEN REMOVAL AND MICROBIAL INTERACTION IN A TWO-STAGE DYNAMIC MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(7): 108-115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107013
    [13]SUN Hao, YU Tong, YIN Hao-shuai, ZHAO Fei, SHI Xue-qing, BI Xue-jun. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON BIOFOULING OF REVERSE OSMOSIS AND ITS MONITORING AND CONTROL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(7): 62-72. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107007
    [14]KANG Xiao-feng, WANG Li-sheng, LIU Chun, LIU Yan-chen, HUANG Xia. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF NITROGEN REMOVAL IN MEMBRANE AERATED BIOFILM REACTOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(7): 38-45. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202107004
    [15]WAN Ming-yue, DU Ji-ming, LI Jun, LI Yi, WANG Long-fei. INFLUENCE OF FLOWING AND STATIC WATER CONDITIONS ON MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES OF BIOFILMS ATTACHED ON SURFACE OF HYDRAULIC CONCRETE STRUCTURES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 35-40,69. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002004
    [16]Liu Qiang, Zhao Taixin, Zhao Changshuang, Yan Meng. MICRO-POLLUTED LAKE WATER TREATMENT BY A FLOTATION/POROUS BALL/MEMBRANE INTEGRATED PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 11-14. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501003
    [17]Duan Huajie, Tang Zhijian, Zhang Yuefeng, Zheng Pu, Zhu Guangcan, Wang Guangyuan. SIMULATION ON NITRIFICATION PERFORMANCE IN PULSE TRICKLING FILTER BASED ON BIOFILM MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 53-57. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504012
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.2 %FULLTEXT: 9.2 %META: 88.3 %META: 88.3 %PDF: 2.5 %PDF: 2.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 22.3 %其他: 22.3 %其他: 1.1 %其他: 1.1 %China: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %上海: 3.9 %上海: 3.9 %东莞: 0.7 %东莞: 0.7 %中山: 0.4 %中山: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %北京: 2.5 %北京: 2.5 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 4.6 %南京: 4.6 %厦门: 0.7 %厦门: 0.7 %台北: 0.4 %台北: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %喀什: 1.8 %喀什: 1.8 %大同: 0.7 %大同: 0.7 %天津: 2.8 %天津: 2.8 %宜春: 0.7 %宜春: 0.7 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常德: 0.7 %常德: 0.7 %广州: 1.1 %广州: 1.1 %弗吉: 0.4 %弗吉: 0.4 %张家口: 1.4 %张家口: 1.4 %张家界: 0.4 %张家界: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %扬州: 1.1 %扬州: 1.1 %昆明: 1.1 %昆明: 1.1 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 3.5 %杭州: 3.5 %桂林: 0.4 %桂林: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.4 %河内: 0.4 %河内: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %温州: 0.7 %温州: 0.7 %湘潭: 0.7 %湘潭: 0.7 %漯河: 2.8 %漯河: 2.8 %澳门: 2.1 %澳门: 2.1 %福州: 1.8 %福州: 1.8 %秦皇岛: 0.7 %秦皇岛: 0.7 %绍兴: 1.1 %绍兴: 1.1 %芒廷维尤: 8.9 %芒廷维尤: 8.9 %芝加哥: 3.5 %芝加哥: 3.5 %葫芦岛: 0.4 %葫芦岛: 0.4 %西宁: 7.1 %西宁: 7.1 %西安: 1.1 %西安: 1.1 %西雅图: 0.4 %西雅图: 0.4 %贵阳: 3.9 %贵阳: 3.9 %运城: 1.1 %运城: 1.1 %连云港: 0.4 %连云港: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.7 %邯郸: 0.7 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %重庆: 1.8 %重庆: 1.8 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %马鞍山: 1.1 %马鞍山: 1.1 %其他其他China上海东莞中山保定北京十堰南京厦门台北合肥呼和浩特哈尔滨喀什大同天津宜春常州常德广州弗吉张家口张家界成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州桂林武汉沈阳河内济南温州湘潭漯河澳门福州秦皇岛绍兴芒廷维尤芝加哥葫芦岛西宁西安西雅图贵阳运城连云港遵义邯郸郑州重庆长春长沙马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (266) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return