Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
HUANG Yajie, CUI Yanzhi, LIU Haidong, BIAN Huafeng, LI Junchao, ZHOU Yan. ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL DIFFERENCES AND COUNTERMEASURES OF PRECISION OF THE RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE TREATMENT IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 47-53,156. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306007
Citation: YUAN Lei, YANG Zanxian, LONG Haixiao, CHEN Guoping, LI Qiangjun, WU Xiaowei. ANALYSIS OF SPATIOTEMPORAL EVOLUTION OF WATER RESOURCES CARRYING CAPACITY IN KUNMING BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD AND MARKOV MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 202-209. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306027

ANALYSIS OF SPATIOTEMPORAL EVOLUTION OF WATER RESOURCES CARRYING CAPACITY IN KUNMING BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD AND MARKOV MODEL

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306027
  • Received Date: 2022-08-10
    Available Online: 2023-09-02
  • In order to reveal the changing law of water resources carrying capacity (WRCC) in Kunming and provide decision support for regional water resources allocation and sustainable utilization, this paper constructed a comprehensive evaluation model of WRCC based on the entropy weight method and Markov transfer model, and analyzed the results of the spatiotemporal transfer and evolution characteristics of WRCC in the study area over the past 25 years. The results showed that the overall water resource carrying capacity of the research area is relatively low, with significant spatial differences. Among them, the northern and northeastern regions are areas with low water resource carrying capacity due to resource scarcity, with an average annual water resource carrying capacity of 0.26 to 0.38 during the research period; the central and southwest regions have developed economies and the largest population density, and are low in water resources carrying capacity due to water shortage. The multi-year average value of water resources carrying capacity in the study period is 0.30 to 0.41; the southeast region is relatively rich in precipitation, low in population density, and relatively higher in water resources carrying capacity. The multi-year average value of water resources carrying capacity in the study period is 0.37 to 0.54. In addition, the overall spatial transfer and change frequency of water resource carrying capacity in the research area is relatively high. Among them, the frequency of changes in the central region reached a maximum of four times during the five research periods, indicating that the level of water resource carrying capacity in the study area has a significant periodic change, which is closely related to the extremely uneven spatiotemporal distribution of precipitation, imbalanced supply and demand of water resources, seasonal water scarcity, and population distribution in the study area.
  • [1]
    金菊良, 郭涵, 李征, 等. 基于水资源承载力动态评价的五元引力减法集对势方法[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(6):1-7.
    [2]
    韩礼博, 门宝辉. 基于组合博弈论法的海河流域水资源承载力评价[J]. 水电能源科学, 2021, 39(11):61-64.
    [3]
    张爱国, 李鑫, 张义明, 等. 城市水资源承载力评价指标体系构建:以天津市为例[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(4):1839-1848.
    [4]
    联合国水机制. 2020年联合国世界水发展报告[R]. 日内瓦:联合国教育科学及文化组织, 2020.
    [5]
    田英杰, 王倩, 周蓉, 等. 水资源紧缺程度评估模型[J]. 数学建模及其应用, 2016, 5(2):73-82.
    [6]
    代稳, 吕殿青, 王金凤, 等. 基于变权灰色关联法的长江荆南三口地区水资源短缺程度分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017, 34(6):17-23.
    [7]
    柏义生,陈涛,梁静,等.信阳市水环境承载力评价及优化对策建议[J].环境工程,2019,37(10):78-82.
    [8]
    GIKAS P, TCHOBANOGLOUS G. Sustainable use of water in the Aegean Islands[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(8):2601-2611.
    [9]
    姜文超. 城镇地区水资源(极限)承载力及其量化方法与应用研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2004.
    [10]
    KANG D, LANSEY K. Real-time demand estimation and confidence limit analysis for water distribution systems[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009, 135(10):825-837.
    [11]
    封志明, 杨艳昭, 闫慧敏, 等. 百年来的资源环境承载力研究:从理论到实践[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(3):379-395.
    [12]
    宋子成, 孙以萍. 从我国淡水资源看我国现代化后能养育的最高人口数量[J]. 人口与经济, 1981(4):3-7.
    [13]
    许有鹏. 干旱区水资源承载能力综合评价研究:以新疆和田河流域为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 1993, 8(3):229-237.
    [14]
    傅湘, 纪昌明. 区域水资源承载能力综合评价:主成分分析法的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 1999, 8(2):168-172.
    [15]
    封志明, 杨艳昭, 游珍. 中国人口分布的水资源限制性与限制度研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(10):1637-1648.
    [16]
    BRELSFORD C, ABBOTT J K. Growing into water conservation? Decomposing the drivers of reduced water consumption in Las Vegas, NV[J]. Ecological Economics, 2017, 133:99-110.
    [17]
    OJEDA A ÁLVAREZ, CLARA ROSALÍA, RAMOS M, et al. Determinants of domestic water consumption in Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 142:1901-1910.
    [18]
    李少朋, 赵衡, 王富强, 等. 基于AHP-TOPSIS模型的江苏省水资源承载力评价[J]. 水资源保护, 2021, 37(3):20-25.
    [19]
    安强, 魏传江, 贺华翔, 等. 基于模糊综合评价法的河南省中原城市群水资源承载力评价研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2019(12):65-71.
    [20]
    胡启玲, 董增川, 杨雁飞, 等. 基于联系数的水资源承载力状态评价模型[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(5):425-432.
    [21]
    何云玲, 刘雪莲, 杨焰, 等. 县域资源环境承载力评价研究[J]. 生态经济(中文版), 2017, 33(1):124-128.
    [22]
    袁磊, 闻珊珊, 杨昆. 快速城市化区域资源环境承载力与建设适宜性分析:以昆明市呈贡区为例[J]. 生态科学, 2019, 38(1):218-225.
    [23]
    吴开亚, 金菊良. 基于变权重和信息熵的区域水资源安全投影寻踪评价模型[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(9):1085-1091.
    [24]
    张凤太,张军以,苏维词.基于熵权和主成分分析的岩溶区水资源安全评价:以毕节为例[J].环境工程,2016,34(3):174-179.
    [25]
    徐政华, 曹延明. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的长春市水资源承载力评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2022,22(5):2900-2907.
    [26]
    陈培阳,朱喜钢.中国区域经济趋同:基于县级尺度的空间马尔可夫链分析[J].地理科学, 2013,33(11):1302-1308.
    [27]
    刘瑞, 朱道林. 基于转移矩阵的土地利用变化信息挖掘方法探讨[J]. 资源科学, 2010, 32(8):1544-1550.
    [28]
    李宝芬. 昆明市年降水量时空分布特征[C]//云南省水利学会,2016年度学术年会论文集, 2016:123-133.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Tongliang, ZHENG Tianlong, LI Wenkai, CHENG Wenhu, ZHU Chang, MEN Yingxin, CAO Yingnan, LIU Jianguo, YUAN Hongchao. PRESENT SITUATION AND SUGGESTION OF RURAL SEWAGE TREATMENT IN INNER MONGOLIA AUTONOMOUS REGION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 50-55. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410007
    [2]FENG Yuan, ZHAO Lüxuan, LIU Bingyan, WU Kaiqing, HE Yanfang, LI Li, HUANG Junkai, WENG Rui, LIANG Mingqi. CURRENT SITUATION AND SUGGESTIONS FOR AIR POLLUTION EMISSION CONTROL OF STEEL INDUSTRY IN GUANGXI[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 63-70. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406008
    [3]LIU Yuxin, ZENG Lingwu, FANG Zheng, SUN Dezhi. COMPREHENSIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN THE UPPER AND MIDDLE REACHES OF THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 34-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412005
    [4]GU Xuedian, LIU Dongmei, LI Yuting, ZHANG Shangjun, CHEN Yidi, FENG Yujie, REN Nanqi. RESEARCH ON GREEN AND LOW CARBON TREATMENT PATH OF URBAN WATER POLLUTION IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 27-33. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412004
    [5]GUO Songjun, WANG Junhui, CHEN Laiguo, LIANG Xiaoming, LU Qing, ZHU Lihua, LIU Ming. COUNTERMEASURES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IN-DEPTH TREATMENT OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN PRINTING INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 202-209,228. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303027
    [6]LÜ Zhiwen, LI Yuqing, YANG Jingjing, CAO Xiaoqiang, ZHANG Jian, LIU Huaqing, WANG Gang. PREPARATION OF SOLID WASTE-BASED POROUS MATERIALS BY PHYSICAL FOAMING TO CAPTURE AND STORE CO2[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 38-46. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306006
    [7]JIANG Yanbo, LING Wei, WEI Chunzhong, WEI Yuan, WU Chunfeng, WANG Chao, MENG Fangang. ENHANCEMENT OF COMPOSITE SOLID CARBON SOURCES ON NITROGEN REMOVAL PERFORMANCE OF A RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE TREATMENT PROCESS AND FUNCTIONAL BACTERIAL COMMUNITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 62-70. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210009
    [8]ZHANG Ke, TIAN Shuangchao, DOU Xueyan, ZHANG Chang, DONG Lixin, ZHU Jinliang, XIAO Benyi, LIU Qixin, LIU Jianwei, LIU Junxin. ANAEROBIC/AEROBIC BIOLOGICAL CONTACT OXIDATION PROCESS COUPLED WITH MICROBIAL FUEL CELL TO TREAT RURAL DOMESTIC WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 139-146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203021
    [9]ZHANG Zhi-jie, WEN Fei, ZHANG Ya-qun, ZHOU Jing, FENG Ai-ping. CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE ANALYSIS OF NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION LOAD IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN ON A REGIONAL SCALE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 81-88,142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209011
    [10]HAO Shuran, CHEN Zhuo, XU Ao, WU Yinhu, LI Guoqiang, NI Xinye, HU Hongying. ANALYSIS OF WATER REUSE SITUATIONS AND POTENTIALS IN MAIN CITIES IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 1-8,79. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210001
    [11]SONG Da-gang, LI Hui-bin, WANG Jiu-chen, MEI Zi-li, RAN Yi. BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH TRENDS ON RURAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 16-24,30. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105003
    [12]CHEN An-yao, LUO An-cheng, LIANG Zhi-wei, LIN Qiang, JIA Rui-jie, PING Shao-wei, DU Ping. AN EXPLORATORY RESEARCH ON ONLINE MONITORING METHOD FOR RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 227-233. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108031
    [13]LUO Qi-jin, HE Chen-hui, CHEN Jian-yu, LI Jin-shi, YI Xin-gui. TREATMENT OF RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE BY AUTONOMOUS BREATHING ECOLOGICAL FILTER TECHNOLOGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 58-63. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101008
    [14]ZHANG Ji-ku, SUN Mian. TREATMENT OF RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE BY AN AIR LIFTING A2/O PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 18-23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101002
    [15]LIU Xing, LIU Wen-li, JIANG Xia, GUO Ji-feng, HUANG Wei, LIU Rui, ZHANG Cong. ANALYSIS OF TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE AND STATUS OF TREATMENT FACILITIES IN PLAIN RIVER NETWORK AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 38-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012007
    [17]Gao Yangjun, Geng Chunnv, Cao Yong. THREE ASSESSMENT METHODS ON HEAVY METALS CONTAMINATION IN RIVER SEDIMENTS OF SHANGHAI SUBURBAN AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 121-125. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510027
    [18]Sun Zijie Tian Kan Liu Tao Tian Honghai, . CURRENT SITUATION AND COUNTERMEASURES ON THE DEVELOPMENT ON HEAVY METAL REFERENCE MATERIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 136-140. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503027
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 崔艳智,黄亚捷,李君超,刘海东,贾小梅,周岩. 新时期京津冀农村生活污水协同治理实施路径. 中国环境管理. 2025(01): 30-39 .
    2. 张博,王凌生,和娴娴,张兆祥,栗勇田. 华北地区某沿海县域农村生活污水治理情况及建议. 能源与环境. 2025(01): 97-99+138 .
    3. 陈欣,冯震江,徐俏,夏瑞,马翠梅,夏星辉. 近十年来黄河中下游河水硝酸盐含量和来源变化及影响因素分析. 环境科学学报. 2025(03): 241-250 .
    4. 李海生. 黄河流域生态环境问题系统识别与展望. 环境科学研究. 2024(01): 1-10 .
    5. 李中华,井柳新,洪源,王帅,续衍雪. 基于水质提升的黄河流域城市尺度问题分析及对策研究. 环境科学研究. 2024(01): 51-62 .
    6. 郭钟锐,王东,孙滢斐,付根深. 郑州市新密市的农村污水治理及长效管理机制探索. 水处理技术. 2024(11): 14-19 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.9 %FULLTEXT: 9.9 %META: 86.1 %META: 86.1 %PDF: 4.0 %PDF: 4.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 15.8 %其他: 15.8 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %上海: 4.2 %上海: 4.2 %东京: 0.8 %东京: 0.8 %佛山: 0.3 %佛山: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %兰州: 2.8 %兰州: 2.8 %北京: 6.4 %北京: 6.4 %十堰: 0.6 %十堰: 0.6 %南京: 2.2 %南京: 2.2 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %台州: 0.8 %台州: 0.8 %唐山: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %大同: 0.6 %大同: 0.6 %大连: 0.3 %大连: 0.3 %天津: 2.8 %天津: 2.8 %太原: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %娄底: 1.4 %娄底: 1.4 %安康: 1.1 %安康: 1.1 %宜宾: 0.6 %宜宾: 0.6 %宜春: 0.3 %宜春: 0.3 %宣城: 0.8 %宣城: 0.8 %常德: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %广州: 0.8 %广州: 0.8 %张家口: 0.3 %张家口: 0.3 %成都: 1.1 %成都: 1.1 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %昆明: 3.1 %昆明: 3.1 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %普洱: 0.6 %普洱: 0.6 %杭州: 1.7 %杭州: 1.7 %格兰特县: 0.3 %格兰特县: 0.3 %桂林: 0.6 %桂林: 0.6 %武汉: 5.0 %武汉: 5.0 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %泰安: 0.3 %泰安: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %济南: 1.7 %济南: 1.7 %淄博: 0.6 %淄博: 0.6 %淮安: 1.7 %淮安: 1.7 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %漯河: 2.5 %漯河: 2.5 %烟台: 0.6 %烟台: 0.6 %甘孜: 0.6 %甘孜: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 6.7 %芒廷维尤: 6.7 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %衡阳: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.3 %西宁: 6.4 %西宁: 6.4 %西安: 3.1 %西安: 3.1 %贵阳: 0.6 %贵阳: 0.6 %运城: 1.7 %运城: 1.7 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 9.2 %郑州: 9.2 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %金昌: 0.3 %金昌: 0.3 %银川: 0.3 %银川: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %黄石: 0.6 %黄石: 0.6 %其他其他上海东京佛山保定兰州北京十堰南京南昌南通台州唐山大同大连天津太原娄底安康宜宾宜春宣城常德广州张家口成都扬州昆明晋城普洱杭州格兰特县桂林武汉沈阳泰安洛阳济南淄博淮安深圳漯河烟台甘孜福州芒廷维尤芝加哥衡阳西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆金昌银川长沙长治青岛黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (139) PDF downloads(6) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return