Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
YUAN Wei-hao, WANG Hua, ZENG Yi-chuan, FANG Shao-wen, WANG Shi-gang, LI Yuan-yuan, ZHANG Xin-yue. SPATIOTEMPORAL VARIATION OF DRIVING FACTORS OF ALGAL PROLIFERATION IN A LARGE RIVER-CONNECTED LAKE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 64-71,128. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110009
Citation: MENG Qingcheng, HU Lei, LI Mingjian, QI Xin. ANALYSIS OF CARBON EMISSION AND CARBON COMPENSATION IN DEMOLITION OF ABANDONED BUILDINGS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 45-52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307007

ANALYSIS OF CARBON EMISSION AND CARBON COMPENSATION IN DEMOLITION OF ABANDONED BUILDINGS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307007
  • Received Date: 2022-09-05
  • The carbon emissions from the construction industry account for nearly one-third of the total carbon emissions in China, and the potential for carbon reduction is huge. Aiming at the evaluation of carbon emission and carbon compensation in the demolition stage of the abandoned buildings, the whole life cycle evaluation method was adopted to define the calculation boundary of the demolition stage of abandoned buildings, which was divided into the demolition stage, waste transportation stage and waste disposal stage. Carbon compensation is the reuse stage of construction waste, and the calculation model of carbon emission and carbon compensation was established. Through quantitative analysis, it was concluded that carbon emissions are mainly concentrated in the construction waste disposal stage, accounting for about 75% of the total carbon emissions. The secondary recycling of construction waste could effectively reduce 31.01% of the total carbon emissions in the demolition stage of buildings, which had a good carbon reduction effect. With the increase of the secondary recycling rate of construction waste, the carbon emission of the construction waste disposal stage linearly decreased, the carbon compensation of building materials linearly increased, and the carbon reduction effect was enhanced.
  • [1]
    IPCC.Climate Change 2021:The Physical Science Basis[R].Cambridge and New York:Cambridge University Press, 2021.
    [2]
    汪涛.建筑生命周期温室气体减排政策分析方法及应用[D].北京:清华大学,2012.
    [3]
    张天辰.基于全生命周期的低碳桥梁评价体系研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2018.
    [4]
    龚志起,张智慧.生命周期评价和管理与建筑业可持续发展[J].青海大学学报(自然科学版),2004,22(2):24-29.
    [5]
    彭渤.绿色建筑全生命周期能耗及二氧化碳排放案例研究[D].北京:清华大学,2012.
    [6]
    李小冬,朱辰.我国建筑碳排放核算及影响因素研究综述[J].安全与环境学报,2020,20(1):317-327.
    [7]
    PENG Z Y, LU W S, WEBSTER C J.Quantifying the embodied carbon saving potential of recycling construction and demolition waste in the greater bay area, China:status quo and future scenarios[J/OL].Science of the Total Environment,2021.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148427.
    [8]
    WANG J J, WEI J J, LIU Z S, et al.Life cycle assessment of building demolition waste based on building information modeling[J/OL].Resources, Conservation & Recycling,2022.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106095.
    [9]
    IVANICA R, RISSE M, WEBER-BLASCHKE G, et al.Development of a life cycle inventory database and life cycle impact assessment of the building demolition stage:a case study in Germany[J/OL].Journal of Cleaner Production,2022.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130631.
    [10]
    YU B, WANG J Y, LI J, et al.Prediction of large-scale demolition waste generation during urban renewal:a hybrid trilogy method[J].Waste Management,2019, 89:1-9.
    [11]
    DONG H J, GENG Y, YU X M, et al.Uncovering energy saving and carbon reduction potential from recycling wastes:a case of Shanghai in China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2018, 205:27-35.
    [12]
    KABIRIFAR K, MOJTAHEDI M, WANG C X, et al.Construction and demolition waste management contributing factors coupled with reduce, reuse, and recycle strategies for effective waste management:a review[J/OL].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121265.
    [13]
    SAGHAFI M D, TESHNIZI Z S H.Recycling value of building materials in building assessment systems[J].Energy & Buildings, 2011, 43(11):3181-3188.
    [14]
    MINUNNO R, O'GRADY T, MORRISON G M, et al.Exploring environmental benefits of reuse and recycle practices:a circular economy case study of a modular building[J/OL].Resources, Conservation & Recycling,2020.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104855.
    [15]
    黄正杰.拆除建筑废弃物碳排放经济与环境评估研究[D].广州:广州大学,2021.
    [16]
    丁衎然,谢剑.废旧建筑材料再利用与建筑的拆解[J].建筑结构,2016,46(9):100-104.
    [17]
    PAI V, ELZARKA H.Whole building life cycle assessment for buildings:a case study on how to achieve the leed credit[J/OL].Journal of Cleaner Production,2021.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126501.
    [18]
    建筑碳排放计算标准:GB/T 51366-2019[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.
    [19]
    王永琴,周叶,张荣.碳排放影响因子与碳足迹文献综述:基于研究方法视角[J].环境工程,2017,35(1):155-159.
    [20]
    欧阳磊.基于碳排放视角的拆除建筑废弃物管理过程研究[D].深圳:深圳大学,2016.
    [21]
    袁荣丽.基于BIM的建筑物化碳足迹计算模型研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2019.
    [22]
    KONG M J, JI C Y, HONG T, et al.Impact of the use of recycled materials on the energy conservation and energy transition of buildings using life cycle assessment:a case study in south Korea[J/OL].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2022.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111891.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]DU Yu, SUN Shuqing, DAI Wen, CAO Menghua, TU Shuxin, XIONG Shuanglian. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND MECHANISM OF ATRAZINE FROM CONTAMINATED SOIL BY PERSULFATE AND ASCORBIC ACID[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 146-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406017
    [2]HU Xiaomin, JIANG Shuqi. TREATMENT OF EMULSIFIED OIL WASTEWATER BY PULSE ELECTRIC FIELD DEMULSIFICATION-ACTIVATED PERSULFATE PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 55-62. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401008
    [3]SHI En, ZHANG Shuai, ZHANG Miao, LIU Shasha, ZOU Yuliang, ZHANG Xiangzhi. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF SLUDGE-BASED ACTIVATED CARBON PREPARATION PROCESS BASED ON LIFE CYCLE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 40-47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402005
    [4]REN Yuqing, WU Wei, WEI Haijuan, ZHOU Bin, XING Yunxin, HE Kankan, ZHOU Zhen. EFFECTS OF PROPERTIES AND STRUCTURE OF POLYACRYLAMIDE ON SLUDGES CONDITIONING AND DEWATERING PERFORMANCE BEFORE AND AFTER ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 57-64. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308008
    [5]CONG Xin, SUN Meizhen, YUAN Xuehong, LI Taolue, XUE Nandong. IRON-BASED NANOMATERIALS MEDIATED BY LEAF EXTRACTS FROM SYCAMORE ACTIVATE PERSULFATES TO CATALYZE TBBPA DEGRADATION IN SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 107-114. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305015
    [6]ZHANG Shicheng, LI Simin, ZHU Jia. DEGRADATION OF METHYL ORANGE BY CuO/g-C3N4 ACTIVATED PEROXODISULFATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 40-48. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210006
    [7]SUN Li-hua, MEI Xiao-yu, GAO Cheng, FENG Cui-min. MECHANISMS AND EFFICIENCY OF REMOVAL OF ORGANIC MATTER AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE GENES IN SECONDARY EFFLUENT OF WATARPLANTS BY DIFFERENT PERSULFATE ACTIVATION METHODS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 74-80,134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209010
    [8]WANG Xinlong, SUN Pinghe, ZHAO Mingzhe, XING Shikuan, FENG Deshan, TANG Lei. INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT CONSOLIDATION FACTORS ON MOISTURE CONTENT AND PERMEABILITY OF WASTE SLURRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 84-89. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208011
    [9]ZOU Zhikun, CHEN Yudao, ZHENG Gao, LU Renqian, YANG Pengfei, WU Weizhong. EFFECTS OF ETHANOL ON REMOVAL OF BTEX FROM GASOLINE BY PERSULFATE IN LIMESTONE AQUEOUS MEDIA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 98-104. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212013
    [10]XIE Min, WU Xin, WANG Xiao, XU Su, XIAO Ben-yi, GUO Xue-song. OPTIMIZATION ON EXCESS SLUDGE DEWATERING OF RURAL DISPERSED WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 15-20. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106003
    [11]YAN Qiu-he, WANG Hong-tao, LIU Yan-ting. EVALUATION OF CLASSIFICATION EFFECT OF KITCHEN WASTE AND OTHER WASTE AND ENERGY UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY USING MOISTURE CONTENT: A CASE STUDY OF ZHANGJIAGANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 105-109,159. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102016
    [12]HOU Si-ying, DENG Yi-rong, LU Hai-jian, LV Ming-chao, SU Jia-yun, LI Qu-sheng. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON IRON ACTIVATED PERSULFATE IN SITU REMEDIATION OF ORGANIC CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 195-200,194. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104029
    [13]CAO Yuan, LI Xiao-dong, PENG Chang-sheng, SUN Zong-quan, SHEN Jia-lun, MA Fu-jun, GU Qing-bao. REMOVAL OF 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE BY PERSULFATE ACTIVATED WITH IRON MODIFIED BIOCHAR PREPARED BY DIPPING-PYROLYSIS PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 135-142,178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111017
    [14]LIAN Guang-hu, CHENG Gang, ZHANG Lin-yu, ZHANG Yu, SONG Zhi-jun, XU Xiao-jie, WEN Yu-ting, CAI Mei-qiang. SLUDGE DEWATERING PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT BY HYDRODYNAMIC CAVITATION-ACIDIFICATION CONDITIONING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 96-100,70. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008016
    [15]LAN Bing-bing, JIN Ruo-fei, LIU Yan-song, LIU Guang-fei, ZHOU Ji-ti. EFFECT OF SODIUM PERIODATE-APAM CONJUNCTION ON DEWATERABILITY OF WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 122-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007019
    [16]WANG Yan, ZOU Lv-xi, MAO Lin-feng, CHEN Ya-li, LI Ji. EFFICIENCY AND MECHANISM OF UV/O3-Na2S2O8 IN TREATING ACTIVATED CARBON REGENERATION CONDENSATE WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 38-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007006
    [17]XU Rui, YANG Wei, YANG Zhe, CHENG Qian-lan, GU Li-ting, GUO Sheng. HIGH-EFFICIENT REMOVAL OF TETRACYCLINE HYDROCHLORIDE BASED ON PEROXYMONOSULFATE ACTIVATED BY CuO/EXPANDED GRAPHITE COMPOSITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 48-54,47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002006
    [18]CHEN Wei-gang, WU Hai-xia, FAN Jia-wei. ACTIVATED CARBON HETEROGENEOUS ACTIVATION OF DIFFERENT PERSULFATES TO DEGRADATION AZO DYE ACID ORANGE Ⅱ[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 113-118,57. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008019
    [19]GUO Zhao-qiang, SHANG Shuang, LAN Kui, LI Ze-shan, XIONG Tao, ZHANG Juan-juan, WANG Yan, QIN Zhen-hua, LI Jian-fen. HYDROGEN-RICH SYNGAS PRODUCTION BY CO-PYROLYSIS OF WHEAT STALK AND WET SEWAGE SLUDGE WITH DIFFERENT MOISTURE CONTENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 160-164,214. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005028
    [20]Zhang Xiaoxu, Zhang Hongyu, Li Guoxue, . EFFECT OF ADDITIVE QUANTITY OF STALKS ON H2 S AND NH3 EMISSION DURING KITCHEN WASTE COMPOSTING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 95-99. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501022
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 黎栩霞,王裕东,肖佑鹏,徐旭,王海鹏,陈伊梦,林俊川,黄桂松,黄振国,孙萍,麦有全,杨尚波,许旺. 深圳近岸海域水质遥感监测及时空变化. 环境工程. 2024(01): 243-252 . 本站查看
    2. 胡芳,刘聚涛,杨平,温春云,张兰婷,张洁. 鄱阳湖蓝藻时空分布特征及其驱动因子研究. 长江流域资源与环境. 2024(03): 605-614 .
    3. 钱春龙,曾一川,袁伟皓,吴怡. 基于时间序列的鄱阳湖Chl-a预测模型优化构建. 长江科学院院报. 2023(10): 14-21 .
    4. 任永琴,金柱成,俞真元,王晓丽,彭士涛. 基于双向门控循环单元的地表水氨氮预测. 中国环境科学. 2022(02): 672-679 .
    5. 朱江伟,马鹏飞,杜晓,杨言言,郝晓刚,罗善霞. 基于可变价NiFe-LDH/rGO对磷酸根离子的特异性电控分离. 化工学报. 2022(07): 3057-3067 .
    6. 张天衍,董增川,罗赟,石晴宜,韩亚雷,崔璨,周强,张游. 基于水质-水位二元响应关系推求过水型湖泊适宜生态水位研究. 湖泊科学. 2022(05): 1670-1682 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.5 %FULLTEXT: 8.5 %META: 85.5 %META: 85.5 %PDF: 6.0 %PDF: 6.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.3 %其他: 14.3 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %上海: 1.6 %上海: 1.6 %上饶: 0.5 %上饶: 0.5 %东京: 0.3 %东京: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %兰州: 1.1 %兰州: 1.1 %北京: 13.2 %北京: 13.2 %南京: 3.5 %南京: 3.5 %南宁: 0.3 %南宁: 0.3 %南昌: 1.1 %南昌: 1.1 %台州: 1.1 %台州: 1.1 %吉林: 0.5 %吉林: 0.5 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %嘉兴: 2.2 %嘉兴: 2.2 %大同: 0.5 %大同: 0.5 %天津: 2.7 %天津: 2.7 %安康: 0.5 %安康: 0.5 %常州: 0.3 %常州: 0.3 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %广州: 1.9 %广州: 1.9 %庆阳: 1.6 %庆阳: 1.6 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.3 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.3 %张家口: 1.9 %张家口: 1.9 %德阳: 0.3 %德阳: 0.3 %成都: 2.7 %成都: 2.7 %扬州: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %新乡: 0.5 %新乡: 0.5 %无锡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %武汉: 4.9 %武汉: 4.9 %江门: 0.3 %江门: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %海口: 0.3 %海口: 0.3 %深圳: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %漯河: 1.4 %漯河: 1.4 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %盐城: 0.5 %盐城: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %福州: 0.5 %福州: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 7.3 %芒廷维尤: 7.3 %芝加哥: 1.4 %芝加哥: 1.4 %菏泽: 0.8 %菏泽: 0.8 %蚌埠: 2.2 %蚌埠: 2.2 %衡水: 1.6 %衡水: 1.6 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 6.8 %西宁: 6.8 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %贵港: 0.8 %贵港: 0.8 %贵阳: 1.1 %贵阳: 1.1 %资阳: 0.5 %资阳: 0.5 %运城: 1.9 %运城: 1.9 %通辽: 1.4 %通辽: 1.4 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %长沙: 1.1 %长沙: 1.1 %龙岩: 1.6 %龙岩: 1.6 %其他其他上海上饶东京东莞临汾保定兰州北京南京南宁南昌台州吉林呼和浩特唐山嘉兴大同天津安康常州常德广州庆阳弗吉尼亚州张家口德阳成都扬州新乡无锡昆明晋城杭州武汉江门洛阳海口深圳温州湖州漯河烟台盐城石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥菏泽蚌埠衡水衢州西宁西安贵港贵阳资阳运城通辽遵义邯郸郑州重庆长沙龙岩

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (245) PDF downloads(18) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return