Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 41 Issue 7
Jul.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2023  >  41(7): 201-205,240
YUAN Wei-hao, WANG Hua, ZENG Yi-chuan, FANG Shao-wen, WANG Shi-gang, LI Yuan-yuan, ZHANG Xin-yue. SPATIOTEMPORAL VARIATION OF DRIVING FACTORS OF ALGAL PROLIFERATION IN A LARGE RIVER-CONNECTED LAKE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 64-71,128. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110009
Citation: CUI Yong, FAN Yuesheng, ZHANG Xin, WANG Huan, XUE Kexin, LI Ming, GAN Weikang. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF A NEW REDUCED GRAPHENE OXIDE FILTER MATERIAL AND COMMON ELECTRET MATERIAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 201-205,240. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307027
shu

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF A NEW REDUCED GRAPHENE OXIDE FILTER MATERIAL AND COMMON ELECTRET MATERIAL

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307027

  • 1. School of Building Services Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China;

  • 2. School of Resources Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China

  • Received Date: 2022-04-29
    Abstract
  • It is necessary to research and develop a multifunctional composite filter material under the current context of regular epidemic prevention and control. Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) composite functional filter material and the electret air filtration material (PTFE) were chosen for the experimental study. Tests on the filtration characteristics and antibacterial properties and other properties were conducted. Results showed that at the beginning of the filtration experiment, the filtration efficiency of rGO filter material was positively correlated with the change in filtration rate, while the trend of the filtration efficiency of PTFE filter material was opposite, and the filtration efficiency was better than that of rGO filter material overall. In the subsequent experiments, the filtration efficiency of rGO filter material was generally higher than that of PTFE filter material, but the filtration resistance of rGO filter material was about twice that of PTFE filter material. The dust capacity of rGO filter material was far greater than that of PTFE filter material at the wind velocity of 0.05 m/s. In addition, it was found that rGO filter media also had certain antibacterial and bacteriostatic properties. This study provides a reference for the selection of air purifiers and improvement of rGO filter material performance in the post-pandemic era, which also provides a new idea for the subsequent research of composite filter material.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(31)
  • [1]
    CHOW J C, WATSON J G, MAUDERLY J L, et al.Health effects of fine particulate air pollution:lines that connect[J].Air Waste Manag.Assoc, 2006, 56(6):709-742.
    [2]
    MARTINS N R, GUILHERME C.Impact of PM2.5 in indoor urban environments:a review[J].Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018, 42:259-275.
    [3]
    樊越胜,谢伟,张鑫,等.住宅建筑室内PM2.5污染特征与控制[J].环境工程,2018,36(7):93-97

    ,45.
    [4]
    郭二宝,张一飞,胡浩威,等.建筑室内健康环境中不同过滤单元净化PM2.5特性[J].环境工程,2022,40(4):64-70.
    [5]
    殷平.疫情下的风机盘管空气净化技术研究[J].暖通空调,2021,51(11):6-12.
    [6]
    钱幺, 吴波伟, 钱晓明.驻极体纤维过滤材料研究进展[J].化工新型材料, 2021, 49(6):42-46.
    [7]
    ABDOLGHADER P, BROCHOT C, HAGHIGHAT F, et al.Airborne nanoparticles filtration performance of fibrous media:a review[J].Science & Technology for the Built Environment, 2018,24(6):648-672.
    [8]
    ZHU S, XU Y K, HUANG C, et al.Triboelectric effect of polytetrafluoroethylene fibers to improve the filtration performance of air-purified materials[J].Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 2018, 13(1):442-450.
    [9]
    陈梦艳,仲兆祥,邢卫红.石墨烯功能化纳米纤维空气净化材料研究进展[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),2021,43(4):411-419.
    [10]
    张琳娇.石墨烯使用中存在的问题及其发展趋势[J].中国高新科技, 2021(18):101-102.
    [11]
    邹卫武, 顾宝珊, 孙世清,等.石墨烯及其复合材料在空气净化领域的应用研究进展[J].炭素技术, 2020,9(1):6-11.
    [12]
    YE X L, FENG J, ZHANG J X, et al.Controlled release and long-term antibacterial activity of reduced graphene oxide/quaternary ammonium salt nanocomposites prepared by non-covalent modification[J].Colloids and Surfaces B:Biointerfaces, 2017, 149:322-329.
    [13]
    侯若梦,贾瑛,黄远征,等.石墨烯复合材料在空气净化中的应用研究进展[J].材料导报,2020,34(增刊2):1104-1111,1137.
    [14]
    陈淑花, 张恒, 张晶,等.聚乙烯醇/壳聚糖/壳聚糖-g-氧化石墨烯复合膜的制备[J].塑料工业, 2022, 50(2):32-38.
    [15]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.空气过滤器:GB/T 14295-2019[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2019.
    [16]
    AL-HARBI M, ALHAJRI I, WHALEN J K.Characteristics and health risk assessment of heavy metal contamination from dust collected on household HVAC air filters[J].Chemosphere, 2021, 277(115054):130276-130276.
    [17]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.高效空气过滤器性能试验方法效率和阻力:GB/T 6165-2021[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2015.
    [18]
    贾雪莹,王騊.TiO2纳米棒复合织物的制备及其光催化和抗菌性能[J].现代纺织技术,2022,30(3):136-142.
    [19]
    马欢.建筑环境低阻高效过滤材料净化PM2.5特性模型及应用研究[D].上海:东华大学, 2016.
    [20]
    何瑾.居住建筑室内空气微细颗粒物净化用过滤材料的性能试验研究[D].上海:东华大学,2012.
    [21]
    闫雪,刘兴成,沈恒根.含尘烟气净化用滤料性能测试与分析[J].环境工程,2018,36(8):92-97

    ,123.
    [22]
    谭亮亮.建筑环境空气过滤微细颗粒物技术的试验研究[D].上海:东华大学, 2006.
    [23]
    HUNG C H, LEUNG W F.Filtration of nano-aerosol using nanofiber filter under low Peclet number and transitional flow regime[J].Separation and Purification Technology, 2011, 79(1):34-42.
    [24]
    刘朝军,刘俊杰,丁伊可,等.高效空气过滤用PTFE膜材料的结构和性能[J].化工进展,2022,41(8):4367-4374.
    [25]
    MIKHEEV A Y, SHLYAPNIKOV Y M, KANEV I L, et al.Filtering and optical properties of free standing electrospun nanomats from nylon-4,6[J].European Polymer Journal, 2016, 75:317-328.
    [26]
    王岩,张涛,陈宜华,等.新型微孔膜过滤材料的制备与除尘性能测试[J].中国粉体技术,2022,28(1):43-51.
    [27]
    KASHIF J, ANDRES K, MIHKEL V, et al.A method for producing conductive graphene biopolymer nanofibrous fabrics by exploitation of an ionic liquid dispersant in electrospinning[J].Carbon, 2018, 140:148-156.
    [28]
    YIN J, BAI Y, LU J, et al.Enhanced mechanical performances and high-conductivity of rGO/PEDOT:PSS/PVA composite fiber films via electrospinning strategy[J].Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2022, 643:128791.
    [29]
    刘朝军,刘俊杰,丁伊可,等.空气过滤用高容尘膨体聚四氟乙烯复合材料的制备及其性能[J].纺织学报,2021,42(5):31-37.
    [30]
    CAO G H, YAN J H, NING X X, et al.Antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of graphene and its derivatives[J].Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2021,200:111588.
    [31]
    HAN W, WU Z N, LI Y, et al.graphene family nanomaterials (gfns)-promising materials for antimicrobial coating and film:a review[J].Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 358:1022-1037.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]DU Yu, SUN Shuqing, DAI Wen, CAO Menghua, TU Shuxin, XIONG Shuanglian. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND MECHANISM OF ATRAZINE FROM CONTAMINATED SOIL BY PERSULFATE AND ASCORBIC ACID[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 146-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406017
    [2]HU Xiaomin, JIANG Shuqi. TREATMENT OF EMULSIFIED OIL WASTEWATER BY PULSE ELECTRIC FIELD DEMULSIFICATION-ACTIVATED PERSULFATE PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 55-62. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401008
    [3]SHI En, ZHANG Shuai, ZHANG Miao, LIU Shasha, ZOU Yuliang, ZHANG Xiangzhi. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF SLUDGE-BASED ACTIVATED CARBON PREPARATION PROCESS BASED ON LIFE CYCLE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 40-47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402005
    [4]REN Yuqing, WU Wei, WEI Haijuan, ZHOU Bin, XING Yunxin, HE Kankan, ZHOU Zhen. EFFECTS OF PROPERTIES AND STRUCTURE OF POLYACRYLAMIDE ON SLUDGES CONDITIONING AND DEWATERING PERFORMANCE BEFORE AND AFTER ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 57-64. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308008
    [5]CONG Xin, SUN Meizhen, YUAN Xuehong, LI Taolue, XUE Nandong. IRON-BASED NANOMATERIALS MEDIATED BY LEAF EXTRACTS FROM SYCAMORE ACTIVATE PERSULFATES TO CATALYZE TBBPA DEGRADATION IN SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 107-114. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305015
    [6]ZHANG Shicheng, LI Simin, ZHU Jia. DEGRADATION OF METHYL ORANGE BY CuO/g-C3N4 ACTIVATED PEROXODISULFATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 40-48. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210006
    [7]SUN Li-hua, MEI Xiao-yu, GAO Cheng, FENG Cui-min. MECHANISMS AND EFFICIENCY OF REMOVAL OF ORGANIC MATTER AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE GENES IN SECONDARY EFFLUENT OF WATARPLANTS BY DIFFERENT PERSULFATE ACTIVATION METHODS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 74-80,134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209010
    [8]WANG Xinlong, SUN Pinghe, ZHAO Mingzhe, XING Shikuan, FENG Deshan, TANG Lei. INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT CONSOLIDATION FACTORS ON MOISTURE CONTENT AND PERMEABILITY OF WASTE SLURRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 84-89. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208011
    [9]ZOU Zhikun, CHEN Yudao, ZHENG Gao, LU Renqian, YANG Pengfei, WU Weizhong. EFFECTS OF ETHANOL ON REMOVAL OF BTEX FROM GASOLINE BY PERSULFATE IN LIMESTONE AQUEOUS MEDIA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 98-104. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212013
    [10]XIE Min, WU Xin, WANG Xiao, XU Su, XIAO Ben-yi, GUO Xue-song. OPTIMIZATION ON EXCESS SLUDGE DEWATERING OF RURAL DISPERSED WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 15-20. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106003
    [11]YAN Qiu-he, WANG Hong-tao, LIU Yan-ting. EVALUATION OF CLASSIFICATION EFFECT OF KITCHEN WASTE AND OTHER WASTE AND ENERGY UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY USING MOISTURE CONTENT: A CASE STUDY OF ZHANGJIAGANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 105-109,159. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102016
    [12]HOU Si-ying, DENG Yi-rong, LU Hai-jian, LV Ming-chao, SU Jia-yun, LI Qu-sheng. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON IRON ACTIVATED PERSULFATE IN SITU REMEDIATION OF ORGANIC CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 195-200,194. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104029
    [13]CAO Yuan, LI Xiao-dong, PENG Chang-sheng, SUN Zong-quan, SHEN Jia-lun, MA Fu-jun, GU Qing-bao. REMOVAL OF 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE BY PERSULFATE ACTIVATED WITH IRON MODIFIED BIOCHAR PREPARED BY DIPPING-PYROLYSIS PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 135-142,178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111017
    [14]LIAN Guang-hu, CHENG Gang, ZHANG Lin-yu, ZHANG Yu, SONG Zhi-jun, XU Xiao-jie, WEN Yu-ting, CAI Mei-qiang. SLUDGE DEWATERING PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT BY HYDRODYNAMIC CAVITATION-ACIDIFICATION CONDITIONING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 96-100,70. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008016
    [15]LAN Bing-bing, JIN Ruo-fei, LIU Yan-song, LIU Guang-fei, ZHOU Ji-ti. EFFECT OF SODIUM PERIODATE-APAM CONJUNCTION ON DEWATERABILITY OF WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 122-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007019
    [16]WANG Yan, ZOU Lv-xi, MAO Lin-feng, CHEN Ya-li, LI Ji. EFFICIENCY AND MECHANISM OF UV/O3-Na2S2O8 IN TREATING ACTIVATED CARBON REGENERATION CONDENSATE WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 38-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007006
    [17]XU Rui, YANG Wei, YANG Zhe, CHENG Qian-lan, GU Li-ting, GUO Sheng. HIGH-EFFICIENT REMOVAL OF TETRACYCLINE HYDROCHLORIDE BASED ON PEROXYMONOSULFATE ACTIVATED BY CuO/EXPANDED GRAPHITE COMPOSITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 48-54,47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002006
    [18]CHEN Wei-gang, WU Hai-xia, FAN Jia-wei. ACTIVATED CARBON HETEROGENEOUS ACTIVATION OF DIFFERENT PERSULFATES TO DEGRADATION AZO DYE ACID ORANGE Ⅱ[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 113-118,57. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008019
    [19]GUO Zhao-qiang, SHANG Shuang, LAN Kui, LI Ze-shan, XIONG Tao, ZHANG Juan-juan, WANG Yan, QIN Zhen-hua, LI Jian-fen. HYDROGEN-RICH SYNGAS PRODUCTION BY CO-PYROLYSIS OF WHEAT STALK AND WET SEWAGE SLUDGE WITH DIFFERENT MOISTURE CONTENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 160-164,214. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005028
    [20]Zhang Xiaoxu, Zhang Hongyu, Li Guoxue, . EFFECT OF ADDITIVE QUANTITY OF STALKS ON H2 S AND NH3 EMISSION DURING KITCHEN WASTE COMPOSTING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 95-99. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501022
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 黎栩霞，王裕东，肖佑鹏，徐旭，王海鹏，陈伊梦，林俊川，黄桂松，黄振国，孙萍，麦有全，杨尚波，许旺. 深圳近岸海域水质遥感监测及时空变化. 环境工程. 2024(01): 243-252 . 本站查看
    2. 胡芳，刘聚涛，杨平，温春云，张兰婷，张洁. 鄱阳湖蓝藻时空分布特征及其驱动因子研究. 长江流域资源与环境. 2024(03): 605-614 .
    3. 钱春龙，曾一川，袁伟皓，吴怡. 基于时间序列的鄱阳湖Chl-a预测模型优化构建. 长江科学院院报. 2023(10): 14-21 .
    4. 任永琴，金柱成，俞真元，王晓丽，彭士涛. 基于双向门控循环单元的地表水氨氮预测. 中国环境科学. 2022(02): 672-679 .
    5. 朱江伟，马鹏飞，杜晓，杨言言，郝晓刚，罗善霞. 基于可变价NiFe-LDH/rGO对磷酸根离子的特异性电控分离. 化工学报. 2022(07): 3057-3067 .
    6. 张天衍，董增川，罗赟，石晴宜，韩亚雷，崔璨，周强，张游. 基于水质-水位二元响应关系推求过水型湖泊适宜生态水位研究. 湖泊科学. 2022(05): 1670-1682 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.5 %FULLTEXT: 8.5 %META: 85.5 %META: 85.5 %PDF: 6.0 %PDF: 6.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.3 %其他: 14.3 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %上海: 1.6 %上海: 1.6 %上饶: 0.5 %上饶: 0.5 %东京: 0.3 %东京: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %兰州: 1.1 %兰州: 1.1 %北京: 13.2 %北京: 13.2 %南京: 3.5 %南京: 3.5 %南宁: 0.3 %南宁: 0.3 %南昌: 1.1 %南昌: 1.1 %台州: 1.1 %台州: 1.1 %吉林: 0.5 %吉林: 0.5 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %唐山: 0.3 %嘉兴: 2.2 %嘉兴: 2.2 %大同: 0.5 %大同: 0.5 %天津: 2.7 %天津: 2.7 %安康: 0.5 %安康: 0.5 %常州: 0.3 %常州: 0.3 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %广州: 1.9 %广州: 1.9 %庆阳: 1.6 %庆阳: 1.6 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.3 %弗吉尼亚州: 0.3 %张家口: 1.9 %张家口: 1.9 %德阳: 0.3 %德阳: 0.3 %成都: 2.7 %成都: 2.7 %扬州: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %新乡: 0.5 %新乡: 0.5 %无锡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %武汉: 4.9 %武汉: 4.9 %江门: 0.3 %江门: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %海口: 0.3 %海口: 0.3 %深圳: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %漯河: 1.4 %漯河: 1.4 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %盐城: 0.5 %盐城: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %福州: 0.5 %福州: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 7.3 %芒廷维尤: 7.3 %芝加哥: 1.4 %芝加哥: 1.4 %菏泽: 0.8 %菏泽: 0.8 %蚌埠: 2.2 %蚌埠: 2.2 %衡水: 1.6 %衡水: 1.6 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 6.8 %西宁: 6.8 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %贵港: 0.8 %贵港: 0.8 %贵阳: 1.1 %贵阳: 1.1 %资阳: 0.5 %资阳: 0.5 %运城: 1.9 %运城: 1.9 %通辽: 1.4 %通辽: 1.4 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %长沙: 1.1 %长沙: 1.1 %龙岩: 1.6 %龙岩: 1.6 %其他其他上海上饶东京东莞临汾保定兰州北京南京南宁南昌台州吉林呼和浩特唐山嘉兴大同天津安康常州常德广州庆阳弗吉尼亚州张家口德阳成都扬州新乡无锡昆明晋城杭州武汉江门洛阳海口深圳温州湖州漯河烟台盐城石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥菏泽蚌埠衡水衢州西宁西安贵港贵阳资阳运城通辽遵义邯郸郑州重庆长沙龙岩

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (94) PDF downloads(2) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return