BIOLOGICAL MECHANISM OF AMMONIA INHIBITION DURING ANAEROBIC DIGESTION

LIU Chao; ZHANG Xuemeng; CHEN Chuang; YIN Yue; HUANG Haining; CHEN Yinguang

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202309019

Volume 41 Issue 9

Sep. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2023 > 41(9): 156-165

LI Conglin, HUANG Shoubin, WANG Zhuoyi, ZHANG Hongtao, NING Tao, NIU Zhenhua, CHEN Yun. A CASE ANALYSIS OF COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT OF URBAN BLACK-ODOROUS WATER AND KEY POINTS DISCUSSION ON ENGINEERING DESIGN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 149-157. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301018

Citation:

LIU Chao, ZHANG Xuemeng, CHEN Chuang, YIN Yue, HUANG Haining, CHEN Yinguang. BIOLOGICAL MECHANISM OF AMMONIA INHIBITION DURING ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 156-165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309019

Citation:

PDF( 19455 KB)

BIOLOGICAL MECHANISM OF AMMONIA INHIBITION DURING ANAEROBIC DIGESTION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309019

State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received Date: 2023-07-20
Available Online: 2023-11-15

Abstract

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion, an effective approach to the harmless treatment of organic waste and recovery of energy and materials, has been widely used in practical engineering. However, the high concentration of ammonia nitrogen produced during anaerobic digestion seriously inhibits substrate degradation and biogas production, which is a vital factor leading to the decline of system performance, and even the collapse of the reaction system. The essence of anaerobic digestion is the process of using organic matter to produce methane by large numbers of microbes, such as hydrolyzing-acidifying and syntrophic acetogenic bacteria and methanogenic archaea. The analysis of the microbial mechanism of ammonia inhibition is conducive to clarifying the essential causes of instability. However, the biological mechanism of ammonia suppression on anaerobic digestion is rarely reviewed. This paper first systematically summarizes the remodeling characteristics of microbial communities under ammonia stress. The influence of high ammonia on the vital phenotypes of cells is then introduced. Finally, the evolution of enzymes and lipid molecules under ammonia stress is discussed. This work will expand the understanding of ammonia inhibition behaviors. Future studies are recommended to reveal the molecular mechanism of microbial interaction under ammonia stress and develop disinhibition methods based on ammonia-inhibiting mechanisms.
- anaerobic digestion,
- ammonia inhibition,
- microflora structure,
- cell membrane,
- enzymes,
- lipids,
- omics

FullText(HTML)

References(61)

References

[1]	CALDERON A G, DUAN H, MENG J, et al. An integrated strategy to enhance performance of anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge[J]. Water Research, 2021, 195:116977.
[2]	SHI Z, CAMPANARO S, USMAN M, et al. Genome-centric metatranscriptomics analysis reveals the role of hydrochar in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(12):8351-8361.
[3]	LI Y, CHEN Z, PENG Y, et al. Deeper insights into the effects of substrate to inoculum ratio selection on the relationship of kinetic parameters, microbial communities, and key metabolic pathways during the anaerobic digestion of food waste[J]. Water Reserach, 2022, 217:118440.
[4]	赵刚, 唐建国, 徐竟成, 等. 中美典型污泥处理处置工程能耗和碳排放比较分析[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(12):9-16.
[5]	RAJAGOPAL R, MASSÉ D I, SINGH G. A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 143:632-641.
[6]	JIANG Y, MCADAM E, ZHANG Y, et al. Ammonia inhibition and toxicity in anaerobic digestion:a critical review[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2019, 32:100899.
[7]	WANG Z, JIANG Y, WANG S, et al. Impact of total solids content on anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and food waste:insights into shifting of the methanogenic pathway[J]. Waste Management, 2020, 114:96-106.
[8]	何仕均, 王建龙, 赵璇. 氨氮对厌氧颗粒污泥产甲烷活性的影响[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 9(45):1294-1296.
[9]	LIU C, HUANG H, DUAN X, et al. Integrated metagenomic and metaproteomic analyses unravel ammonia toxicity to active methanogens and syntrophs, enzyme synthesis, and key enzymes in anaerobic digestion[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(21):14817-14827.
[10]	ZHANG H, YUAN W, DONG Q, et al. Integrated multi-omics analyses reveal the key microbial phylotypes affecting anaerobic digestion performance under ammonia stress[J]. Water Research, 2022, 213:118152.
[11]	LIU Y, NGO H H, GUO W, et al. The roles of free ammonia (FA) in biological wastewater treatment processes:a review[J]. Environment International, 2019, 123:10-19.
[12]	SAHA S, BASAK B, HWANG J H, et al. Microbial symbiosis:a network towards biomethanation[J]. Trends in Microbiology, 2020, 28(12):968-984.
[13]	CARBALLA M, REGUEIRO L, LEMA J M. Microbial management of anaerobic digestion:exploiting the microbiome-functionality nexus[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2015, 33:103-111.
[14]	SIEBER J R, MCINERNEY M J, GUNSALUS R P. Genomic insights into syntrophy:the paradigm for anaerobic metabolic cooperation[J]. Annual Review of Microbiology, 2012, 66:429-452.
[15]	SPROTT G D, PATEL G B. Ammonia toxicity in pure cultures of methanogenic bacteria[J]. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 1986, 7(2/3):358-363.
[16]	FOTIDIS I A, KARAKASHEV D, ANGELIDAKI I. The dominant acetate degradation pathway/methanogenic composition in full-scale anaerobic digesters operating under different ammonia levels[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 11(7):2087-2094.
[17]	WANG Z, WANG S, HU Y, et al. Distinguishing responses of acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens to ammonia stress in mesophilic mixed cultures[J]. Water Research, 2022, 224:119029.
[18]	LV Z, LEITE A F, HARMS H, et al. Microbial community shifts in biogas reactors upon complete or partial ammonia inhibition[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2019, 103(1):519-533.
[19]	RUIZ-SANCHEZ J, CAMPANARO S, GUIVERNAU M, et al. Effect of ammonia on the active microbiome and metagenome from stable full-cale digesters[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 250:513-522.
[20]	CHEN H, WANG W, XUE L, et al. Effects of ammonia on anaerobic digestion of food waste:process performance and microbial community[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(7):5749-5757.
[21]	CHRISTOU M L, VASILEIADIS S, KALAMARAS S D, et al. Ammonia-induced inhibition of manure-based continuous biomethanation process under different organic loading rates and associated microbial community dynamics[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 320:124323.
[22]	HE L, YU J, LIN Z, et al. Organic matter removal performance, pathway and microbial community succession during the construction of high-ammonia anaerobic biosystems treating anaerobic digestate food waste effluent[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 317:115428.
[23]	彭韵, 李蕾, 伍迪, 等. 微生物群落对氨胁迫响应的宏基因组学研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(2):777-786.
[24]	CALLI B, MERTOGLU B, INANC B, et al. Effects of high free ammonia concentrations on the performances of anaerobic bioreactors[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2005, 40(3/4):1285-1292.
[25]	ZHANG C, YUAN Q, LU Y. Inhibitory effects of ammonia on syntrophic propionate oxidation in anaerobic digester sludge[J]. Water Research, 2018, 146:275-287.
[26]	PENG X, ZHANG S, LI L, et al. Long-term high-solids anaerobic digestion of food waste:effects of ammonia on process performance and microbial community[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 262:148-158.
[27]	ZHANG H, PENG Y, YANG P, et al. Response of process performance and microbial community to ammonia stress in series batch experiments[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 314:123768.
[28]	YE M, ZHU A, SUN B, et al. Methanogenic treatment of dairy product wastewater by thermophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor:ammonia inhibition and microbial community[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 357:127349.
[29]	MLINAR S, WEIG A R, FREITAG R. Influence of NH₃ and NH₄⁺ on anaerobic digestion and microbial population structure at increasing total ammonia nitrogen concentrations[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 361:127638.
[30]	CYPIONKA H, WIDDEL F, PFENNIG N. Survival of sulfate-reducing bacteria after oxygen stress, and growth in sulfate-free oxygen-sulfide gradients[J]. FEMS microbiology ecology, 1985, 1(1):39-45.
[31]	BOONE D R, BRYANT M P. Propionate-degrading bacterium, Syntrophobacter wolinii sp. nov. gen. nov., from methanogenic ecosystems[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1980, 40(3):626-632.
[32]	DWYER D F, WEEG-AERSSENS E, SHELTON D R, et al. Bioenergetic conditions of butyrate metabolism by a syntrophic, anaerobic bacterium in coculture with hydrogen-oxidizing methanogenic and sulfidogenic bacteria[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1988, 54(6):1354-1359.
[33]	LIU C, ZHANG X, CHEN C, et al. Physiological responses of Methanosarcina barkeri under ammonia stress at the molecular level:the unignorable lipid reprogramming[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023, 57(9):3917-3929.
[34]	MCNEIL P L, STEINHARDT R A. Loss, restoration, and maintenance of plasma membrane integrity[J]. The Journal of Cell Biology, 1997, 137(1):1-4.
[35]	CALLI B, MERTOGLU B, INANC B, et al. Methanogenic diversity in anaerobic bioreactors under extremely high ammonia levels[J]. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2005, 37(4):448-455.
[36]	CALLI B, MERTOGLU B, INANC B, et al. Community changes during start-up in methanogenic bioreactors exposed to increasing levels of ammonia[J]. Environmental Technology, 2005, 26(1):85-91.
[37]	JEYENDRAN R, VAN DER VEN H, PEREZ-PELAEZ M, et al. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics[J]. Reproduction, 1984, 70(1):219-228.
[38]	ROY S, MONDAL A, YADAV V, et al. Mechanistic insight into the antibacterial activity of chitosan exfoliated MoS₂ nanosheets:membrane damage, metabolic inactivation, and oxidative stress[J]. ACS Applied Bio Materials, 2019, 2(7):2738-2755.
[39]	SCHNAIDER L, BRAHMACHARI S, SCHMIDT N W, et al. Self-assembling dipeptide antibacterial nanostructures with membrane disrupting activity[J]. Nature Communication, 2017, 8(1):1365.
[40]	PENG Y, LI L, YANG P, et al. Integrated genome-centric metagenomic and metaproteomic analyses unravel the responses of the microbial community to ammonia stress[J]. Water Research, 2023, 242:120239.
[41]	PADMAKUMAR R, PADMAKUMAR R, BANERJEE R. Evidence that cobalt-carbon bond homolysis is coupled to hydrogen atom abstraction from substrate in methylmalonyl-CoA mutase[J]. Biochemistry, 1997, 36(12):3713-3718.
[42]	WEBSTER M W, TAKACS M, ZHU C, et al. Structural basis of transcription-translation coupling and collision in bacteria[J]. Science, 2020, 369(6509):1355-1359.
[43]	KORKHIN Y, UNLIGIL U M, LITTLEFIELD O, et al. Evolution of complex RNA polymerases:the complete archaeal RNA polymerase structure[J]. PLoS Biology, 2009, 7(5):e1000102.
[44]	YUSUPOV M M, YUSUPOVA G Z, BAUCOM A, et al. Crystal structure of the ribosome at 5.5Å resolution[J]. Science, 2001, 292(5518):883-896.
[45]	SCHMEING T M, VOORHEES R M, KELLEY A C, et al. The crystal structure of the ribosome bound to EF-Tu and aminoacyl-tRNA[J]. Science, 2009, 326(5953):688-694.
[46]	KAYHANIAN M. Ammonia inhibition in high-solids biogasification:an overview and practical solutions[J]. Environmental Technology, 1999, 20(4):355-365.
[47]	FERREIRA T, CARRONDO M, ALVES P. Effect of ammonia production on intracellular pH:consequent effect on adenovirus vector production[J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2007, 129(3):433-438.
[48]	SPROTT G D, SHAW K M, JARRELL K F. Ammonia/potassium exchange in methanogenic bacteria[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1984, 259(20):12602-12608.
[49]	WITTMANN C, ZENG A P, DECKWER W D. Growth inhibition by ammonia and use of a pH-controlled feeding strategy for the effective cultivation of Mycobacterium chlorophenolicum[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1995, 44(3):519-525.
[50]	KUHNER C, DRAKE H, ALM E, et al. Methane production and oxidation by soils from acidic forest wetlands of east-central Germany[C]//Abstr 96th Gen Meet Am Soc Microbiol American Society for Microbiology. Washington, DC, 1996:304.
[51]	LLOYD C T, IWIG D F, WANG B, et al. Discovery, structure and mechanism of a tetraether lipid synthase[J]. Nature, 2022, 609(7925):197-203.
[52]	HARAYAMA T, RIEZMAN H. Understanding the diversity of membrane lipid composition[J]. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2018, 19(5):281-296.
[53]	LOPEZ-LARA I M, GEIGER O. Bacterial lipid diversity[J]. Biochimica et biophysica acta:molecular and cell biology of lipids, 2017, 1862(11):1287-1299.
[54]	QI Z, SUN N, LIU C. Glyoxylate cycle maintains the metabolic homeostasis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in viable but nonculturable state induced by chlorine stress[J]. Microbiological Research, 2023, 270:127341.
[55]	BALLWEG S, SEZGIN E, DOKTOROVA M, et al. Regulation of lipid saturation without sensing membrane fluidity[J]. Nature Communinations, 2020, 11(1):756.
[56]	LI R, GUINEY L M, CHANG C H, et al. Surface oxidation of graphene oxide determines membrane damage, lipid peroxidation, and cytotoxicity in macrophages in a pulmonary toxicity model[J]. ACS Nano, 2018, 12(2):1390-1402.
[57]	SHANTA P V, LI B, STUART D D, et al. Lipidomic profiling of algae with microarray MALDI-MS toward ecotoxicological monitoring of herbicide exposure[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(15):10558-10568.
[58]	MARQUENO A, BLANCO M, MACEDA-VEIGA A, et al. Skeletal muscle lipidomics as a new tool to determine altered lipid homeostasis in fish exposed to urban and industrial wastewaters[J]. Environmental Science Technology, 2019, 53(14):8416-8425.
[59]	TANIGUCHI M, OKAZAKI T. The role of sphingomyelin and sphingomyelin synthases in cell death, proliferation and migration-from cell and animal models to human disorders[J]. Biochimica Biophysica Acta, Mol. Cell Biology Lipids, 2014, 1841(5):692-703.
[60]	TANIGUCHI M, OKAZAKI T. Role of ceramide/sphingomyelin (SM) balance regulated through "SM cycle" in cancer[J]. Cell Signalling, 2021, 87:110119.
[61]	YANG P, PENG Y, LIU H, et al. Multi-scale analysis of the foaming mechanism in anaerobic digestion of food waste:from physicochemical parameter, microbial community to metabolite response[J]. Water Research, 2022, 218:118482.

Relative Articles

[1]	LI Sida, WANG Xinyan, ZHANG Fangfei, SHAO Dongdong, CUI Baoshan, CAO Bo, ZHANG Yong. UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY IN WETLAND HYDRODYNAMIC RESEARCH: PROGRESS, PROSPECT, AND CHALLENGES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 93-104. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301012
[5]	Qin Lanlan Wang Youle, . CASE STUDY ON THE INDICATOR SYSTEM OF PLANNED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 143-146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502032
[6]	Li Xiangyu, Sun Jian, Qu Qizhong. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ON GREEN CONSTRUCTION FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 118-121. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503024
[7]	Cai Ming Luo Peng Lv Zishen, . MONITORING AND ANALYSIS OF ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE IN GUANGZHOU BETWEEN 2011 AND 2013[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 146-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501034

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

1.	熊瑛，曹海深，楼春华，曹天昊. 城市水环境治理技术及其发展趋势. 北京水务. 2024(01): 55-60 .
2.	张东. 基于黑臭水体治理的城市雨污分流改造技术研究. 水利技术监督. 2024(03): 215-217+226 .
3.	刘学虎. 农村水环境污染治理对策分析. 皮革制作与环保科技. 2024(05): 119-121 .
4.	金丽丽. 流域水环境污染生态修复关键工艺研究. 皮革制作与环保科技. 2024(07): 153-155 .
5.	闫林霞，韩小波，范翊. 城市河流生态构建与水环境安全保障集成技术研究. 皮革制作与环保科技. 2024(17): 58-60 .
6.	邓立昌. 城区黑臭水体污染特征研究. 环境科学与管理. 2024(10): 71-75 .
7.	陈正侠，张潇月，于金旗，张鹤清，佟庆远，徐常青，贾海峰. 面向水质目标管理的城镇河湖排口雨水径流控制方法与技术. 给水排水. 2024(12): 15-20+27 .
8.	吴冰，尤春伟，周代迎. RPIR+磁混凝沉淀在深圳市白花河沿岸黑臭水体治理中的应用. 市政技术. 2023(05): 205-211 .
9.	张帅. 基于城市水环境综合治理思路研究. 清洗世界. 2023(07): 132-134 .
10.	于飞. 黑臭水体生态修复实施效果试验研究. 水利技术监督. 2023(11): 38-40 .

Other cited types(2)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (362) PDF downloads(10)