PREDICTION OF INDUSTRIAL CARBON EMISSIONS IN SHAANXI PROVINCE BASED ON LASSO-GWO-KELM MODEL

ZHANG Xinsheng; WEI Zhizhen; CHEN Zhangzheng; HAN Yiwei

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202310018

Volume 41 Issue 10

Oct. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2023 > 41(10): 141-149

ZHAO Tianrui, CHEN Zhengrui, LIU Yiming, LI Yanliang, GUO Wei, TANG Xiaomi, TIAN Yu, ZHANG Jun, WANG Shutao. A SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION MODEL OF DOMESTIC WASTE BASED ON GIS REMOTE SENSING DATA ANALYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 213-218. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302028

Citation:

ZHANG Xinsheng, WEI Zhizhen, CHEN Zhangzheng, HAN Yiwei. PREDICTION OF INDUSTRIAL CARBON EMISSIONS IN SHAANXI PROVINCE BASED ON LASSO-GWO-KELM MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 141-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310018

Citation:

PDF( 1971 KB)

PREDICTION OF INDUSTRIAL CARBON EMISSIONS IN SHAANXI PROVINCE BASED ON LASSO-GWO-KELM MODEL

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310018

1. School of Management, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China;
2. The Research Institute of New Urbanization and Human Settlement in Shaanxi Province, Xi'an 710055, China

Received Date: 2023-07-08
Available Online: 2023-12-26

Abstract

Abstract

A model based on LASSO regression (LASSO), Grey Wolf Optimization algorithm (GWO) and nuclear Extreme Learning Machine (KELM) was established to improve the prediction accuracy of industrial carbon emissions. Firstly, the direct and indirect carbon emissions of the industry during 2000 to 2020 were calculated according to the IPCC formula method and electrothermal allocation method respectively, and the gross domestic product (GDP), energy structure, and fixed asset investment were selected by the STIRPAT model. Then seven significant influencing factors were selected by grey correlation analysis and the LASSO regression model. Secondly, the parameter data of the industrial carbon emission system were preprocessed and input into the KELM model, and the KELM regularization coefficient (C) and kernel function parameter (γ) were optimized using the GWO algorithm. Finally, the forecast results were integrated and summarized, and the forecast results of LASSO-GGO-KELM, LASSO-SSA-KELM, LASSO-SFO-KELM, LASSO-KELM, and LASSO-ELM were compared and analyzed. The results showed that the predicted value of the LASSO-GGO-KELM model fits well with the actual value, and its mean square error, mean absolute error, root mean square error, and mean absolute percentage error was 0.02%, 1.09%, 1.33%, and 1.17% respectively, which was superior to other models, proving that this model can predict industrial carbon emissions more accurately. This study can provide a reference for China to realize the Double Carbon Goal as soon as possible.
- industry,
- LASSO regression,
- kernel extreme learning machine (KELM),
- grey wolf optimization algorithm (GWO),
- carbon emission prediction

FullText(HTML)

References(27)

References

[1]	杨冕, 卢昕, 段宏波.中国高耗能行业碳排放因素分解与达峰路径研究[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(10):2501-2511.
[2]	张巍.基于STIRPAT模型的陕西省工业碳排放量预测和情景分析[J].可再生能源, 2017(5):771-777.
[3]	王向前, 夏丹.工业煤炭生产-消费两侧碳排放及影响因素研究:基于STIRPAT-EKC的皖豫两省对比[J].软科学, 2020, 34(8):84-89.
[4]	张国兴, 苏钊贤.黄河流域交通运输碳排放的影响因素分解与情景预测[J].管理评论, 2020, 32(12):283-294.
[5]	刘炳春, 符川川, 李健.基于PCA-SVR模型的中国CO₂排放量预测研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(4):51-61.
[6]	赵金辉, 李景顺, 王潘乐, 等.基于Lasso-BP神经网络模型的河南省碳达峰路径研究[J].环境工程, 2022, 40(12):151-164.
[7]	徐丽, 曲建升, 李恒吉, 等.西北地区居民生活碳排放现状分析及预测[J].干旱区地理, 2019, 42(5):1166-1175.
[8]	WANG Z X, YE D J.Forecasting Chinese carbon emissions from fossil energy consumption using non-linear grey multivariable models[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 142(8):600-612.
[9]	王勇, 毕莹, 王恩东.中国工业碳排放达峰的情景预测与减排潜力评估[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(10):131-140.
[10]	邵帅, 张曦, 赵兴荣.中国制造业碳排放的经验分解与达峰路径:广义迪氏指数分解和动态情景分析[J].中国工业经济, 2017(3):44-63.
[11]	SUN W, LIU M H.Prediction and analysis of the three major industries and residential consumption CO₂ Emissions based on least squares support vector machine in China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 122(2):144-153.
[12]	胡剑波, 罗志鹏, 李峰."碳达峰"目标下中国碳排放强度预测:基于LSTM和ARIMA-BP模型的分析[J].财经科学, 2022(2):89-101.
[13]	胡振, 龚薛, 刘华.基于BP模型的西部城市家庭消费碳排放预测研究:以西安市为例[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(7):82-89.
[14]	潘思羽, 张美玲.基于BP神经网络的甘肃省二氧化碳排放预测及影响因素研究[J].环境工程, 2023, 41(7):1-12.
[15]	朱盛恺.基于极限学习机模型的空气质量二次预报[J].软件工程, 2022, 25(8):39-42.
[16]	HUANG G B.An insight into extreme learning machines:random neurons, random features and kernels[J].Cognitive Computation, 2014, 6(3):376-390.
[17]	CHENG C, TAY W P, HUANG G B.Extreme learning machines for intrusion detection[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).Brisbane, QLD:IEEE, 2012:1-8.
[18]	高金贺, 郑宝珠, 周伟昊, 等.基于GA-SVR的城市交通运输碳排放预测研究[J].东华理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 45(3):269-274.
[19]	王珂珂, 牛东晓, 甄皓, 等.基于WOA-ELM模型的中国碳排放预测研究[J].生态经济, 2020, 36(8):20-27.
[20]	何洋, 李丽敏, 温宗周, 等.基于GWO-ELM算法模型的水体含沙量预测[J].科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(3):910-917.
[21]	PAUSTIAN K, RAVINDRANATH N H, AMSTEL A V.2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories[J].International Panel on Climate Change, 2006.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00023-4.
[22]	国家发展和改革委员会应对气候变化司.中国2008年温室气体清单研究[M].北京:中国计划出版社, 2014.
[23]	张新生, 张玥.基于Lasso-PSO-BP神经网络的腐蚀管道失效压力的预测[J].材料保护, 2020, 53(4):46-52.
[24]	SUN W, HUANG C C.Predictions of carbon emission intensity based on factor analysis and an improved extreme learning machine from the perspective of carbon emission efficiency[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 338:130414.
[25]	汪涛.2035年远景目标和"十四五"规划要点[J].企业观察家, 2021(2):24.
[26]	马高权, 周娜, 谢蒙飞, 等.基于GWO-KELM模型的变压器油纸套管典型绝缘故障辨识方法[J].电网与清洁能源, 2023, 39(5):38-48.
[27]	骆正山, 于瑶如, 骆济豪, 等.基于IAOA-KELM的储气库注采管柱内腐蚀速率预测[J].安全与环境学报, 2023:1-9.doi: 10.13637 /j.issn.1009-6094.2023.0267.

Relative Articles

[1]	KOU Xingxia, PENG Zhen, ZHANG Meigen, MIAO Shiguang, CHEN Min, ZHAO Xiujuan. RESEARCH PROGRESS IN URBAN AND REGIONAL-SCALE ATMOSPHERIC INVERSIONS OF CARBON SOURCES AND SINKS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 209-217. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410024
[2]	GANG Qinyan, MA Xiaoqian, LIU Chao, WANG Han, WANG Yayi. RESEARCH ON CARBON EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION LEACHATE TREATMENT SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 31-39. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404004
[3]	XUAN Gan, TANG Baiyang, LI Yuting, ZHANG Xitong, LIU Weijing, CAO Jiashun, LUO Jingyang, FENG Qian. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON MONITORING METHODS OF DIRECT CARBON EMISSIONS FROM URBAN SEWAGE COLLECTING SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 13-21. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411002
[4]	ZHANG Yili, LIU Hui, QIAN Xiaoyong. N₂O EMISSION FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS: EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND CONTROL STRATEGIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 9-21. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404002
[5]	HE Zihao, YI Mengting, ZHONG Qiumeng, LIANG Sai. INFLUENCING FACTORS OF SYNERGY DEGREE FOR INDUSTRIAL POLLUTANT AND CARBON REDUCTIONS IN CHINESE CITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 206-214. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401027
[6]	LIU Yuxin, ZENG Lingwu, FANG Zheng, SUN Dezhi. COMPREHENSIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN THE UPPER AND MIDDLE REACHES OF THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 34-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412005
[7]	LIU Yueting, ZHANG Qiang, JIANG Xiaohui, JI Yajun, YUAN Xiaohong, XIE Wenhao, ZHENG Lielong, LUO Jiaxin. SPATIAL-TEMPORAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CARBON EMISSIONS IN URBAN SEWAGE SYSTEM IN XI’AN AND ITS DOMINANT DRIVING FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 40-49. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411005
[8]	SHEN Yaohui, KANG Caixia, WU Mingwei, LIU Yurun, TONG Zhengong, WANG Liyuan. SPATIAL-TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF CONVERTIBLE NITROGEN IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF THE POYANG LAKE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 18-27. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405003
[9]	NING Lizhe, ZHANG Zhe, CAI Bofeng, ZHOU Caihua. RESEARCH ON CHINA'S REGIONAL AND PROVINCIAL ELECTRICITY GHG EMISSION FACTORS IN 2020[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 222-228. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303030
[10]	WANG Qinyi, SHENG Yangyue, SONG Ningning, ZHANG Junqi, ZENG Songxi, QIAN Xiaoyong, QIU Kaipei, LIU Qizhen. PROGRESS OF CH₄ AND N₂O MONITORING IN FULL-SCALE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 51-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310008
[11]	WU Qixian, XIE Xinyan, CHEN Yun, JIN Ziyi. ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING CARBON EMISSIONS OF URBAN RAIL TRANSIT PROJECTS BASED ON PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 133-140. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310017
[12]	YUAN Ye, GAO Jun, ZHANG Lulu, CHEN Tianming, DING Cheng. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON INFLUENCING FACTORS AND THEIR PREDICTION MODELS OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE GENERATION IN MUNICIPAL SEWAGE PIPELINES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 69-77. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311013
[13]	MA Yan, ZHANG Dading, ZHANG Fan, CHENG Lu, MA Yue, GUO Jianda. INFLUENTING FACTORS OF CHITOSAN-MODIFIED ZEOLITE AND ITS STABILIZATION EFFECT ON MULTI METAL CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 94-101,116. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201014
[14]	CHEN Weidong, WEN Donghui. ADVANCES IN SPATIAL-TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION AND ASSEMBLY MECHANISMS OF MICROBIAL COMMUNITY IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 1-13,39. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208001
[15]	ZHOU Yi-xin, LI Ji, WANG Yan, ZHENG Kai-kai, WANG Xiao-fei, ZHI Yao. REASON ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT MEASURES FOR LOW POLLUTANTS CONCENTRATION OF INFLUENT WATER OF URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 25-30. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112004
[16]	ZHENG Kai-kai, ZHOU Zhen, ZHOU Yuan, WANG Yan, ZHOU Jian-chun, LI Ji. A QUANTITIVE STUDY ON PROPORTION OF GROUNDWATER, RIVER WATER AND RAINWATER IN INFLUENT OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 75-80. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007012
[17]	LI Ji, WANG Yan, LUO Guo-bing, LI Bing-bing. OPERATION EVALUATION OF URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS IMPLEMENTING GRADE I-A STANDARD AND ANALYSIS ON EMPASSIS AND DIFFICULTIES IN UPGRADING THE STANDARD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 1-12. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007001
[18]	LI Jia-ju, ZHENG Xing-can, LI Peng-feng, LI Ji, HE Ling-jun, SUI Ke-jian, LV Zhen, SUN Yong-li, WANG Yan, YANG Min, GAO Chen-chen, GUO Ya-qiong, CHEN Tian-fang, ZHANG Yue, WANG Yi-da. RESEARCH SCHEME AND PROBLEMS IDENTIFICATION OF URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS BASED ON NEW LOCAL STANDARD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 13-18. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007002
[19]	LIU Xing, LIU Wen-li, JIANG Xia, GUO Ji-feng, HUANG Wei, LIU Rui, ZHANG Cong. ANALYSIS OF TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF RURAL DOMESTIC SEWAGE AND STATUS OF TREATMENT FACILITIES IN PLAIN RIVER NETWORK AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 38-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012007
[20]	HUANG Chou, WANG Yan, ZHENG Kai-kai, WANG Shuo, LI Ji. THE INFLUENCING FACTORS AND OPTIMAL OPERATION OF PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IN URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 58-65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007009

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	杨鹏至，赵元，肖粤新，闵英姿，邓曌，郭军，韦晓堃. 基于空间插值与PMF模型的国道沿线土壤重金属源解析：以107国道岳阳段为例. 现代地质. 2024(03): 694-705 .
2.	卓宁，陈小丫，吴伟. 基于ArcGIS和EVS的堆放废物危险特性鉴别应用与研究. 环境卫生工程. 2023(05): 66-72+85 .
3.	谢鹏远，伍泽涛，杨扬. 面向国土空间基础信息平台的地理分析模型构建方法研究. 西部资源. 2023(06): 88-90 .

Other cited types(3)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (241) PDF downloads(5)