Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 41 Issue 12
Dec.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2023  >  41(12): 48-53,115
HAN Lei, ZHONG Zhao-ping, JIANG Chao. ANALYSIS ON THE LAW OF COMBINED DEMERCURATION OF FLUE GAS PURIFICATION UNIT BY ADDING CaCl2[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 57-63. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104010
Citation: WANG Ersong, GONG Yongwei, ZHOU Guohua. SIMULATION ON RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY CONTROL EFFECTS IN A SPONGE RECONSTRUCTION COMMUNITY OF TIANJIN BY SWMM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 48-53,115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312005
shu

SIMULATION ON RUNOFF AND WATER QUALITY CONTROL EFFECTS IN A SPONGE RECONSTRUCTION COMMUNITY OF TIANJIN BY SWMM

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312005

  • 1. Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China;

  • 2. North China Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300074, China

  • Received Date: 2023-10-27
    Available Online: 2024-03-08
    Abstract
  • This study took a sponge reconstruction community in Tianjin as the research object, and used a combination of online monitoring and model simulation to conduct a quantitative evaluation of the control effect of sponge construction on runoff and water quality at the community scale. We built a stormwater management model, calibrated, and verified the key parameters of the model using the measured rainfall, water volume and water quality data, and simulated and analyzed the control effect and difference of sponge transformation on the total runoff, runoff peak value, and runoff pollution under the scenarios of design rainfall, actual field rainfall, and multi-year continuous rainfall. The results showed the total runoff volume control rate was 64.43% to 74.10%, the runoff volume reduction rate was 31.27% to 40.09% for the sponge community, and the peak flow reduction rate was 40.57% to 41.40% for the monitored area with different return periods. The total runoff volume control rate was 58.29% to 100.00%, and the runoff pollution reduction rate was 40.93% to 83.05% under 55 rainfall events. Total rainfall and maximum hourly rainfall were the most important characteristics affecting the efficiencies of runoff control and non-point source pollution reduction, with a strong negative correlation (P<0.01). The total runoff volume control rate was 78.61%, the runoff volume reduction rate was 37.18%, and the runoff pollution reduction rate was 45.16% with years of continuous rainfall. The results provided a reference for evaluating the effects of runoff control and non-point source pollution reduction at a community scale after the sponge reconstruction.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(15)
  • [1]
    章林伟. 中国海绵城市建设与实践[J]. 给水排水,2018,54(11):1-5.
    [2]
    YIN D, CHEN Y, JIA H, et al. Sponge city practice in China: a review of construction, assessment, operational and maintenance[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 280: 124963.
    [3]
    孙铮,王建龙,张长鹤等.基于SWMM模型的城市已建区排水防涝提标改造途径探讨[J]. 环境工程,2022,40(9):199-207.
    [4]
    周志才. 基于SWMM模型的上海市松江国际生态商务区海绵城市建设效果评价[J]. 环境工程,2020,38(8):167-173.
    [5]
    王文亮,李俊奇,宫永伟,等. 基于SWMM模型的低影响开发雨洪控制效果模拟[J]. 中国给水排水,2012,28(21):42-44.
    [6]
    刘洁,李玉琼,张翔,等. 基于SWMM的不同LID措施城市雨洪控制效果模拟研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电,2020(7):6-11.
    [7]
    胡海辉,梁雪,杜佳月. 北方高校校园雨水径流控制与景观设计[J]. 科学技术与工程,2021,21(2):744-750.
    [8]
    陈韬,夏蒙蒙,刘云鹏,等. 基于SWMM的海绵改建小区雨水径流调控研究[J]. 中国给水排水,2020,36(11):103-111.
    [9]
    熊赟,李子富,胡爱兵,等. 某低影响开发居住小区水量水质的SWMM模拟[J]. 中国给水排水,2015,31(17):100-103.
    [10]
    任南琪,黄鸿,王秋茹.海绵城市的地区分类建设范式[J]. 环境工程,2020,38(4):1-4.
    [11]
    印定坤,陈正侠,杨萌祺,等. 基于在线监测+模型的海绵城市建设径流水量控制效果研究[J]. 环境工程,2020,38(4):151-157.
    [12]
    田坤,宫永伟,陈世杰,等. 深圳新城公园低影响开发改造工程效果[J]. 深圳大学学报(理工版),2023,40(3):370-378.
    [13]
    国小伟,张海行,赵晨辰,等. 基于模型及在线监测的校园海绵改造项目效果评估[J]. 中国给水排水,2020,36(16):1-5

    ,11.
    [14]
    宫永伟,傅涵杰,印定坤,等. 降雨特征对低影响开发停车场径流控制效果的影响[J]. 中国给水排水,2018,34(11):119-125.
    [15]
    印定坤,陈正侠,李骐安,等.降雨特征对多雨城市海绵改造小区径流控制效果的影响[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版),2021,61(1):50-56.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Jianke, LIAO Hongqiang, DUAN Siyu, YANG Yelin, GAO Hongyu. CEMENTITIOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF ULTRAFINE POWDER FOR COAL-FIRED CFB ASH AND CFB SLAG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 110-117. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208015
    [2]HU Hua-jun, HUANG Ya-ji, CAO Jian-hua, LIU Ling-qin, QI Er-bing, DING Shou-yi, FAN Cong-hui. PYROLYSIS AND CARBON PRODUCTION OF RICE HUSK IN FLUIDIZED BED UNDER FLUE GAS WITH DIFFERENT CO2/O2 ATMOSPHERES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 117-122. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101018
    [3]LI Peng-fei, LI Rui, WANG Guang-chun, CHENG Zheng-lin. SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF SPRAY GUN DESIGN IN FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION AND DENITRIFICATION FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 151-155. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010024
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 徐哲丰，刘春铄，廖旭东，隋佳宏，陈雨秋，陈长宝，张涛，魏丽娜. 生态因子对林地参和农田参质量差异的影响. 中国农业科技导报. 2024(09): 213-223 .
    2. 赵彤，张圣柱，王旭，杨祉涵，王如君，多英全. 油气长输管线路由评价指标体系及模型构建研究. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2023(S2): 108-114 .
    3. 曹筱晗，薛旭东，刘大为，王永平，李笑咪. 陕西省工业行业绿色度研究与评价. 环境科学与管理. 2022(12): 87-91 .

    Other cited types(6)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402468
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 13.8 %FULLTEXT: 13.8 %META: 80.6 %META: 80.6 %PDF: 5.6 %PDF: 5.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.1 %其他: 6.1 %China: 8.2 %China: 8.2 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %上海: 1.6 %上海: 1.6 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %临沂: 0.3 %临沂: 0.3 %乐山: 0.3 %乐山: 0.3 %佳木斯: 0.3 %佳木斯: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %兰州: 0.3 %凉山彝族自治州: 0.3 %凉山彝族自治州: 0.3 %北京: 9.8 %北京: 9.8 %南京: 4.3 %南京: 4.3 %南充: 0.3 %南充: 0.3 %南宁: 0.3 %南宁: 0.3 %厦门: 0.5 %厦门: 0.5 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %合肥: 0.5 %合肥: 0.5 %天津: 3.7 %天津: 3.7 %宁波: 0.8 %宁波: 0.8 %宜昌: 0.5 %宜昌: 0.5 %宿迁: 0.3 %宿迁: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %平顶山: 0.5 %平顶山: 0.5 %广州: 1.1 %广州: 1.1 %成都: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 1.1 %杭州: 1.1 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %汉中: 0.3 %汉中: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %济南: 2.9 %济南: 2.9 %济源: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %深圳: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %湖州: 0.8 %湖州: 0.8 %濮阳: 0.5 %濮阳: 0.5 %玉林: 0.5 %玉林: 0.5 %盘锦: 0.3 %盘锦: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %红河哈尼族彝族自治州: 0.5 %红河哈尼族彝族自治州: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 17.6 %芒廷维尤: 17.6 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %蚌埠: 0.3 %蚌埠: 0.3 %西宁: 19.4 %西宁: 19.4 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.3 %贵港: 0.3 %贵港: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %达州: 0.5 %达州: 0.5 %运城: 2.4 %运城: 2.4 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %长春: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长沙: 1.6 %长沙: 1.6 %长治: 0.8 %长治: 0.8 %阳泉: 0.8 %阳泉: 0.8 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %黄山: 0.3 %黄山: 0.3 %其他China[]上海临汾临沂乐山佳木斯兰州凉山彝族自治州北京南京南充南宁厦门台州合肥天津宁波宜昌宿迁常德平顶山广州成都昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉汉中沈阳济南济源深圳湖州濮阳玉林盘锦石家庄福州红河哈尼族彝族自治州芒廷维尤苏州蚌埠西宁西安诺沃克贵港贵阳达州运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆长春长沙长治阳泉青岛黄山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (179) PDF downloads(11) Cited by(9)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return