Source Journal of CSCD
Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Volume 41 Issue 12
Dec.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WEI Qing, CHEN Yongqi, XIE Yifan, LIN Jingying, YIN Hailong. POLLUTION MECHANISM OF WET-WEATHER PUMPING DISCHARGE IN SEPARATED STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS BASED ON ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 54-60,181. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312006
Citation: WEI Qing, CHEN Yongqi, XIE Yifan, LIN Jingying, YIN Hailong. POLLUTION MECHANISM OF WET-WEATHER PUMPING DISCHARGE IN SEPARATED STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS BASED ON ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 54-60,181. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312006

POLLUTION MECHANISM OF WET-WEATHER PUMPING DISCHARGE IN SEPARATED STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS BASED ON ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312006
  • Received Date: 2023-11-15
    Available Online: 2024-03-08
  • Wet-weather discharges from stormwater pumping stations in separate stormwater drainage systems contribute to the deterioration of river water quality. Understanding the pollution mechanism of pumping discharge is the key to alleviating wet-weather pollution and improving water quality. To identify the dominant factors for controlling wet-weather discharge pollution, this study employed back propagation neural network (BPNN) and radial basis neural network (RBNN) models to establish the nonlinear relationships between 11 input parameters (i.e., rainfall and stormwater network operation) and the wet-weather discharge pollution from two pumping stations in separate stormwater drainage systems in downtown Shanghai. The findings indicated that RBNN performs better in simulating wet-weather pumping discharge pollution than BPNN. For water quality indicators of COD, NH3-N, and SS, the RBNN achieved a higher performance of 15.6% to 31.9%, 12.3%~18.3%, and 12.6%~53.9%, respectively than BPNN, measuring by average absolute error, root mean square error, and average percentage error, respectively. Coefficients of determination were improved by 3.1%~5.4% when comparing RBNN with BPNN. Moreover, the importance ranking of input parameters using RBNN identified five key parameters, including time duration between two consecutive pump operation events, wet-well water level for starting the pumps, peak rainfall intensity, antecedent dry-weather periods, and wet-well level for stopping the pumps. Actions should be taken to investigate the sewage sources illicitly discharging into storm drains and then correct these illicit discharges. These actions can eliminate the sewage accommodation and the corresponding accumulated pollutant deposits within the storm pipes on dry-weather days, which are inappropriately flushed into the receiving waters during the operation of wet-weather storm pumps. Therefore, the wet-weather discharge pollution would be obviously alleviated. Optimizing the in-pipe water level to stop stormwater pumps, can also aid in reducing the wet-weather discharge pollution.
  • loading
  • [1]
    ZGHEIB S, MOILLERON R, CHEBBO G. Priority pollutants in urban stormwater: part 1-Case of separate storm sewers[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(20): 6683-6692.
    [2]
    徐祖信, 徐晋, 金伟, 等. 我国城市黑臭水体治理面临的挑战与机遇[J]. 给水排水, 2019, 55(3): 1-5

    , 77.
    [3]
    ELLIS J B, BUTLER D. Surface water sewer misconnections in England and Wales: pollution sources and impacts[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 526: 98-109.
    [4]
    LI Y, ZHOU Y, WANG H, et al. Characterization and sources apportionment of overflow pollution in urban separate stormwater systems inappropriately connected with sewage[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 303: 114231.
    [5]
    THÉVENOT D R, MOILLERON R, LESTEL L, et al. Critical budget of metal sources and pathways in the Seine River basin (1994—2003) for Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2007, 375(1/2/3): 180-203.
    [6]
    李田, 戴梅红, 张伟, 等. 水泵强制排水系统合流制溢流的污染源解析[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(10): 1513-1518, 1525.
    [7]
    WU J, WANG Z. A hybrid model for water quality prediction based on an artificial neural network, wavelet transform, and long short-term memory[J]. Water, 2022, 14(4): 610.
    [8]
    SALEH A, ALI H. Wastewater pollutants modeling using artificial neural networks[J]. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 2021, 22(7): 35-45.
    [9]
    赵梦圆,王建龙,黄涛,等.北京市雨水径流中颗粒物沉降特性[J].环境工程,2019,37(2):67-72.
    [10]
    王新民, 张超超. 基于深度学习的旧金山湾水质预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 222-230.
    [11]
    张秀菊, 王柳林, 李秀平, 等. 基于BP神经网络的潇河流域水质预测[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2021, 32(5): 19-26.
    [12]
    孙跃扬,武利,郭楠,等.具有在线自组织功能的RBF网络的COD预测[J/OL].控制工程:1-7.https://doi.org/10.14107/j.cnki.kzgc.20230237.

    2023-12-17.
    [13]
    XIE Y, CHEN Y, LIAN Q, et al. Enhancing real-time prediction of effluent water quality of wastewater treatment plant based on improved feedforward neural network coupled with optimization algorithm[J]. Water, 2022, 14(7): 1053.
    [14]
    ZHANG Q, LI Z, SNOWLING S, et al. Predictive models for wastewater flow forecasting based on time series analysis and artificial neural network[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2019, 80(2): 243-253.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (157) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return