Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
DU Ying'en, HOU Jingming, CHAI Jie, BAI Guangbi, LI Xuan, ZHANG Hongfang, ZHANG Zhaoan, CHEN Guangzhao, LI Bingyao. TEMPORAL VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS OF PRECIPITATION EXTREMES IN XI'AN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 41-46. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211006
Citation: ZHANG Xiuhong, LI Renge, ZHAO Yueshuai, GAO Linting, NING Bo. ANALYSIS OF DIFFUSE POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS IN AGRICULTURAL SPACE IN XI'AN BASED ON DPeRS MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 142-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312017

ANALYSIS OF DIFFUSE POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS IN AGRICULTURAL SPACE IN XI'AN BASED ON DPeRS MODEL

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312017
  • Received Date: 2023-03-07
    Available Online: 2024-03-08
  • The diffuse pollution estimation with remote sensing (DPeRS) model was conducted to quantify the agricultural spatial diffuse pollution load discharge and river inflow in Xi'an in 2020. The spatial distribution characteristics of surface source pollution were analyzed, the main types of non-point source pollution in the agricultural space of Xi'an were identified, and the targeted prevention and control suggestions for non-point source pollution were also provided. The results showed that the surplus of nitrogen and phosphorus in farmland of agricultural space in Xi'an was large and widely distributed. There were significant differences in the spatial distribution of non-point source pollution emissions. High-value areas were distributed in the east part of Yanliang District, the east part of Gaoling District, the plain area of Zhouzhi County and Chang'an District, and the Lishan hilly area in Lintong District and Lantian County. The nitrogen non-point source pollution is main affected by rural life, and the phosphorus non-point source pollution is mainly affected by soil erosion. The spatial distribution of nitrogen and phosphorus non-point source pollution into the river in agricultural space is similar, but the content is quite different. The high-value areas are located in the east part of Yanliang District, the middle and north part of Lintong District, the Lishan Mountain area of Lantian County, the central and eastern plain area of Zhouzhi County, the shallow mountain area of Qinling Mountains and both sides of some valley roads.
  • [1]
    高荣伟. 我国水资源的污染现状及对策分析[J]. 资源与人居环境, 2018, 239(11): 44-51.
    [2]
    王一格, 王海燕, 郑永林, 等. 农业面源污染研究方法与控制技术研究进展[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021,42(1):25-33.
    [3]
    黄瑜, 刘佩诗, 甘曼琴,等. GIS技术在农业面源污染研究中的应用[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020, 290(6):279-285.
    [4]
    中华人民共和国生态环境部, 国家统计局, 中华人民共和国农业农村部. 第二次全国污染源普查公报[R]. 2020.
    [5]
    王雪蕾. 遥感分布式面源污染评估模型:理论方法与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.
    [6]
    USEPA(United States Environmental Protection Agency). Methods for Identifying and Evaluating the Nature and Extent of Non-point Sources of Pollutants[R].Washington, D.C., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,1973.
    [7]
    冯爱萍, 黄莉, 王雪蕾, 等. 浦阳江流域(浦江县段)面源污染模型估算及河流生态缓冲带重点区域识别[J]. 环境工程学报,2022, 16(1): 73-84.
    [8]
    BORAH D K, YAGOW G, SALEH A, et al. Sediment and nutrient modeling for TMDL development and implementation[J]. Transactions of the ASABE, 2006, 49(4): 967-986.
    [9]
    张玉珍. 九龙江上游五川流域农业非点源污染研究[D]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2003.
    [10]
    吴在兴, 王晓燕. 流域空间统计模型SPARROW及其研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2010, 33(9): 87-90

    ,139.
    [11]
    谢经朝, 赵秀兰, 何丙辉,等. 汉丰湖流域农业面源污染氮磷排放特征分析[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(4): 1760-1769.
    [12]
    王玉, 王雪蕾, 张亚群,等. 基于DPeRS模型的渭河典型断面汇水区面源污染评估及污染成因分析[J]. 环境监控与预警, 2022, 14(6):8-16.
    [13]
    ABATZOGLOU J T, DOBROWSKI S Z, PARKS S A, et al. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958—2015[DB/OL]. Sci. Data 2018, 5, 170191. [2023-1-4]. https://developers.google.cn/earth-engine/datasets.
    [14]
    DIDAN K. MOD13Q1 MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 250m SIN Grid V006[DB/OL]. 2015, distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. [2023-1-4]. https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/.
    [15]
    FISCHER G, F NACHTERGAELE, S PRIELER, et al. Global Agro-ecological Zones Assessment for Agriculture (GAEZ 2008)[DB/OL]. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria and FAO, Rome, Italy. [2023-1-4]. https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/data-hub/soil-maps-and-databases/.
    [16]
    NASA JPL. NASADEM Slope and Curvature Global 1 arc second V001[DB/OL]. 2020, distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. [2023-1-4]. https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/search.
    [17]
    地表径流分布数据[DB/OL]. [2023-1-7]. 地理遥感生态网科学数据注册与出版系统(www.gisrs.cn).
    [18]
    西安市统计局, 国家统计局西安调查队. 西安市统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2021.
    [19]
    吴义根, 冯开文, 李谷成. 我国农业面源污染的时空分异与动态演进[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2017, 22(7): 186-199.
    [20]
    高莹, 孙喜军, 吕爽,等. 陕西省化肥施用时空分异及面源污染环境风险评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(2): 76-83,96.
    [21]
    索龙, 赵晓进, 张俊丽, 等. 基于统计数据的陕西省农业面源污染现状分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(8): 137-144.
    [22]
    WANG X L, FENG A P, WANG Q, et al. Spatial variability of the nutrient balance and related NPSP risk analysis for agro-ecosystems in China in 2010[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2014, 193:42-52.
    [23]
    JIA K, LIANG S, LIU S, et al. Global land surface fractional vegetation cover estimation using general regression neural networks from MODIS surface reflectance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 2015, 53(9):4787-4796.
    [24]
    WANG X L, WANG Q, WU C Q, et al. A method coupled with remote sensing data to evaluate non-point source pollution in the Xin'anjiang catchment of China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2012, 430:132-143.
    [25]
    王略, 屈创赵国栋. 基于中国土壤流失方程模型的区域土壤侵蚀定量评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(1):122-125

    ,130.
    [26]
    黄满湘, 周成虎, 章申,等. 农田暴雨径流侵蚀泥沙流失及其对氮磷的富集[J]. 水土保持学报, 2002, 16(4):13-16

    ,33.
    [27]
    薛金凤, 夏军, 梁涛,等. 颗粒态氮磷负荷模型研究[J]. 水科学进展, 2005, 16(3):334-337.
    [28]
    刘宇林, 赵广举, 穆兴民,等. 近55年渭河流域降雨侵蚀力变化及对输沙量的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(3):15-22.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]XIE Qi, XIA Fei, YUAN Bo. PREDICTION OF PM2.5 CONCENTRATION IN XI’AN BASED ON CEEMDAN-SE-BiLSTM MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(8): 105-115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202408013
    [2]LIU Xiaorui, WANG Zhimin, WANG Yinlong. POLLUTION REDUCTION OF INFLOW RIVERS OF THE TIEGANG RESERVOIR IN BAO’AN DISTRICT, SHENZHEN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 26-32. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410004
    [3]TIAN Weichao, CHEN Rongxu, TIAN Shimin, WANG Xin, LIU Jiaxin. EFFECT OF POLYPLOID ARUNDO DONAX L. ON POLLUTION CONTROL OF SLOPE RUNOFF IN HILLY AREA IN WEST HENAN PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 60-65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412008
    [4]WANG Yan, WANG Jie, XIE Zijian, LI Chunhua, YE Chun, MIAO Kexin, WEI Weiwei, ZHENG Ye. NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTIONS IN TYPICAL RIVER BASINS IN HILLY AND MOUNTAINOUS AREAS AND PLAIN RIVER NETWORK AREA IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 33-40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410005
    [5]LIU Yueting, ZHANG Qiang, JIANG Xiaohui, JI Yajun, YUAN Xiaohong, XIE Wenhao, ZHENG Lielong, LUO Jiaxin. SPATIAL-TEMPORAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CARBON EMISSIONS IN URBAN SEWAGE SYSTEM IN XI’AN AND ITS DOMINANT DRIVING FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 40-49. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411005
    [6]WANG Xuelian, LIU Bo, ZHAO Changsen, HUANG Zhenfang, PAN Xu. STUDY ON CALCULATION METHOD SYSTEM OF POLLUTANT LOAD FROM NON-POINT SOURCE INTO RIVERS IN BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 166-172,211. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203025
    [7]DU Ying'en, HOU Jingming, CHAI Jie, BAI Guangbi, LI Xuan, ZHANG Hongfang, ZHANG Zhaoan, CHEN Guangzhao, LI Bingyao. TEMPORAL VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS OF PRECIPITATION EXTREMES IN XI'AN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 41-46. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211006
    [8]YIN Jingchen, DING Han, LI Zeli, LI Xue, LI Guoguang, WANG Yuqiu. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION SIMULATION BASED ON SPARROW MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 253-260,294. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206032
    [9]ZHANG Zhi-jie, WEN Fei, ZHANG Ya-qun, ZHOU Jing, FENG Ai-ping. CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE ANALYSIS OF NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION LOAD IN THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN ON A REGIONAL SCALE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 81-88,142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209011
    [10]ZHANG Zi-yang, QI Hao, ZHANG Xiao-ran, LI Hai-yan. INFLUENCING MECHANISM OF PERMEABLE PAVEMENT TYPE ON REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF HEAVY METALS FROM RUNOFF[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 41-46,88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102007
    [11]GENG Yi-cheng, ZHOU Wei-bo, SHI Fang-fang, DONG Yan-hui. STUDY ON GROUNDWATER POLLUTION RISK IN PLAIN AREA OF XI’AN CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 215-222. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005037
    [12]GUO Min-peng, HOU Jing-ming, FU De-yu, KANG Yong-de, SHI Bao-shan, LI Chang-hao. HIGH PERFORMANCE NUMERICAL SIMULATION METHOD FOR NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION TRANSFER PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 160-166,173. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008027
    [20]Zhang Lihua, Wu Jiechun, Bao Yuhai, Xu Ri, Xu Kun. THE ANALYSIS OF POLLUTION LEVEL OF PARTICLES PM10 AND PM2. 5 IN WUHAN AND XI'AN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 73-76. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503015
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 杨璐莹,霍艾迪,赵志欣,钟芳倩,王星,陈建. 基于CMIP6的秦岭北麓未来极端降水洪涝风险分析. 人民黄河. 2024(02): 55-60+66 .
    2. 李遥. 基于优化深度学习的西南地区极端降雨事件预测模型构建. 水资源开发与管理. 2024(04): 64-70 .
    3. 范臣臣,侯精明,陆品品,李东来,官保君,张佩琦,高徐军. 极端暴雨下城区新建基础设施洪涝致灾规律研究. 防灾减灾工程学报. 2024(06): 1265-1274 .
    4. 高芸,王婉婉,景晶. 豫北地区长短历时极端降水重心迁移与变化趋势. 环境工程. 2023(S2): 898-901 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 15.3 %FULLTEXT: 15.3 %META: 82.8 %META: 82.8 %PDF: 1.8 %PDF: 1.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.1 %其他: 14.1 %上海: 1.8 %上海: 1.8 %亳州: 1.2 %亳州: 1.2 %保定: 0.6 %保定: 0.6 %北京: 3.1 %北京: 3.1 %南京: 1.8 %南京: 1.8 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %台州: 2.5 %台州: 2.5 %合肥: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.6 %大同: 0.6 %大同: 0.6 %天津: 2.5 %天津: 2.5 %常德: 1.8 %常德: 1.8 %广州: 0.6 %广州: 0.6 %张家口: 2.5 %张家口: 2.5 %成都: 0.6 %成都: 0.6 %扬州: 1.8 %扬州: 1.8 %昆明: 2.5 %昆明: 2.5 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %杭州: 1.8 %杭州: 1.8 %江门: 1.2 %江门: 1.2 %泉州: 0.6 %泉州: 0.6 %深圳: 1.2 %深圳: 1.2 %温哥华: 1.8 %温哥华: 1.8 %温州: 1.2 %温州: 1.2 %湖州: 1.2 %湖州: 1.2 %漯河: 4.9 %漯河: 4.9 %烟台: 0.6 %烟台: 0.6 %石家庄: 2.5 %石家庄: 2.5 %福州: 0.6 %福州: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 20.9 %芒廷维尤: 20.9 %芝加哥: 1.8 %芝加哥: 1.8 %衢州: 1.2 %衢州: 1.2 %西宁: 3.7 %西宁: 3.7 %西安: 1.8 %西安: 1.8 %贵阳: 1.2 %贵阳: 1.2 %运城: 1.2 %运城: 1.2 %遵义: 1.2 %遵义: 1.2 %郑州: 1.8 %郑州: 1.8 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %长沙: 1.2 %长沙: 1.2 %阳泉: 1.2 %阳泉: 1.2 %阿什本: 1.8 %阿什本: 1.8 %鞍山: 1.2 %鞍山: 1.2 %其他上海亳州保定北京南京南昌南通台州合肥嘉兴大同天津常德广州张家口成都扬州昆明晋城杭州江门泉州深圳温哥华温州湖州漯河烟台石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义郑州重庆长沙阳泉阿什本鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (135) PDF downloads(3) Cited by(6)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return