Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
YU Jin-tao, MA Xiao-yu, ZHANG Chang-bo. AN EFFICIENT SCREENING SYSTEM OF CLAY SOIL PARTICLES IN THE SOIL WASHING REMEDIATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 160-166. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106024
Citation: ZHU Yixin, YE Zhen, REN Lingwei, ZHONG Yuchi, ZHOU Wenjun. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONSTRUCTION WASTE TO BURN CERAMICS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 206-212,130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312025

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONSTRUCTION WASTE TO BURN CERAMICS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312025
  • Received Date: 2022-10-28
    Available Online: 2024-03-08
  • In this paper, municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash was pre-treated with acid pickling to remove most chloride, and then burned ceramics in conjunction with construction waste. The effects of dechlorinated fly ash doping ratios and sintering temperatures on the morphology and mechanical properties of ceramics were investigated. The doping ratios of the dechlorinated fly ash brought about the content differences of SiO2, Al2O3 and CaO in the mixture. The sintering temperatures mainly affected the pore structure and crystalline phase of ceramics. The results showed that at the dechlorinated fly ash doping of 20% and the sintering temperature of 1150 ℃, the ceramics had the optimal performance: the compressive strength was 7.94 MPa, the particle density was 1245.50 kg/m3, 1 hour water absorption rate was 7.92%. After pretreatment and sintering, compared to the mixture, the leaching rate of heavy metal in the ceramics was reduced by more than 62.50%, and the toxic equivalent concentration of dioxin was reduced by 90.15%. The study provided a reference for the harmless resource treatment of fly ash and construction waste.
  • [1]
    付凌晖, 刘爱华. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2022.
    [2]
    田志鹏, 田海燕, 张冰如. 城市生活垃圾焚烧飞灰物化性质及重金属污染特性[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2016, 38(9): 80-85.
    [3]
    马懿, 郑仁栋, 周志昊, 等. 生活垃圾焚烧飞灰处置技术与应用瓶颈[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(5): 237-243.
    [4]
    黄建立, 金宜英, 舒郅斐, 等. 利用飞灰烧结陶粒制备实心发泡自保温砌块的研究[J]. 环境工程, 2022: 1-7.
    [5]
    秦娟, 杨尚文, 鲍雨晴, 等. 钙铝黄长石陶粒改性及处理含锰废水效能[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(8): 47-54.
    [6]
    胡超超, 王里奥, 詹欣源, 等. 城市生活垃圾焚烧飞灰与电解锰渣烧制陶粒[J]. 环境工程学报, 2019, 13(1): 177-185.
    [7]
    魏国侠, 王承智, 孙磊, 等. 污染底泥与焚烧飞灰混烧陶粒实验研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2015, 38(2): 134-138.
    [8]
    ZHANG J, LIU B, ZHANG X, et al. Co-vitrification of municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash and bottom slag: Glass detoxifying characteristics and porous reformation[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2022, 243: 113995.
    [9]
    马载红, 郭青, 蔡辉. 建筑废弃土在烧结制品方面资源化应用研究[J]. 砖瓦, 2021(12): 25-27.
    [10]
    吴世流. 建筑淤泥质弃土烧结保温多孔砖生产技术[J]. 砖瓦, 2009(2): 22-24.
    [11]
    秦晋一, 封硕, 方姣, 等. 二氧化硅对污泥烧结陶粒结构强度和孔隙率的影响[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2019, 46(9): 117-122.
    [12]
    RILEY C M. Relation of Chemical Properties to the Bloating of Clays[J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1951, 34(4): 121-128.
    [13]
    国家环境保护总局,国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 危险废物鉴别标准浸出毒性鉴别: GB 5085.3—2007[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2007.
    [14]
    中华人民共和国生态环境部. 固体废物浸出毒性浸出方法硫酸硝酸法: HJ/T 299—2007[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2007.
    [15]
    中华人民共和国生态环境部. 生活垃圾焚烧飞灰污染控制技术规范(试行): HJ 1134—2020[S]. 2020.
    [16]
    中华人民共和国生态环境部. 固体废物二噁英类的测定同位素稀释高分辨气相色谱-高分辨质谱法: HJ 77.3—2008[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2008.
    [17]
    李海丹, 郑丽萍, 周涵, 等. 我国生活垃圾组分的时空分布特征回顾[J]. 环境工程: 1-12.
    [18]
    柴晓利, 王冬扬, 高桥史武, 等. 我国典型垃圾焚烧飞灰物化特性对比[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(12): 1857-1862.
    [19]
    王月香, 邵兰燕, 徐天男, 等. 垃圾焚烧飞灰中氯元素存在形态及深度脱氯的研究[J]. 无机盐工业, 2021, 53(5): 78-83.
    [20]
    CONLEY J E, WILSON H, KLINEFELTER T H. Production of Lightweight Concrete Aggregates from Clays, Shales, Slates, and Other Materials[M]. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, 1948.
    [21]
    王燕琳, 贾冠华, 杨凤玲. 固硫灰-污泥陶粒的制备及其性能影响研究[J]. 非金属矿, 2022, 45(3): 98-102

    ,106.
    [22]
    ACCHAR W, VIEIRA F A, HOTZA D. Effect of marble and granite sludge in clay materials[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2006, 419(1-2): 306-309.
    [23]
    刘明伟, 许国仁, 李圭白. Al2O3对污泥和河道底泥制取陶粒的性能影响[J]. 中国给水排水, 2013, 29(21): 132-134.
    [24]
    罗晖, 钱觉时, 陈伟, 等. 污水污泥页岩陶粒烧胀特性[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2010, 38(7): 1247-1252.
    [25]
    杨时元. 陶粒原料性能及其找寻方向的探讨[J]. 建材地质, 1997(4): 14-19.
    [26]
    JUNG I H, DECTEROV S A, PELTON A D. Critical thermodynamic evaluation and optimization of the MgO-Al2O3, CaO-MgO-Al2O3, and MgO-Al2O3-SiO2 Systems[J]. Journal of Phase Equilibria and Diffusion, 2004, 25(4): 329-345.
    [27]
    LEE W E, JAYASEELAN D D, ZHANG S. Solid–liquid interactions: The key to microstructural evolution in ceramics[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2008, 28(7): 1517-1525.
    [28]
    ZOU J L, XU G R, LI G B. Ceramsite obtained from water and wastewater sludge and its characteristics affected by Fe2O3, CaO, and MgO[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 165(1-3): 995-1001.
    [29]
    赵光岩, 饶平根, 吕明. 莫来石及多孔莫来石的研究和应用[J]. 中国陶瓷, 2006(9): 13-17.
    [30]
    许事成, 苏壮飞, 刘泽, 等. 硅灰掺量对免烧粉煤灰陶粒性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021: 1-7.
    [31]
    杨雷, 罗树琼, 张印民. 利用城市污泥烧制页岩陶粒[J]. 环境工程学报, 2010, 4(5): 1177-1180.
    [32]
    邢明飞. 中州铝厂多年期赤泥"泛霜"物质分析及制备赤泥烧结砖研究[D]. 焦作: 河南理工大学, 2010[2022-05-21].
    [33]
    翁焕新, 章金骏, 曹彦圣, 等. 污泥陶粒的性能特征与烧制工艺[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2011, 45(10): 1877-1883.
    [34]
    张静波. 利用煤矸石掺量及成分检测控制烧结砖的泛霜[J]. 砖瓦, 2017(7): 30-31.
    [35]
    唐敏, 邓寅生, 欧睿, 等. 城市污水处理厂污泥的资源化利用研究[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 28(3): 369-372.
    [36]
    章泓立, 吴思民, 金利学, 等. 河道底泥制备陶粒轻骨料的工艺条件及性能[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2021, 43(3): 304-308

    ,316.
    [37]
    罗忠涛, 肖宇领, 杨久俊, 等. 垃圾焚烧飞灰有毒重金属固化稳定技术研究综述[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2012, 34(8): 58-62

    ,68.
    [38]
    LIU M, XU G, LI G. Effect of the ratio of components on the characteristics of lightweight aggregate made from sewage sludge and river sediment[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2017, 105: 109-116.
    [39]
    施勇. 二噁英控制及飞灰处理技术的探讨[C]//第八届中国水泥环资论坛暨大气污染物超低排放治理技术研讨会文集. 中国水泥学会环资专委会、中国硅酸盐学会环境保护分会, 2019: 189-194.
    [40]
    韦平英, 侯美珍, 莫德清, 等. 环境中二噁英及其控制、降解技术[J]. 环境科学动态, 2002(2): 34-36.
    [41]
    李润东, 聂永丰, 李爱民, 等. 垃圾焚烧飞灰熔融过程二噁英分解特性[J]. 化工学报, 2004(4): 668-672.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]XIA Qiongqiong, ZHENG Xingcan, GU Miao, LI Mai, SHANG Wei, TIAN Yongying, HUANG Haiwei, ONG Say Leong. CHARACTERIZATION OF SUMMER GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SEPTIC TANKS AND MEASUMENT OF CH4 EMISSION FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 240-246. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409023
    [2]WU Yi, MAO Xufeng, SONG Xiuhua, YU Hongyan, TANG Wenjia, XIE Shunbang, LIU Zebi, DING Qizhi. COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF METHANOGENS IN CASCADE RESERVOIRS IN THE UPPER YELLOW RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 8-17. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412002
    [3]ZHANG Lei, LI Xuemei, WEI Yuan, FENG Chenglian, SU Hailei, LIU Yuxian, ZHAO Yanan, LI Feilong, GUO Fen, ZHANG Yuan, XUE Jingchuan. ENVIRONMENTAL OCCURRENCE AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF PARABENS AND METABOLITES IN THE DONGJIANG RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 91-99. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404011
    [4]SHEN Yaohui, KANG Caixia, WU Mingwei, LIU Yurun, TONG Zhengong, WANG Liyuan. SPATIAL-TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF CONVERTIBLE NITROGEN IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF THE POYANG LAKE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 18-27. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405003
    [5]CHI Shanqing, LIN Caiqiang, WU Ligui, ZOU Xiaoming, HUANG Xiangfeng, ZHANG Haiping, XIE Rongrong, LI Jiabing, WU Qiaofeng, LIU Jia. TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF NUTRIENTS AND ANTIBIOTICS IN URBAN ARTIFICIAL LAKES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 29-36. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401005
    [6]ZHANG Yaning, ZHU Weihuang, DONG Ying, WU Xijun, LIU Jing. EFFECT OF REDOX CONDITION AND MICROBIAL ACTION ON HEAVY METALS TRANSFORMATION IN RESERVOIR SEDIMENTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 101-108. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306014
    [7]LIU Haizhu, BAI Junhong, WANG Yaqi, ZHANG Ling, LIU Zhe. RESEARCH PROGRESS AND HOTSPOT ANALYSIS OF SEDIMENT MICROPLASTICS BASED ON CITESPACE LITERATURE METROLOGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 42-50. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301006
    [8]WANG Chengwen, ZHANG Yong, ZHANG Jiaxin, ZHANG Hui. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SEDIMENT NUTRIENTS IN A WETLAND WITH RECLAIMED WATER SUPPLEMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 87-92,104. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301011
    [9]XUE Zhaoxia, FENG Qian, FANG Fang, LUO Jingyang, CAO Jiashun, XU Runze. EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND MECHANISMS OF METHANE IN MUNICIPAL SEWER SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 123-129,193. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206016
    [10]SU Jinwei, ZHANG Lingfei, YU Minghui, SUN Tianxin, WANG Bo, ZHAO Jinghao, WANG Ziyi, SUN Yue, ZHOU Shilei. CHARACTERISTICS AND DISTRIBUTION OF NITROGEN FORMS IN SEDIMENTS OF BAIYANGDIAN LAKE IN SUMMER AND AUTUMN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 53-58,153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202009
    [11]LI Anna, WANG Hui, LIU Qiangnan, LI Taiping. DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF SOIL POLLUTANTS IN AN EXPLOSION SITE OF A CHEMICAL PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 189-198. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211027
    [12]CUI Feijian, QIN Guangxiong, ZENG Hailong, HUANG Zhiwei, LI Wenjing, YANG Hanjie, HU Yanfang, FANG Huaiyang, ZENG Fantang, DU Hongwei. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND HEAVY METAL IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF HEAVILY POLLUTED TRIBUTARIES OF SHAHE RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 110-116. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201016
    [13]CHEN Rui, DU Shuangjie, XU Wei, ZHU Tao. CONCENTRATION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN SOIL OF A WITHDRAWAL CULTIVATED LAND IN SUBURB OF NANJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 102-110,165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203016
    [14]PENG Yan, CHEN Di-yun, CHEN Nan, ZENG Lin-wei. PASSIVATION EFFECT OF CALCIUM PHOSPHATE ON URANIUM IN SEDIMENTS IN DOWNSTREAM WATERS OF A URANIUM MINE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 13-19,24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104003
    [15]MA Tao, SONG Jiang-min, LIU Qun-qun, SHENG Yan-qing. COMPARISON OF ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN DREDGED SEDIMENT TREATED BY DIFFERENT METHODS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 141-146,152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102023
    [16]WAN Ling, XIANG Song, NIU Yong, HUANG Tian-yin, WANG Yong-tao, PANG Yan. DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND ORGANIC MATTERS IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF THE NIUGU RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 174-180. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101027
    [19]Liu Xiao'er. POLLUTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY EVALUATION FOR SOIL IN THE OIL PRODUCTION ZONES OF AN OIL FIELD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 126-129. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502028
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 陈亦妍,郭媛媛,吕政霖. 沂河临沂段表层沉积物重金属污染特征与生态风险评价. 首都师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(02): 66-72 .
    2. 周颖,王雪梅,蒋玉琢,赵云峰,季宏兵. 北京市平谷区金矿区周边土壤砷、汞赋存形态特征及生态风险评价. 环境工程. 2021(08): 203-210+164 . 本站查看
    3. 朱学韬,林海英,冯庆革,赵博涵,朱奕帆,蓝文陆,李天深. 广西北部湾表层沉积物重金属污染水平、生态风险评价和源分析. 环境工程. 2021(08): 69-76 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.5
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 18.2 %FULLTEXT: 18.2 %META: 81.0 %META: 81.0 %PDF: 0.8 %PDF: 0.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 9.3 %其他: 9.3 %China: 0.8 %China: 0.8 %Netherlands: 0.4 %Netherlands: 0.4 %上海: 0.8 %上海: 0.8 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %保定: 1.6 %保定: 1.6 %北京: 1.9 %北京: 1.9 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %和田: 0.4 %和田: 0.4 %大同: 0.4 %大同: 0.4 %天津: 1.2 %天津: 1.2 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %张家口: 1.9 %张家口: 1.9 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %扬州: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.4 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.4 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 0.8 %杭州: 0.8 %沈阳: 0.8 %沈阳: 0.8 %济源: 0.8 %济源: 0.8 %湖州: 0.8 %湖州: 0.8 %漯河: 1.9 %漯河: 1.9 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 57.0 %芒廷维尤: 57.0 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %衡水: 0.4 %衡水: 0.4 %衢州: 0.8 %衢州: 0.8 %西宁: 5.4 %西宁: 5.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %运城: 3.5 %运城: 3.5 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %长沙: 1.6 %长沙: 1.6 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %鹰潭: 0.4 %鹰潭: 0.4 %其他ChinaNetherlands上海临汾保定北京台州和田大同天津常德广州张家口成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦晋城朝阳杭州沈阳济源湖州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡水衢州西宁贵阳运城遵义邯郸重庆长沙长治鹰潭

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (133) PDF downloads(5) Cited by(5)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return