A TWO-STAGE PLANNING FOR SITE SELECTION OF LARGE ENVIRONMENTAL NIMBY (NOT IN MY BACKYARD) FACILITIES BASED ON PROBABILISTIC MULTI-VALUED NEUTROSOPHIC SET AND GIS

GAO Jianwei; MENG Qichen; LIU Jiangtao

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202312032

Volume 41 Issue 12

Dec. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2023 > 41(12): 256-263,295

GAO Jianwei, MENG Qichen, LIU Jiangtao. A TWO-STAGE PLANNING FOR SITE SELECTION OF LARGE ENVIRONMENTAL NIMBY (NOT IN MY BACKYARD) FACILITIES BASED ON PROBABILISTIC MULTI-VALUED NEUTROSOPHIC SET AND GIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 256-263,295. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312032

Citation:

GAO Jianwei, MENG Qichen, LIU Jiangtao. A TWO-STAGE PLANNING FOR SITE SELECTION OF LARGE ENVIRONMENTAL NIMBY (NOT IN MY BACKYARD) FACILITIES BASED ON PROBABILISTIC MULTI-VALUED NEUTROSOPHIC SET AND GIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 256-263,295. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312032

Citation:

GAO Jianwei, MENG Qichen, LIU Jiangtao. A TWO-STAGE PLANNING FOR SITE SELECTION OF LARGE ENVIRONMENTAL NIMBY (NOT IN MY BACKYARD) FACILITIES BASED ON PROBABILISTIC MULTI-VALUED NEUTROSOPHIC SET AND GIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 256-263,295. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312032

PDF( 3420 KB)

A TWO-STAGE PLANNING FOR SITE SELECTION OF LARGE ENVIRONMENTAL NIMBY (NOT IN MY BACKYARD) FACILITIES BASED ON PROBABILISTIC MULTI-VALUED NEUTROSOPHIC SET AND GIS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312032

GAO Jianwei^1,2,
MENG Qichen^{1,2
,
,},
LIU Jiangtao^1,2

1. School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102200, China;
2. Beijing Key Laboratory of New Energy Electricity and Low-carbon Development, Beijing 102200, China

Received Date: 2022-11-21
Available Online: 2024-03-08

Abstract

Abstract

At present, large-scale environmental NIMBY facilities have been strongly resisted by the public due to their potential environmental pollution. Considering the correlation between factors influencing NIMBY facility location and residents' rejection of NIMBY facilities in terms of spatial distance, a two-stage location optimal model was constructed based on GIS and multi-objective decision-making theory. In the first stage, a comprehensive evaluation index system including geographic information factors was established, and the influence relationship between indicators was determined by the DEMATEL method to calculate the weight of the indicators. Then, GIS technology was used to superimpose geographical layers to obtain alternative areas. In the second stage, the concept of a multi-valued neutrosophic set was introduced to evaluate the alternative areas, and the expert weight calculation method based on the deviation measure was proposed. The interactive multi-criteria decision method (TODIM) based on the prospect theory was extended to the probabilistic multi-valued intelligent cluster decision-making environment, and then the candidate regions were ranked. Finally, a waste-to-energy project in Beijing was taken as an example, to verify the feasibility and reliability of the model, which provides a powerful reference for the decision-making of large-scale environmental NIMBY facilities in urban planning and layout.
- site selection of environmental NIMBY facilities,
- GIS,
- expert weight,
- DEMATEL,
- probabilistic multi-valued neutrosophic set,
- TODIM method

FullText(HTML)

References(20)

References

[1]	王佃利, 于棋. 高质量发展中邻避治理的尺度策略:基于城市更新个案的考察[J]. 学术研究, 2022(1):56-62,178.
[2]	胡鸣明, 彭峰, 向鹏成. 建筑废弃物产量预测及资源化处理厂选址布局优化:以重庆市主城为例[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 38(1): 122-127.
[3]	乔凯凯, 张俊容, 陈加伟. 基于二层多目标优化模型的重庆主城区垃圾分类回收模式探讨[J]. 系统工程, 2022, 40(2): 151-158.
[4]	徐东洋, 李航, 王利娟. 城市地下垃圾中转站选址及两级转运联合最优方案研究[J]. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 38(1): 96-104.
[5]	韩晓冬, 孙也. 基于恶臭气体扩散数值模拟的垃圾中转站选址[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(3): 130-135.
[6]	霍攀, 曹丽文, 田艳凤. AHP与模糊评判法在垃圾填埋场选址中的应用对比[J]. 环境工程, 2015, 33(3): 131-135.
[7]	LIU H C, YOU J X, FAN X J, et al. Site selection in waste management by the VIKOR method using linguistic assessment. Applied Soft Computing, 2014, 21: 453-461.
[8]	邝雨婕, 赵佳虹. 连续时变风险下危险品储运选址-选线问题[J].中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 185-191.
[9]	PAN X, WANG Y, CHIN K S. A large-scale group decision-making method for site selection of waste to energy project under interval type-2 fuzzy environment[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021, 71(25): 103003.doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103003.
[10]	TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D.Advances in prospect theory:cumulative representation of uncertainty[J].Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4): 297-323.
[11]	汤兆平, 秦进, 孙剑萍. 基于非概率可靠性的铁路应急设施选址-路径鲁棒优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 206-216.
[12]	陈寰,毛楠. 基于GIS的生活垃圾填埋场选址的应用研究[J]. 环境工程, 2013, 31(增刊): 513-516.
[13]	刘欣,王君燕. 非正规建筑垃圾场地空间布局特征研究:以北京市昌平区为例[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(12): 193-198 ,233.
[14]	ZHOU J L, WU Y N, WU C H, et al. A geographical information system based multi-criteria decision-making approach for location analysis and evaluation of urban photovoltaic charging station: a case study in Beijing[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 205: 112340.doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112340.
[15]	RAHIMI S, HAFEZALKOTOB A, MONAVARI S M, et al. Sustainable landfill site selection for municipal solid waste based on a hybrid decision-making approach: fuzzy group BWM-MULTIMOORA-GIS[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 248: 119186.doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119186.
[16]	PENG H G, ZHANG H Y, WANG J Q. Probability multi-valued neutrosophic sets and its application in multi-criteria group decision-making problems[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2018, 30(2): 563-583.
[17]	LIU P P, CHENG S F, ZHANG Y M. An extended multi-criteria group decision-making PROMETHEE method based on probability multi-valued neutrosophic sets[J]. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2019, 21(2): 388-406.
[18]	ZHANG L, CHENG S F, LIU P D. Probability multi-valued neutrosophic ELECTRE method for multi-criteria group decision-making[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 39(5): 7587-7604.
[19]	臧誉琪, 费晓香. 基于概率多值中智统计距离的灰色妥协关联双向投影决策法[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(7): 162-166.
[20]	LEE H S, TZENG G H, YEIH W, et al. Revised DEMATEL: resolving the infeasibility of DEMATEL[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(10/11): 6746-6757.