Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
LI Xuan, WANG Yan, FANG Hua, ZHANG Tingting, ZHAO Yi. INFLUENCING FACTORS OF STABILITY OF GRAPHENE OXIDE IN WATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 121-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402014
Citation: LI Xuan, WANG Yan, FANG Hua, ZHANG Tingting, ZHAO Yi. INFLUENCING FACTORS OF STABILITY OF GRAPHENE OXIDE IN WATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 121-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402014

INFLUENCING FACTORS OF STABILITY OF GRAPHENE OXIDE IN WATER

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402014
  • Received Date: 2023-06-27
    Available Online: 2024-04-28
  • Based on the analysis of the physicochemical properties of graphene oxide(GO), the effects of electrolyte, natural organic matter(NOM), and stable solution concentration on its aggregation and sedimentation in water were studied. The results showed that the concentration of GO stable solution had little effect on its physicochemical properties and stability in water. Electrolytes induced the GO aggregation by reducing Zeta potential in water. The aggregation process presented two stages: reaction limited and diffusion limited. The critical condensation concentrations(CCC) of each electrolyte were 180 mmol/L of Na+, 4.5 mmol/L of Mg2+ and 1.8 mmol/L of Ca2+, respectively. Compared with Mg2+, Ca2+ could strengthen the aggregation process by adsorption bridging. The sedimentation process of GO was also divided into two stages: rapid sedimentation and slow sedimentation, and aggregation was the main factor affecting GO sedimentation. The presence of natural organic matter could effectively inhibit coagulation and enhance the stability of GO in water. However, HA has a complex correlation with GO and Ca2+, which further accelerates the aggregation process. With the increase of GO concentration in water, the aggregation and sedimentation rate were accelerated. In the presence of a lower concentration, GO had higher stability in the water environment.
  • [1]
    ZHAO J,LIN M,WANG Z,et al.Engineered nanomaterials in the environment:are they safe?[J].Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology,2020:1-36.
    [2]
    BOULANGER N,KUZENKOVA A,IAKUNKOV A,et al.Enhanced sorption of radionuclides by defect-rich graphene oxide[J].ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces,2020,12 (40):45122-45135.
    [3]
    张婷婷,孔祥清,付莹,等.以城市污泥为基质制备氧化石墨烯的响应面优化[J].环境工程,2022,40(7):25-30

    ,51.
    [4]
    MA C,WHITE J C,DHANKHER O P,et al.Metal-based nanotoxicity and detoxification pathways in higher plants[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2015,49(12):7109-7122.
    [5]
    BARRIOS A,WANG Y,GILBERTSON L,et al.Structure-property-toxicity relationships of graphene oxide:role of surface chemistry on the mechanisms of interaction with bacteria[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2019,53(24):14679-14687.
    [6]
    LANPHERE J D,LUTH C J,WALKER S L.Effects of solution chemistry on the transport of graphene oxide in saturated porous media[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2013,47(9):4255-4261.
    [7]
    杨艺,张焕祯,刘俊峰.纳米颗粒在水环境中的团聚行为和毒性效应研究[J].环境工程,2016,34(9):17-21.
    [8]
    方华,章婷婷,于江华,等.天然有机物对水中氧化石墨烯凝聚的影响[J].环境化学,2019,38(6):1251-1257.
    [9]
    赖奇,罗学萍.氧化石墨烯的制备和定性定量分析[J].材料研究学报,2015,29(2):155-160.
    [10]
    CHEN K L,ELIMELECH M.Aggregation and deposition kinetics of fullerene (C60) nanoparticles[J].Langmuir:the ACS Journal of Surfaces & Colloids,2006,22(26):10994-11001.
    [11]
    LEE M C,SNOEYINK V L,CRITTENDEN J C.Activated carbon adsorption of humic substances[J].Journal American Water Works Association,1981(8):440-446.
    [12]
    TANG H,ZHAO Y,YANG X,et al.New insight into the aggregation of graphene oxide using molecular dynamics simulations and extended Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek theory[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2017,51(17):9674-9682.
    [13]
    SU Y,YANG G,LU K,et al.Colloidal properties and stability of aqueous suspensions of few-layer graphene:importance of graphene concentration[J].Environmental Pollution,2017,220(PT A):469-477.
    [14]
    CHOWDHURY I,DUCH M C,MANSUKHANI N D,et al.Colloidal properties and stability of graphene oxide nanomaterials in the aquatic environment[J].Environmental Science& Technology,2013,47(12):6288-6296.
    [15]
    石磊,庞宏伟,王祥学,等.氧化石墨烯在水体中的迁移转化机制研究[J].化学学报,2019,77(11):1177-1183.
    [16]
    PETOSA A R,JAISI D P,QUEVEDO I R,et al.Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments:role of physicochemical interactions[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2010,44(17):6532-6549.
    [17]
    WANG X,SHU L,WANG Y,et al.Sorption of peat humic acids to multi-walled carbon nanotubes[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2011,45(21):9276-9283.
    [18]
    TAN X,FANG M,LI J,et al.Adsorption of Eu(Ⅲ) onto TiO2:effect of pH,concentration,ionic strength and soil fulvic acid[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2009,168(1):458-465.
    [19]
    CHEN K L,ELIMELECH M.Influence of humic acid on the aggregation kinetics of fullerene (C60) nanoparticles in monovalent and divalent electrolyte solutions[J].Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,2007,309(1):126-134.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHOU Qi, HAN Peipei, HOU Yanan, HUANG Cong. CHANGES IN MICROBIAL COMMUNITY OF NITRIFYING SLUDGE UNDER LONG-TERM CARBON DISULFIDE STRESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 51-57. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403006
    [2]YAO Xinhua, LU Guanghua. EFFECTS OF SLUDGE BLENDING SINTERING ON MINERALIZATION, EMISSION OF FLUE GAS PARTICLES AND DIOXINS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 190-196,157. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312023
    [3]XU Zhilong, YU Naichuan, SUN Huijie, WANG Qunhui. MECHANISM AND TOXICITY ANALYSIS OF SULFAMETHAZINE DEGRADATION BY ELECTRO-FENTON SYSTEM USING NATURAL TOURMALINE AS THE CATALYST[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 89-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309011
    [4]DING Fuge, GUO Yuxiang, YUAN Daying, ZHANG Bixian, ZHU Jing, XU Yiqun, HU Qingsong. CONTROLLABLE CONSTRUCTION OF β-FeOOH/TiO2 NANOCOMPOSITE AND ITS PERFORMANCE IN PHOTO-FENTON DEGRADATION OF ACID ORANGE Ⅱ[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 75-82,90. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308010
    [5]ZHAO Ying, LIU Qingliang, WANG Shuo, SUN Zhiqiang, MA Jun. MECHANISM OF PEROVSKITE LaBO3 CATALYZED PEROXYACETIC ACID DEGRADATION OF BISPHENOL A IN WATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 1-10. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312001
    [6]ZHANG Shicheng, LI Simin, ZHU Jia. DEGRADATION OF METHYL ORANGE BY CuO/g-C3N4 ACTIVATED PEROXODISULFATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 40-48. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210006
    [7]LI Hao, WANG Hao-nan, REN Fei-peng, PENG Rui-chao. APPLICATION OF MANGANESE DIOXIDE NANOSPHERES IN ELECTRO-FENTON REACTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 26-31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012005
    [8]CHEN Wei-gang, WU Hai-xia, FAN Jia-wei. ACTIVATED CARBON HETEROGENEOUS ACTIVATION OF DIFFERENT PERSULFATES TO DEGRADATION AZO DYE ACID ORANGE Ⅱ[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 113-118,57. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008019
    [15]Liu Guo, Wu Xi Li Jun, . RESEARCH ON ADSORPTION OF Cd( Ⅱ) BY EDTA INTERCALATED HYDROTALCITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(7): 41-45?.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 李悦,唐玉朝,冯琪瑞,王坤,伍昌年,黄显怀,胡文霞,石鹏. UV/过碳酸钠高级氧化体系降解酸性橙7的反应机理研究. 环境科学与技术. 2024(11): 141-151 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 21.4 %FULLTEXT: 21.4 %META: 78.6 %META: 78.6 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 17.9 %其他: 17.9 %其他: 1.6 %其他: 1.6 %三亚: 0.5 %三亚: 0.5 %上海: 2.1 %上海: 2.1 %兰州: 1.1 %兰州: 1.1 %北京: 2.6 %北京: 2.6 %南京: 2.6 %南京: 2.6 %南通: 0.5 %南通: 0.5 %台州: 2.1 %台州: 2.1 %合肥: 0.5 %合肥: 0.5 %嘉兴: 0.5 %嘉兴: 0.5 %大同: 0.5 %大同: 0.5 %天津: 2.6 %天津: 2.6 %太原: 0.5 %太原: 0.5 %孝感: 0.5 %孝感: 0.5 %宜昌: 1.1 %宜昌: 1.1 %常州: 5.8 %常州: 5.8 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %广州: 1.1 %广州: 1.1 %张家口: 1.1 %张家口: 1.1 %徐州: 0.5 %徐州: 0.5 %成都: 3.7 %成都: 3.7 %昆明: 1.1 %昆明: 1.1 %晋城: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %杭州: 3.2 %杭州: 3.2 %枣庄: 0.5 %枣庄: 0.5 %温州: 1.6 %温州: 1.6 %湖州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.5 %漯河: 3.2 %漯河: 3.2 %烟台: 1.1 %烟台: 1.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %芒廷维尤: 15.3 %芒廷维尤: 15.3 %芝加哥: 6.3 %芝加哥: 6.3 %衡水: 0.5 %衡水: 0.5 %西宁: 4.2 %西宁: 4.2 %西安: 1.1 %西安: 1.1 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 3.7 %运城: 3.7 %遵义: 0.5 %遵义: 0.5 %重庆: 2.1 %重庆: 2.1 %青岛: 2.6 %青岛: 2.6 %鹤壁: 0.5 %鹤壁: 0.5 %其他其他三亚上海兰州北京南京南通台州合肥嘉兴大同天津太原孝感宜昌常州常德广州张家口徐州成都昆明晋城杭州枣庄温州湖州漯河烟台石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥衡水西宁西安贵阳运城遵义重庆青岛鹤壁

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (155) PDF downloads(6) Cited by(2)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return