APPLICATION AND COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DEEP LEARNING MODELS IN RECOGNITION OF FOOD WASTE TYPES

LIU Zhi; GAO Dongming

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202403031

Volume 42 Issue 3

Mar. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2024 > 42(3): 254-260

JIE Ya-wei, XU Ran-yun, DING Wei, JIANG Yi-heng, ZHANG Ben, LIU Hong-yuan. AOX FORMATION DURING THE ADVANCED OXIDATION OF PHENOL WASTEWATER CONTAINING CHLORIDE ION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 1-8. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205001

Citation:

LIU Zhi, GAO Dongming. APPLICATION AND COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DEEP LEARNING MODELS IN RECOGNITION OF FOOD WASTE TYPES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 254-260. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403031

Citation:

PDF( 5140 KB)

APPLICATION AND COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DEEP LEARNING MODELS IN RECOGNITION OF FOOD WASTE TYPES

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403031

LIU Zhi,
GAO Dongming^,

College of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China

Received Date: 2023-02-28
Available Online: 2024-05-31

Abstract

Abstract

Kitchen waste and post-meal waste vary greatly in texture, if the pre-treatment process doesn’t effectively identify the type of kitchen waste, and then take the appropriate working parameters, it often leads to poor treatment effect of the reduction treatment equipment. We collected and processed images of vegetable waste and post-meal waste in different seasons and different dietary styles, considering the differences in images between tailgate waste and post-meal waste, on this basis, ResNet18 was used as the base network, and attention mechanism was introduced to design a new deep learning model for kitchen waste recognition, which was compared with ResNet18, ECANET+ResNet18, SENET+ResNet18, and SANET+ResNet18 models. The results showed that all the above four network models had high accuracy rates. Their accuracy rates were 96.73%, 97.10%, 97.28%, and 96.92%, respectively; their loss rates were 4.35%, 4.11%, 3.76%, and 4.17%, respectively; in terms of training time, ECANET+ResNet18 had the shortest training time, which was 350 seconds faster than ResNet18. ECANET+ResNet18 network effectively improved the performance of ResNet18 network, achieved the highest accuracy rate and the smallest loss rate, and could meet the requirements of machine recognition of kitchen waste.
- food waste,
- deep learning,
- image processing,
- type identification,
- attention mechanism

FullText(HTML)

References(24)

References

[1]	周建华,陈锋.某典型餐厨垃圾综合处理项目实例[J].环境工程,2020,38(8):47-51.
[2]	高东明,马建行,周磊,等.基于PLC的餐厨垃圾破碎机控制系统设计[J].制造业自动化,2022,44(2):133-137.
[3]	刘航驿,颜蓓蓓,林法伟,等.生命周期视角下2种餐厨垃圾资源化处理方案的对比分析[J].环境工程,2021,39(9):169-175.
[4]	KRIZHEVSKY A, SUTSKEVER I, HINTON G. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,2012,25(2).DOI: 10.1145/3065386.
[5]	金佩薇,姚燕,梁晓瑜,等.垃圾图像识别研究进展[J].环境工程,2022,40(1):196-206.
[6]	SZEGEDY C, LIU W, JIA Y, et al. Going deeper with convolutions[C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society,2015:1-9.
[7]	HE K, ZHANG X, REN S, et al. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition[C]//IEEE Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition. IEEE Computer Society,2016.
[8]	黄兴华,叶军一,熊杰.基于纹理特征融合的道路垃圾图像识别及提取[J].计算机工程与设计,2019, 40(11):3212-3218 ,3305.
[9]	段春云,李广.绿色建筑施工垃圾智能分类仿真建模研究[J].计算机仿真,2022,39(3):234-237 ,243.
[10]	王莉,何牧天,徐硕,等.基于YOLOv5s网络的垃圾分类和检测[J].包装工程,2021,42(8):50-56.
[11]	许伟,熊卫华,姚杰,等.基于改进YOLOv3算法在垃圾检测上的应用[J].光电子·激光,2020,31(9):928-938.
[12]	王一田,唐开强,留沧海,等.基于YOLO v3的地面垃圾检测与清洁度评定方法[J].传感器与微系统,2022,41(4):129-133.
[13]	王文胜,年诚旭,张超,等.基于YOLO v5模型的非住宅区自动垃圾分类箱设计[J].环境工程,2022,40(3):159-165.
[14]	魏铖磊,南新元,李成荣,等.一种具有多尺度感受视野注意力机制的生活垃圾单阶段目标检测方法[J].环境工程, 2022, 40(1):175-183.
[15]	TIAN M J, LI X L, KONG S H. A modified YOLOv4 detection method for a vision-based underwater garbage cleaning robot[J].Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,2022,23(8):1217-1229.
[16]	邢洁洁,谢定进,杨然兵,等.基于YOLOv5s的农田垃圾轻量化检测方法[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(19):153-161.
[17]	田有文,吴伟,林磊,等.基于深度学习与高光谱成像的蓝莓果蝇虫害无损检测[J/OL].农业机械学报,2023(1):393-401.
[18]	黄林生,罗耀武,杨小冬,等.基于注意力机制和多尺度残差网络的农作物病害识别[J].农业机械学报,2021,52(10):264-271.
[19]	赵杰,李絮,申通.基于SENet注意力机制和深度残差网络的腹部动脉分割[J].科学技术与工程,2022,22(22):9529-9536.
[20]	刘学平,李玙乾,等.嵌入SENet结构的改进YOLOV3目标识别算法[J].计算机工程,2019,45(11):243-248.
[21]	于慧伶,霍镜宇,张怡卓.融合多层特征SENet和多尺度宽残差的高光谱图像地物分类[J].实验室研究与探索,2020,39(7):28-34 ,44.
[22]	WANG Q L, WU B G, ZHU P F, et al. ECA-Net:efficient channel attention for deep convolutional neural networks[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020:11534-11542.
[23]	张小敏,徐涛,张延宁,等.用于体质量估测的黄羽鸡姿态关键帧识别与分析[J].农业机械学报,2022,53(12):254-263.
[24]	王玮琦,游雄,苏明占,等. SANet:空间注意力机制下的LiDAR点云实时语义分割方法[J].测绘通报, 2022(11):32-38.

Relative Articles

[1]	DU Jiamin, WEI Yuanyuan, DING Chao, ZHU Haochuan, LIU Weijing, TANG Baiyang, YANG Shiyao, FENG Qian. RESEARCH ON LAYOUT OF INTERCEPTION COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW DETENTION TANKS BASED ON THEIR LIFE CYCLE CARBON EMISSIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 50-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411006
[2]	YU Feng, WANG Kejia, ZHANG Wenlong, LI Yi. PREDICTION OF COAGULANT DOSAGE FOR IN-SITU TURBIDITY CONTROL IN WATER ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION BASED ON BP NEURAL NETWORK OPTIMIZED BY GENETIC ALGORITHM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 154-163. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304022
[3]	LIU Yuxuan, GAO Yahong, WANG Zhenbei, HU Qian, QI Fei, SUN Dezhi. REVIEW OF OVERFLOW POLLUTION CONTROL OF URBAN COMBINED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 32-47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312004
[4]	WANG Jianlong, ZHANG Changhe, XI Guangpeng. A NOVEL VOLUME OPTIMIZATION METHOD FOR DETENTION TANKS FOR FLOODING IMMIGRATION BASED ON MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 166-173. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306022
[5]	PENG Zhouyang, JIN Xi, SANG Wenjiao. OPTIMIZATION OF DESIGN OF TERMINAL FLOW INTERCEPTION AND STORAGE FACILITIES OF COMBINED DRAINAGE SYSTEM BASED ON NSGA-Ⅲ ALGORITHM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 143-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208020
[6]	ZHENG Qiongqi, LIN Yiyuan, YIN Hailong, XU Zuxin, SU Lei, WU Shanshan. SOURCE TRACKING OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE INTO RIVERS USING HYDRODYNAMIC DIFFUSION WAVE MODEL AND GENETIC ALGORITHM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 63-69. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206008
[7]	HE Jun-chao, LI Ming-ming, LIU Rui, BAI Wei-lan, WANG Qi. RESEARCH ON MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL SYSTEM OF COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW POLLUTION IN CHINA AND OVERSEAS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 42-49. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104008
[8]	ZHANG Zi-yang, QI Hao, ZHANG Xiao-ran, LI Hai-yan. INFLUENCING MECHANISM OF PERMEABLE PAVEMENT TYPE ON REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF HEAVY METALS FROM RUNOFF[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 41-46,88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102007
[9]	LONG Jia, WANG Si-si, FENG Meng-ke. APPLICATION STATUS AND EVALUATION OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANTS IN BEIJING LID FACILITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 89-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004016
[10]	GE Jin-jin, ZHANG Wen-hai, YANG Yong, PENG Wen-qi, QU Xiao-dong. STUDY ON THE METHOD TO SOLVE WATER RESOURCE CONFLICTS: A CASE STUDY OF THE JINJIANG RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 47-52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010008
[11]	LI Han, WANG Jian-long, FENG Cui-min, CAI Zhi-wen, HE Cun-gang, LIU Yan. MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF STORMWATER CONTROL EFFECT VIA LOW-IMPACT DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 145-150. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004026
[12]	YANG Zheng, LI Jun-qi, WANG Wen-liang, CHE Wu, JU Chen-tao, ZHAO Yang. THE ADVANCED RECOGNITION OF LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AND SPONGE CITY CONSTRUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 10-15,38. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004003
[17]	INTEGRATED OPTIMIZATION OF COMBINED SEWER SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 57-61. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412009

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(28)

1.	吴姬，王婧，符式锦. 海口市城乡环境梯度带土壤重金属富集特征. 热带作物学报. 2025(02): 503-513 .
2.	邵璐，刘洪，欧阳渊，张景华，高文龙，刘小念，宋雯洁，吴君毅，苏悦. 三峡库区典型岩石土壤中重（类）金属迁移富集特征研究及风险评价. 西北地质. 2025(01): 204-218 .
3.	陈佳，范萍萍，龙文涛，邰良. 土壤侵蚀对重金属迁移的作用规律与机制研究进展. 水土保持研究. 2024(01): 460-470 .
4.	占楠彪，谷端银，李婷，崔秀敏，娄燕宏，诸葛玉平. 中轻度重金属污染农田土壤的时空特征及改良. 农业环境科学学报. 2024(02): 294-307 .
5.	葛磊，方凤满，周浩，姚有如，谭华荣，王飞，林跃胜. 菜子湖湿地不同类型土壤重金属的垂直分布特征及迁移规律. 环境化学. 2024(03): 933-941 .
6.	闫金霞，杨家哲，杜正浩. 垃圾堆放场土壤重金属分布特征及污染评价. 山东化工. 2024(05): 231-236 .
7.	张锦明，张建泽，王洲瑜，汪世轩，赵东阳，阿不都艾尼·阿不里. 基于PMF模型的吉木萨尔县土壤重金属空间分布特征与来源解析. 新疆大学学报(自然科学版)(中英文). 2024(03): 354-363+374 .
8.	贾少宁，申发，颜宁，王若菲，刘苏慧，于洋，栗云召，杨继松，于君宝. 黄河三角洲不同土地利用方式下土壤重金属分析评价. 鲁东大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 193-202 .
9.	丰土根，郑柳钦，张箭，韦扬. 重金属-有机物复合污染土风险评价新方法. 环境工程. 2023(07): 222-228 . 本站查看
10.	高梦绯，郑顺安，刘昌华，郜允兵，高戈，赵亚楠. 基于多因素融合的耕地土壤重金属污染风险评价. 环境工程. 2023(08): 233-241 . 本站查看
11.	阮彦楠，吕本春，王志远，王应学，王伟，陈检锋，尹梅，陈华，付利波. 云南某区典型农田土壤重金属污染和潜在生态风险评价. 安徽农业科学. 2023(21): 65-72 .
12.	陈海英，虎啸，覃昆，魏腾川，白薇. 巴中市巴州区水田与旱地土壤重金属富集与垂直分布特征. 四川农业科技. 2023(12): 56-59 .
13.	陈敏毅，宋清梅，叶权运，游学睿，吴颖欣. 华南典型金属制品遗留生产场地重金属空间分布特征. 生态环境学报. 2023(12): 2228-2235 .
14.	黄钟霆，易盛炜，陈贝贝，彭锐，石雪芳，李峰. 典型锰矿区周边农田土壤-农作物重金属污染特征及生态风险评价. 环境科学. 2022(02): 975-984 .
15.	毛盼，王明娅，孙昂，陈纯，冯茜茜，韩桥，王明仕. 某典型废弃硫酸场地土壤重金属污染特征与评价. 环境化学. 2022(02): 511-525 .
16.	丰土根，郑柳钦，张箭，张福海，宋健. 废弃农药厂重金属污染土风险评价及焙烧修复效果研究. 环境工程. 2022(02): 132-138 . 本站查看
17.	陈锐，杜双杰，徐伟，竹涛. 南京城郊某典型退耕农用地土壤重金属含量特征与污染评价分析. 环境工程. 2022(03): 102-110+165 . 本站查看
18.	朱迪，张朝晖，王智慧. 农田-泥炭藓系统重金属富集特征与生态风险评价. 环境科学. 2022(04): 2115-2123 .
19.	姜宇，郭庆军，邓义楠. 长江流域沉积物和土壤重金属分布规律研究进展. 生态学杂志. 2022(04): 804-812 .
20.	张瀚丹，刘新会，王宇静，段林帅，董璐. 土壤剖面重金属污染对微生物群落结构的影响. 环境科学与技术. 2022(04): 184-191 .
21.	王磊，周璐瑶，胡静博，蔡佳坊，王伟，肖万川，何妙妙. 再生水灌溉对稻田重金属分布的影响. 排灌机械工程学报. 2022(08): 842-849 .
22.	李延雪，张梦竹，舒莎莎，邹君晗，焦伟，周峻宇. 基于富集因子法与MLR-APCS模型应用的农田土壤重金属人为来源定量识别. 环境工程. 2022(09): 173-177+232 . 本站查看
23.	赵家印，杨地，杨湘智，张宁，刘宇，王蒙蒙，吴云成，陈秋会，田伟. 云南省某煤矿开采遗址周边农用地土壤重金属污染评价及源解析研究. 生态与农村环境学报. 2022(11): 1473-1481 .
24.	陆音，肖昕，徐蕾，梁妍，栾慧君，塞古，李俊池，郭春滢. 煤矿开采裂缝对土壤中重金属分布的影响. 环境科技. 2022(06): 1-5+12 .
25.	孟婷婷，刘金宝，董浩，王博，张国剑. 城市绿地不同管理方式土壤重金属污染及生态风险评价. 环境工程. 2022(12): 217-223 . 本站查看
26.	马晓慧，郝春明，王梦露，朱云燕. 峰峰煤矿塌陷区典型农田土壤剖面重金素元素化学风化规律. 科学技术与工程. 2021(03): 1202-1210 .
27.	浦江，张翠萍，刘淑娟，杨小燕，赵斌，李淑英，陆轶峰，王媛媛，周元清. 杞麓湖径流区不同湿地沉积物重金属污染特征及潜在生态风险评价. 农业资源与环境学报. 2021(05): 755-763 .
28.	王多兵，张猛，韩冬雅，陈锦，朱鹏鹏，肖立权. 湖南典型煤矿区地表水——土壤系统重金属污染特征、来源及风险. 应用化工. 2021(S2): 94-100+112 .