Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
LI Feifei, SU Zhiguo, CAO Feng, MU Qinglin, HUANG Bei, CHEN Lüjun, WEN Donghui. CONTRIBUTION OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE FROM SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS TO ANTIBIOTIC POLLUTION IN COASTAL WATER: A CASE STUDY OF HANGZHOU BAY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 1-8. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404001
Citation: LI Feifei, SU Zhiguo, CAO Feng, MU Qinglin, HUANG Bei, CHEN Lüjun, WEN Donghui. CONTRIBUTION OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE FROM SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS TO ANTIBIOTIC POLLUTION IN COASTAL WATER: A CASE STUDY OF HANGZHOU BAY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 1-8. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404001

CONTRIBUTION OF WASTEWATER DISCHARGE FROM SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS TO ANTIBIOTIC POLLUTION IN COASTAL WATER: A CASE STUDY OF HANGZHOU BAY

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404001
  • Received Date: 2024-01-24
    Available Online: 2024-06-01
  • The research was focused on Hangzhou Bay (HB) in the East China Sea, a region characterized by severe water pollution. The composition and distribution of 77 antibiotics belonging to 6 classes, in sewage treatment plants, near-shore effluent receiving areas, and coastal waters were investigated using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The findings revealed that the removal rates of antibiotics in sewage treatment plants ranged from 31.1% to 88.8%, with quinolones exhibiting the highest removal rate at an average value of 80.3%. Effluent from the sewage treatment plants was discharged into the corresponding effluent receiving areas. In the Jiaxing (JX) effluent receiving area, 53 antibiotics were identified with an average concentration of 48180.7 ng/L, while the Shangyu (SY) effluent receiving area contained 63 antibiotics with an average concentration of 341.2 ng/L. The result of the principal component analysis indicated that the sewage treatment plant was a significant source of antibiotic pollution in the SY effluent receiving area. In contrast, the antibiotics in the JX effluent receiving area were less influenced by the sewage treatment plant discharge and more affected by other sources containing veterinary antibiotics. Following the collection of antibiotic-containing wastewater, the near-shore effluent receiving areas became a "source" of antibiotic pollution in the coastal sea. The waterin coastal area contained 51 antibiotics with an average concentration of 189.5 ng/L. A clear "distance attenuation" trend was observed in the diffusion of antibiotic concentration from near-shore to coastal areas, particularly for quinolone antibiotics.
  • [1]
    张昱, 杨敏, 王春艳, 等. 生产过程中抗生素与抗药基因的排放特征、环境行为及控制[J]. 环境化学, 2015, 34(1): 1-8.
    [2]
    KLEIN E Y, VAN BOECKEL T P, MARTINEZ E M, et al. Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, 115(15): 3463-3470.
    [3]
    BAO Y, LI F, CHEN L, et al. Fate of antibiotics in engineered wastewater systems and receiving water environment: a case study on the coast of Hangzhou Bay, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 769:144642.
    [4]
    GOTHWAL R, SHASHIDHAR T. Antibiotic pollution in the environment: a review[J]. Clean-Soil Air Water, 2015, 43(4): 479-489.
    [5]
    WANG B, XU Z, DONG B. Occurrence, fate, and ecological risk of antibiotics in wastewater treatment plants in China: a review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2024, 469: 133925.
    [6]
    LE PAGE G, GUNNARSSON L, SNAPE J, et al. Integrating human and environmental health in antibiotic risk assessment: a critical analysis of protection goals, species sensitivity, and antimicrobial resistance[J]. Environment International, 2017, 109: 155-169.
    [7]
    MINH T B, LEUNG H W, LOI I H, et al. Antibiotics in the Hong Kong Metropolitan Area: ubiquitous distribution and fate in Victoria Harbour[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2009, 58(7): 1052-1062.
    [8]
    刘玉学, 李彭, 王拯. 我国污水处理厂中典型抗生素的分布及处理研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2023, 39(10): 23-30.
    [9]
    ZHANG R, TANG J, LI J, et al. Antibiotics in the offshore waters of the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea in China: occurrence, distribution and ecological risks[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2013, 174: 71-77.
    [10]
    JIA A, HU J, WU X, et al. Occurrence and source apportionment of sulfonamides and their metabolites in Liaodong Bay and the adjacent Liao River Basin, North China[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2011, 30(6): 1252-1260.
    [11]
    ZHANG R, ZHANG G, ZHENG Q, et al. Occurrence and risks of antibiotics in the Laizhou Bay, China: impacts of River Discharge[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2012, 80: 208-215.
    [12]
    CARVALHO I T, SANTOS L. Antibiotics in the aquatic environments: a review of the European Scenario[J]. Environment International, 2016, 94: 736-757.
    [13]
    GAW S, THOMAS K V, HUTCHINSON T H. Sources, impacts and trends of pharmaceuticals in the marine and coastal environment[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2014, 369(1656): 20130572.
    [14]
    LI F, BAO Y, CHEN L, et al. Screening of priority antibiotics in Chinese seawater based on the persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity and resistance[J]. Environment International, 2023, 179: 108140.
    [15]
    ASHBOLT N J, AMEZQUITA A, BACKHAUS T, et al. Human health risk assessment (HHRA) for environmental development and transfer of antibiotic resistance[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2013, 121(9): 993-1001.
    [16]
    苏志国, 陈伟东, 郑宇涵, 等. 基于宏基因组学解析不同污水处理系统的耐药基因组分布特征和传播机制[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2023, 18(2): 1-13.
    [17]
    李士俊, 谢文明. 污水处理厂中抗生素去除规律研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2019, 42(3): 17-29.
    [18]
    LI B, ZHANG T. Biodegradation and adsorption of antibiotics in the activated sludge process[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(9): 3468-3473.
    [19]
    GOEBEL A, MCARDELL C S, JOSS A, et al. Fate of sulfonamides, macrolides, and trimethoprim in different wastewater treatment technologies[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2007, 372(2/3): 361-371.
    [20]
    KVMMERER K. Antibiotics in the aquatic environment-a Review-Part I[J]. Chemosphere, 2009, 75(4): 417-434.
    [21]
    SARMAH A K, MEYER M T, BOXALL A B A. A global perspective on the use, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics (VAS) in the environment[J]. Chemosphere, 2006, 65(5): 725-759.
    [22]
    JIAO S, ZHENG S, YIN D, et al. Aqueous photolysis of tetracycline and toxicity of photolytic products to luminescent bacteria[J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 73(3): 377-382.
    [23]
    CHEN C Q, ZHENG L, ZHOU J L, et al. Persistence and risk of antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance genes in major mariculture sites in Southeast China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 580: 1175-1184.
    [24]
    LI Z, LI M, ZHANG Z, et al. Antibiotics in aquatic environments of China: a review and Meta-analysis[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 199: 110668.
    [25]
    TASHO R P, CHO J Y. Veterinary antibiotics in animal waste, its distribution in soil and uptake by plants: a review[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 563: 366-376.
    [26]
    BRANDT K K, AMEZQUITA A, BACKHAUS T, et al. Ecotoxicological assessment of antibiotics: a call for improved consideration of microorganisms[J]. Environment International, 2015, 85: 189-205.
    [27]
    ZHANG Q, YING G, PAN C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of antibiotics emission and fate in the river basins of China: source analysis, multimedia modeling, and linkage to bacterial resistance[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(11): 6772-6782.
    [28]
    LI S, SHI W, LIU W, et al. A duodecennial national synthesis of antibiotics in China’s major rivers and seas (2005—2016)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 615: 906-917.
    [29]
    吴秀茹. 大环内酯类抗生素的厌氧降解及其生态毒性研究[D]. 南京:河南大学, 2018: 72.
    [30]
    王宏, 杨霓云, 闫振广, 等. 我国持久性、生物累积性和毒性(Pbt)化学物质评价研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2011, 1(5): 414-419.
    [31]
    赵哲. 基于微孔有机网络吸附材料的喹诺酮类抗生素的检测和去除技术研究[D]. 保定:河北大学, 2022: 187.
    [32]
    席峰, 颜立立, 潘春霖, 等. 鱼类恩诺沙星药物残留风险、成因与消减技术研究进展[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2023, 14(5): 155-163.
    [33]
    ROSA J, LESTON S, CRESPO D, et al. Uptake of enrofloxacin from seawater to the Macroalgae ulva and its use in imta systems[J]. Aquaculture, 2020, 516: 734609.
    [34]
    HE X, DENG M, WANG Q, et al. Residues and health risk assessment of quinolones and sulfonamides in cultured fish from Pearl River Delta, China[J]. Aquaculture, 2016, 458: 38-46.
    [35]
    LIU X, ZHANG H, LI L, et al. Levels, Distributions and sources of veterinary antibiotics in the sediments of the Bohai Sea in China and surrounding estuaries[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2016, 109(1): 597-602.
    [36]
    ZHANG Q, YING G, PAN C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of antibiotics emission and fate in the river basins of China: source analysis, multimedia modeling, and linkage to bacterial resistance[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(11): 6772-6782.
    [37]
    THIANG E L, LEE C W, TAKADA H, et al. Antibiotic residues from aquaculture farms and their ecological risks in southeast asia: a case study from malaysia[J]. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2021, 7(1): 1926337.
    [38]
    MARTINEZ-CARBALLO E, GONZALEZ-BARREIRO C, SCHARF S, et al. Environmental monitoring study of selected veterinary antibiotics in animal manure and soils in austria[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2007, 148(2): 570-579.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LE Jihang, WANG Wenlong, WU Qianyuan, CHEN Zhuo, WU Yinhu, JIA Haifeng, LIU Fanghua, WANG Fang, HU Hongying. Quality and risk characteristics of effluent from wastewater treatment plants in central area of Luzhou[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2025, 43(1): 135-143. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202501015
    [2]LIU Yuxin, ZENG Lingwu, FANG Zheng, SUN Dezhi. COMPREHENSIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN THE UPPER AND MIDDLE REACHES OF THE YELLOW RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 34-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412005
    [3]JIN Hongqi, JIANG Rongjie, WANG Zirui, LI Luyang, LUO Jingyang. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON IMPACT AND REGULATION STRATEGIES OF TYPICAL ANTIBIOTICS ON ANAEROBIC DIGESTION EFFICIENCY OF SLUDGE: A REVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 49-59. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407005
    [4]CHI Shanqing, LIN Caiqiang, WU Ligui, ZOU Xiaoming, HUANG Xiangfeng, ZHANG Haiping, XIE Rongrong, LI Jiabing, WU Qiaofeng, LIU Jia. TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF NUTRIENTS AND ANTIBIOTICS IN URBAN ARTIFICIAL LAKES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 29-36. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401005
    [5]LI Yunong, WEN Donghui. IMPACTS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS EFFLUENT ON MICROBIAL COMMUNITY OF RECEIVING WATER BODIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 167-179. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409016
    [6]YU Huaixing, YUAN Ding, HE Zihao. APPLICATION OF SHORT-RANGE PRECISION AERATION AND INTELLIGENT CONTROL SYSTEM IN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 165-171. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311026
    [7]FU Xiaoyan, LI Zhenguo, LI Xiangyu, YANG Meng, LIU Lianlian, XIA Ying, SUN Zhen, LI Zhiyuan. ANTIBIOTIC POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF WATER BODIES AROUND LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY BREEDING IN DALIAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 164-169. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304023
    [8]KONG Huimin, ZHAO Xiaohui, XU Wan, DAI Yuhan, ZHANG Jiayu. OCCURRENCE AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF ANTIBIOTICS IN GROUNDWATER ENVIRONMENT IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 219-226. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302029
    [9]WANG Shuo, LU Yunping, LIU Shuyang, CHEN Kangli. CARBON EMISSIONS OF URBAN AND INDUSTRIAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS OF SUZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 173-184. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310021
    [10]XIE Chengcheng, LIU Gang. ROAD MAP FOR CUSTRUCTING CARBON NEUTRAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 181-186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309022
    [11]ZHENG Yuhan, SU Zhiguo, LI Feifei, YAO Pengcheng, WEN Donghui. IMPACTS OF LAND-BASED WASTEWATER DISCHARGE ON MICROBIAL COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND CARBON METABOLISM IN COASTAL EFFLUENT-RECEIVING AREAS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 194-200. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309024
    [12]JING Yu-shu, MOU Run-zhi, JIANG Yi-ming, LIU Zhang-qing, YANG Yan-dong. REDUCING ENERGY AND CHEMICALS CONSUMPTION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS BY ACCURATE AERATION CONTROL: A CASE STUDY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 141-145,165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205020
    [13]CENG Zi-jun, LIANG Ying, RONG Hong-wei, LUO Hua-yong, LIAO Quan. ADSORPTION PROPERTIES OF TYPICAL ANTIBIOTICS BY COMPOSITE MAGNETIC NANO-GEL BEADS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 59-66. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205009
    [14]LIU Linmei, TENG Yanguo, YANG Guang, CHEN Haiyang. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON REMOVAL OF ANTIBIOTICS AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE GENES FROM WASTEWATER BY CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 270-280. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212035
    [15]WANG Yu-hang, YU Wei, ZHAO Si-yu, LIU Shan, JIANG Xiao-hui, LI Qi. ADSORPTION OF ANTIBIOTIC DRUGS IN WATER ENVIRONMENT BY MODIFIED BIOCHAR:A REVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 91-99,134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112014
    [16]ZHANG Tian, JIANG Bo, XING Yi, YA Hao-bo. REVIEW ON DEVELOPMENT OF ADSORPTION METHODS TO REMOVE ANTIBIOTICS FORM WATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 29-39. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103005
    [17]YAO Quan-wei, ZHANG Jun, YAN Qin-ying, WANG Dun-qiu, XI Bei-dou. MAIN FACTORS ON DISSIPATION OF TYPICAL FLUOROQUINOLONES IN SEWAGE SLUDGE COMPOST DURING MESOPHILIC AND THERMOPHILIC PHASES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 200-207. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009032
    [18]YU Yong, YU Sheng-hua, CHEN Da-gang. PRACTICE AND REFLECTION ON CLEAN EMISSION TECHNOLOGY TRANSFORMATION OF URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS IN ZHEJIANG PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 19-24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007003
    [19]LIU Peng-xiao, WANG Xu, FENG Ling. OCCURRENCES, RESOURCES AND RISK OF ANTIBIOTICS IN AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT: A REVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 36-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005007
    [20]SHEN Jie, JIN Wei. REVIEW ON EFFECT OF URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT ON RECEIVING WATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 92-98,115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003016
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 梁爽,李海斌,胡海洋,连贺强,史晓娟,马建敏. 新乡市2023年城市污水中重点肠道致病菌及常见耐药菌分布特征研究. 环境与健康杂志. 2025(01): 33-38 .
    2. 肖南娇,刘艳. 江西省部分污水处理厂中抗生素的赋存状况及其研究. 农业灾害研究. 2024(12): 25-27 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040255075100125150
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.2 %FULLTEXT: 11.2 %META: 81.3 %META: 81.3 %PDF: 7.5 %PDF: 7.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 21.5 %其他: 21.5 %三亚: 0.6 %三亚: 0.6 %上海: 4.5 %上海: 4.5 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %兰州: 2.2 %兰州: 2.2 %北京: 6.4 %北京: 6.4 %南京: 4.5 %南京: 4.5 %南昌: 0.3 %南昌: 0.3 %南通: 2.0 %南通: 2.0 %台州: 0.6 %台州: 0.6 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %商洛: 0.3 %商洛: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %天津: 0.6 %天津: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %太原: 0.6 %宁波: 0.8 %宁波: 0.8 %安康: 0.8 %安康: 0.8 %常州: 0.6 %常州: 0.6 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %广州: 2.2 %广州: 2.2 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %徐州: 0.6 %徐州: 0.6 %成都: 1.1 %成都: 1.1 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %昆明: 2.2 %昆明: 2.2 %昌吉: 0.3 %昌吉: 0.3 %晋中: 0.3 %晋中: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 2.8 %杭州: 2.8 %武汉: 3.9 %武汉: 3.9 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湘潭: 0.3 %湘潭: 0.3 %漯河: 2.0 %漯河: 2.0 %益阳: 0.3 %益阳: 0.3 %盐城: 0.3 %盐城: 0.3 %绍兴: 1.1 %绍兴: 1.1 %聊城: 0.8 %聊城: 0.8 %肇庆: 0.6 %肇庆: 0.6 %舟山: 0.8 %舟山: 0.8 %芒廷维尤: 11.7 %芒廷维尤: 11.7 %芝加哥: 3.4 %芝加哥: 3.4 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.3 %荆州: 0.3 %荆门: 0.3 %荆门: 0.3 %莆田: 0.3 %莆田: 0.3 %莫斯科: 3.1 %莫斯科: 3.1 %菏泽: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.6 %衡阳: 0.6 %西宁: 0.8 %西宁: 0.8 %西安: 1.1 %西安: 1.1 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 2.0 %运城: 2.0 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %重庆: 2.5 %重庆: 2.5 %金华: 0.3 %金华: 0.3 %钦州: 0.3 %钦州: 0.3 %长沙: 1.4 %长沙: 1.4 %青岛: 0.8 %青岛: 0.8 %其他三亚上海东莞保定兰州北京南京南昌南通台州合肥商洛嘉兴天津太原宁波安康常州常德广州张家口徐州成都扬州昆明昌吉晋中朝阳杭州武汉洛阳深圳温州湘潭漯河益阳盐城绍兴聊城肇庆舟山芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州荆门莆田莫斯科菏泽衡阳西宁西安贵阳运城遵义郑州重庆金华钦州长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (290) PDF downloads(29) Cited by(4)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return