Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
SUN Xing, HU Kai, LEI Chen-yu, CHEN Wei. EFFECT OF FREEZING/THAWING PRETREATMENT ON EXCESS SLUDGE DISINTEGRATION AND TREATMENT EFFICIENCY OF MICROBIAL ELECTROLYSIS CELL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 147-155. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104023
Citation: WU Yi, WANG Hua, DENG Yanqing, LI Xiaoying, XU Haosen. EVALUATION AND DRIVING CHARACTERISTICS OF WATER NUTRIENTS IN POYANG LAKE BASED ON TLI METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 10-17. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405002

EVALUATION AND DRIVING CHARACTERISTICS OF WATER NUTRIENTS IN POYANG LAKE BASED ON TLI METHOD

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405002
  • Received Date: 2023-07-19
    Available Online: 2024-07-11
  • As the largest freshwater lake in China, Poyang Lake has important ecological functions and social values. According to the monitoring data of Poyang Lake from 2012 to 2017, six representative monitoring points in the lake were selected in this study. The trophic status of the lake was evaluated by the Trophic level index method (TLI), and the correlation coefficient method was also used to judge its accuracy based on the bioindicators. The regression equation of Poyang Lake trophic was proposed, and the hydrological characteristics of the lake were included in the calculation, and biological indicators were introduced as reference. The findings were as follows: 1) according to the evaluation result of the TLI method, the average value of TLI in Poyang Lake was within the range of 44.00 to 49.00 during the time period of the study, which means that Poyang Lake was mostly in the medium-rich trophic level. Banghu Lake, shaped like a disc, was in the eutrophic state in 30.56% of the study time, and was at a high trophic level. 2) compared with the seasonal pattern of higher algal cell density in summer and lower algal cell density in winter, the TLI values in Poyang Lake remained stable, with a standard deviation in a range of 3.00 to 5.00. The TLI value could not match the significant difference in algal cell density in the lake, and the TLI value only changed by about 2% in the case of a 300% difference in algal cell density. The reason is that the water physicochemical indicators (TP, TN, SD, COD) in the lake do not well reflect the algal proliferation status, while the TLI method is highly dependent on these indicators. 3) the drivers of algal proliferation in Poyang Lake were highly spatially heterogeneous, among which water temperature had a high positive effect on algal proliferation, and total phosphorus was one of the limiting factors for algal proliferation at monitoring point of Hukou, Banghu, and Kanshan. In contrast, flow volume and water body transparency had different effects at different points due to spatial variability in lake basin morphology. To achieve effective management and protection of lake water, other factors need to be taken into account to achieve a comprehensive master of the mechanisms driving algal proliferation.
  • [1]
    HUISMAN J, CODD G A, PAERL H W, et al. Cyanobacterial blooms[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, Nature Publishing Group, 2018, 16(8): 471-483.
    [2]
    GU H F, WU Y R, LÜ S H, et al. Emerging harmful algal bloom species over the last four decades in China[J]. Harmful Algae, 2022, 111: 102059.
    [3]
    BROOKS B W, LAZORCHAK J M, HOWARD M D A, et al. Are harmful algal blooms becoming the greatest inland water quality threat to public health and aquatic ecosystems? Harmful algal blooms: the greatest water quality threat?[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2016, 35(1): 6-13.
    [4]
    范亚民, 姜伟立, 刘宝贵, 等. 蓝藻水华暴发期间太湖贡湖湾某水厂水源水及出厂水中微囊藻毒素污染分析及健康风险评价[J]. 湖泊科学, 2018, 30(1): 25-33.
    [5]
    秦伯强, 杨桂军, 马健荣, 等. 太湖蓝藻水华"暴发"的动态特征及其机制[J]. 科学通报, 2016, 61(7): 759-770.
    [6]
    REID A J, CARLSON A K, CREED I F, et al. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity[J]. Biological Reviews, 2019, 94(3): 849-873.
    [7]
    GRIFFITH A W, GOBLER C J. Harmful algal blooms: a climate change co-stressor in marine and freshwater ecosystems[J]. Harmful Algae, 2020, 91: 101590.
    [8]
    RAVEN J A, GOBLER C J, HANSEN P J. Dynamic CO2 and pH levels in coastal, estuarine, and inland waters: theoretical and observed effects on harmful algal blooms[J]. Harmful Algae, 2020, 91: 101594.
    [9]
    ELLIOTT J A. Is the future blue-green? a review of the current model predictions of how climate change could affect pelagic freshwater cyanobacteria[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(5): 1364-1371.
    [10]
    GLIBERT P M, ICARUS Allen J, ARTIOLI Y, et al. Vulnerability of coastal ecosystems to changes in harmful algal bloom distribution in response to climate change: projections based on model analysis[J]. Global Change Biology, 2014, 20(12): 3845-3858.
    [11]
    GOBLER C J, DOHERTY O M, HATTENRATH-Lehmann T K, et al. Ocean warming since 1982 has expanded the niche of toxic algal blooms in the North Atlantic and North Pacific oceans[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017, 114(19): 4975-4980.
    [12]
    KAMIYAMA T, NAGAI S, SUZUKI T, et al. Effect of temperature on production of okadaic acid, dinophysistoxin-1, and pectenotoxin-2 by Dinophysis acuminata in culture experiments[J]. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 2010, 60(2): 193-202.
    [13]
    DONEY S C, RUCKELSHAUS M, EMMETT Duffy J, et al. Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems[J]. Annual Review of Marine Science, 2012, 4(1): 11-37.
    [14]
    KIM H, SPIVACK A J, MENDEN-Deuer S. pH alters the swimming behaviors of the raphidophyte Heterosigma akashiwo: implications for bloom formation in an acidified ocean[J]. Harmful Algae, 2013, 26: 1-11.
    [15]
    RAVEN J A, GIORDANO M. Acquisition and metabolism of carbon in the Ochrophyta other than diatoms[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2017, 372(1728): 20160400.
    [16]
    TYLER R M, BRADY D C, TARGETT T E. Temporal and spatial dynamics of diel-cycling hypoxia in Estuarine Tributaries[J]. Estuaries and Coasts, 2009, 32(1): 123-145.
    [17]
    LI J, GLIBERT P M, ZHOU M, et al. Relationships between nitrogen and phosphorus forms and ratios and the development of dinoflagellate blooms in the East China Sea[J]. Marine Ecology Progress Series, Oldendorf Luhe: Inter-Research, 2009, 383: 11-26.
    [18]
    周名江, 颜天, 邹景忠. 长江口邻近海域赤潮发生区基本特征初探[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003,14(7): 1031-1038.
    [19]
    钱畅, 汪晓东, 罗芳, 等. 营养状态指数在长江下游小型浅水湖泊富营养化水平评价中的局限及改进建议[J]. 湖泊科学, 2023, 35(4): 1173-1184.
    [20]
    邹伟, 朱广伟, 蔡永久, 等. 综合营养状态指数(TLI)在夏季长江中下游湖库评价中的局限及改进意见[J]. 湖泊科学, 2020, 32(1): 36-47.
    [21]
    曾一川, 王华, 渠昊, 等. 滨湖河网叶绿素a时空分布特征及相关性分析[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 38(9): 23-30

    ,153.
    [22]
    JI B, LIANG J C, CHEN R. Bacterial eutrophic index for potential water quality evaluation of a freshwater ecosystem[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27(26): 32449-32455.
    [23]
    LONG T Y, WU L, MENG G H,et al.Numerical simulation for impacts of hydrodynamic conditions on algae growth in Chongqing Section of Jialing River, China[J].Ecological Modelling, 2011, 222(1):112-119.
    [24]
    秦伯强, 胡维平, 陈伟民, 等. 太湖梅梁湾水动力及相关过程的研究[J]. 湖泊科学, 2000(4): 327-334,385.
    [25]
    杜冰雪, 徐力刚, 张杰, 等. 鄱阳湖富营养化时空变化特征及其与水位的关系[J]. 环境科学研究, 2019, 32(5): 795-801.
    [26]
    俞珊妮, 彭俊, 谷梓鹏, 等. 鄱阳湖出入湖径流量变化过程及与长江相互作用关系[J]. 黑龙江工程学院学报, 2020, 34(6): 6-13.
    [27]
    闫喜凤, 邱祖民. 区域空气质量与水质及其土地利用变化响应研究[D]. 南昌:南昌大学, 2013.
    [28]
    王若男, 刘晓波, 韩祯, 等. 鄱阳湖湿地典型植被对关键水文要素的响应规律研究[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报, 2021, 19(5): 482-489.
    [29]
    WANG H, WU Y, DENG Y Q, et al. Examination of changes in selected nutrient concentrations from 1988 to 2018 in the largest freshwater Lake in China[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2022, 27(11): 05022016.
    [30]
    温春云, 刘聚涛, 胡芳, 等. 鄱阳湖水质变化特征及水体富营养化评价[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2020(11): 83-88.
    [31]
    胡春华, 黄丹, 周文斌, 等. 典型湖泊边缘区丰水期营养状态及其影响因子研究:以蚌湖为例[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2013, 34(3): 32-38.
    [32]
    曾辉. 长江和三峡库区浮游植物季节变动及其与营养盐和水文条件关系研究[D]. 武汉:中国科学院研究生院(水生生物研究所), 2006.
    [33]
    朱孔贤, 毕永红, 胡建林, 等. 三峡水库神农溪2008年夏季铜绿微囊藻(Microcystis aeruginosa)水华暴发特性[J]. 湖泊科学, 2012, 24(2): 220-226.
    [34]
    范宏翔, 徐力刚, 朱华, 等. 气候变化和人类活动对鄱阳湖水龄影响的定量区分[J]. 湖泊科学, 2021, 33(4): 1175-1187.
    [35]
    YUAN W K, LIU X N, WANG W F, et al. Microplastic abundance, distribution and composition in water, sediments, and wild fish from Poyang Lake, China[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2019, 170: 180-187.
    [36]
    刘霞, 刘宝贵, 陈宇炜, 等. 鄱阳湖浮游植物叶绿素a及营养盐浓度对水位波动的响应[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(6): 2141-2148.
    [37]
    WU Z S, CAI Y J, LIU X, et al. Temporal and spatial variability of phytoplankton in Lake Poyang: the largest freshwater lake in China[J]. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2013, 39(3): 476-483.
    [38]
    YANG Z, ZHANG M, SHI X L, et al. Nutrient reduction magnifies the impact of extreme weather on cyanobacterial bloom formation in large shallow Lake Taihu (China)[J]. Water Research, 2016, 103: 302-310.
    [39]
    de LEEUW J, SHANKMAN D, WU G F, et al. Strategic assessment of the magnitude and impacts of sand mining in Poyang Lake, China[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2010, 10(2): 95-102.
    [40]
    CARLSON R E, HAVENS K E. Simple graphical methods for the interpretation of relationships between trophic state variables[J]. Lake and Reservoir Management, 2005, 21(1): 107-118.
    [41]
    DAI G F, ZHANG W, PENG N Y, et al. Study on distribution of N and P pollutants and risk of cyanobacteria bloom in Poyang Lake and waters around the Lake during drought periods[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 24(5): 838-844.
    [42]
    HAMILTON D P, MITCHELL S F. An empirical model for sediment resuspension in shallow lakes[J]. Hydrobiologia, 1996, 317(3): 209-220.
    [43]
    LI J L, ZUO Q T. Forms of nitrogen and phosphorus in suspended solids: a case study of Lihu Lake, China[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(12): 5026.
    [44]
    XU Y Y, SCHROTH A W, ISLES P D F, et al. Quantile regression improves models of lake eutrophication with implications for ecosystem-specific management[J]. Freshwater Biology, 2015, 60(9): 1841-1853.
    [45]
    李嫚斐, 何明珠, 任建新, 等. 县域尺度土壤元素空间预测方法对比研究:以陇西县为例[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2023(4): 45-53.
    [46]
    LIU Y, JIANG H. Retrieval of total phosphorus concentration in the surface waters of Poyang Lake based on remote sensing and analysis of its spatial-temporal characteristics[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013, 28(12): 2169-2177.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]QIANG Chunmei, NI Xinxin, WU Jichun, XU Fen, LIU Yuanyuan. Screening method and engineering application of combined remediation technology for petrochemical aggregation sites based on AHP-TOPSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2025, 43(1): 211-222. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202501023
    [2]CHEN Yating, ZHAO Xinyu, LI Yanhong, ZHANG Chuanyan, DANG Qiuling, XI Beidou. ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR AND RESTORATION PROGRESS OF EMERGING CONTAMINANTS IN CONTAMINATED SITES IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 166-176. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401022
    [3]ZHAO Bin, PENG Tianyue, ZHANG Hao, WANG Liuwei, ZONG Wenjing, HOU Deyi. CHARACTERISTICS IDENTIFICATION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF MERCURY CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 205-212. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304028
    [4]LU Ailing, ZHU Dongyun, ZHANG Hong, CAO Han, ZHANG Jing. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON REMEDIATION OF HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATED SOIL BY EICP COMBINED WITH BIOCHAR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 176-180. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308022
    [5]TENG Hui, LI Dong, WU Junru. INTERFERENCE OF REMEDIATION AGENTS TO SOIL Cr(Ⅵ) DETERMINATION BY ALKALINE DIGESTION-FLAME ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 143-151. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211020
    [6]TU Degang, FENG Tao, YANG Guodong, LUO Weiwei, NIE Beili. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AN ABANDONED MACHINERY PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 217-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204031
    [7]WANG Jinnan, WU Yufeng, LI Liangzhong, YU Lu, YANG Mengchuan, LI Bin, GUO Lianjie. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF BARRIER TECHNOLOGIES FOR SITE COMBINED HEAVY METAL POLLUTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 244-253. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204034
    [8]NIU Zhenru, LI Feifei, ZHANG Youjun, QU Weigui, CONG Hui, LIU Shigang, ZHANG Jia. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND CAUSES OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS POLLUTION IN SOIL IN A TYPICAL CONTAMINATED SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 94-101,228. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203015
    [9]ZHANG Shao-kang, GONG Xiao-feng, LIN Yuan, WU Li, XIONG Jie-qian, WU Jing-lin. REMEDIATION OF Cd CONTAMINATED SOIL BY ARTIFICIAL STRUVITE COMBINED WITH RYEGRASS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 193-198. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109027
    [10]LIANG Jing, WANG Shi-jie, ZHANG Wen-yu, ZHANG Dan, ZHANG Yuan, ZOU Hui. REVIEW ON CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE USA AND THEIR REVELATION TO CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 173-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106026
    [11]MENG Xiang-shuai, CHEN Hong-han, HE Ya-ping, ZHENG Cong-qi, YUE Xi. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL INDEXES IN SELECTION OF REMEDIATION SCHEMES: A CASE STUDY OF AN ABANDONED COKING SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 153-159. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102025
    [12]HUO Li-li, HU Yu-lin, CHEN Wei, ZHONG Hua, LIU Guan-sheng, YANG Xin. TRANSPORT BEHAVIORS AND INFLUENCE FACTORS OF SURFACTANTS IN SUBSURFACE POROUS MEDIA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 207-215. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010033
    [13]LU Xiu-guo, WU Jin-jin, ZHENG Yu-jia. PASSIVATION OF CADMIUM IN SOIL BY WALNUT SHELL BIOCHAR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 196-202. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011032
    [14]CHEN Wen-hao, XU Guo-hui, ZHANG Yan-yan. LAYOUT OPTIMIZATION OF PUMPING AND INJECTION WELLS FOR LEACHING RESTORATION IN ENCLOSED CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 211-217. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011034
    [15]Liu Zengjun, Xia Xu, Zhang Xu, Li Guanghe, Jiang Lin. STUDY OF REMEDIATION AND LONG-TERM EFFECT OF AGENTS ON CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 160-163. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502036
    [16]Zhu Wenyuan Song Zixin Li Shefeng Liu Gengsheng Tao Ling Xu Xinying Qin Hui, . RESEARCH ON LOGISTICS ORGANIZATION IN PROCESS OF CONTAMINATED SOIL REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 164-167. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502037
    [17]Deng Yirong, Lin Ting, Xiao Rongbo, Zhao Lu, Han Cunliang. RECENT ADVANCES IN THE APPLICATION OF EKR-PRB IN CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 152-157. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510034
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 田伟超,陈融旭,田世民,王新,刘佳昕. 多倍体剑叶芦竹对豫西丘陵区坡面径流污染阻控效果研究. 环境工程. 2024(12): 60-65 . 本站查看
    2. 胡海波,邓文斌,王霞. 长江流域河岸植被缓冲带生态功能及构建技术研究进展. 浙江农林大学学报. 2022(01): 214-222 .
    3. 周传庭,王梦玉,幸韵欣,朱峰,安莹,周振. 城市初期雨水污染及处理措施的研究进展. 净水技术. 2022(07): 17-26 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.5 %FULLTEXT: 11.5 %META: 85.0 %META: 85.0 %PDF: 3.5 %PDF: 3.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 35.8 %其他: 35.8 %北京: 4.0 %北京: 4.0 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 3.1 %南京: 3.1 %南宁: 0.4 %南宁: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.9 %嘉兴: 0.9 %大连: 1.3 %大连: 1.3 %天津: 0.9 %天津: 0.9 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %张家口: 3.1 %张家口: 3.1 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %无锡: 0.4 %无锡: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %杭州: 6.2 %杭州: 6.2 %武汉: 5.3 %武汉: 5.3 %济宁: 0.9 %济宁: 0.9 %深圳: 2.7 %深圳: 2.7 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %漯河: 0.4 %漯河: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 16.8 %芒廷维尤: 16.8 %芝加哥: 2.7 %芝加哥: 2.7 %荆门: 1.3 %荆门: 1.3 %衡阳: 0.4 %衡阳: 0.4 %西宁: 1.8 %西宁: 1.8 %西安: 0.9 %西安: 0.9 %运城: 2.2 %运城: 2.2 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %邯郸: 1.3 %邯郸: 1.3 %郑州: 1.3 %郑州: 1.3 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %其他北京十堰南京南宁合肥嘉兴大连天津宣城常州常德张家口成都扬州无锡昆明杭州武汉济宁深圳温州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥荆门衡阳西宁西安运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (144) PDF downloads(6) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return