DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR RANKING QUANTITATIVE DETECTION LIST FROM NONTARGET SCREENING OF EMERGING POLLUTANTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES

ZHAO Xi; WEI Si

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202407008

Volume 42 Issue 7

Jul. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2024 > 42(7): 81-87

ZHAO Xi, WEI Si. DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR RANKING QUANTITATIVE DETECTION LIST FROM NONTARGET SCREENING OF EMERGING POLLUTANTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 81-87. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407008

Citation:

ZHAO Xi, WEI Si. DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR RANKING QUANTITATIVE DETECTION LIST FROM NONTARGET SCREENING OF EMERGING POLLUTANTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 81-87. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407008

Citation:

PDF( 1338 KB)

DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR RANKING QUANTITATIVE DETECTION LIST FROM NONTARGET SCREENING OF EMERGING POLLUTANTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407008

ZHAO Xi¹,
WEI Si²

1. Shenzhen Hanyu Environmental Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518001, China;
2. School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China

Received Date: 2024-03-08
Available Online: 2024-12-02

Abstract

Abstract

To develop an assessment system for evaluating the ranking of the quantitative detection list from the nontarget screening of emerging pollutants in the environmental samples, specific indicators were determined by Delphi method, and the weight of each indicator was calculated by analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and the evaluation index was quantified by five-point score system. This assessment system integrated three modules, i.e., the target, the criterion, and the index. From the perspective of nontarget screening, investigation of chemical substances, attention, ecological and environmental hazards, quantitative detection methods, etc., 15 evaluation criteria were identified and summarized into five groups, including results of nontarget screening, use of chemical substances, level of concern, ecological and environmental risks, feasibility of quantitative detection methods. The evaluation index was quantified and the weight of each index was assigned to assess the ranking of the quantitative detection list from the nontarget screening of emerging pollutants in the environmental samples. This system was then applied to a batch of environmental samples collected from South China. The top 30 emerging pollutants included 11 pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs), 8 endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), 7 pesticides, and 4 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs).
- emerging pollutants,
- nontarget screening,
- assessment system,
- analytic hierarchy process

FullText(HTML)

References(29)

References

[1]	孟小燕, 黄宝荣. 我国新污染物治理的进展、问题及对策[J]. 环境保护, 2023, 51(7): 9-13.
[2]	李仓敏, 王燕飞. 新污染物治理与现有环境治理措施衔接的探讨[J]. 环境保护, 2023, 51(7): 14-17.
[3]	钱慧敏, 刘艳娜, 姚林林, 等. 非靶标技术在新污染物识别中的应用[J]. 环境化学, 2024, 43(2): 1-14.
[4]	YU N Y, DENG Y Y, WANG X B. Nontarget discovery of antimicrobial transformation products in wastewater based on molecular networks[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2023, 57: 8335-8346.
[5]	卢昕妍, 王菲, 张丽敏, 等. 太湖西岸地表水中极性有机污染物非靶向筛查与生态风险评估[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(11): 5284-5293.
[6]	许衎, 王学兵, 于南洋, 等. 长江江苏段新污染物非靶向识别研究[J]. 质谱学报, 2023, 44(2): 267-276.
[7]	王一喆, 张亚辉, 赵莹, 等. 国内外环境优先污染物筛选排序方法比较[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2018, 8(4): 456-464.
[8]	United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Toxic and priority pollutants under the Clean Water Act[R]. Washington DC: US EPA, 1977.
[9]	COUNCIL E. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water[R]. European Community, 2000.
[10]	王伟霞, 姚烘烨, 赵静, 等. 基于逼近理想解排序的江苏省优先控制毒害有机化学物质筛查研究[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(4): 197-212.
[11]	RUAN T, LI P, WANG H, et al. Identification and prioritization of environmental organic pollutants: from an analytical and toxicological perspective[J]. Chem Rev, 2023, 123: 10584-10640.
[12]	朱菲菲, 秦普丰, 张娟, 等. 我国地下水环境优先控制有机污染物的筛选[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2013, 3(5): 443-450.
[13]	葛海虹, 胡俊杰, 赵静, 等. 欧盟化学物质风险评估与风险管理要点分析[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2023, 18(6): 51-59.
[14]	宋杰玉, 徐婵, 李进, 等. 长江流域全氟化合物污染现状及环境基准探讨[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2022, 45(9):219-229.
[15]	胡丽雅. 地下水典型药品和个人护理品检测与风险评估[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2023, 46(增刊1):216-223.
[16]	姚理, 马艳芳, 周漪, 等. 氯咪巴唑在鱼体的富集和代谢动力学[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(8): 3501-3507.
[17]	杨彦, 高源, 马盛韬, 等. 壬基酚异构体的组成、环境行为及毒性效应研究进展[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2023, 18(1): 206-216.
[18]	郭雨婷, 刘亚军, 邓觅, 等. F-53B胁迫下污水厌氧处理系统及微生物群落的响应[J]. 中国环境科学, 2024, 44(2): 721-729.
[19]	吴文铸, 郭敏, 孔德洋, 等. 3种三唑类杀菌剂的环境降解特性[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(5): 837-841.
[20]	潘新赟, 石斌, 毛翔, 等. 武汉市饮用水中阿特拉津及降解产物浓度特征[J].环境科学与技术, 2023, 46(4):137-140.
[21]	戴竹青, 戴巍, 王明新, 等. 高铁酸钾降解嗅味物质异佛尔酮的效能及机理[J].环境化学, 2019, 38(9): 2108-2117.
[22]	崔嵩, 李斐, 刘志琨. 新烟碱类杀虫剂污染特征及其毒性效应[J]. 中国环境科学, 2023, 43(1): 361-373.
[23]	巢铸, 夏鹏, 司静宜, 等. 我国淡水中卡马西平的水质基准初探及生态风险评估[J]. 环境工程, 2023, 41(4):170-177.
[24]	刘仁彬, 姜锦林, 张宇峰, 等. 壬基酚聚氧乙烯醚对斑马鱼精巢组织的影响[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2019, 14(3): 155-162.
[25]	吕娟, 许志伟, 王言. UV降解水溶液中文拉法辛的影响因素及机制[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(5): 2278-2286.
[26]	郑雪松, 孙亚兵, 於仲清, 等. 湿壁介质阻挡放电强化浮石载羟基氧化铁降解水中避蚊胺[J]. 环境工程学报, 2021, 15(2): 512-521.
[27]	黄文平, 鲍轶凡, 胡霞林, 等. 黄浦江上游水源地中31 种内分泌干扰物的分布特征以及生态风险评价[J]. 环境化学, 2020, 39(6): 1488-1495.
[28]	何姝, 董慧峪, 任南琪. 我国东南地区饮用水源地多种农药的赋存特征及健康风险评估[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(1): 180-188.
[29]	邹秀萍, 李振玮, 张丛林, 等.构建中国特色新污染物风险防控体系[J]. 环境生态学, 2022, 4(2/3): 111 -115.