Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
YAN Rong, LEI Xin, MU Yu-jie, KONG Zhi-yuan, ZHANG Yuan-can, FU Zhi-min. CONTROL STRATEGY OF SUBSEQUENT CARBON SOURCE IN ANAMMOX-MFC SYSTEM FOR ENHANCEMENT NITROGEN REMOVAL AND POWER GENERATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 76-83. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109012
Citation: GUO Qianjin. COMPONENTS CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PM2.5 IN AUTUMN AND WINTER IN JINCHENG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 153-161. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407017

COMPONENTS CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PM2.5 IN AUTUMN AND WINTER IN JINCHENG

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407017
  • Received Date: 2023-06-12
    Available Online: 2024-12-02
  • Jincheng is an important coal chemical industry base in China, and its industrial economic structure is dominated by heavy industry. In recent years, PM2.5 pollution has become prominent in Jincheng. Atmospheric PM2.5 samples were collected from three sites in Jincheng in the autumn and winter from 2018 to 2019. This study analyzed the component concentrations (ions, elements, and carbon) and secondary transformation characteristics under different conditions. Backward trajectory was used to investigate the impact of regional transport on ambient air, and a chemical mass balance model was used to analyze the source of PM2.5. The results showed that: 1) the concentration of PM2.5 in Jincheng was 86.1 μg/m3 during the sampling period. The PM2.5 concentration in the polluted period (131.1 μg/m3) was 2.3 times higher than that in the clean period (58.2 μg/m3), which maybe related to the high humidity and static stability conditions. 2) secondary inorganic ions were the main component (83.4%) of water-soluble ions in PM2.5 in Jincheng, which had a higher concentration in the polluted period (71.2 μg/m3) than clean period (24.6 μg/m3). The conversion of SO2 to SO2-4 in autumn and winter in Jincheng was mainly dominated by heterogeneous reactions, while the formation of NO-3 was influenced by both oxidation and heterogeneous hydrolysis. Compared with the clean period, the concentrations of OC and EC in polluted days increased by 88.5% and 83.0%, respectively. The backward trajectory results showed that under the influence of adverse meteorological conditions, the short-distance air mass from the southeast of Jincheng in January aggravated the pollution process, which reflected the importance of regional joint prevention and control. The results of source apportionment showed that dust source (18.4%), secondary nitrates (16.5%), coal combustion (15.9%) source, and vehicle source (12.0%) were the main source of PM2.5. Therefore, to further reduce the concentration of PM2.5 in Jincheng, it is necessary to strengthen the control of vehicle and coal combustion in autumn and winter to reduce the emissions of the primary pollutants (SO2 and NO2).
  • [1]
    ZHANG Q H, ZHANG J P, XUE H W. The challenge of improving visibility in Beijing[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2010, 10(16): 7821-7827.
    [2]
    YU S, LIU W, XU Y, et al. Characteristics and oxidative potential of atmospheric PM2.5 in Beijing: source apportionment and seasonal variation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 650: 277-287.
    [3]
    LIU B, SONG N, DAI Q, et al. Chemical composition and source apportionment of ambient PM2.5 during the non-heating period in Taian, China[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2016, 170: 23-33.
    [4]
    ZHANG R, JING J, TAO J, et al. Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing: seasonal perspective[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2013, 13(14): 7053-7074.
    [5]
    DU W, HONG Y, XIAO H, et al. Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 during spring and winter in the Yangtze River Delta, China[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2017, 17(9): 2165-2180.
    [6]
    WANG Y, JIA C, TAO J, et al. Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 in a semi-arid and petrochemical-industrialized city, Northwest China[J]. Science of the Total Environment 2016, 573: 1031-1040.
    [7]
    TIAN S, LIU Y, WANG J, et al. Chemical compositions and source analysis of PM during autumn and winter in a heavily polluted city in China[J]. Atmosphere, 2020, 11(4): 336.
    [8]
    TANG R, WU Z, LI X, et al. Primary and secondary organic aerosols in summer of 2016 in Beijing[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2018, 18(6): 4055-4068.
    [9]
    GAO S, YANG W, ZHANG H, et al. Estimating representative background PM2.5 concentration in heavily polluted areas using baseline separation technique and chemical mass balance model[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2018, 174: 180-187.
    [10]
    ZHOU J, XIONG Y, XING Z, et al. Characterizing and sourcing ambient PM2.5 over key emission regions in China Ⅱ: organic molecular markers and CMB modeling[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2017, 163: 57-64.
    [11]
    LU H, LIN S, MWANGI J K, et al. Characteristics and source apportionment of atmospheric PM2.5 at a coastal city in Southern Taiwan[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2016, 16(4): 1022-1034.
    [12]
    杨帆, 闫雨龙, 戈云飞, 等. 晋城市冬季环境空气中挥发性有机物的污染特征及来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(9): 4042-4050.
    [13]
    LIU Q, LIANG S, XU J. Characteristics and sources of air pollution in southern Shanxi Province[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(20): 13511.
    [14]
    GUO D, WANG R, ZHAO P. Spatial distribution and source contributions of PM2.5 concentrations in Jincheng, China[J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2020, 11(8): 1281-1289.
    [15]
    马帅, 王春迎, 刘孟雄, 等. 晋城市冬、春季 PM2.5 和PM10 污染水平时空分布及其与气象因子的关系[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2020, 43(1): 96-103.
    [16]
    TURPIN B J, LIM H. Species contributions to PM2.5 mass concentrations: revisiting common assumptions for estimating organic mass[J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2001, 35(1): 602-610.
    [17]
    XU Q, WANG S, JIANG J, et al. Nitrate dominates the chemical composition of PM2.5 during haze event in Beijing, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment 2019, 689: 1293-1303.
    [18]
    WANG S, YIN S, ZHANG R, et al. Insight into the formation of secondary inorganic aerosol based on high-time-resolution data during haze episodes and snowfall periods in Zhengzhou, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 660: 47-56.
    [19]
    WATSON J G, COOPER J A, HUNTZICKER J J. The effective variance weighting for least squares calculations applied to the mass balance receptor model[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1984, 18(7): 1347-1355.
    [20]
    张毅. 长治市秋冬季PM2.5组分特征及来源解析[J]. 环境化学, 2020, 39(6): 1699-1708.
    [21]
    王振宇, 李永斌, 郭凌, 等. 基于多种新型受体模型的PM2.5来源解析对比[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(2): 608-618.
    [22]
    王成, 闫雨龙, 谢凯, 等. 阳泉市秋冬季PM2.5化学组分及来源分析[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(3): 1036-1044.
    [23]
    陈楚, 王体健, 李源昊, 等. 濮阳市秋冬季大气细颗粒物污染特征及来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(8): 3421-3430.
    [24]
    DUAN X, YAN Y, XIE K, et al. Impact of primary emission variations on secondary inorganic aerosol formation: prospective from COVID-19 lockdown in a typical northern China city[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2023, 323: 121355.
    [25]
    WANG C, YAN Y, NIU Y, et al. Formation and driving factors of sulfate in PM2.5 at a high-level atmospheric SO2 city of Yangquan in China[J]. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2020.
    [26]
    刘素, 马彤, 杨艳, 等. 太原市冬季 PM2.5 化学组分特征与来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(4): 1537-1544.
    [27]
    JIANG N, LI Q, SU F, et al. Chemical characteristics and source apportionment of PM2.5 between heavily polluted days and other days in Zhengzhou, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2018, 66: 188-198.
    [28]
    吴琳, 沈建东, 冯银厂, 等. 杭州市灰霾与非灰霾日不同粒径大气颗粒物来源解析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2014, 27(4): 373-381.
    [29]
    CHOW J C, WATSON J G, LU Z, et al. Descriptive Analysis of PM2.5 and PM10 at Regionally Representative Locations During SJVAQS/AUSPEX[Z]. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 1996: 2079-2112.
    [30]
    邓萌杰, 雷雨果, 成海容. 华中背景地区大气颗粒物中水溶性离子特征与来源解析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2023.
    [31]
    丁萌萌, 周健楠, 刘保献, 等. 2015年北京城区大气PM2.5中NH+4、NO-3、SO2-4及前体气体的污染特征[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(4): 1307-1316.
    [32]
    CHEN X, WANG H, LU K, et al. Field determination of nitrate formation pathway in winter Beijing[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(15): 9243-9253.
    [33]
    DUAN X, YAN Y, PENG L, et al. Role of ammonia in secondary inorganic aerosols formation at an ammonia-rich city in winter in north China: a comparative study among industry, urban, and rural sites[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 291: 118151.
    [34]
    马杰利, 罗达通, 刘欣, 等. 长株潭城市群 PM2.5中二次无机离子特征及生成机制[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(11): 5975-5985.
    [35]
    WU P, HUANG X, ZHANG J, et al. Characteristics and formation mechanisms of autumn haze pollution in Chengdu based on high time-resolved water-soluble ion analysis[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(3): 2649-2661.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]KONG Lingrui, LI Xinjue, ZHENG Ru, ZHANG Kuo, LIU Sitong. ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF PARTIAL NITRIFICATION-ANAMMOX BY USING HYDROTALCITE COMPOSITE BIOFILM CARRIERS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 16-23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401003
    [2]YANG Shenhua, ZHANG Lujing, PENG Yongzhen, PANG Hongtao, JIANG Leyong, SUN Shihao, ZHAI Dandan. RESEARCH ADVANCES OF ENHANCING BIOFILM FORMATION OF ANAMMOX[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 1-8. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401001
    [3]ZHAO Jinan, LIU Siyun, SHAN Yingqi, LIU Chang, TIAN Mengyuan, LI Bolin. RAPID START-UP AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY ANALYSIS OF A SULFUR AUTOTROPHIC DENITRIFICATION COUPLED ANAEROBIC AMMONIA OXIDATION DENITRIFICATION SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 9-16. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406002
    [4]SHI Xiaobei. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON IRON ENHANCED ANAEROBIC AMMONIA OXIDATION REACTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 231-236. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305030
    [5]LIU Changyuan, HAN Rui, YI Longqiang, LEI Jiahui, ZHANG Cuiya, WU Yinghai. REVIEW ON ENHANCEMENT OF ANAMMOX PROCESS BY QUORUM SENSING SIGNAL MOLECULES AHLs[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 251-258. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308032
    [6]ZHANG Chi, SHA Hongjü, WANG Chao, LÜ Ze, HU Xiaomin. MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ENHANCEMENT BY ELECTRIC FIELD AT ROOM TEMPERATURE AND HIGH NITROGEN LOAD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 39-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305006
    [7]MEN Yan, LIU Lingjie, ZHU Yaxin, BI Yanmeng, MENG Fansheng, YU Jingjie, WANG Shaopo. EFFECT OF ORGANIC MATTER CONCENTRATION VARIATION ON NITROGEN REMOVAL PERFORMANCE AND BACTERIA COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN A HYBRID SBR ANAMMOX SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 83-90. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308011
    [8]LI Cong, DU Rui, PENG Yongzhen. NITROGEN REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND CARBON SOURCE UTILIZATION CHARACTERISTICS OF PARTIAL DENITRIFICATION COUPLING ANAMMOX PROCESSES WITH DIFFERENT SLUDGE AGGREGATION MODES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 1-9. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309001
    [9]SONG Xiaokang, YIN Fangfang, DING Min, ZHU Cheng, WU Peng, LIU Wenru. NITROGEN REMOVAL FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER BY ANAEROBIC AMMONIA OXIDATION: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 235-243. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204033
    [10]ZHANG Ke, TIAN Shuangchao, DOU Xueyan, ZHANG Chang, DONG Lixin, ZHU Jinliang, XIAO Benyi, LIU Qixin, LIU Jianwei, LIU Junxin. ANAEROBIC/AEROBIC BIOLOGICAL CONTACT OXIDATION PROCESS COUPLED WITH MICROBIAL FUEL CELL TO TREAT RURAL DOMESTIC WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 139-146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203021
    [11]GUO Yankai, GUO Jinyan, ZHAO Juan, MA Zhiyuan, NIU Yanyan, YANG Jiaqi, LIAN Jing. PREPARATION OF PMo12/rGO/PPy ANODE BY ELECTRODEPOSITION FOR MICROBIAL FUEL CELLS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 147-153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203022
    [12]ZHANG Zong-bin, YUE Zheng-bo, WU Jing-hang, WANG Jin. CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS OF AN ELECTRICITY-PRODUCING STRAIN SHEWANELLA XMS-1 FROM MARINE SEDIMENTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 33-39. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101004
    [13]TANG Xin-hua, JIA Yu-yang, CUI Yang, CHEN Mo-yu, LIU Lei. ENHANCEMENT OF MICROBIAL FUEL CELL PERFORMANCE BY Fe-S-N CO-DOPED POROUS CARBON CATHODE CATALYST[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 163-170. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110023
    [14]SHI Yu-cui, LUO Xin-yi, TANG Gang, YE Yan-chao, YOU Shao-hong. RESEARCH PROGRESS AND PROSPECTS OF CONSTRUCTED WETLAND-MICROBIAL FUEL CELL COUPLING SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 25-33. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108004
    [15]XIANG Xi-yi, YU Ji-hong, NIU Ma-dou, HU Xiao-min. EFFECT OF PULSED ELECTRIC AND DIRECT CURRENT FIELD ON NITROGEN REMOVAL BY AN ANAMMOX REACTOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 108-112,233. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108014
    [16]GAO Yan-ming, WANG Ting, LI Jie-ling, WEI Shi-cheng, LIU Guang-li, LUO Hai-ping, ZHANG Ren-duo. ELECTRICITY GENERATION PROPERTIES OF MICROBIAL FUEL CELL WITH CORN COB ACID PYROLYSIS SOLUTION AS THE SUBSTRATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 127-134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111016
    [17]MA Xiao-qian, ZHANG Zhe, LIU Chao, WANG Jun-jie, WANG Jia-lin, YU Yi, CAO Rui-jie, SHI Zhi-li, WANG Ya-yi. TREATMENT OF LEACHATE FROM MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION PLANT BY COMBINED ANAMMOX PROCESS: NITROGEN REMOVAL AND MICROBIAL MECHANISM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 110-118. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111014
    [18]FU Jin-xiang, QIAN Jie, ZHANG Li, YU Peng-fei, LUO Di, YOU Kun. EFFECT OF HIGH CONCENTRATION PHOSPHORUS ON ANAEROBIC AMMONIA OXIDATION PERFORMANCE AND GRANULAR SLUDGE PROPERTY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 98-102,109. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011016
    [19]CAI Ze-xiang, XIAO Long-wen, ZHANG Da-chao, SU Hao, LI Yong-chao, LAI Cheng. NITROGEN REMOVAL PERFORMANCE OF A NOVEL MULTI-SETTLER ANAEROBIC SPOUTED BED REACTOR VIA ANAEROBIC AMMONIA OXIDATION (ANAMMOX) PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 70-75,83. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005013
    [20]Qi Jiaoqin, Zhu Liang, Xu Xiangyang, Kong Yun, Cai Rui. MICROBIAL FUEL CELLS AND ITS APPLICATION IN BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER/WASTE TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 1-5. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503001
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 王婷婷,盛昌栋. 城镇污水污泥低温氧化放热特性的恒温量热分析. 环境工程. 2021(10): 110-115+123 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.6 %FULLTEXT: 14.6 %META: 83.3 %META: 83.3 %PDF: 2.0 %PDF: 2.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 21.2 %其他: 21.2 %Ulu Bedok: 0.5 %Ulu Bedok: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 2.5 %上海: 2.5 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %北京: 2.0 %北京: 2.0 %南京: 1.5 %南京: 1.5 %台州: 1.5 %台州: 1.5 %咸阳: 0.5 %咸阳: 0.5 %唐山: 0.5 %唐山: 0.5 %天津: 1.5 %天津: 1.5 %宣城: 1.0 %宣城: 1.0 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %广州: 2.5 %广州: 2.5 %张家口: 1.0 %张家口: 1.0 %成都: 1.5 %成都: 1.5 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %晋城: 1.0 %晋城: 1.0 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 2.5 %杭州: 2.5 %武汉: 1.0 %武汉: 1.0 %汕头: 0.5 %汕头: 0.5 %济南: 1.0 %济南: 1.0 %济源: 1.0 %济源: 1.0 %湖州: 1.5 %湖州: 1.5 %漯河: 2.0 %漯河: 2.0 %芒廷维尤: 27.3 %芒廷维尤: 27.3 %芝加哥: 5.6 %芝加哥: 5.6 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %西宁: 1.5 %西宁: 1.5 %西安: 1.0 %西安: 1.0 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 6.1 %运城: 6.1 %连云港: 1.0 %连云港: 1.0 %遵义: 0.5 %遵义: 0.5 %邯郸: 1.0 %邯郸: 1.0 %郑州: 2.0 %郑州: 2.0 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %其他Ulu Bedok[]上海临汾北京南京台州咸阳唐山天津宣城常德广州张家口成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉汕头济南济源湖州漯河芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州西宁西安贵阳运城连云港遵义邯郸郑州重庆长沙长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (42) PDF downloads(3) Cited by(5)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return