Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
MA Ruohan, LI Zhouyan, CAI Teng, NIU Chengxin, WANG Xueye, WANG Zhiwei. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON EMISSION AND CONTROL OF NON-CO2 GREENHOUSE GASES IN MUNICIPAL DRAINAGE NETWORKS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 1-12. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411001
Citation: MA Ruohan, LI Zhouyan, CAI Teng, NIU Chengxin, WANG Xueye, WANG Zhiwei. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON EMISSION AND CONTROL OF NON-CO2 GREENHOUSE GASES IN MUNICIPAL DRAINAGE NETWORKS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 1-12. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411001

RESEARCH PROGRESS ON EMISSION AND CONTROL OF NON-CO2 GREENHOUSE GASES IN MUNICIPAL DRAINAGE NETWORKS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411001
  • Received Date: 2024-07-14
    Available Online: 2025-01-16
  • The non-CO2 greenhouse gases emitted from municipal drainage networks are the core components of the direct carbon emissions from municipal drainage systems. Reducing non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions from municipal drainage networks will contribute to green development and low-carbon transformation of municipal drainage systems in the context of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. The current status of non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions, generating mechanisms, and emission control measures are critical for lowering non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions in drainage networks. Based on the recent advances in non-CO2 greenhouse gases emissions and control in drainage networks, the non-CO2 greenhouse gases generation and emission data are analyzed, the micro-mechanism and key influencing factors of non-CO2 greenhouse gases production in drainage networks are clarified, and the prediction methods and mathematical models of non-CO2 greenhouse gases emissions are also summarized. In addition, the existing non-CO2 greenhouse gases control methods in drainage networks are discussed. Finally, a conclusion on its future research direction is proposed.
  • [1]
    IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
    [2]
    World Meteorological Organization. WMO Greenhouse Gas Bulletin No.19[R/OL]. https://wmo.int/publication-series/wmo-greenhouse-gas-bulletin-no-19. 2023-11-15.
    [3]
    《2022年中国城乡建设统计年鉴》编委会.中国城乡建设统计年鉴[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2023:4-5.
    [4]
    GUISASOLA A, de HAAS D, KELLER J, et al. Methane formation in sewer systems[J]. Water Research, 2008, 42(6/7): 1421-1430.
    [5]
    FOLEY J, YUAN Z G, LANT P. Dissolved methane in rising main sewer systems: field measurements and simple model development for estimating greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Water Science & Technology, 2009, 60(11): 2963-2971.
    [6]
    SHORT M D, DAIKELER A, PETERS G M, et al. Municipal gravity sewers: an unrecognised source of nitrous oxide[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 468: 211-218.
    [7]
    CLEMENS J, HAAS B. Nitrous oxide emissions in sewer systems[J]. Acta hydrochimica et hydrobiologica, 1997, 25(2): 96-99.
    [8]
    FRIES A E, SCHIFMAN L A, SHUSTER W D, et al. Street-level emissions of methane and nitrous oxide from the wastewater collection system in Cincinnati, Ohio[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 236: 247-256.
    [9]
    WILLIS J. GHG methodologies for sewer CH4, methanol-use CO2, and biogas combustion CH4 and their significance for centralized wastewater treatment[D]. Queensland Australia: The University of Queensland, 2017.
    [10]
    GUO L, PORRO J, SHARMA K R, et al. Towards a benchmarking tool for minimizing wastewater utility greenhouse gas footprints[J]. Water Science & Technology, 2012, 66(11): 2483-2495.
    [11]
    郝晓地, 孙群, 李季, 等. 排水管道甲烷产生影响因素及其估算方法[J]. 中国给水排水, 2022, 38(20): 1-7.
    [12]
    ZHU H J, WANG Q, LIU J, et al. Closing the gap in methane emission from urban wastewater sewer system in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 437:140722.
    [13]
    LIM J S, KIM J, FRIEDMAN J, et al. SewerSnort: a drifting sensor for in situ wastewater collection system gas monitoring[J]. Ad Hoc Networks, 2013, 11(4): 1456-1471.
    [14]
    LIU Y, NI B J, GANIGUE R, et al. Sulfide and methane production in sewer sediments[J]. Water Research, 2015, 70: 350-359.
    [15]
    XU J W, HE Q, LI H, et al. Modeling of methane formation in gravity sewer system: the impact of microorganism and hydraulic condition[J]. AMB Express, 2018, 8(34): 1-10.
    [16]
    LI W K, ZHENG T L, MA Y Q, et al. Current status and future prospects of sewer biofilms: their structure, influencing factors, and substance transformations[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 695: 133815.
    [17]
    JENSEN H, BIGGS C A, KARUNAKARAN E. The importance of sewer biofilms[J]. WIREs Water, 2016, 3(4): 487-494.
    [18]
    郝晓地, 杨振理, 张益宁, 等. 排水管道中CH4、H2S与N2O的产生机制及其控制策略[J]. 环境工程学报, 2023, 17(1): 1-12.
    [19]
    熊洁, 左晓俊, 李路程, 等. 城市排水管网中温室气体减排策略研究进展[J]. 中国环境科学, 2023,43(4): 1937-1945.
    [20]
    ZHOU Z, ZHANG C J, LIU P F, et al. Non-syntrophic methanogenic hydrocarbon degradation by an archaeal species[J]. Nature, 2022, 601(7892): 257-262.
    [21]
    SUN J, HU S, SHARMA K R, et al. Stratified microbial structure and activity in sulfide- and methane-producing anaerobic sewer biofilms[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2014, 80(22): 7042-7052.
    [22]
    CAO J J, ZHANG L, HONG J Y, et al. Different ferric dosing strategies could result in different control mechanisms of sulfide and methane production in sediments of gravity sewers[J]. Water Research, 2019, 164: 114914.
    [23]
    LI Y, JIANG J, ZHANG W L, et al. Changes in stoichiometric ratio of carbon and sulfate affect methanogenesis pathways in sulfate-rich sewers[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 426:139112.
    [24]
    KAMPSCHREUR M J, TEMMINK H, KLEEREBEZEM R, et al. Nitrous oxide emission during wastewater treatment[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(17): 4093-4103.
    [25]
    DUAN H R, YE L, ERLER D, et al. Quantifying nitrous oxide production pathways in wastewater treatment systems using isotope technology: a critical review[J]. Water Research, 2017, 122: 96-113.
    [26]
    LAW Y, YE L, PAN Y, et al. Nitrous oxide emissions from wastewater treatment processes[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2012, 367(1593): 1265-1277.
    [27]
    CHEN H B, ZENG L, WANG D B, et al. Recent advances in nitrous oxide production and mitigation in wastewater treatment[J]. Water Research, 2020, 184: 116168.
    [28]
    LEE Y, CHOI H, CHO K, et al. Toxic/hazardous substances and environmental engineering effects of carbon source, C/N ratio, nitrate, temperature, and pH on N2O emission and functional denitrifying genes during heterotrophic denitrification emission and functional denitrifying genes during heterotrophic denitrification[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 2019, 54(1): 16-29.
    [29]
    ZHANG G J, PANG Y, ZHOU Y C, et al. Effect of dissolved oxygen on N2O release in the sewer system during controlling hydrogen sulfide by nitrate dosing[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 816: 151581.
    [30]
    SONG C, ZHU J J, WILLIS J L, et al. Methane emissions from municipal wastewater collection and treatment systems[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2023, 57(6): 2248-2261.
    [31]
    BEELEN B, PARKER W. A probabilistic approach to the quantification of methane generation in sewer networks[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 320: 115775.
    [32]
    苑心, 李轩, 胡言午, 等. 隐形的地下碳源:城市排水管道CH4排放[J]. 给水排水, 2022, 58(9): 139-146.
    [33]
    KYUNG D, KIM D, YI S, et al. Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from sewer pipeline system[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22(12): 1901-1911.
    [34]
    GUTIERREZ O, SUDARJANTO G, REN G, et al. Assessment of pH shock as a method for controlling sulfide and methane formation in pressure main sewer systems[J]. Water Research, 2014, 48: 569-578.
    [35]
    JIANG G, GUTIERREZ O, SHARMA K R, et al. Effects of nitrite concentration and exposure time on sulfide and methane production in sewer systems[J]. Water Research, 2010, 44(14): 4241-4251.
    [36]
    SPENCER A U, NOLAND S S, GOTTLIEB L J. Bathtub fire: an extraordinary burn injury[J]. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 2006, 27(1): 97-98.
    [37]
    JOO J, JEONG S, SHIN J, et al. Missing methane emissions from urban sewer networks[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2024, 342: 123101.
    [38]
    CHEN H, YE J, ZHOU Y, et al. Variations in CH4 and CO2 productions and emissions driven by pollution sources in municipal sewers: an assessment of the role of dissolved organic matter components and microbiota[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 263: 114489.
    [39]
    CHAOSAKUL T, KOOTTATEP T, POLPRASERT C. A model for methane production in sewers[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 2014, 49(11): 1316-1321.
    [40]
    LIU Y, SHARMA K R, MURTHY S, et al. On-line monitoring of methane in sewer air[J]. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4(1): 6637.
    [41]
    TERRYN I C C, COCARCEA A, LAZAR G. Mitigation of hazardous air pollutant emissions: vacuum vs. conventional sewer system [J]. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 2017, 16(4): 809-819.
    [42]
    JIN P K, WANG B, JIAO D, et al. Characterization of microflora and transformation of organic matters in urban sewer system[J]. Water Research, 2015, 84: 112-119.
    [43]
    赵刚, 蒋明, 韦志成, 等. 不同水质条件下污水管道甲烷排放规律及微生物作用机制[J]. 环境工程, 2024, 42(4): 22-30.
    [44]
    陈思远, 肖向哲, 滕俊, 等. 剩余污泥厌氧消化过程产甲烷抑制技术研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(6): 137-143.
    [45]
    WUNDERLIN P, MOHN J, JOSS A, et al. Mechanisms of N2O production in biological wastewater treatment under nitrifying and denitrifying conditions[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(4): 1027-1037.
    [46]
    GUISASOLA A, SHARMA K R, KELLER J, et al. Development of a model for assessing methane formation in rising main sewers[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(11): 2874-2884.
    [47]
    SHORT M D, DAIKELER A, WALLIS K, et al. Dissolved methane in the influent of three Australian wastewater treatment plants fed by gravity sewers[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 599: 85-93.
    [48]
    LIU Y W, SHARMA K R, FLUGGEN M, et al. Online dissolved methane and total dissolved sulfide measurement in sewers[J]. Water Research, 2015, 68: 109-118.
    [49]
    HE Q, YIN F X, LI H, et al. Suitable flow pattern increases the removal efficiency of nitrogen in gravity sewers: a suitable anoxic and aerobic environment in biofilms[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25(16): 15743-15753.
    [50]
    XU J W, LI M Z, HE Q, et al. Effect of flow rate on growth and oxygen consumption of biofilm in gravity sewer[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24(1): 427-435.
    [51]
    LIU Y W, NI B J, SHARMA K R, et al. Methane emission from sewers[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 524: 40-51.
    [52]
    SUN J, HU S H, SHARMA K R, et al. Impact of reduced water consumption on sulfide and methane production in rising main sewers[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 154: 307-315.
    [53]
    吴美容, 张瑞, 周俊, 等. 温度对产甲烷菌代谢途径和优势菌群结构的影响[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(5): 1602-1606.
    [54]
    TAN E, ZOU W B, ZHENG Z Z, et al. Warming stimulates sediment denitrification at the expense of anaerobic ammonium oxidation[J]. Nature. Climate. Change, 2020, 10: 349-355.
    [55]
    CHUN Y, KIM D, HATTORI S, et al. Temperature control on wastewater and downstream nitrous oxide emissions in an urbanized river system[J]. Water Research, 2020, 187: 116417.
    [56]
    ZUO Z Q, REN D H, QIAO L K, et al. Rapid dynamic quantification of sulfide generation flux in spatially heterogeneous sediments of gravity sewers[J]. Water Research, 2021, 203: 117494.
    [57]
    FRUTOS O D, QUIJANO G, AIZPURU A, et al. A state-of-the-art review on nitrous oxide control from waste treatment and industrial sources[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2018, 36(4): 1025-1037.
    [58]
    SUN J, NI B J, SHARMA K R, et al. Modelling the long-term effect of wastewater compositions on maximum sulfide and methane production rates of sewer biofilm[J]. Water Research, 2018, 129: 58-65.
    [59]
    AI T, HE Q, XU J W, et al. A conceptual method to simultaneously inhibit methane and hydrogen sulfide production in sewers: the carbon metabolic pathway and microbial community shift[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 246: 119-127.
    [60]
    PAN Y T, LIU Y W, WANG D B, et al. Modeling effects of H2S on electron competition among nitrogen oxide reduction and N2O accumulation during denitrification[J]. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2019, 5(3): 533-542.
    [61]
    PAN Y T, YE L, YUAN Z G. Effect of H2S on N2O reduction and accumulation during denitrification by methanol utilizing denitrifiers[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(15): 8408-8415.
    [62]
    潘亚男, 王娅静, 曹文超, 等. 土壤pH影响氧化亚氮(N2O)排放的研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2017, 23(15): 19-24.
    [63]
    CHEN Y, XING Y X, ZUO Z Q, et al. Enhanced mechanistic insights and performance optimization: controlling methane and sulfide in sewers using nitrate dosing strategies[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 907: 167580.
    [64]
    JIANG G M, GUTIERREZ O, SHARMA K R, et al. Optimization of intermittent, simultaneous dosage of nitrite and hydrochloric acid to control sulfide and methane productions in sewers[J]. Water Research, 2011, 45(18): 6163-6172.
    [65]
    薛朝霞, 冯骞, 方芳, 等. 城镇污水管道系统甲烷产排特性及发生机制[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(6): 123-129.
    [66]
    SHARMA K R, YUAN Z G, de HAAS D, et al. Dynamics and dynamic modelling of H2S production in sewer systems[J]. Water Research, 2008, 42(10/11): 2527-2538.
    [67]
    GANIGUE R, YUAN Z G. Impact of oxygen injection on CH4 and N2O emissions from rising main sewers[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2014, 144: 279-285.
    [68]
    GAO R Y, ZHANG Z Q, ZHANG T W, et al. Upstream Natural Pulsed Ventilation: a simple measure to control the sulfide and methane production in gravity sewer[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 742: 140579.
    [69]
    MOHANAKRISHNAN J, GUTIERREZ O, SHARMA K R, et al. Impact of nitrate addition on biofilm properties and activities in rising main sewers[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(17): 4225-4237.
    [70]
    JIANG G M, SHARMA K R, YUAN Z G. Effects of nitrate dosing on methanogenic activity in a sulfide-producing sewer biofilm reactor[J]. Water Research, 2013, 47(5): 1783-1792.
    [71]
    JIANG G M, GUTIERREZ O, YUAN Z Q. The strong biocidal effect of free nitrous acid on anaerobic sewer biofilms[J]. Water Research, 2011, 45(12): 3735-3743.
    [72]
    JIANG G M, YUAN Z G. Synergistic inactivation of anaerobic wastewater biofilm by free nitrous acid and hydrogen peroxide[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2013, 250/251: 91-98.
    [73]
    ZHANG L S, KELLER J, YUAN Z G. Inhibition of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic activities of anaerobic sewer biofilms by ferric iron dosing[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(17): 4123-4132.
    [74]
    PIKAAR I, FLUGEN M, LIN H W, et al. Full-scale investigation of in-situ iron and alkalinity generation for efficient sulfide control[J]. Water Research, 2019, 167: 115032.
    [75]
    YAN X F, SUN J, KENJIAHAN A, et al. Rapid and strong biocidal effect of ferrate on sulfidogenic and methanogenic sewer biofilms[J]. Water Research, 2020, 169: 115208.
    [76]
    YAN X F, SUN J, WANG Y Z, et al. Low-rate ferrate dosing damages the microbial biofilm structure through humic substances destruction and facilitates the sewer biofilm control[J]. Water Research, 2023, 235: 119834.
    [77]
    SHARMA K, GANIGUE R, YUAN Z G. pH dynamics in sewers and its modeling[J]. Water Research, 2013, 47: 6086-6096.
    [78]
    GUTIERREZ O, PARK D, SHARMA K R, et al. Effects of long-term pH elevation on the sulfate-reducing and methanogenic activities of anaerobic sewer biofilms[J]. Water Research, 2009, 43: 2549-2557.
    [79]
    CEN X T, DUAN H R, HU Z T, et al. Multifaceted benefits of magnesium hydroxide dosing in sewer systems: impacts on downstream wastewater treatment processes[J]. Water Research, 2023, 247: 120778.
    [80]
    ZHAO Z L, YANG J, ZHANG Z G, et al. New method for efficient control of hydrogen sulfide and methane in gravity sewers: combination of NaOH and Nitrite[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2022, 16(6): 75.
    [81]
    BLACK G, JONES M, VALE P, et al. Biofilm responses to toxic shocks in closed pipes: using nitrous oxide emissions as an early warning of toxicity ahead of a wastewater treatment works[J]. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 2014, 225(2): 1837.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LU Qian, WU Yonggui, WANG Yiran, HAN Yiqin. ANALYSIS OF DYNAMIC CHANGES IN CARBON EMISSIONS OF UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER PLANTS IN OPERATION PHASE IN GUIYANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 106-114. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411012
    [2]XUAN Gan, TANG Baiyang, LI Yuting, ZHANG Xitong, LIU Weijing, CAO Jiashun, LUO Jingyang, FENG Qian. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON MONITORING METHODS OF DIRECT CARBON EMISSIONS FROM URBAN SEWAGE COLLECTING SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 13-21. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411002
    [3]GANG Qinyan, MA Xiaoqian, LIU Chao, WANG Han, WANG Yayi. RESEARCH ON CARBON EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION LEACHATE TREATMENT SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 31-39. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404004
    [4]KOU Xingxia, PENG Zhen, ZHANG Meigen, MIAO Shiguang, CHEN Min, ZHAO Xiujuan. RESEARCH PROGRESS IN URBAN AND REGIONAL-SCALE ATMOSPHERIC INVERSIONS OF CARBON SOURCES AND SINKS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 209-217. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410024
    [5]WU Yiqi, YIN Xiaoqing. STUDY ON STANDARDS ON CARBON EMISSION IN MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 146-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411016
    [6]XIA Qiongqiong, ZHENG Xingcan, GU Miao, LI Mai, SHANG Wei, TIAN Yongying, HUANG Haiwei, ONG Say Leong. CHARACTERIZATION OF SUMMER GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SEPTIC TANKS AND MEASUMENT OF CH4 EMISSION FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 240-246. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409023
    [7]LIU Jun, PAN Tianqi, ZHAO Huihui, GUO Yan, CHEN Guanyi, HOU Li'an. A MODEL OF CARBON EMISSION REDUCTION CALCULATION FOR AEROBIC REMEDIATION PROCESS IN MSW LANDFILLS BASED ON PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 133-139. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309016
    [8]WU Cuihua, YU Xiaohua, GAO Junzheng, YAN Haochun, LU Yintao, YAO Hong. CARBON EMISSION ACCOUNTING AND REDUCTION ANALYSIS OF WASTE COLLABORATIVE DISPOSAL IN TYPICAL CEMENT KILNS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 30-36,60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307005
    [9]FU Bin, XU Ping. EXAMPLE ANALYSIS OF CARBON EMISSION STRUCTURE OF RESIDENTIAL WATER SYSTEMS AND THEIR REDUCTION POTENTIAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 178-184,194. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304025
    [10]NING Lizhe, ZHANG Zhe, CAI Bofeng, ZHOU Caihua. RESEARCH ON CHINA'S REGIONAL AND PROVINCIAL ELECTRICITY GHG EMISSION FACTORS IN 2020[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 222-228. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303030
    [11]WU Jun. ANALYSIS OF SETTLING VELOCITY OF PARTICULATES IN FLOWS IN DRY AND WET WEATHER FROM THE COMBINED SEWER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 1-9. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304001
    [12]ZHAO Congcong, ZHAO Yunfei, REN Ziyan. APPLICATION OF WATER IOT MONITORING TECHNOLOGY IN PROBLEM DIAGNOSIS OF DRAINAGE NETWORK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 34-38,45. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311007
    [13]WANG Yanzhao, WU Yang, LIU Yiwei, CHEN Yinguang, ZHENG Xiong. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF CARBON-BASED CONDUCTIVE MATERIALS TO PROMOTE METHANE PRODUCTION FROM ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF ORGANIC SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 146-155. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309018
    [14]CHEN Biaohua, TIAN Meng, XU Ruinian. GREENHOUSE GAS N2O EMISSIONS IN CHEMICAL PRODUCTION AND INDUSTRIAL ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 82-90. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310011
    [15]TANG Baiyang, XUAN Gan, YANG Shiyao, LIU Weijing, XUE Zhaoxia, CAO Jiashun, LUO Jingyang, FENG Qian. REEXAMINING THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT OF SEPTIC TANK: EVIEW AND PROSPECTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 14-21. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307003
    [16]GENG Ziqian, DAI Wenting, LI Chao, TANG Jie, DAI Kun, CENG Jianxiong, ZHANG Fang. ENHANCED METHANOGENESIS OF WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE FERMENTATION BY DOSING AN ALGINATE-DEGRADING CONSORTIUM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 90-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208012
    [17]PENG Zhouyang, JIN Xi, SANG Wenjiao. OPTIMIZATION OF DESIGN OF TERMINAL FLOW INTERCEPTION AND STORAGE FACILITIES OF COMBINED DRAINAGE SYSTEM BASED ON NSGA-Ⅲ ALGORITHM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 143-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208020
    [18]QIU Dezhi, CHEN Chun, GUO Li, LIU Dan, MA Jiahui, LEI Miao, LI Tianning, XU Keke, YAN Xu. CHARACTERISTICS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN MAJOR URAN GROUPS OF CHINA BASED ON EMISSION FACTOR METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 116-122. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206015
    [19]WANG Yuan-yuan, QIN Xiao-jie, NIU Lai-chun, FAN Jia-qi. ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF VEGETATION IN EBB ZONE ENHANCED BY CaO FOR METHANE PRODUCTION AND ITS MECHANISM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 208-212,218. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009033
    [20]CALCULATION OF CARBON EMISSION REDUCTION OF NEW ENERGY VEHICLES AND ANALYSIS OF ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 148-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412027
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.4 %FULLTEXT: 9.4 %META: 85.8 %META: 85.8 %PDF: 4.7 %PDF: 4.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 73.6 %其他: 73.6 %北京: 0.9 %北京: 0.9 %宜春: 2.8 %宜春: 2.8 %张家口: 2.8 %张家口: 2.8 %杭州: 0.9 %杭州: 0.9 %泰州: 2.8 %泰州: 2.8 %漯河: 1.9 %漯河: 1.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %芒廷维尤: 4.7 %芒廷维尤: 4.7 %芝加哥: 0.9 %芝加哥: 0.9 %苏州: 0.9 %苏州: 0.9 %西宁: 2.8 %西宁: 2.8 %重庆: 3.8 %重庆: 3.8 %其他北京宜春张家口杭州泰州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州西宁重庆

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (90) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return