Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
LV Shuangru, JIN Yanjun, LIU Guotao, REN Fumin, XI Chenggang, LU Tong, ZHU Jintong, ZHANG Chao. CHARACTERISTICS OF RESIDENTIAL DECORATION WASTE GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT COUNTERMEASURES:A CASE STUDY ON OLD PALACE AREA IN DAXING DISTRICT,BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 186-192. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207027
Citation: KONG Xiangru, CHEN Min, CHEN Hengrui, PAN Feng, PANG Ke, MA Caiyun, ZHANG Qian. VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCE FACTORS OF SURFACE OZONE CONCENTRATION IN LANZHOU IN 2018-2019[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 69-75,152. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207010

VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCE FACTORS OF SURFACE OZONE CONCENTRATION IN LANZHOU IN 2018-2019

doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207010
  • Received Date: 2021-12-12
    Available Online: 2022-09-02
  • This paper investigated temporal and spatial variations of ozone concentration in Lanzhou from 2018 to 2019 and further the effects of meteorological factors and the related pollutants on O3-8 h were discussed based on the dataset of observation from the meteorological stations and four air monitoring stations in Lanzhou.The results indicated that:1) The monthly concentration variation of O3-8 h showed a single peak trend in all stations in Lanzhou.The high value appeared from April to August and the low value appeared in winter.The diurnal distribution of O3 concentration showed a single peak pattern,and the highest concentration appeared at about 15:00.2) Relevant pollutants had a negative correlation with O3-8 h,which showed that the concentration of O3-8 h decreased with the increase of NO2,CO and PM2.5.3) High temperature and low humidity were conducive to the formation of O3 in Lanzhou,while the special topographic conditions led to the accumulation of ozone more easily under a certain wind speed.4) By establishing regression equations of multiple linear of related pollutants and meteorological factors,the effects of related pollutants and meteorological factors on O3-8 h concentration were studied.The results showed that the influence of meteorological factors on the concentration of O3 in Lanzhou was more important than that of the related pollutants under the current meteorological conditions and related pollutants emission status.
  • [1]
    李全喜,王金艳,刘筱冉,等.兰州市区臭氧时空分布特征及气象和环境因子对臭氧的影响[J].环境保护科学, 2018, 44(2):78-84.
    [2]
    唐孝炎,张远航,邵敏.大气环境化学[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2006:272-273.
    [3]
    刘晶淼,丁裕国,黄永德,等.太阳紫外辐射强度与气象要素的相关分析[J].高原气象,2003,22(1):45-50.
    [4]
    安俊琳,王跃思,孙扬.气象因素对北京臭氧的影响[J].生态环境学报, 2009,18(3):944-951.
    [5]
    邓慧颖,陈立新,余永江,等.武夷山市臭氧分布特征及其与气象要素关系分析[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(7):1428-1435.
    [6]
    张利慧,李斌,周壮志,等.太原市2017年臭氧污染特征及其气象因素分析[J].环境工程(增刊1),2019:169-173.
    [7]
    赵卉伊褶,周卫健,牛振川,等.西安市2013-2017年大气PM2.5的时空变化特征及影响因素分析[J].地球环境学报,2019,10(3):248-256.
    [8]
    吴锴,康平,于雷,等.2015-2016年中国城市臭氧浓度时空变化规律研究[J].环境科学学报,2018,38(6):2179-2190.
    [9]
    赵辉,郑有飞,徐静馨,等.南京市北郊夏季臭氧浓度变化特征分析[J].地球与环境, 2016,44(2):161-168.
    [10]
    符传博,徐文帅,丹利,等.前体物与气象因子对海南省臭氧污染的影响[J].环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(7):45-50.
    [11]
    王闯,王帅,杨碧波,等.气象条件对沈阳市环境空气臭氧浓度影响研究[J].中国环境监测, 2015,31(3):32-37.
    [12]
    段晓瞳,曹念文,王潇,等.2015年中国近地面臭氧浓度特征分析[J].环境科学,2017,38(12):4976-4982.
    [13]
    符传博,徐文帅,丹利,等.2015-2020年海南省臭氧时空变化及其成因分析[J/OL].环境科学,2021,https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202105103.
    [14]
    王冠岚,薛建军,张建忠.2014年京津冀空气污染时空分布特征及主要成因分析[J].气象与环境科学,2016,39(1):34-42.
    [15]
    王占山,李云婷,陈添,等.北京城区臭氧日变化特征及与前体物的相关性分析[J].中国环境科学,2014,34(12):3001-3008.
    [16]
    刘建,吴兑,范绍佳,等.前体物与气象因子对珠江三角洲臭氧污染的影响[J].中国环境科学, 2017,37(3):813-820.
    [17]
    王玫,郑有飞,柳艳菊,等.京津冀臭氧变化特征及与气象要素的关系[J].中国环境科学, 2019,39(7):2689-2698.
    [18]
    李莉,杨闻达,吕升,等.嘉兴市臭氧污染特征及其与气象条件的关系[J/OL].中山大学学报(自然科学版):1-8[2022-01-24].DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.acta.snus.2020B097.
    [19]
    易睿,王亚林,张殷俊,等.长江三角洲地区城市臭氧污染特征与影响因素分析[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(8):2370-2377.
    [20]
    姜允迪,王式功,祁斌,等.兰州城区臭氧浓度时空变化特征及其与气象条件的关系[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2000,36(5):118-125.
    [21]
    张宇静,赵天良,殷翀之,等.徐州市大气PM2.5与O3作用关系的季节变化[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(6):2267-2272.
    [22]
    李博.兰州市大气环境容量的研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2019.
    [23]
    王长梅,万大娟,王开心,等.长沙市PM2.5浓度时空分布特征及影响因子分析[J].科学技术与工程,2021,21(12):5157-5165.
    [24]
    余益军,孟晓艳,王振,等.京津冀地区城市臭氧污染趋势及原因探讨[J].环境科学, 2020,41(1):106-114.
    [25]
    程念亮,李云婷,张大伟,等. 2014年北京市城区臭氧超标日浓度特征及与气象条件的关系[J].环境科学, 2016,37(6):2041-2051.
    [26]
    陈优良,李亚倩.长三角PM2.5和O3变化特征及与气象要素的关系[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(2):382-396.
    [27]
    刘慧,夏敦胜,陈红,等. 2017年兰州市大气污染物输送来源及传输特征模拟分析[J].环境科学研究, 2019,32(6):993-1000.
    [28]
    符传博,周航.中国城市臭氧的形成机理及污染影响因素研究进展[J].中国环境监测,2021,37(2):33-43.
    [29]
    TAO J, ZHANG L M, HO K, et al. Impact of PM2.5, chemical compositions on aerosol light scattering in Guangzhou-the largest megacity in South China[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2014,135/136:48-58.
    [30]
    DICKERSON R R, KONDRAGUNTA S, STENCHIKOV G, et al. The impact of aerosols on solar ultraviolet radiation and photochemical smog[J]. Science, 1997,278(5339):827-830.
    [31]
    LI G H, BEI N, TIE X, et al. Aerosol effects on the photochemistry in Mexico City during MCMA-2006/MILAGRO campaign[J].Atmospheric Chemistry&Physics, 2011,11(3):5169-5182.
    [32]
    钱悦,许彬,夏玲君,等.2016-2019年江西省臭氧污染特征与气象因子影响分析[J].环境科学,2021,42(5):2190-2201.
    [33]
    吉莉,李强,司云燕,等.重庆北碚大气污染物的变化特征及其与气象要素的相关性[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(18):88-93.
    [34]
    杨雪玲,王颖,李博,等.河谷地形气象要素对污染物浓度的影响[J].环境科学研究,2018,31(1):34-41.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]HU Hongying, XIA Jun, CHEN Zhuo, LI Jun, WANG Yuming, CAI Hanying, ZHOU Qiaohong, WANG Bin, XUE Ying. Ethical issues and countermeasures regarding emerging contaminants in water environment[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2025, 43(1): 1-11. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202501001
    [2]YANG Yanmei, XIA Tong, ZHANG Yun, AO Liang. SIMULATION ON TRANSPORT OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTANTS AFTER CLOSURE OF A LANDFILL IN CHONGQING BASED ON VISUAL MODFLOW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 40-47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404005
    [3]CHEN Jianjun, LONG Jisheng, CHEN Lin, BAI Li, LI Junhua. STATUS AND DEVELOPMENT TREND OF INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY FOR MUTI-POLLUTANT CONTROL IN WASTE INCINERATION FLUE GAS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 211-221. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409020
    [4]LIU Guotao, REN Fumin, HU Shuxin, JIA Jinming. OCCURRENCE PREDICTION AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION OF OFFICE BUILDING DECORATION WASTE IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 119-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406014
    [5]XIANG Yuxue, LIANG Daolun, WANG Xiaojia, QIAN Yiwen, PAN Queyi, LIU Guofu, SHEN Dekui. FORMATION CHARACTERISTICS OF GASEOUS POLLUTANTS DURING CO-COMBUSTION PROCESS OF STEEL SMELTING SOLID WASTE AND WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 197-205,106. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312024
    [6]ZHOU Jun. IMPROVEMENT AND ECONOMIC BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF A TYPICAL TREATMENT PROCESS FOR DECORATION WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 181-187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302024
    [7]JIAO Xu-dong, WU Jia, WANG Tao, WU Na, FENG Qiang, FU Ze-qiang, DU Huan-zheng. RESEARCH ON SOLID WASTE CLASSIFICATION AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION BASED ON LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 201-206,170. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110029
    [8]DUAN Zhen-hua, HUANG Dong-li, XIAO Jian-zhuang, CHONG Dan, WANG Xing. INVESTIGATION ON COMPOSITION OF DECORATION WASTE AND POTENTIAL RESOURCE UTILIZATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 171-177. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110024
    [9]WANG Ruo-fei, ZHANG Guang-zhi, WANG Ning, REN Fu-min, CHEN Rui, XI Cheng-gang. ANALYSIS ON DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE RELATED STANDARDS AND PATENTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 27-32. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003005
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 张海艳. 西安市装修垃圾处置现状研究. 中国资源综合利用. 2024(04): 108-111 .
    2. 邵明,吴奇轩. 装配式建筑可拆卸设计策略研究. 新建筑. 2024(02): 94-99 .
    3. 曾贤刚,李康玮,王琦. 室内装修甲醛污染健康效应及经济影响评价. 中国环境科学. 2023(08): 4370-4381 .
    4. 马黎,杜镇瀚,李大成,钟启明,吴迪. 基于蒙特卡洛法的土石坝溃决生命损失评估方法研究. 河南科学. 2022(11): 1811-1818 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 10.0 %FULLTEXT: 10.0 %META: 86.7 %META: 86.7 %PDF: 3.3 %PDF: 3.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 16.9 %其他: 16.9 %上海: 5.2 %上海: 5.2 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %乌兰察布: 0.5 %乌兰察布: 0.5 %佛山: 1.4 %佛山: 1.4 %北京: 9.9 %北京: 9.9 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %合肥: 0.5 %合肥: 0.5 %吉林: 0.5 %吉林: 0.5 %天津: 1.4 %天津: 1.4 %巴中: 0.5 %巴中: 0.5 %常德: 0.9 %常德: 0.9 %延安: 0.5 %延安: 0.5 %张家口: 1.9 %张家口: 1.9 %成都: 1.4 %成都: 1.4 %昆明: 0.9 %昆明: 0.9 %晋城: 0.9 %晋城: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.9 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %桂林: 0.5 %桂林: 0.5 %武汉: 1.9 %武汉: 1.9 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %洛杉矶: 1.4 %洛杉矶: 1.4 %济源: 0.9 %济源: 0.9 %淄博: 0.5 %淄博: 0.5 %湖州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.5 %盐城: 0.9 %盐城: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %福州: 1.9 %福州: 1.9 %芒廷维尤: 17.4 %芒廷维尤: 17.4 %莆田: 0.5 %莆田: 0.5 %西宁: 15.5 %西宁: 15.5 %西安: 0.9 %西安: 0.9 %贵阳: 1.4 %贵阳: 1.4 %达州: 0.9 %达州: 0.9 %运城: 4.2 %运城: 4.2 %遵义: 0.5 %遵义: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %鄂州: 0.5 %鄂州: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %青岛: 0.9 %青岛: 0.9 %马鞍山: 0.5 %马鞍山: 0.5 %其他上海临汾乌兰察布佛山北京南京合肥吉林天津巴中常德延安张家口成都昆明晋城朝阳杭州桂林武汉沈阳洛杉矶济源淄博湖州盐城石家庄福州芒廷维尤莆田西宁西安贵阳达州运城遵义郑州鄂州重庆青岛马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (417) PDF downloads(20) Cited by(6)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return