Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 40 Issue 7
Sep.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2022  >  40(7): 69-75,152
KONG Xiangru, CHEN Min, CHEN Hengrui, PAN Feng, PANG Ke, MA Caiyun, ZHANG Qian. VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCE FACTORS OF SURFACE OZONE CONCENTRATION IN LANZHOU IN 2018-2019[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 69-75,152. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207010
Citation: KONG Xiangru, CHEN Min, CHEN Hengrui, PAN Feng, PANG Ke, MA Caiyun, ZHANG Qian. VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCE FACTORS OF SURFACE OZONE CONCENTRATION IN LANZHOU IN 2018-2019[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 69-75,152. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207010
shu

VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCE FACTORS OF SURFACE OZONE CONCENTRATION IN LANZHOU IN 2018-2019

doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207010

  • College of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

  • Received Date: 2021-12-12
    Available Online: 2022-09-02
    Abstract
  • This paper investigated temporal and spatial variations of ozone concentration in Lanzhou from 2018 to 2019 and further the effects of meteorological factors and the related pollutants on O3-8 h were discussed based on the dataset of observation from the meteorological stations and four air monitoring stations in Lanzhou.The results indicated that:1) The monthly concentration variation of O3-8 h showed a single peak trend in all stations in Lanzhou.The high value appeared from April to August and the low value appeared in winter.The diurnal distribution of O3 concentration showed a single peak pattern,and the highest concentration appeared at about 15:00.2) Relevant pollutants had a negative correlation with O3-8 h,which showed that the concentration of O3-8 h decreased with the increase of NO2,CO and PM2.5.3) High temperature and low humidity were conducive to the formation of O3 in Lanzhou,while the special topographic conditions led to the accumulation of ozone more easily under a certain wind speed.4) By establishing regression equations of multiple linear of related pollutants and meteorological factors,the effects of related pollutants and meteorological factors on O3-8 h concentration were studied.The results showed that the influence of meteorological factors on the concentration of O3 in Lanzhou was more important than that of the related pollutants under the current meteorological conditions and related pollutants emission status.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(34)
  • [1]
    李全喜,王金艳,刘筱冉,等.兰州市区臭氧时空分布特征及气象和环境因子对臭氧的影响[J].环境保护科学, 2018, 44(2):78-84.
    [2]
    唐孝炎,张远航,邵敏.大气环境化学[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2006:272-273.
    [3]
    刘晶淼,丁裕国,黄永德,等.太阳紫外辐射强度与气象要素的相关分析[J].高原气象,2003,22(1):45-50.
    [4]
    安俊琳,王跃思,孙扬.气象因素对北京臭氧的影响[J].生态环境学报, 2009,18(3):944-951.
    [5]
    邓慧颖,陈立新,余永江,等.武夷山市臭氧分布特征及其与气象要素关系分析[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(7):1428-1435.
    [6]
    张利慧,李斌,周壮志,等.太原市2017年臭氧污染特征及其气象因素分析[J].环境工程(增刊1),2019:169-173.
    [7]
    赵卉伊褶,周卫健,牛振川,等.西安市2013-2017年大气PM2.5的时空变化特征及影响因素分析[J].地球环境学报,2019,10(3):248-256.
    [8]
    吴锴,康平,于雷,等.2015-2016年中国城市臭氧浓度时空变化规律研究[J].环境科学学报,2018,38(6):2179-2190.
    [9]
    赵辉,郑有飞,徐静馨,等.南京市北郊夏季臭氧浓度变化特征分析[J].地球与环境, 2016,44(2):161-168.
    [10]
    符传博,徐文帅,丹利,等.前体物与气象因子对海南省臭氧污染的影响[J].环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(7):45-50.
    [11]
    王闯,王帅,杨碧波,等.气象条件对沈阳市环境空气臭氧浓度影响研究[J].中国环境监测, 2015,31(3):32-37.
    [12]
    段晓瞳,曹念文,王潇,等.2015年中国近地面臭氧浓度特征分析[J].环境科学,2017,38(12):4976-4982.
    [13]
    符传博,徐文帅,丹利,等.2015-2020年海南省臭氧时空变化及其成因分析[J/OL].环境科学,2021,https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202105103.
    [14]
    王冠岚,薛建军,张建忠.2014年京津冀空气污染时空分布特征及主要成因分析[J].气象与环境科学,2016,39(1):34-42.
    [15]
    王占山,李云婷,陈添,等.北京城区臭氧日变化特征及与前体物的相关性分析[J].中国环境科学,2014,34(12):3001-3008.
    [16]
    刘建,吴兑,范绍佳,等.前体物与气象因子对珠江三角洲臭氧污染的影响[J].中国环境科学, 2017,37(3):813-820.
    [17]
    王玫,郑有飞,柳艳菊,等.京津冀臭氧变化特征及与气象要素的关系[J].中国环境科学, 2019,39(7):2689-2698.
    [18]
    李莉,杨闻达,吕升,等.嘉兴市臭氧污染特征及其与气象条件的关系[J/OL].中山大学学报(自然科学版):1-8[2022-01-24].DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.acta.snus.2020B097.
    [19]
    易睿,王亚林,张殷俊,等.长江三角洲地区城市臭氧污染特征与影响因素分析[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(8):2370-2377.
    [20]
    姜允迪,王式功,祁斌,等.兰州城区臭氧浓度时空变化特征及其与气象条件的关系[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2000,36(5):118-125.
    [21]
    张宇静,赵天良,殷翀之,等.徐州市大气PM2.5与O3作用关系的季节变化[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(6):2267-2272.
    [22]
    李博.兰州市大气环境容量的研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2019.
    [23]
    王长梅,万大娟,王开心,等.长沙市PM2.5浓度时空分布特征及影响因子分析[J].科学技术与工程,2021,21(12):5157-5165.
    [24]
    余益军,孟晓艳,王振,等.京津冀地区城市臭氧污染趋势及原因探讨[J].环境科学, 2020,41(1):106-114.
    [25]
    程念亮,李云婷,张大伟,等. 2014年北京市城区臭氧超标日浓度特征及与气象条件的关系[J].环境科学, 2016,37(6):2041-2051.
    [26]
    陈优良,李亚倩.长三角PM2.5和O3变化特征及与气象要素的关系[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(2):382-396.
    [27]
    刘慧,夏敦胜,陈红,等. 2017年兰州市大气污染物输送来源及传输特征模拟分析[J].环境科学研究, 2019,32(6):993-1000.
    [28]
    符传博,周航.中国城市臭氧的形成机理及污染影响因素研究进展[J].中国环境监测,2021,37(2):33-43.
    [29]
    TAO J, ZHANG L M, HO K, et al. Impact of PM2.5, chemical compositions on aerosol light scattering in Guangzhou-the largest megacity in South China[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2014,135/136:48-58.
    [30]
    DICKERSON R R, KONDRAGUNTA S, STENCHIKOV G, et al. The impact of aerosols on solar ultraviolet radiation and photochemical smog[J]. Science, 1997,278(5339):827-830.
    [31]
    LI G H, BEI N, TIE X, et al. Aerosol effects on the photochemistry in Mexico City during MCMA-2006/MILAGRO campaign[J].Atmospheric Chemistry&Physics, 2011,11(3):5169-5182.
    [32]
    钱悦,许彬,夏玲君,等.2016-2019年江西省臭氧污染特征与气象因子影响分析[J].环境科学,2021,42(5):2190-2201.
    [33]
    吉莉,李强,司云燕,等.重庆北碚大气污染物的变化特征及其与气象要素的相关性[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(18):88-93.
    [34]
    杨雪玲,王颖,李博,等.河谷地形气象要素对污染物浓度的影响[J].环境科学研究,2018,31(1):34-41.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]CHEN Yi, LI Longguo, BAI Ting, CHEN Meng, HUANG Yanchun, FU Bin, LI Naiwen. EVALUATION AND CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF WATER/SEDIMENT POLLUTION STATUS IN CHENGDU SECTION OF THE TUOJIANG RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 144-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407016
    [2]CHEN Fang, HU Jun, XU Lizhong, HUANG Weilong, GUO Eryang, RAO Qinghua. SPATIOTEMPORAL AGGREGATION CHANGE PATTERN OF PM2.5 AND O3 CONCENTRATION IN FUJIAN PROVINCE,CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 171-182. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407019
    [3]ZHANG Qing, ZHAO Liya, GUO Zhiwei, QI Kai. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTANTS IN WUHAN FROM 2017 TO 2020[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 82-90. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302012
    [4]GUO Yajun, WANG Hualan, LI Mingxuan, LI Ruohan. ANALYSIS OF AIR POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS IN EXPRESSWAY AREAS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 166-171. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312020
    [5]WU Jie, ZHANG Zhi-Yong, LIU Xian-li. RESEARCH ON THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE LOAD CHANGE OF COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT UNITS AND SCR SYSTEM PARAMETERS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 131-135. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108018
    [6]JIA Lin, ZHANG Jin-long, LIU Lu-yao, WANG Peng-shan, MI Hong-lei, LI Zhi-ming, TIAN Xiao-ming, WANG Guo-qiang. VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS OF VEGETATION RESTORATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENT RECLAMATION YEARS IN TIANJIN COASTAL AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 179-186,159. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106027
    [7]GAO Chan-juan, ZHAO Qi-chao, DING Ruo-nan, ZHANG Jin-ming, LI Ying-hua, DONG Chun-xin. VARIATIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTANTS CONCENTRATIONS AND THEIR CORRELATION WITH METEOROLOGICAL FACTOR IN JILIN CITY IN 2018[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 71-79. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105010
    [8]ZENG Yi-chuan, WANG Hua, QU Hao, HE Xin-chen, YAN Huai-yu, SHEN Yu-han. SPATIO-TEMPERAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF CHLOROPHYLL-A IN RIVER NETWORK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 23-30,153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009004
    [16]Peng Gangzhi Xu Jianxia Wang Jianzhu, . RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL ENZYME ACTIVITY AND INORGANIC PHOSPHORUS FORMS IN HIGH PHOSPHORUS REGION OF XIANGXI RIVER WATERSHED[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(6): 116-120. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201506026
    [17]Wang Yuehua Tang Lili Zou Qiang Ding Ming, . A CONTRASTIVE STUDY OF BLACK CARBON AEROSOL INSTRUMENTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 142-145. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504030
    [18]Li Anfeng, Xu Wenjiang, Pan Tao, Yao Jinghua, Li Jian. APPLICATION OF CONSTRUCTED WETLAND IN EUTROPHICATED LANDSCAPE WATER REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 15-18. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501004
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 吴晓兰，姜世中，郑月蓉，何秋霞，汪美宏. 成都平原经济区城市空气质量时空变化特征. 四川师范大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(01): 90-97 .
    2. 韩力慧，兰童，程水源，王慎澳，田健，齐超楠，肖茜，王海燕，韩登越，王迎澳. 唐山市大气颗粒物和O_3多尺度变化及影响因素. 中国环境科学. 2024(03): 1185-1194 .
    3. 雷璇，张冰洁. 乡村振兴背景下工业园区周边空气污染物浓度分布测定方法研究. 环境科学与管理. 2024(07): 116-121 .
    4. 周惜荫，高晓清，常毅，赵素平. 兰州市大气挥发性有机物变化特征. 环境科学学报. 2024(08): 59-69 .
    5. 王聪慧，施光耀，杨思琪，倪细炉，杨丽蓉，纪丽萍. 银川城市公园气象及大气污染物对臭氧影响机制. 环境科学. 2024(09): 5149-5156 .
    6. 付和成，朱云波，黄建洪，史建武. 典型高原城市空气质量变化特征及驱动因素分析. 昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(06): 126-136 .

    Other cited types(6)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.1 %FULLTEXT: 11.1 %META: 85.0 %META: 85.0 %PDF: 3.9 %PDF: 3.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.1 %其他: 10.1 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %上海: 13.3 %上海: 13.3 %东京: 0.2 %东京: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %兰州: 3.3 %兰州: 3.3 %包头: 0.2 %包头: 0.2 %北京: 4.7 %北京: 4.7 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %台州: 0.6 %台州: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %大连: 0.4 %大连: 0.4 %天津: 1.2 %天津: 1.2 %太原: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %定西: 0.2 %定西: 0.2 %巴中: 0.2 %巴中: 0.2 %常德: 1.0 %常德: 1.0 %广州: 1.4 %广州: 1.4 %延安: 0.2 %延安: 0.2 %弗吉: 0.2 %弗吉: 0.2 %张家口: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %徐州: 1.0 %徐州: 1.0 %德阳: 0.2 %德阳: 0.2 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %文昌: 0.2 %文昌: 0.2 %昆明: 1.4 %昆明: 1.4 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.8 %杭州: 1.0 %杭州: 1.0 %柳州: 0.2 %柳州: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %榆林: 0.2 %榆林: 0.2 %武汉: 0.8 %武汉: 0.8 %江门: 0.4 %江门: 0.4 %池州: 0.2 %池州: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %泰安: 1.8 %泰安: 1.8 %洛杉矶: 0.6 %洛杉矶: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %济源: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %深圳: 1.4 %深圳: 1.4 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %漯河: 0.4 %漯河: 0.4 %焦作: 0.6 %焦作: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %福州: 1.0 %福州: 1.0 %芒廷维尤: 19.1 %芒廷维尤: 19.1 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %荆门: 0.4 %荆门: 0.4 %葫芦岛: 0.2 %葫芦岛: 0.2 %衡水: 0.4 %衡水: 0.4 %衢州: 0.6 %衢州: 0.6 %西宁: 10.7 %西宁: 10.7 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %贵阳: 1.0 %贵阳: 1.0 %运城: 1.6 %运城: 1.6 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %邢台: 0.2 %郑州: 3.9 %郑州: 3.9 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %金华: 0.2 %金华: 0.2 %金昌: 0.4 %金昌: 0.4 %铁岭: 0.2 %铁岭: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %长治: 1.2 %长治: 1.2 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %其他其他上海东京东莞临汾兰州包头北京南京南宁台州合肥嘉兴大连天津太原定西巴中常德广州延安弗吉张家口徐州德阳成都文昌昆明晋城朝阳杭州柳州格兰特县榆林武汉江门池州沈阳泰安洛杉矶济南济源淄博深圳温州漯河焦作石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆门葫芦岛衡水衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邢台郑州重庆金华金昌铁岭银川长沙长治青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (413) PDF downloads(20) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return