Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
YIN Wenhua, LONG Shikang, HE Zhiyuan, ZHENG Yiyun, LIU Lijun, XIE Danping, ZHAN Wensen. IMPACT OF CO-INCINERATION OF MSWI WITH AGED REFUSE ON GASEOUS POLLUTANTS EMISSION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 76-80,87. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207011
Citation: KONG Xiangru, CHEN Min, CHEN Hengrui, PAN Feng, PANG Ke, MA Caiyun, ZHANG Qian. VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCE FACTORS OF SURFACE OZONE CONCENTRATION IN LANZHOU IN 2018-2019[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 69-75,152. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207010

VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCE FACTORS OF SURFACE OZONE CONCENTRATION IN LANZHOU IN 2018-2019

doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207010
  • Received Date: 2021-12-12
    Available Online: 2022-09-02
  • This paper investigated temporal and spatial variations of ozone concentration in Lanzhou from 2018 to 2019 and further the effects of meteorological factors and the related pollutants on O3-8 h were discussed based on the dataset of observation from the meteorological stations and four air monitoring stations in Lanzhou.The results indicated that:1) The monthly concentration variation of O3-8 h showed a single peak trend in all stations in Lanzhou.The high value appeared from April to August and the low value appeared in winter.The diurnal distribution of O3 concentration showed a single peak pattern,and the highest concentration appeared at about 15:00.2) Relevant pollutants had a negative correlation with O3-8 h,which showed that the concentration of O3-8 h decreased with the increase of NO2,CO and PM2.5.3) High temperature and low humidity were conducive to the formation of O3 in Lanzhou,while the special topographic conditions led to the accumulation of ozone more easily under a certain wind speed.4) By establishing regression equations of multiple linear of related pollutants and meteorological factors,the effects of related pollutants and meteorological factors on O3-8 h concentration were studied.The results showed that the influence of meteorological factors on the concentration of O3 in Lanzhou was more important than that of the related pollutants under the current meteorological conditions and related pollutants emission status.
  • [1]
    李全喜,王金艳,刘筱冉,等.兰州市区臭氧时空分布特征及气象和环境因子对臭氧的影响[J].环境保护科学, 2018, 44(2):78-84.
    [2]
    唐孝炎,张远航,邵敏.大气环境化学[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2006:272-273.
    [3]
    刘晶淼,丁裕国,黄永德,等.太阳紫外辐射强度与气象要素的相关分析[J].高原气象,2003,22(1):45-50.
    [4]
    安俊琳,王跃思,孙扬.气象因素对北京臭氧的影响[J].生态环境学报, 2009,18(3):944-951.
    [5]
    邓慧颖,陈立新,余永江,等.武夷山市臭氧分布特征及其与气象要素关系分析[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(7):1428-1435.
    [6]
    张利慧,李斌,周壮志,等.太原市2017年臭氧污染特征及其气象因素分析[J].环境工程(增刊1),2019:169-173.
    [7]
    赵卉伊褶,周卫健,牛振川,等.西安市2013-2017年大气PM2.5的时空变化特征及影响因素分析[J].地球环境学报,2019,10(3):248-256.
    [8]
    吴锴,康平,于雷,等.2015-2016年中国城市臭氧浓度时空变化规律研究[J].环境科学学报,2018,38(6):2179-2190.
    [9]
    赵辉,郑有飞,徐静馨,等.南京市北郊夏季臭氧浓度变化特征分析[J].地球与环境, 2016,44(2):161-168.
    [10]
    符传博,徐文帅,丹利,等.前体物与气象因子对海南省臭氧污染的影响[J].环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(7):45-50.
    [11]
    王闯,王帅,杨碧波,等.气象条件对沈阳市环境空气臭氧浓度影响研究[J].中国环境监测, 2015,31(3):32-37.
    [12]
    段晓瞳,曹念文,王潇,等.2015年中国近地面臭氧浓度特征分析[J].环境科学,2017,38(12):4976-4982.
    [13]
    符传博,徐文帅,丹利,等.2015-2020年海南省臭氧时空变化及其成因分析[J/OL].环境科学,2021,https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202105103.
    [14]
    王冠岚,薛建军,张建忠.2014年京津冀空气污染时空分布特征及主要成因分析[J].气象与环境科学,2016,39(1):34-42.
    [15]
    王占山,李云婷,陈添,等.北京城区臭氧日变化特征及与前体物的相关性分析[J].中国环境科学,2014,34(12):3001-3008.
    [16]
    刘建,吴兑,范绍佳,等.前体物与气象因子对珠江三角洲臭氧污染的影响[J].中国环境科学, 2017,37(3):813-820.
    [17]
    王玫,郑有飞,柳艳菊,等.京津冀臭氧变化特征及与气象要素的关系[J].中国环境科学, 2019,39(7):2689-2698.
    [18]
    李莉,杨闻达,吕升,等.嘉兴市臭氧污染特征及其与气象条件的关系[J/OL].中山大学学报(自然科学版):1-8[2022-01-24].DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.acta.snus.2020B097.
    [19]
    易睿,王亚林,张殷俊,等.长江三角洲地区城市臭氧污染特征与影响因素分析[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(8):2370-2377.
    [20]
    姜允迪,王式功,祁斌,等.兰州城区臭氧浓度时空变化特征及其与气象条件的关系[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2000,36(5):118-125.
    [21]
    张宇静,赵天良,殷翀之,等.徐州市大气PM2.5与O3作用关系的季节变化[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(6):2267-2272.
    [22]
    李博.兰州市大气环境容量的研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2019.
    [23]
    王长梅,万大娟,王开心,等.长沙市PM2.5浓度时空分布特征及影响因子分析[J].科学技术与工程,2021,21(12):5157-5165.
    [24]
    余益军,孟晓艳,王振,等.京津冀地区城市臭氧污染趋势及原因探讨[J].环境科学, 2020,41(1):106-114.
    [25]
    程念亮,李云婷,张大伟,等. 2014年北京市城区臭氧超标日浓度特征及与气象条件的关系[J].环境科学, 2016,37(6):2041-2051.
    [26]
    陈优良,李亚倩.长三角PM2.5和O3变化特征及与气象要素的关系[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(2):382-396.
    [27]
    刘慧,夏敦胜,陈红,等. 2017年兰州市大气污染物输送来源及传输特征模拟分析[J].环境科学研究, 2019,32(6):993-1000.
    [28]
    符传博,周航.中国城市臭氧的形成机理及污染影响因素研究进展[J].中国环境监测,2021,37(2):33-43.
    [29]
    TAO J, ZHANG L M, HO K, et al. Impact of PM2.5, chemical compositions on aerosol light scattering in Guangzhou-the largest megacity in South China[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2014,135/136:48-58.
    [30]
    DICKERSON R R, KONDRAGUNTA S, STENCHIKOV G, et al. The impact of aerosols on solar ultraviolet radiation and photochemical smog[J]. Science, 1997,278(5339):827-830.
    [31]
    LI G H, BEI N, TIE X, et al. Aerosol effects on the photochemistry in Mexico City during MCMA-2006/MILAGRO campaign[J].Atmospheric Chemistry&Physics, 2011,11(3):5169-5182.
    [32]
    钱悦,许彬,夏玲君,等.2016-2019年江西省臭氧污染特征与气象因子影响分析[J].环境科学,2021,42(5):2190-2201.
    [33]
    吉莉,李强,司云燕,等.重庆北碚大气污染物的变化特征及其与气象要素的相关性[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(18):88-93.
    [34]
    杨雪玲,王颖,李博,等.河谷地形气象要素对污染物浓度的影响[J].环境科学研究,2018,31(1):34-41.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]SUN Yueyin, HUANG Qiong, ZHOU Jie, YU Xiaomeng, ZHU Jie, GU Mingyang, XU Lirui, YANG Bo, TAO Tao. PREPARATION OF VISIBLE LIGHT CATALYST AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF FORMALDEHYDE DEGRADATION OVER SILVER-BISMUTH MODIFIED TiO2 NANOMATERIAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 146-155. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302020
    [2]LIU Ya, CHEN Jin-quan, YANG Zi-yue, JIN Shi-bo, FU Dong-tang, SHEN Shi-li. GROWTH AND PHYSIOLOGICAL INDEXES OF WHEAT SEEDLINGS UNER CADMIUM STRESS ALLEVIATED BY NANO TITANIUM DIOXIDE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 184-189,195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105026
    [3]FU Rao, ZHANG Wen-long, FENG Jiang-tao, YAN Wei. SYNTHESIZATION OF ANATASE TiO2 SYNTHESIZED AT LOW TEMPERATURE, AND ITS ADSORPTION PERFORMANCE ON FLUORIDE ION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 70-76. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002009
    [4]CHEN Jun-wei, LI Li-li, FANG Zhi-huang, YE Ling-fen, ZHENG Jia-hui, WANG Fei-feng. DEGRADATION OF HUMIC ACID IN WATER BY ULTRAVIOLET PHOTOCATALYSIS OF TiO2/GO COMPOSITE NANOMATERIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 89-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008015
    [15]Wang Xiquan Zhao Dandan Yu Lihong, . STUDY ON DEGRADATION OF METHYLENE BLUE BY GRAPHENE/TiO2[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 38-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502008
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 文玉玲,王加俊. 陈腐垃圾掺烧对生活垃圾焚烧厂飞灰稳定化的影响研究. 清洗世界. 2024(04): 47-50 .
    2. 王湘徽,朱悦,陈润生. 填埋场陈腐垃圾筛上物热值及掺烧对焚烧炉运行工况影响研究——以云南省某市陈腐垃圾掺烧为例. 环境卫生工程. 2024(02): 53-62 .
    3. 张效刚,齐添,宋树祥,陈彬荣,张玉飞,陈晓强,张乐,李慈花,李一鸣. 我国南方某生活垃圾填埋场存量垃圾开挖作业案例分析. 环境工程. 2024(05): 90-97 . 本站查看
    4. 唐剑云,肖信彤. 陈腐垃圾资源化技术研究. 环境保护与循环经济. 2024(06): 4-7 .
    5. 李敏,魏亮. 生活垃圾填埋场陈腐垃圾资源化利用研究进展. 中国资源综合利用. 2024(06): 162-164 .
    6. 曾武清,王予,卜庆国,马硕,白东明,张宗建,张鹏,马丹丹,王圣博,王润其,武丽雯,刘晨,马洪亭. 陈腐垃圾掺烧对垃圾炉焚烧特性的影响. 化工进展. 2024(08): 4642-4653 .
    7. 黄静颖,焦学军,龙吉生. 垃圾焚烧发电项目碳排放计算对比. 浙江大学学报(工学版). 2024(11): 2338-2346 .
    8. 杨旭,余昭胜,何玉荣,宾衍辉,马晓茜. 垃圾焚烧炉中城市生活垃圾掺烧高热值工业固废的数值模拟. 洁净煤技术. 2023(09): 98-108 .
    9. 李水江,张效刚,谈强,陈晓强,李耀晃,刘金海,张乐,张楠. 我国南方某生活垃圾填埋场存量垃圾直接开挖掺烧中试. 环境工程. 2023(08): 196-201 . 本站查看
    10. 孙子维,张雨轩,唐玉婷,王思琪,唐杰洪,马晓茜. 城市生活垃圾与陈腐垃圾掺烧的燃烧特性与反应动力学分析. 环境卫生工程. 2023(06): 1-10 .
    11. 朱浩,喻武,薛浩,马晓玲. 垃圾焚烧炉排炉掺烧工业有机固废运行优化调控研究. 环境卫生工程. 2023(06): 11-15 .
    12. 李德波,陈兆立,陈智豪,冯永新,黄梓淦,韦琛,马晓茜. 垃圾焚烧炉掺烧陈腐垃圾及其配风优化的数值模拟. 环境工程. 2022(11): 113-119 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.2 %FULLTEXT: 8.2 %META: 86.2 %META: 86.2 %PDF: 5.6 %PDF: 5.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.6 %其他: 7.6 %其他: 1.1 %其他: 1.1 %上海: 10.2 %上海: 10.2 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %兰州: 0.8 %兰州: 0.8 %北京: 4.2 %北京: 4.2 %十堰: 0.3 %十堰: 0.3 %南京: 4.8 %南京: 4.8 %南充: 0.3 %南充: 0.3 %南宁: 0.8 %南宁: 0.8 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %台州: 1.1 %台州: 1.1 %合肥: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %吉林: 0.6 %吉林: 0.6 %周口: 0.3 %周口: 0.3 %天津: 1.4 %天津: 1.4 %安庆: 0.6 %安庆: 0.6 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %宿州: 0.3 %宿州: 0.3 %常德: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %平顶山: 0.3 %平顶山: 0.3 %广州: 0.8 %广州: 0.8 %延安: 0.3 %延安: 0.3 %张家口: 2.0 %张家口: 2.0 %成都: 2.0 %成都: 2.0 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %无锡: 0.6 %无锡: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 2.0 %杭州: 2.0 %桂林: 0.3 %桂林: 0.3 %榆林: 0.3 %榆林: 0.3 %武汉: 2.3 %武汉: 2.3 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济源: 0.6 %济源: 0.6 %淄博: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湘潭: 0.3 %湘潭: 0.3 %滁州: 0.3 %滁州: 0.3 %漯河: 1.7 %漯河: 1.7 %焦作: 1.1 %焦作: 1.1 %甘孜: 0.3 %甘孜: 0.3 %石家庄: 1.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %福州: 0.8 %福州: 0.8 %秦皇岛: 0.3 %秦皇岛: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 10.7 %芒廷维尤: 10.7 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.6 %衢州: 0.6 %西宁: 14.7 %西宁: 14.7 %西安: 1.1 %西安: 1.1 %贵阳: 0.6 %贵阳: 0.6 %赤峰: 0.8 %赤峰: 0.8 %运城: 2.5 %运城: 2.5 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %郑州: 4.8 %郑州: 4.8 %重庆: 1.1 %重庆: 1.1 %长沙: 1.1 %长沙: 1.1 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %雅安: 0.3 %雅安: 0.3 %青岛: 0.8 %青岛: 0.8 %鞍山: 2.0 %鞍山: 2.0 %马鞍山: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.3 %其他其他上海东莞临汾兰州北京十堰南京南充南宁南昌台州合肥吉林周口天津安庆宣城宿州常德平顶山广州延安张家口成都扬州无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州桂林榆林武汉济南济源淄博深圳温州湖州湘潭滁州漯河焦作甘孜石家庄福州秦皇岛芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安贵阳赤峰运城遵义郑州重庆长沙长治雅安青岛鞍山马鞍山

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (417) PDF downloads(20) Cited by(15)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return