Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 40 Issue 7
Sep.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2022  >  40(7): 94-100
MIAO Fangfang, ZHANG Yimei, LI Yu, LIN Qianguo. ANALYSIS OF SOIL POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF CHEMICAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 94-100. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207014
Citation: MIAO Fangfang, ZHANG Yimei, LI Yu, LIN Qianguo. ANALYSIS OF SOIL POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF CHEMICAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 94-100. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207014
shu

ANALYSIS OF SOIL POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF CHEMICAL

doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207014

  • 1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China;

  • 2. Laboratory of Environment Remediation and Function Material, Suzhou Research Academy of North China Electric Power University, Suzhou 215213, China;

  • 3. College of Energy, Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China

  • Received Date: 2021-09-29
    Available Online: 2022-09-02
    Abstract
  • To reduce the impact of landfills on residents and the environment when performing landfill operation,a solid waste landfill site in Jiangsu Province was taken as the research object to carry out a health risk assessment.Soil samples in the study area were collected and analysed to obtain the contents of heavy metals such as As,Ni,Cd,Zn,Pb,and Hg.Kriging interpolation,chemical mass balance morphological simulation,and health risk assessment models were applied respectively.The concentration spatial distribution,speciation,and regional health risk of heavy metals were studied.The results showed that the area was mainly polluted by solid waste landfills and over-fertilization of agricultural land.The contents of Cd and Zn were higher than the soil background values,and Hg content was close to the background value.15 types of metal forms of Cd and 21 metal forms of Zn were obtained by simulation.A health risk assessment was conducted on the obtained metal species,and it was concluded that Cd2+ and CdCO3 had carcinogenic risks,with total contribution rates of 38.4% and 31.9%,respectively.But Zn2S32- metal form had non-carcinogenic risk,and the total contribution rate was 91.66%.The carcinogenic risk of Cd2+ ranged from 10-6 to 10-4,and that's not ignorable.Therefore,the toxicity of heavy metal species to humans in the study area should be paid more attention to.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(29)
  • [1]
    李亚静,黄庭,谢哲宇,等.非正规垃圾填埋场土壤和地下水重金属污染特征与评价[J].地球与环境,2019,46(3):361-369.
    [2]
    李鹏辉,邹晓燕,楼婕,等.不同季节垃圾填埋场周围重金属污染特征及评价[J].环境化学, 2018, 37(1):41-50.
    [3]
    董晓丹.某大型垃圾填埋场环境调查分析[J].环境卫生工程, 2019, 27(6):25-29.
    [4]
    杨敏,滕应,任文杰,等.石门雄黄矿周边农田土壤重金属污染及健康风险评估[J].土壤, 2016, 48(6):1172-1178.
    [5]
    陈志良,周建民,蒋晓璐,等.典型电镀污染场地重金属污染特征与环境风险评价[J].环境工程技术学报, 2014, 4(1):80-84.
    [6]
    HOEHUN H, OLSON J R, LING B, et al. Analysis of heavy metal sources in soil using kriging interpolation on principal components[J]. Environmental Science Technology, 2014, 48(9):4999-5007.
    [7]
    GUSTAFSSON J P. Visual MINTEQ 3.0 User Guide[J]. Dep of Land&Water Resour Eng, 2012.
    [8]
    白薇扬.三峡库区典型支流水库长寿湖汞的生物地球化学特征[D].成都:西南大学,2015.
    [9]
    任宗玲,彭桂香,徐会娟,等.化学平衡计算模型软件在环境化学教学中的应用[J].广东化工,2017,44(14):271,273.
    [10]
    刘芳,塔西甫拉提,特依拜,等.准东煤炭产业区周边土壤重金属污染与健康风险的空间分布特征[J].环境科学, 2016, 37(12):4815-4829.
    [11]
    张丹丹,娄亚龙,张一梅,等.某铬矿山地下水中Cr (Ⅵ)的形态模拟[J].环境工程, 2018, 44(2):68-71

    ,76.
    [12]
    YI Y J, YANG Z F, ZHANG S H. Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in sediment and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in fishes in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2011, 159(10):2575-2585.
    [13]
    WILDLING L P. Spatial variability:its documentation, accommodation and implication to soil survey[M]. Wageningen:Pudoc Publishers, 1985.
    [14]
    陈洁,施维林,张一梅,等.电镀厂遗留场地污染分析及健康风险空间分布评价[J].环境工程, 2018, 36(4):153-159.
    [15]
    瞿明凯,李卫东,张传荣,等.基于受体模型和地统计学相结合的土壤镉污染源解析[J].中国环境科学, 2013, 33(5):854-860.
    [16]
    廖启林,刘聪,许艳,等.江苏省土壤元素地球化学基准值[J].中国地质, 2011, 38(5):1363-1378.
    [17]
    WANG S, CAI L M, WEN H H, et al. Spatial distribution and source apportionment of heavy metals in soil from a typical county-level city of Guangdong Province, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 655:92-101.
    [18]
    生态环境部.国家市场监督管理总局. GB 36600-2018《土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行)》[S].北京:中国环境出版集团,2018.
    [19]
    郭辉,康明亮,陈万良,等.镅在北山地下水中赋存形态及溶解度分析[J].辐射防护, 2016, 36(1):40-46.
    [20]
    杨森,王永利,张志程,等.甘肃北山地下水中Pu的形态分布及影响因素[J].黄金, 2014(4):75-79.
    [21]
    LIU G N, TAO L, LIU X H, et al. Heavy metal speciation and pollution of agriculture soils along Jishui River in non-ferrous metal mine area in Jiangxi Province, China[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2013, 132:156-163.
    [22]
    徐真,陆春海,陈敏,等.西南某低放废物库场址地下水中铀的形态模拟[J].物理化学学报, 2015(增刊1):45-48.
    [23]
    余铭明,李致春,孟祥嵩,等.城区河流沉积物污染评价方法研究进展[J].科技视界, 2020(16):273-275.
    [24]
    杨子鹏,肖荣波,陈玉萍,等.华南地区典型燃煤电厂周边土壤重金属分布、风险评估及来源分析[J].生态学报, 2020, 40(14):1-13.
    [25]
    FEMANDES-MACIAS J C, GONZALEZ-MILLE D J, GARCIA-ARREOLA M E, et al. Integrated probabilistic risk assessment in sites contaminated with arsenic and lead by long-term mining liabilities in San Luis Potosi, Mexico[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 197:110568.
    [26]
    单爱琴,张威,周洪英,等.徐州市不同功能区重金属污染与健康风险评价[J].环境工程,2016,34(9):125-129.
    [27]
    臧振远,赵毅,尉黎,等.北京市某废弃化工厂的人类健康风险评价[J].生态毒理学报, 2008, 3(1):48-54.
    [28]
    KHOSRAVI Y, ZAMANI A A, PARIZANGANEH A H, et al. Assessment of spatial distribution pattern of heavy metals surrounding a lead and zinc production plant in Zanjan Province, Iran[J]. Geoderma Regional, 2018, 12:10-17.
    [29]
    尉文佳,叶华香,臧淑英,等.克钦湖沉积物重金属时空分布特征及风险评估[J].环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(10):34-42.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]WU Jie, YUE Changsheng, LU Guanghua, LIU Changbo, XIA Chun, LIU Shicheng, KANG Yining. CONFORMATION OF HEAVY METAL SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF AN IN-PRODUCTION ENTERPRISE IN HUNAN BASED ON VOXLER SIMULATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 178-186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406021
    [2]LI Anna, WANG Hui, LIU Qiangnan, LI Taiping. DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF SOIL POLLUTANTS IN AN EXPLOSION SITE OF A CHEMICAL PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 189-198. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211027
    [3]NI Haifeng, DAN Zeng, ZHOU Wenwu, ZHOU Peng, XU Fei, YANG Tao, MENG Dean, CHEN Guanyi. CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS OF WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN LHASA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 89-93,131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203014
    [4]HAN Xu, CHEN Jie, SUN Shou-jun, XU Xiao-lu, SHI Wei-lin. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH RISK IN THE RESIDUAL SITE OF DYE FACTORY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 211-216. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108029
    [5]LI Shuai, ZHANG Yi-mei, WANG Wei-bo, MIAO Fang-fang, LAI Yu-xian, ZHAO Xi-sen, ZHANG Zhi-sheng. QRA PROBABILITY MODEL FOR HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN SUPERCRITICAL NON-PURE CO2 PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION AREA AND ITS APPLICATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 225-230. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105031
    [6]HU Qing, TONG Li-zhi, WANG Hong, GUO Rui-cheng, YANG Gang-ting, XU Sheng-bin. FIELD RAPID SCREENING TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN SOIL SAMPLING OPTIMIZATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 163-167,172. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012027
    [7]JIANG Yi, ZHOU Zhong-fa, XUE Bing-qing, WANG Yan-lin, DAN Yu-sheng, SHANG Meng-jia. STUDY OF HYDRO-CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CONTROL FACTORS IN PINGZHAI RESERVOIR OF SANCHA RIVER BASIN IN GUIZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 41-47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002005
    [17]Fan Shuanxi. POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN SOIL AROUND A SMELTER IN CHANGQING TOWN OF BAOJI CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 121-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504026
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 吴雯雯，孙琼玉，普雨媛，詹明秀，焦文涛. 浙江省某典型垃圾填埋场腐殖土重金属污染特征及生态风险评价. 环境科学学报. 2024(04): 296-305 .
    2. 周晓娟. 固体废物对土壤环境的污染分析与无害化处理技术研究. 环境科学与管理. 2024(04): 81-85 .
    3. 张虹英，赵鹏辉. 绿色建筑施工废弃物堆放对周围环境的污染与低碳化处理措施研究. 环境科学与管理. 2024(06): 168-173 .
    4. 单书月，罗中秋，周新涛，尚波，田鑫聪，阎崔蓉. 钢渣构筑Fe-CSH吸附溶液中Pb(Ⅱ)、Cu(Ⅱ)、Zn(Ⅱ)性能及机理. 化工进展. 2024(10): 5867-5880 .
    5. 邓天乐，马占云，刘舒乐，高庆先，高文康，李华圣，谢立勇. 中国城市生活垃圾填埋CH_4和VOCs等气体排放特征. 中国环境科学. 2024(11): 6007-6017 .
    6. 唐晖，梅金华，谌宏伟，朱智超. 湖南省三十六湾矿区耕地重金属健康风险评价及生态修复对策. 矿产勘查. 2023(08): 1484-1493 .
    7. 周玉娟，马文洁，张博，黄鹤飞，高柏，李彦琦，黄丹丹. 江西省典型区域地下水中铁锰分布特征及综合评价. 有色金属(冶炼部分). 2023(12): 78-86 .
    8. 刘洋洋，尹奇峰，倪圣军，陈思远，张立好. 垃圾填埋场渗滤液泄漏区域土壤重金属空间分布特征及健康风险评价. 安徽农业大学学报. 2023(06): 1021-1029 .
    9. 张施阳. 钢铁厂遗留场地土壤重金属和多环芳烃的污染特征及健康风险评价. 环境污染与防治. 2022(10): 1336-1342 .
    10. 陈仁祥，张博，宋勇，马文洁，高柏. 赣州稀土矿区周边地表水污染分布特征及健康风险评价. 有色金属(冶炼部分). 2022(12): 124-133 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.8 %FULLTEXT: 8.8 %META: 88.7 %META: 88.7 %PDF: 2.5 %PDF: 2.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 13.3 %其他: 13.3 %其他: 0.5 %其他: 0.5 %[]: 1.1 %[]: 1.1 %上海: 9.9 %上海: 9.9 %东莞: 0.5 %东莞: 0.5 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %佛山: 0.2 %佛山: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %北京: 2.7 %北京: 2.7 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %天津: 2.3 %天津: 2.3 %宿州: 0.2 %宿州: 0.2 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %张家口: 0.7 %张家口: 0.7 %扬州: 0.9 %扬州: 0.9 %昆明: 1.4 %昆明: 1.4 %晋城: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 8.1 %杭州: 8.1 %格兰特县: 0.7 %格兰特县: 0.7 %榆林: 0.5 %榆林: 0.5 %武汉: 1.6 %武汉: 1.6 %沈阳: 0.7 %沈阳: 0.7 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %济源: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %渭南: 2.5 %渭南: 2.5 %湖州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.5 %漯河: 0.2 %漯河: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.5 %潍坊: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 22.1 %芒廷维尤: 22.1 %芝加哥: 2.3 %芝加哥: 2.3 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %西宁: 8.8 %西宁: 8.8 %西雅图: 0.2 %西雅图: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %辽阳: 0.2 %辽阳: 0.2 %运城: 2.0 %运城: 2.0 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %郑州: 5.2 %郑州: 5.2 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %铁岭: 0.5 %铁岭: 0.5 %长沙: 2.3 %长沙: 2.3 %阳泉: 0.2 %阳泉: 0.2 %青岛: 0.5 %青岛: 0.5 %香港: 0.7 %香港: 0.7 %黄石: 0.2 %黄石: 0.2 %其他其他[]上海东莞临汾佛山保定北京南京台州合肥呼和浩特嘉兴天津宿州常德张家口扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州格兰特县榆林武汉沈阳洛阳济源温州渭南湖州漯河潍坊石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡阳西宁西雅图贵阳辽阳运城遵义郑州重庆铁岭长沙阳泉青岛香港黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (392) PDF downloads(12) Cited by(11)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return