Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
MA Weiwei, SHI Xueqing, KONG Qiaoping, YU Tong, HAN Hongjun. ENHANCED REMOVAL OF PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS IN COAL GASIFICATION WASTEWATER BY IRON-CARBON MICROELECTROLYSIS PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 18-24. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207003
Citation: LI Qiushi, GUO Xiang, LIU Bin, LIN Fawei, ZHAO Yingxin. STUDY ON METHANE PRODUCTION BY THERMOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE AND CORN STRAW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 139-145. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207020

STUDY ON METHANE PRODUCTION BY THERMOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE AND CORN STRAW

doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207020
  • Received Date: 2021-11-21
    Available Online: 2022-09-02
  • Municipal sludge and corn straw mixtures from three cities,Tianjin,Zhaotong,Taiyuan in China were subjected to thermophilic anaerobic digestion (55℃) with domesticated secondary sedimentation tank sewage as the inoculum.The changes in pH,single-day and cumulative biogas production,and methane production under different systems with digestion time were investigated.The results indicated that anaerobic digestion of sludge-only exhibited no acidification,and its pH value was higher than that of the trials fed with corn straw.The maximum single-day biogas production of the sludge anaerobic digestion system appeared on the first or second day.With the addition of corn straw,the maximum single-day biogas production was delayed.The cumulative biogas production of the Tianjin sludge-only group reached 2004 mL,which was higher than the other two groups.The removal rates of VS under all fermentation systems were higher than 40%.As the digestion process stabilized,the methane content in biogas was maintained at 70%~85%(volume ratio).The specific methane production of Tianjin sludge-only reached 141.01 mL/g-VS.Gompertz model revealed that the sludge-only groups did not fit with the"S"curve,and the lag phase was very short.When the sludge:corn straw was 3:1 or 2:1,both the specific methane production,methane production rate,and lag phase had certain advantages.
  • [1]
    王杰,熊祖鸿,石明岩.污泥能源化技术研究进展[J].现代化工,2021,41(7):99-102.
    [2]
    戴晓虎,张辰,章林伟,等.碳中和背景下污泥处理处置与资源化发展方向思考[J].给水排水,2021,47(3):1-5.
    [3]
    吴春苗.城镇污水处理厂污泥资源化利用技术研究[J].低碳世界,2021,11(6):109-110.
    [4]
    戴晓虎.我国污泥处理处置现状及发展趋势[J].科学,2020,72(6):30-34.
    [5]
    张文哲,陈静,刘玉,等.中温和高温厌氧消化的比较[J].化工进展,2018,37(12):336-344.
    [6]
    戴晓虎,于春晓,李宁,等.污泥超高温(65℃)厌氧消化系统启动方案[J].中国环境科学,2017,37(7):2527-2535.
    [7]
    谭铁鹏.污水污泥的高、中、低温厌氧发酵介绍[J].云南化工,1995(3):51-65.
    [8]
    WU Z L, LIN Z, SUN Z Y, et al. A comparative study of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of municipal sludge with high-solids content:reactor performance and microbial community[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 302:122851.
    [9]
    CAVINATO C, BOLZONELLA D, PAVAN P, et al. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and source sorted biowaste in pilot-and full-scale reactors[J]. Renewable Energy, 2013, 55:260-265.
    [10]
    夏雨扬.玉米秸秆与不同底物协同厌氧发酵产沼气初始条件优化研究[D].重庆:西南交通大学,2020.
    [11]
    于琼.秸秆预处理及添加剂对玉米秸秆与鸡粪混合厌氧发酵产沼气特性的影响[D].上海:上海交通大学, 2020.
    [12]
    李文哲,王忠江,王丽丽,等.牛粪水解酸化过程中挥发性固体去除率的影响因素研究[J].农业工程技术:农业信息化,2007(6):7-10.
    [13]
    马磊,王德汉,杨文杰,等.餐厨垃圾高温厌氧消化接种物的驯化研究[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(6):203-207.
    [14]
    刘士清,张无敌,尹芳.沼气发酵实验教程[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2013.
    [15]
    李建昌,孙可伟,何娟,等.应用Modified Gompertz模型对城市生活垃圾沼气发酵的拟合研究[J].环境科学,2011,32(6):1843-1850.
    [16]
    ZHEN G Y, LU X Q, KOBAYASHI T, et al. Mesophilic anaerobic Co-digestion of waste activated sludge and egeria densa:performance assessment and kinetic analysis[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 148:78-86.
    [17]
    余建峰.不同接种物对牛粪高温厌氧发酵过程的影响[D].郑州:郑州大学,2006.
    [18]
    郭志伟,李勇,倪海亮,等.投配率对餐厨垃圾与污泥二级高温厌氧发酵产甲烷的影响[J].可再生能源,2015,33(2):314-319.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Hang, WANG Xiankai, CHEN Xiang, LI Kun, QIAO Xueyuan, LIU Feng, DONG Bin. CARBON EMISSION ANALYSIS OF COLLABORATIVE TREATMENT OF MUNICIPAL ORGANIC SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 66-72. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402008
    [2]HE Yan, YAN Xiaoxu, LI You, LIU Huhu, YANG Hui, DUAN Xiyu, LU Xiangyang, TIAN Yun, WANG Chong. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON EXOGENOUS ADDITIVES FOR ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 175-186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404021
    [3]GUO Zirui, CHI Riguang, XIN Hailong, GONG Xujin, PENG Zhaoyang, CHEN Zhiqiang. DEHYDRATION PERFORMANCE OF SLUDGE DURING FREEZE-THAW CYCLE AND ANALYSIS BASED ON COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS HYDROTHERMAL COUPLING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 174-183. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412021
    [4]WANG Tao, LING Xiaolong, DONG Yuanyuan, BU Jiuhe, HU Xiaohui. EFFECT OF TYPICAL FLOCCULANTS ON FORMATION AND ADSORPTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SLUDGE-DERIVED HYDROCHAR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 166-173. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412020
    [5]HAO Jingyu, CHEN Shuxian, CHEN Xiang, WANG Xiankai, WANG Hang, HUA Yu, DAI Xiaohu. APPLICATION AND PROSPECTS OF PYROLYSIS CARBONIZATION TECHNOLOGY IN SLUDGE TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 261-275. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409026
    [6]LI Xingwu, YUAN Shushan, YE Han, WANG Zhongyi, OUYANG Lan, LIANG Sha, HU Jingping, YANG Jiakuan. ANALYSIS OF FLUE GAS CHARACTERISTICS AND PROCESS OPTIMIZATION OF CEMENT KILN CO-PROCESSING MUNICIPAL SLUDGE BASED ON ASPEN PLUS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 206-214. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405026
    [7]LENG Jiewen, SHI Ke, WANG Xuejing, KOU Wei, FU Xiaowei, SUN Zhaonan. ADSORPTION OF TETRACYCLINE ON BIOCHAR PREPARED FROM MUNICIPAL SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 75-82. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405010
    [8]ZHANG Yefan, ZHENG Zhiyong, CAO Qihao, ZHU Fukang, PAN Hui, LI Chong, YANG Hanwen, LIU He. A COLLABORATIVE TREATMENT PROCESS FOR MUNICIPAL SURPLUS SLUDGE AND THERMAL PRESS FILTRATE FROM CYANOBACTERIAL SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 24-29. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302004
    [9]DONG Wenyi, DU Hong, ZENG Yuanxin, HUANG Xiao, WANG Hongjie, DAI Zhongyi. REVIEW OF PRETREATMENT PROCESS FOR MUNICIPAL SLUDGE FERMENTATION FOR PRODUCING VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 241-251. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307033
    [10]ZHU Xin-yu, ZHANG Jie, SUN Xiao-jiao, CHEN Guang-hui, WANG Xiao-xia, ZHANG Pei-yu, QIU Yan-ling. BIOAUGMENTATION OF CORN STALKS FERMENTATION BY ANAEROBIC BENZOATE-DEGRADING BACTERIUM SPOROTOMACULUM SYNTROPHICUM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 75-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205011
    [11]ZHAO Shan, GUO Xue-bin, YANG Xiao-fang, WANG Dong-sheng. RESEARCH ON VOLATILE SULFIDE (VSC) AND AMMONIA EMISSION LAW IN PROCESS OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE COMPOSTING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 82-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102013
    [12]XIONG Ying, BAI Dong-rui, ZHANG Tao, LIU Yi, LIU Yan-ting, CHEN Tan, WANG Hong-tao, YANG Ting, JIN Jun, ZHOU Ping, GUO Fang. FEASIBILITY INVESTIGATION ON AEROBIC COMPOSTING OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE SUPPLEMENTED WITH LESS PROPORTION OF GREEN WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 153-160. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103022
    [13]HUANG Ru-yi, TANG Ping, LUO Tao, LI Jiang, LONG En-shen, MEI Zi-li, KONG Chui-xue. A CASE STUDY ON BIOGAS ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF DEXTRAN PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER USING CIRCULATING FLUIDIZATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 48-53. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103007
    [14]ZHANG Yong-ping, WANG Gang, XU Min, SONG Xiao-san. PREPARATION OF MERCAPTOACETYL CORN STRAW, A Cd(Ⅱ) ADSORBENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 116-122. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003020
    [15]XU Yi-wen, JIANG Jian-guo, MENG Yuan, YAN Wei-wei. EFFECTS OF PRETREATMENT ON ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION OF GARDEN WASTE AND OTHER SUBSTRATES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 168-174. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011028
    [16]DENG Qing-hua, ZHANG Jian, XIAN-Ping, FANG Qing, MENG Zheng-cheng. IMPROVING ANAEROBIC DIGESTIBILITY OF SLUDGE PRETREATED BY THERMAL HYDROLYSIS AND BANANA STRAW ADDED[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 144-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005025
    [19]Hao Yidang, Wu Long, Shen Ping, Li Shiqi. PRECISE REDUCTION EXPERIMENT STUDY OF BAYER RED MUD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 100-104. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501023
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 毛晓飞,李地超,周荃,吴玉凤. 深度脱水作为污泥好氧发酵前处理技术的能耗分析. 化工管理. 2024(03): 52-55 .
    2. 张达,林青山,崔鹏,程伯夷,王宗平,郭刚. 餐厨垃圾-剩余污泥物料配比对厌氧共发酵产挥发性脂肪酸的影响. 环境工程. 2024(08): 125-133 . 本站查看
    3. 刘凡,陈冠英,张廷军,马宗虎,刘磊,梁雪,赵健. 4种生物质秸秆厌氧消化产甲烷特性研究. 安徽农业科学. 2023(11): 163-165 .
    4. 刘宝村,周集体,金若菲,田天,崔甜甜. 热碱法处理污泥沼渣及其厌氧发酵性能研究. 环境工程. 2023(09): 166-173 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.7 %FULLTEXT: 11.7 %META: 86.5 %META: 86.5 %PDF: 1.8 %PDF: 1.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.5 %其他: 14.5 %上海: 16.0 %上海: 16.0 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %北京: 4.3 %北京: 4.3 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南宁: 0.4 %南宁: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %周口: 0.7 %周口: 0.7 %天津: 2.8 %天津: 2.8 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %巴黎: 1.4 %巴黎: 1.4 %常州: 1.1 %常州: 1.1 %常德: 0.7 %常德: 0.7 %广州: 0.7 %广州: 0.7 %张家口: 1.1 %张家口: 1.1 %成都: 1.1 %成都: 1.1 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %昆明: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %济南: 0.7 %济南: 0.7 %济宁: 0.4 %济宁: 0.4 %济源: 0.7 %济源: 0.7 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 1.8 %湖州: 1.8 %湛江: 0.4 %湛江: 0.4 %漯河: 2.8 %漯河: 2.8 %潮州: 0.4 %潮州: 0.4 %焦作: 0.4 %焦作: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %福州: 0.7 %福州: 0.7 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 21.6 %芒廷维尤: 21.6 %西宁: 7.4 %西宁: 7.4 %贵阳: 0.7 %贵阳: 0.7 %资阳: 1.1 %资阳: 1.1 %运城: 3.2 %运城: 3.2 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %郑州: 3.5 %郑州: 3.5 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %阿萨姆邦: 1.1 %阿萨姆邦: 1.1 %青岛: 1.1 %青岛: 1.1 %其他上海临汾北京十堰南宁台州合肥周口天津宣城巴黎常州常德广州张家口成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉济南济宁济源温州湖州湛江漯河潮州焦作石家庄福州秦皇岛芒廷维尤西宁贵阳资阳运城遵义郑州重庆长沙阿萨姆邦青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (243) PDF downloads(6) Cited by(9)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return