Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
DU Xiaoli, CHI Zhongwen, YIN Zijie, ZHAO Meng. ATTENUATION ON CONTROL EFFECT OF HEAVY METALS IN RUNOFF BY PERMEABLE BRICK DURING THE WHOLE PROCESS OF BLOCKAGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 1-8. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207001
Citation: CHENG Hongsheng, DING Jingtao, MENG Haibo, SHEN Yujun, ZHOU Haibin, SONG Liqiu, ZHANG Xi, XU Pengxiang, ZHANG Pengyue, WANG Xinyu, LI Ran, WANG Juan, ZHANG Ying, YAN Haipeng. ANALYSIS ON WHOLE CHAIN TECHNOLOGY OF LIVESTOCK MANURE RESOURCE UTILIZATION IN THE YANGTZE RIVER BASIN PLAIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 240-247. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207033

ANALYSIS ON WHOLE CHAIN TECHNOLOGY OF LIVESTOCK MANURE RESOURCE UTILIZATION IN THE YANGTZE RIVER BASIN PLAIN

doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207033
  • Received Date: 2021-08-01
    Available Online: 2022-09-02
  • The middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin plain play an important role in livestock and poultry breeding areas in China.Improving the treatment and utilization level of livestock and poultry manure in this area is of great significance to protect the environment of the Yangtze River Basin and promote the sustainable development of the regional economy.To better track the progress of the treatment and utilization of manure and wastewater,a nationwide survey was conducted in 2018-2020,covering 429 pig,cattle and poultry farms.The technical pathway and facility construction for the treatment and utilization of manure and wastewater were thoroughly analyzed,from the aspects of the collection methods,treatment technologies,and utilization to the farmland.The results showed that dry-dung cleaning was the main method for manure and wastewater collection in most surveyed farms (85.71%),while water flushing and deep-pit were frequently adopted in 8.2% and 2.58% of the surveyed farms.Composting was widely used in the treatment of solid feces,accounting for 91% of the surveyed farms.Most of the treated manure and wastewater were used for fertilizers for the farmland with fruits and vegetables,while their application to the farmland with grain crops was still low.Only 25.56% of the large-scale livestock and poultry farms had insufficient farmland for manure and wastewater consumption.The overall dosage based on nitrogen demand was relatively higher than plant need,which caused water pollution.Meanwhile,manual fertilization was still the main method compared with mechanical fertilization.To improve the treatment and utilization of livestock and poultry manure and wastewater,it was suggested to further standardize and improve the utilization technologies of manure and sewage resources,improve the technology and equipment level of manure and sewage resources utilization,guide large-scale farms to prepare the consuming land according to the requirements of planting and breeding balance,and strengthen the tracking and evaluation of farmland soil applying manure,so as to improve the utilization level of manure.
  • [1]
    农业现代化成就辉煌全面小康社会根基夯实[EB/OL]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/xw/zxfb/202105/t20210510_6367489.htm.2021-05-10.
    [2]
    国务院办公厅.国务院办公厅关于加快推进畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用的意见(国办发[2017] 48号)[EB/OL]. http:www gov cn zhengce content 2017-0612 content_5201790.htm.2017-06-12.
    [3]
    中共中央国务院关于坚持农业农村优先发展做好"三农"工作的若干意见[J].中华人民共和国国务院公报,2019(7):25-33.
    [4]
    董红敏,左玲玲,魏莎,等.建立畜禽废弃物养分管理制度促进种养结合绿色发展[J].中国科学院院刊, 2019; 34(2):56-65.
    [5]
    关于发布《第二次全国污染源普查公报》的公告[EB/OL].中华人民共和国生态环境部,国家统计局,中华人民共和国农业农村部. http://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk01/202006/t20200610_783547.html. 2020.
    [6]
    关于印发《长江经济带生态环境保护规划》的通知(环规财[2017] 88号)[EB/OL]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bwj/201707/t20170718_418053.htm.2017-07-17.
    [7]
    肖琴,周振亚,罗其友.长江中下游地区畜禽承载力评估与预警分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(9):2050-2058.
    [8]
    张庆东,耿如林,戴晔.规模化猪场清粪工艺比选分析[J].中国畜牧兽医, 2013, 40(2):232-235.
    [9]
    梁浩,吴德胜,赵明杰,等.好氧堆肥技术发展现状与应用[J].农业工程,2020,10(4):50-53.
    [10]
    杨丽楠,李昂,袁春燕,等.半透膜覆盖好氧堆肥技术应用现状综述[J].环境科学学报, 2020, 40(10):3559-3564.
    [11]
    GB/T 36195-2018,畜禽粪便无害化处理技术规范[S].北京:全国畜牧业标准化技术委员会,2018.
    [12]
    GB/T 18596-2001,畜禽养殖业污染排放标准[S].北京:国家环境保护总局,2003.
    [13]
    隋斌,孟海波,沈玉君,等.丹麦畜禽粪肥利用对中国种养结合循环农业发展的启示[J].农业工程学报, 2018, 34(12):9-15.
    [14]
    丁京涛,张朋月,赵立欣,等.养殖粪水长期贮存过程理化特性变化规律[J].农业工程学报, 2020, 36(14):220-225.
    [15]
    徐鹏翔,沈玉君,丁京涛,等.规模化养猪场粪污全量收集及贮存工艺设计[J].农业工程学报, 2020, 36(9):255-262.
    [16]
    农业部办公厅关于印发《畜禽规模养殖场粪污资源化利用设施建设规范(试行)》的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.xmsyj.moa.gov.cn/zcjd/201904/t20190429_6287182.htm.20218-01-11.
    [17]
    安思羽,李艳霞,张雪莲,等.我国果菜茶中畜禽粪便有机肥替代化肥潜力[J].农业环境科学学报, 2019, 38(8):1712-1722.
    [18]
    农业农村部种植业管理司,全国农业技术推广服务中心,农业农村部科学施肥专家指导组.果菜茶有机肥替代化肥技术指导意见(上)[J].农机科技推广, 2018,(11):52-53.
    [19]
    武淑霞,刘宏斌,黄宏坤,等.我国畜禽养殖粪污产生量及其资源化分析[J].中国工程科学,2018, 20(5):103-111.
    [20]
    杨飞,杨世琦,诸云强,等.中国近30年畜禽养殖量及其耕地氮污染负荷分析[J].农业工程学报, 2013, 29(5):1-11.
    [21]
    DONG S S, SUI B, SHEN Y J, et al. Investigation and analysis of the linkage mechanism and whole process cost of livestock manure organic fertilizer[J]. International Journal of Agricultural Biological Engineering, 2020, 13(2):223-227.
    [22]
    李红娜,吴华山,耿兵,等.我国畜禽养殖污染防治瓶颈问题及对策建议[J].环境工程技术学报,2020,10(2):167-172.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Hang, WANG Xiankai, CHEN Xiang, LI Kun, QIAO Xueyuan, LIU Feng, DONG Bin. CARBON EMISSION ANALYSIS OF COLLABORATIVE TREATMENT OF MUNICIPAL ORGANIC SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 66-72. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402008
    [2]HE Yan, YAN Xiaoxu, LI You, LIU Huhu, YANG Hui, DUAN Xiyu, LU Xiangyang, TIAN Yun, WANG Chong. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON EXOGENOUS ADDITIVES FOR ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 175-186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404021
    [3]GUO Zirui, CHI Riguang, XIN Hailong, GONG Xujin, PENG Zhaoyang, CHEN Zhiqiang. DEHYDRATION PERFORMANCE OF SLUDGE DURING FREEZE-THAW CYCLE AND ANALYSIS BASED ON COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS HYDROTHERMAL COUPLING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 174-183. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412021
    [4]WANG Tao, LING Xiaolong, DONG Yuanyuan, BU Jiuhe, HU Xiaohui. EFFECT OF TYPICAL FLOCCULANTS ON FORMATION AND ADSORPTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SLUDGE-DERIVED HYDROCHAR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 166-173. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412020
    [5]HAO Jingyu, CHEN Shuxian, CHEN Xiang, WANG Xiankai, WANG Hang, HUA Yu, DAI Xiaohu. APPLICATION AND PROSPECTS OF PYROLYSIS CARBONIZATION TECHNOLOGY IN SLUDGE TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 261-275. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409026
    [6]LI Xingwu, YUAN Shushan, YE Han, WANG Zhongyi, OUYANG Lan, LIANG Sha, HU Jingping, YANG Jiakuan. ANALYSIS OF FLUE GAS CHARACTERISTICS AND PROCESS OPTIMIZATION OF CEMENT KILN CO-PROCESSING MUNICIPAL SLUDGE BASED ON ASPEN PLUS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 206-214. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405026
    [7]LENG Jiewen, SHI Ke, WANG Xuejing, KOU Wei, FU Xiaowei, SUN Zhaonan. ADSORPTION OF TETRACYCLINE ON BIOCHAR PREPARED FROM MUNICIPAL SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 75-82. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405010
    [8]ZHANG Yefan, ZHENG Zhiyong, CAO Qihao, ZHU Fukang, PAN Hui, LI Chong, YANG Hanwen, LIU He. A COLLABORATIVE TREATMENT PROCESS FOR MUNICIPAL SURPLUS SLUDGE AND THERMAL PRESS FILTRATE FROM CYANOBACTERIAL SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 24-29. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302004
    [9]DONG Wenyi, DU Hong, ZENG Yuanxin, HUANG Xiao, WANG Hongjie, DAI Zhongyi. REVIEW OF PRETREATMENT PROCESS FOR MUNICIPAL SLUDGE FERMENTATION FOR PRODUCING VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 241-251. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307033
    [10]ZHU Xin-yu, ZHANG Jie, SUN Xiao-jiao, CHEN Guang-hui, WANG Xiao-xia, ZHANG Pei-yu, QIU Yan-ling. BIOAUGMENTATION OF CORN STALKS FERMENTATION BY ANAEROBIC BENZOATE-DEGRADING BACTERIUM SPOROTOMACULUM SYNTROPHICUM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 75-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205011
    [11]ZHAO Shan, GUO Xue-bin, YANG Xiao-fang, WANG Dong-sheng. RESEARCH ON VOLATILE SULFIDE (VSC) AND AMMONIA EMISSION LAW IN PROCESS OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE COMPOSTING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 82-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102013
    [12]XIONG Ying, BAI Dong-rui, ZHANG Tao, LIU Yi, LIU Yan-ting, CHEN Tan, WANG Hong-tao, YANG Ting, JIN Jun, ZHOU Ping, GUO Fang. FEASIBILITY INVESTIGATION ON AEROBIC COMPOSTING OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE SUPPLEMENTED WITH LESS PROPORTION OF GREEN WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 153-160. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103022
    [13]HUANG Ru-yi, TANG Ping, LUO Tao, LI Jiang, LONG En-shen, MEI Zi-li, KONG Chui-xue. A CASE STUDY ON BIOGAS ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF DEXTRAN PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER USING CIRCULATING FLUIDIZATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 48-53. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103007
    [14]ZHANG Yong-ping, WANG Gang, XU Min, SONG Xiao-san. PREPARATION OF MERCAPTOACETYL CORN STRAW, A Cd(Ⅱ) ADSORBENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 116-122. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003020
    [15]XU Yi-wen, JIANG Jian-guo, MENG Yuan, YAN Wei-wei. EFFECTS OF PRETREATMENT ON ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION OF GARDEN WASTE AND OTHER SUBSTRATES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 168-174. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011028
    [16]DENG Qing-hua, ZHANG Jian, XIAN-Ping, FANG Qing, MENG Zheng-cheng. IMPROVING ANAEROBIC DIGESTIBILITY OF SLUDGE PRETREATED BY THERMAL HYDROLYSIS AND BANANA STRAW ADDED[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 144-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005025
    [19]Hao Yidang, Wu Long, Shen Ping, Li Shiqi. PRECISE REDUCTION EXPERIMENT STUDY OF BAYER RED MUD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 100-104. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501023
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 刘超. 水冷机械炉排块冷却性能分析及强度校核. 机电工程技术. 2024(05): 95-99 .
    2. 史焕明,李德胜,邵建强,孙敦冠,彭鹏,梁爽. 垃圾焚烧炉热力计算拓扑模型优化. 工业炉. 2024(03): 37-41 .
    3. 周洪权,陈德珍,尹丽洁,张智,戴小云,陆子叶. CFD-BP神经网络耦合算法对焚烧炉的一次风管道配风的模拟研究. 电力科技与环保. 2023(05): 410-416+435 .
    4. 阙正斌,李德波,肖显斌,苗建杰,刘鹏宇,陈兆立,陈智豪,冯永新. 垃圾焚烧发电厂炉排炉数值模拟研究进展. 洁净煤技术. 2022(10): 15-29 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.7 %FULLTEXT: 11.7 %META: 86.5 %META: 86.5 %PDF: 1.8 %PDF: 1.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.5 %其他: 14.5 %上海: 16.0 %上海: 16.0 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %北京: 4.3 %北京: 4.3 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南宁: 0.4 %南宁: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %周口: 0.7 %周口: 0.7 %天津: 2.8 %天津: 2.8 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %巴黎: 1.4 %巴黎: 1.4 %常州: 1.1 %常州: 1.1 %常德: 0.7 %常德: 0.7 %广州: 0.7 %广州: 0.7 %张家口: 1.1 %张家口: 1.1 %成都: 1.1 %成都: 1.1 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %昆明: 0.7 %昆明: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %济南: 0.7 %济南: 0.7 %济宁: 0.4 %济宁: 0.4 %济源: 0.7 %济源: 0.7 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 1.8 %湖州: 1.8 %湛江: 0.4 %湛江: 0.4 %漯河: 2.8 %漯河: 2.8 %潮州: 0.4 %潮州: 0.4 %焦作: 0.4 %焦作: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %福州: 0.7 %福州: 0.7 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 21.6 %芒廷维尤: 21.6 %西宁: 7.4 %西宁: 7.4 %贵阳: 0.7 %贵阳: 0.7 %资阳: 1.1 %资阳: 1.1 %运城: 3.2 %运城: 3.2 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %郑州: 3.5 %郑州: 3.5 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %阿萨姆邦: 1.1 %阿萨姆邦: 1.1 %青岛: 1.1 %青岛: 1.1 %其他上海临汾北京十堰南宁台州合肥周口天津宣城巴黎常州常德广州张家口成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉济南济宁济源温州湖州湛江漯河潮州焦作石家庄福州秦皇岛芒廷维尤西宁贵阳资阳运城遵义郑州重庆长沙阿萨姆邦青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (341) PDF downloads(21) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return