好氧颗粒污泥MBR工艺处理变电站生活污水性能分析

刘克成; 范辉; 高燕宁

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202109005

好氧颗粒污泥MBR工艺处理变电站生活污水性能分析

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109005

1. 国网河北省电力有限公司电力科学研究院, 石家庄 050021;
2. 国网河北省电力有限公司, 石家庄 050000

基金项目:

国家电网有限公司科技项目"电站生产污水、雨水与生活污水交叉利用资源化技术研究及应用"（kj2020-066）。

详细信息

作者简介:
刘克成(1972-),男,正高级工程师,主要研究方向为水资源管理及废水处理技术。hbdyylkc@163.com

通讯作者:
高燕宁(1981-),男,正高级工程师,主要研究方向为水资源管理及废水处理技术。hbdyygyn@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 110
- HTML全文浏览量: 20
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-01-18
- 网络出版日期: 2022-01-21

PERFORMANCE OF AEROBIC GRANULAR SLUDGE MBR PROCESS FOR THE TREATMENT OF SUBSTATION SEWAGE

1. State Grid Hebei Electric Power Research Institute, Shijiazhuang 050021, China;
2. State Grid Hebei Electric Power Co., Ltd, Shijiazhuang 050000, China

摘要

摘要: 实验对比研究了好氧颗粒污泥膜生物反应器（AGMBR）和传统絮状污泥膜生物反应器（MBR）处理变电站生活污水过程中的膜污染行为及净水性能。以变电站生活污水作为进水，经60 d可以成功培养出好氧颗粒污泥。与传统絮状污泥相比，好氧颗粒污泥能够有效减缓膜污染，尤其是不可逆膜污染。AGMBR水力反洗频率仅为传统MBR的33.3%，30 d连续运行的膜孔阻力仅为传统MBR的69.3%。进一步分析发现，AGMBR反应器中EPS含量显著低于传统MBR，而且EPS中多糖组分含量也远低于传统MBR（仅为MBR的46%）。净水性能对比结果表明，AGMBR对TN和TP有着优异的去除性能，30 d运行平均去除率比传统MBR分别高出37.8%和40.5%。
- 好氧颗粒污泥 /
- 膜生物反应器 /
- 除磷 /
- 膜污染 /
- 变电站生活污水
Abstract: This study compared the membrane fouling behavior and water purification performance of aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor (AGMBR) and traditional flocculent sludge membrane bioreactor (MBR) for the treatment of substation sewage. Using substation domestic sewage as the feed water, aerobic granular sludge could be successfully cultivated after 60 days. Compared with traditional flocculent sludge, aerobic granular sludge could effectively slow down membrane fouling, especially irreversible membrane fouling. In AGMBR, the hydraulic backwash frequency was only 33.3% of that in traditional MBR, and the resistance from pore blocking in 30-day continuous operation was only 69.3% of traditional MBR. Further analysis suggested that EPS content in AGMBR reactor was significantly lower than that of traditional MBR, and the content of polysaccharide in EPS was only 46% of the traditional MBR. The comparison result in water purification performance showed that AGMBR had an excellent removal performance for TN and TP, and the average removal rate of 30-day running was 37.8% and 40.5% higher than that of the traditional MBR, respectively.
- aerobic granular sludge /
- membrane bioreactor /
- phosphorus removal /
- membrane fouling /
- substation sewage

HTML全文

参考文献(20)

[1]	NINOMIYA Y,KIMURA K,SATO T,et al.High-flux operation of MBRs with ceramic flat-sheet membranes made possible by intensive membrane cleaning:tests with real domestic wastewater under low-temperature conditions[J].Water Research,2020,181:115881-115889.
[2]	李键,郭烨烨,王霞,等.活性炭提高膜生物反应器运行性能的研究进展[J].水处理技术,2021,47(1):7-11.
[3]	OU D,LI W,LI H,et al.Enhancement of the removal and settling performance for aerobic granular sludge under hypersaline stress[J].Chemosphere,2018,212:400-407.
[4]	CORSINO S F,CAMPO R,DI BELLA G,et al.Study of aerobic granular sludge stability in a continuous-flow membrane bioreactor[J].Bioresource Technology,2016,200:1055-1059.
[5]	EDWARD J H D,PRONK M,MARK C M van L.A settling model for full-scale aerobic granular sludge[J].Water Research,2020,186:116135-116144.
[6]	SGUANCI S,LUBELLO C,CAFFAZ S,et al.Long-term stability of aerobic granular sludge for the treatment of very low-strength real domestic wastewater[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,222:882-890.
[7]	LONG B,XUAN X P,YANG C Z,et al.Stability of aerobic granular sludge in a pilot scale sequencing batch reactor enhanced by granular particle size control[J].Chemosphere,2019,225:460-469.
[8]	CAI W,HUANG W L,LEI Z F,et al.Granulation of activated sludge using butyrate and valerate as additional carbon source and granular phosphorus removal capacity during wastewater treatment[J].Bioresource Technology,2019,282:269-274.
[9]	CHEN C,GUO W S,NGO H H,et al.Effects of C/N ratio on the performance of a hybrid sponge-assisted aerobic moving bed-anaerobic granular membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment[J].Bioresource Technology,2018,247:340-346.
[10]	IORHEMEN O T,HAMZA R A,ZAGHLOUL M S,et al.Simultaneous organics and nutrients removal in side-stream aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor (AGMBR)[J].Journal of Water Process Engineering,2018,21:127-132.
[11]	WANG X C,SHEN J M,CHEN Z L,et al.Removal of pharmaceuticals from synthetic wastewater in an aerobic granular sludge membrane bioreactor and determination of the bioreactor microbial diversity[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2016,100(18):8213-8223.
[12]	国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[13]	XU J,SHENG G P.Microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) acted as a potential reservoir in responding to high concentrations of sulfonamides shocks during biological wastewater treatment[J].Bioresource Technology,2020,313:123654-123657.
[14]	DI BELLA G,TORREGROSSA M,VIVIANI G.The role of EPS concentration in MBR foaming:analysis of a submerged pilot plant[J].Bioresource Technology,2011,102(2):1628-1635.
[15]	张淼,於蒙,潘婷,等.三级串联式BCO反应器比耗氧速率及菌群结构分析[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(6):1350-1358.
[16]	卜凡.混凝、吸附与氧化预处理对超滤工艺水处理效能和膜污染的影响[D].济南:山东大学,2019.
[17]	CAMPO R,CAPODICI M,DI BELLA G,et al.The role of EPS in the foaming and fouling for a MBR operated in intermittent aeration conditions[J].Biochemical Engineering Journal,2017,118:41-52.
[18]	TAY J H,LIU Q S,LIU Y.The effects of shear force on the formation,structure and metabolism of aerobic granules[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2001,57(1/2):227-233.
[19]	LIU Y,TAY J H.The essential role of hydrodynamic shear force in the formation of biofilm and granule sludge[J].Water Research,2002,36(7):1653-1665.
[20]	KIMURA K,HANE Y,WATANABE Y,et al.Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water[J].Water Research,2004,38(14/15):3431-3441.