Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 38 Issue 6
Aug.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2020  >  38(6): 88-93
ZHOU Wen-wu, CHEN Guan-yi, DAN Zeng, QIONGDA Zhuo-ma, ZHOU Peng, WANG Jing. COMPARISON AND SELECTION OF REHABILITATION SCHEMES FOR GROUNDWATER LEAD IN LANDFILL AREA: A CASE STUDY OF LHASA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 88-93. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006014
Citation: ZHOU Wen-wu, CHEN Guan-yi, DAN Zeng, QIONGDA Zhuo-ma, ZHOU Peng, WANG Jing. COMPARISON AND SELECTION OF REHABILITATION SCHEMES FOR GROUNDWATER LEAD IN LANDFILL AREA: A CASE STUDY OF LHASA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 88-93. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006014
shu

COMPARISON AND SELECTION OF REHABILITATION SCHEMES FOR GROUNDWATER LEAD IN LANDFILL AREA: A CASE STUDY OF LHASA

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006014

  • 1. School of Science, Tibet University, Lhasa 850000, China;

  • 2. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

  • Received Date: 2019-07-04
    Abstract
  • The content of lead in groundwater of Lhasa landfill was increased with the improvement of its service life. In order to protect groundwater, physical shielding method, extraction treatment method and in-situ remediation method were used as the candidate remediation schemes. The AHP-TOPSIS method was used to select the best restoration scheme. Firstly, the weights for all factors were determined by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The AHP model was established by selecting six indexes systems: construction conditions, economic conditions, technical conditions, environmental conditions, pollutant characteristics and hydrochemical characteristics. Then, the ranking method of TOPSIS close to the ideal goal was used to analyze the selection of final repair schemes. The results showed that the weight values obtained by the two methods were in the order of in-situ remediation, physical shielding and extraction. Finally, it was determined that in-situ remediation technology was the most suitable scheme for groundwater remediation in the site.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(24)
  • 周文武,陈冠益,周鹏,等.西藏拉萨市区餐厨垃圾现状分析及建议[J].环境与可持续发展,2019,44(1):60-63.
    拉萨市人民政府.2016年拉萨市固体废物管理及拉萨市固体废物污染防治信息公告[EB/OL].[2017-06/20

    ],http://www.lasa.gov.cn.
    中国膜工业协会.拉萨市生活垃圾填埋场建成膜法渗滤液处理站效果良好[EB/OL].[2015-06-16],http://www.membranes.com.cn.
    薛红琴, 速宝玉, 盛金昌,等. 垃圾填埋场渗滤液的防渗措施和地下水的污染防护[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2002, 2(4):18-22.
    袁宝珊,吴宜群.环境铅污染与儿童健康[J].国外医学(卫生学分册),1998(4):3-8.
    姜楠, 王鹤立, 廉新颖. 地下水铅污染修复技术应用与研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2008, 31(2):56-60.
    COULTHARD T L, SAMIA FADL. Adsorption of Water Pollutants by a Coal Sorption Process [R]. For presentation at the CSAE Annual Meeting, 1973,21(8).
    VIDIC R D, POHLAND F G. Treatment Walls Technology evaluation report TE-96-01[R]. Pittsburgh P A: Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Center, 1996.
    LEUSCH A, HOLAN Z R, VOLESKY B. Solution and particle effects on the biosorption of heavy metals by seaweed biomass[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 1997, 61(3):231-249.
    RAHMUNI G N, H STEMBERG S P K. Bioremoval of lead from water using Lemna minor[J]. Bioresour Technol, 1999, 70(3): 225-230.
    胡宏韬, 侯玲娟. 铅污染地下水电动修复研究[J]. 水处理技术, 2009, 35(9):56-59.
    徐建华. 计量地理学[M]. 北京:等教育出版社, 2006.
    HWANG C L,YOON K S. Multiple Attribute Decision Making [M]. Berlin: Spring-Verlag,1981.
    张婧, 皮鎏, 崔佳鑫, 等. 垃圾填埋场区域氨氮污染地下水的修复方案比选[J]. 环境保护科学, 2017,43(3):125-131.
    王纪洋,张明广,王雪栋.基于AHP-TOPSIS模型的危险化工工艺风险等级评价研究[J].安全与环境工程,2016,23(6):100-105.
    张士宽,王月,安达,等. 垃圾填埋场地下水污染修复技术优选研究[J].环境工程技术学报,2017,7(4):463-469.
    霍攀,曹丽文,田艳凤. AHP与模糊评判法在垃圾填埋场选址中的应用对比[J].环境工程,2015,33(3):131-135.
    吴军年,张后辉,邢景敏. 基于层次分析法的危废渣库选址的环境经济适宜性分析[J].环境工程,2011,29(2):99-103.
    陈海滨,李文杰,杨龑,等. 基于节约法的村镇生活垃圾收运路线优化研究[J].环境工程,2016,34(12):122-125.
    李丹丹,周忠发,但雨生,等. 基于组合赋权TOPSIS模型的土壤养分空间分析及综合评价:以瓮安县为例[J].环境工程,2018,36(8):183-188.
    赵国存,刘占岭. 基于AHP-TOPSIS的装备保障信息定量评价研究[J].装备环境工程,2012,9(4):118-122.
    李君, 常莉. 我国城市地下水污染状况与治理对策[J]. 开封大学学报, 2006, 20(4):89-91.
    鄂佳楠, 周睿, 郑龙日,等. 基于蒙特卡罗法和层次分析法的污染场地地下水修复技术筛选方法研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2017, 39(5):499-503.
    张伯强,安达,王月,等.基于MCDA的沙漠地区污染场地地下水修复技术优化方法[J].环境工程学报,2016,10(10):5521-5527.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Zhijie, QI Cheng, LOU Ziyang, WANG Luochun, WANG Chuan. EXPLORING THE RISK OF POLLUTANT TRANSMISSION THROUGH BIRD FORAGING IN LANDFILLS: A REVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 48-57. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404006
    [2]ZHANG Xiaogang, QI Tian, SONG Shuxiang, CHEN Binrong, ZHANG Yufei, CHEN Xiaoqiang, ZHANG Le, LI Cihua, LI Yiming. A CASE ANALYSIS OF EXCAVATION OF THE EXISTING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN THE LANDFILL IN SOUTHERN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 90-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405012
    [3]LI Shuijiang, ZHANG Xiaogang, TAN Qiang, CHEN Xiaoqiang, LI Yaohuang, LIU Jinhai, ZHANG Le, ZHANG Nan. A PILOT-SCALE STUDY OF DIRECT EXCAVATION AND CO-INCINERATION OF EXISTING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN A LANDFILL IN SOUTHERN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 196-201. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308025
    [4]MAO Xinyu, ZHAI Senmao, JIANG Xiaosan, SUN Jingjing, YU Huaizhi. EFFECT OF MODIFIED BIOCHAR ON PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF FARMLAND SOIL AND IMMOBILIZATION OF Pb AND Cd AND THE MECHANISMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 113-121,139. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302016
    [5]NI Haifeng, DAN Zeng, ZHOU Wenwu, ZHOU Peng, XU Fei, YANG Tao, MENG Dean, CHEN Guanyi. CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS OF WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN LHASA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 89-93,131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203014
    [6]XIAO Wangsong, WANG Huawei, SUN Yingjie, GONG Zhaoguo, WANG Yanan, FU Youxian, LIU Keqiong, SUN Zhiguo. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF Ca2+, Mg2+ FROM CONCENTRATED LEACHATE IN LANDFILL USING NaOH SOLUTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 55-61. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208007
    [7]XU Wenjun, HUANG Dandan, LIANG Mingshen, XU Qiyong. EFFECT OF HYDROGEN SUFIDE ON METHANE OXIDATION OF BIOCHAR-AMENDED LANDFILL COVER SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 120-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202019
    [8]HUO Jiajia, LUO Shengxu, WANG Yanshi, WANG Xinwei, DENG Qin, LI Jinying. PASSIVATION OF LEAD IN SOIL BY FULVIC ACID-NANO-ZERO-VALENT IRON COMPLEX[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 112-120. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204016
    [9]LI Yalin, LI Peng, TANG Yifan, ZHANG Wei, WANG Enci, JIN Mingyu. IMPACT OF DC VOLTAGE ON ELECTRO-REMEDIATION OF Pb AND As CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 131-135,184. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208018
    [10]ZHANG Ke, LONG Jisheng, LIU Yihang, WANG Xianghui, LOU Ziyang. CARBON EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS AND REDUCTION FROM LANDFILL THROUGH FORCED AEROBIC STABILIZATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 17-21,60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212003
    [11]MAO Xinyu, YU Huaizhi, ZHAI Senmao, JIANG Xiaosan, XU Zhou, WANG Qilin. LONG-TERM STABILIZATION EFFECT AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF SOIL CADMIUM AND LEAD BY USING MODIFIED COCONUT SHELL BIOCHAR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 140-146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204020
    [12]BAI Xiu-jia, ZHANG Hong-yu, GU Jun, ZHANG Qi, WANG Ji-hong. PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION OF STALE REFUSE IN LANDFILL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 116-120,124. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102018
    [13]ZHANG Xiang-lu, LIU You-yan, LU Yu-hao, TANG Ai-xing. EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCES OF ASPERGILLUS TUBINGENSIS AND BENTONITE PASSIVATION SOIL LEAD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 171-177,183. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105024
    [15]Xu Wei Li Yong Tang Chuanxiang Chen Xiangbin Li Huijuan Xiong Daowen Yu Shaoqin, . EXPERIMENT OF A NEW AERATION SYSTEM USED IN MBR INTEGRATION EQUIPMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 10-14. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510003
    [16]Cong Jing Yan Dahai Li Li Jiang Xuguang Zhou Yingnan He Jie Wang Qi, . CONDENSATION AND ABSORPTION KINETICS OF THE CEMENT RAW MEAL ON LEAD AND CADMIUM AT LOW-TEMPERATURES DURING CO-PROCESSING IN CEMENT KILNS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 103-107. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504022
    [17]Wang Yayan, Zhang Jiangang, Ni Pengping, Li Mengying, Yu Yingjie, Zhang Lingling, Xu Yuliang, Cai Cong, Xie Liqun. APPLICATION RESEARCHES ON IN-SITU ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION TECHNOLOGY IN POLLUTED URBAN RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 11-16. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503003
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 张芳. 基于不确定性的废物填埋场地下水污染风险评价模型研究. 环境科学与管理. 2023(08): 189-194 .
    2. 杜新月，张晓然，张玉玲，张紫阳，李海燕. 地下水污染修复技术评价方法研究进展. 科技导报. 2023(11): 26-40 .
    3. 王英达，李洵，吴小雯，罗淋，王丰，王维明. 城镇生活垃圾填埋场开采的可行性评估体系. 环境工程. 2022(03): 181-187+202 . 本站查看
    4. 尹浩，詹亚，张浏，刘桂建. 基于层次分析法评价清水廊道陆向缓冲带工程适宜性. 环境工程. 2022(05): 193-196+250 . 本站查看
    5. 刘锋平，孙宁，呼红霞，丁贞玉. 基于AHP-TOPSIS的在产企业地下水铁锰污染修复技术比选. 环境工程技术学报. 2022(05): 1572-1579 .
    6. 李丽琴. 城市垃圾填埋场生态修复综合施工技术. 价值工程. 2022(05): 69-71 .
    7. 贾超，杨霄，刘森，王松涛，王辉辉，刘建章. 基于指数分析和GIS方法的垃圾填埋场地下水环境影响分析. 环境工程. 2021(04): 156-163+155 . 本站查看
    8. 叶兆勇，杨禹，侯立安. 垃圾填埋场地下水相关研究的研究热点与趋势：基于CiteSpace的可视化分析. 环境工程. 2021(06): 65-71 . 本站查看
    9. 周文武，陈冠益，穷达卓玛，周鹏，汪晶，李扬，旦增. 拉萨垃圾填埋场地下水环境质量影响分析研究. 环境监测管理与技术. 2020(04): 20-23+51 .

    Other cited types(7)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 18.2 %FULLTEXT: 18.2 %META: 81.8 %META: 81.8 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 19.3 %其他: 19.3 %China: 2.7 %China: 2.7 %United States: 0.4 %United States: 0.4 %[]: 0.8 %[]: 0.8 %上海: 1.5 %上海: 1.5 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %保定: 0.8 %保定: 0.8 %北京: 7.6 %北京: 7.6 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %大同: 0.4 %大同: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.4 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.4 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 1.9 %杭州: 1.9 %泰州: 0.4 %泰州: 0.4 %济源: 0.8 %济源: 0.8 %湖州: 1.5 %湖州: 1.5 %漯河: 0.8 %漯河: 0.8 %石家庄: 1.5 %石家庄: 1.5 %芒廷维尤: 24.2 %芒廷维尤: 24.2 %芝加哥: 2.7 %芝加哥: 2.7 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %西宁: 22.0 %西宁: 22.0 %诺沃克: 0.8 %诺沃克: 0.8 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %运城: 2.7 %运城: 2.7 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %其他ChinaUnited States[]上海临汾保定北京十堰南京台州大同常德张家口成都拉贾斯坦邦晋城朝阳杭州泰州济源湖州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州西宁诺沃克贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (215) PDF downloads(1) Cited by(16)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return