Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 38 Issue 6
Aug.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Guo, LI Yan-ying, FAN Quan-zhong, LIU Yan-hui. DESIGN AND EFFECT EVALUATION OF THE BLOCKING WALL IN LANDFILL BASED ON VISUAL MODFLOW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 137-142,80. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006022
Citation: LIU Guo, LI Yan-ying, FAN Quan-zhong, LIU Yan-hui. DESIGN AND EFFECT EVALUATION OF THE BLOCKING WALL IN LANDFILL BASED ON VISUAL MODFLOW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 137-142,80. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006022

DESIGN AND EFFECT EVALUATION OF THE BLOCKING WALL IN LANDFILL BASED ON VISUAL MODFLOW

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006022
  • Received Date: 2019-08-08
  • In order to study the application effect of the blocking wall in a groundwater contaminated site, a city landfill in Sichuan province was taken an example and cadmium was selected as the target pollutant. The structure, location and scale of the blocking wall under specific conditions were designed through investigating hydrogeological conditions. The service life of the blocking wall was calculated by analytic method. MODFLOW and MT3D modules were used to simulate the distribution of cadmium pollution plume in groundwater before and after the blocking wall was set up, and the barrier effect was analyzed. The results showed that the blocking wall was a vertical barrier with funnel gate. The service life of the blocking wall was 12.51 years, under the condition that the thickness was set as 1 meter and Class Ⅲ groundwater quality standard was selected as the breakdown standard. In the contaminated field, cadmium would be absorbed by the blocking wall, and the hydraulic connection between the blocking wall and the downstream would be weakened, thus cadmium could be effectively blocked in groundwater.
  • loading
  • 冯兴保. 城市景观艺术设计对垃圾填埋场生态环境的优化与影响研究[J]. 环境科学与管理,2019,44(7):147-150.
    雷抗,李瑞,李鸣晓,等. 海积平原区浅层地下水污染在线监测预警指标的确定:以天津市某简易生活垃圾填埋场为例[J]. 环境工程,2018,36(11):179-184.
    克热木·阿布都米吉提,束龙仓,鲁程鹏,等. 某垃圾填埋场地下水污染运移预测及控制方案模拟[J]. 水电能源科学,2018,36(3):46-49.
    丁文川,姚瑜佳,曾晓岚,等. 垃圾填埋场中新型污染物的研究进展[J]. 环境化学,2018,37(10):2267-2282.
    王敏,朱歆莹. 生活垃圾填埋场渗滤液金属污染特征及典型金属污染物来源解析[J]. 环境科技,2018,31(3):62-66.
    丁乃春,汪宝英. 垃圾填埋场地下水污染修复技术研究[J]. 环境与发展,2018,30(12):95,97.
    骆成杰,刘建,刘丹,等. 某红层地区临河非正规生活垃圾填埋场地下水污染与修复模拟[J]. 环境工程,2018,36(10):24-29.
    杨文韬. 基于ComGIS的垃圾填埋场地下水污染模拟与预测[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学,2018.
    GALITSKAYA I V, MOHAN K R, KRISHNA A K, et al. Assessment of soil and groundwater contamination by heavy metals and metalloids in russian and indian megacities[J]. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 2017, 17: 674-677.
    陈云敏,王誉泽, 谢海建,等. 黄土-粉土混合土对Pb(Ⅱ)的静平衡和动态吸附特性[J].岩土工程学报,2014,36(7): 1185-1194.
    范日东. 重金属作用下土—膨润土竖向隔离屏障化学相容性和防渗截污性能研究[D].南京:东南大学,2017.
    束龙仓,许杨,吴佩鹏. 基于MODFLOW参数不确定性的地下水水流数值模拟方法[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2017,47(6): 1803-1809.
    ALIYARI F, BAILEY R T, TASDIGHI A,et al. Coupled SWAT-MODFLOW model for large-scale mixed agro-urban river basins[J]. Enviormental Modelling & Software, 2019, 115: 200-210.
    YIHDEGO Y, RETA G, BECHT R. Human impact assessment through a transient numerical modeling on the UNESCO World Heritage Site, Lake Naivasha, Kenya[J]. Enviormental Earth Sciences, 2017, 76(91).
    李乐乐, 张卫民. 渗透反应墙技术处理铀尾矿库渗漏水的研究现状[J]. 环境工程, 2016,34(1): 168-172.
    许四法, 张勇, 王哲. 垃圾填埋场衬垫系统穿刺性能评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2011,32(6): 1697-1700.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (165) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return