Source Journal of CSCD
Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Volume 38 Issue 9
Nov.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Ying, DENG Jian-guo, WANG Gang, LI Yan-jing, XU Peng, JIANG Jing-kun. CHARACTERIZATION OF CONDENSABLE PARTICULATE MATTER EMITTED FROM A TYPICAL COKING PLANT IN IRON AND STEEL PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 154-158,125. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009025
Citation: ZHANG Ying, DENG Jian-guo, WANG Gang, LI Yan-jing, XU Peng, JIANG Jing-kun. CHARACTERIZATION OF CONDENSABLE PARTICULATE MATTER EMITTED FROM A TYPICAL COKING PLANT IN IRON AND STEEL PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 154-158,125. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009025

CHARACTERIZATION OF CONDENSABLE PARTICULATE MATTER EMITTED FROM A TYPICAL COKING PLANT IN IRON AND STEEL PLANT

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009025
  • Received Date: 2019-11-15
  • Condensable particulate matter (CPM) contributes considerably to the fine particles (PM2.5) emitted from coking plant in iron and steel plants. However, the emission characteristics of CPM from coking plants are still unclear. In this study, indirect dilution method was applied to collect the CPM emitted from coking plant. The concentrations and chemical compositions of CPM at the flue gas desulfurization inlet and the stack were analyzed systematically. The concentrations of CPM at the flue gas desulfurization inlet and the stack were 9.5 mg/m3 and 1.2 mg/m3, respectively, which were 14 times and 4 times of fine filterable particulate matter (FPM2.5), respectively. The most dominant constituents in CPM at the flue gas desulfurization inlet and the stack were water-soluble ions of Cl- and K+, and then organic components. The organic constituents in CPM were mainly alkenes, cyclanes, alkanes at the flue gas desulfurization inlet and alcohols, alkenes, phenols at the stack. The comined process, dry desulfurization with sodium bicarbonate-fabric filter-selective catalytic reduction under medium and low temperature could remove a certain amount of condensable gaseous pollutants synergistically, with a removal rate for CPM of 87.3%.
  • loading
  • WANG X Y, LEI Y, YAN L, et al. A unit-based emission inventory of SO2, NOx and PM for the Chinese iron and steel industry from 2010 to 2015[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 676:18-30.
    HLEIS D, FERNANDEZ-OLMO I, LEDOUX F, et al. Chemical profile identification of fugitive and confined particle emissions from an integrated iron and steelmaking plant[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2013, 250/251:246-255.
    KONG S F, JI Y Q, LI Z Y, et al. Emission and profile characteristic of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in PM2.5 and PM10 from stationary sources based on dilution sampling[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2013, 77:155-165.
    TSAI J H, LIN K H, CHEN C Y, et al. Chemical constituents in particulate emissions from an integrated iron and steel facility[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 147(1/2):111-119.
    JIUN-HORNG T, KUO-HSIUNG L, CHIH-YU C, et al. Volatile organic compound constituents from an integrated iron and steel facility[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 157(2/3):569-578.
    YANG H H, LAI S O, HSIEH L T, et al. Profiles of PAH emission from steel and iron industries[J]. Chemosphere, 2002, 48(10):1061-1074.
    KHALILI N R, SCHEFF P A, HOLSEN T M. PAH source fingerprints for coke ovens, diesel and gasoline-engines, highway tunnels, and wood combustion emissions[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1995, 29(4):533-542.
    蒋靖坤, 邓建国, 李振, 等. 固定污染源排气中PM2.5采样方法综述[J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(5):2018-2024.
    裴冰. 固定源排气中可凝结颗粒物排放与测试探讨[J]. 中国环境监测, 2010, 26(6):9-12.
    裴冰. 燃煤电厂可凝结颗粒物的测试与排放[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(5):1544-1549.
    CORIO L A, SHERWELL J. In-stack condensible particulate matter measurements and issues[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2000, 50(2):207-218.
    WANG G, DENG J G, MA Z Z, et al. Characteristics of filterable and condensable particulate matter emitted from two waste incineration power plants in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 639:695-704.
    YANG H H, LEE K T, HSIEH Y S, et al. Filterable and condensable fine particulate emissions from stationary sources[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2014, 14(7):2010-2016.
    USEPA. Method 202-Dry impinger method for determining condensable particulate emissions from stationary sources[S]. USEPA:Washington, D.C., 2010.
    蒋靖坤, 邓建国, 王刚, 等. 固定污染源可凝结颗粒物测量方法[J]. 环境科学, 2019(12):5234-5239.
    WANG G, DENG J G, ZHANG Y, et al. Evaluating airborne condensable particulate matter measurement methods in typical stationary sources in China[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020,54(3):1363-1371.
    YANG H H, LEE K T, HSIEH Y S, et al. Emission characteristics and chemical compositions of both filterable and condensable fine particulate from steel plants[J]. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2015, 15(4):1672-1680.
    International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Stationary source emissions-test method for determining PM2.5 and PM10 mass in stack gases using cyclone samplers and sample dilution. ISO 25597:2013[S]. ISO:Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
    李妍菁, 邓建国, 王刚, 等. 固定源可凝结颗粒物稀释采样器的设计[J]. 环境科学学报, 2020,40(5):1656-1660.
    温斌, 宋宝华, 孙国刚, 等. 钢铁烧结烟气脱硝技术进展[C]//2017年烧结烟气脱硝及综合治理技术交流研讨会, 临汾, 2017.
    JI Z Y, GAN M, FAN X H, et al. Characteristics of PM2.5 from iron ore sintering process:influences of raw materials and controlling methods[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 148:12-22.
    TSUKADA M, NISHIKAWA N, HORIKAWA A, et al. Emission potential of condensable suspended particulate matter from flue gas of solid waste combustion[J]. Powder Technology, 2008, 180(1/2):140-144.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (220) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return