Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 38 Issue 12
Apr.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WEI Wen-jing, XIE Bing-geng, ZHOU Kai-chun, LI Xiao-qing. RESEARCH ON TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIATIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC PM2.5 AND PM10 AND THE INFLUENCING FACTORS IN SHANDONG, CHINA DURING 2013—2018[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 103-111. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012018
Citation: WEI Wen-jing, XIE Bing-geng, ZHOU Kai-chun, LI Xiao-qing. RESEARCH ON TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIATIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC PM2.5 AND PM10 AND THE INFLUENCING FACTORS IN SHANDONG, CHINA DURING 2013—2018[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 103-111. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012018

RESEARCH ON TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIATIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC PM2.5 AND PM10 AND THE INFLUENCING FACTORS IN SHANDONG, CHINA DURING 2013—2018

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012018
  • Received Date: 2019-11-02
    Available Online: 2021-04-23
  • PM2.5 and PM10 pollutions have become important environmental problems which have attracted great attention in the world. Monitoring PM2.5 and PM10 pollutions is of great significance to human health, animal and plant growth, atmospheric environment assessment, etc. Based on the atmospheric PM2.5 and PM10 monitoring data of 17 cities in Shandong during 2013—2018, the paper studied spatial and temporal variation characteristics of PM2.5 and PM10 pollution in Shandong and analyzed the influence of meteorological factors, human factors and policy factors on them, using the temporal-spatial analysis method and the Spearman correlation analysis method. The results showed that: compared with 2013, the pollution extent of PM2.5 and PM10 in Shandong was significantly reduced in 2018, with an annual mean concentration dropped of 48.72% and 37.72% respectively; the presentation of the monthly PM2.5 mean concentration variation in the studied six years was similar to the "U" shape change rule, and the monthly PM10 mean concentration was similar to the "V" shape change rule; the overall pollution conditions of PM2.5 and PM10 showed a spatial trend of gradual reduction from the northwest inland to the eastern coastal area; the concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 were significantly affected by the meteorological factors of temperature and precipitation, as well as the human factors of road density, urban green coverage, SO2 and NOx emissions, etc. Besides, meteorological and human factors had a greater impact on PM2.5 concentration than PM10 concentration.
  • loading
  • 苏维,张帅珺,赖新云,等.南昌市空气PM2.5和PM10的时空动态及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(1):257-265.
    王涛,何浩奇,夏忠欢,等.2015年南京市PM2.5与PM10的污染特征[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(11):5978-5985.
    GUAN D B, SU X, ZHANG Q, et al. The socioeconomic drivers of China's primary PM2.5 emissions[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2014, 9:1-9.
    Kan H D, Chen R J, Tong S L. Ambient air pollution, climate change, and population health in China[J]. Environment International, 2012, 42:10-19.
    潘月鹏,贾琳,田世丽,等.大气霾污染对农业生产的可能影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014,33(11):2279-2280.
    王振波,方创琳,许光,等.2014年中国城市PM2.5浓度的时空变化规律[J].地理学报,2015,70(11):1720-1734.
    李名升,张建辉,张殷俊,等.近10年中国大气PM10污染时空格局演变[J].地理学报,2013,68(11):1504-1521.
    华锦欣,任晓旭,雷亦晨,等.杭州市城区典型区域PM2.5和PM10质量浓度变化特征[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学版),2017,37(5):135-140.
    王珍珍,孙丽,李志文,等.2016年南昌市PM10和PM2.5

    质量浓度变化研究[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版),2019,48(1):34-39.
    孟媛媛,符超峰, 席建建,等.渭南市区冬春季PM2.5和PM10时间分布特征及与气象因素的关系[J].地球环境学报, 2018,9(2):182-192.
    桑会勇,李爽,魏英策,等. 京津冀地区PM2.5/PM10浓度时空分布监测与分析[J]. 测绘科学,2019,44(6):323-329.
    于彩霞,邓学良,石春娥,等.降水和风对大气PM2.5、PM10的清除作用分析[J].环境科学学报,2018,38(12):4620-4629.
    张达标,陈志明,莫招育,等.百色市PM2.5和PM10中有机碳和元素碳污染特征及来源解析[J].环境监测管理与技术, 2019,31(2):16-20.
    张忠地,邵天杰,黄小刚,等.2017年京津冀地区PM2.5污染特征及潜在来源分析[J]. 环境工程,2020,38(2):99-106

    ,134.
    闫丽娜,左昊,张聚全,等.石家庄市大气PM1、PM2.5和PM10中重金属元素分布特征及来源的对比研究[J].地学前缘,2019,26(3):263-270.
    王娜,殷宝辉,王静,等.漯河市PM2.5和PM10中水溶性离子浓度特征及其来源解析[J].环境科学研究,2018,31(12):2073-2081.
    李凯飞,张恒德,谢永华.降水对京津冀中南部PM10和PM2.5清除作用的分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(3):69-74.
    王嫣然,张学霞,赵静瑶,等.北京地区不同季节PM2.5和PM10浓度对地面气象因素的响应[J].中国环境监测,2017,33(2):34-41.
    黄军,郭胜利,王希.南京市冬春PM2.5和PM10污染特征及影响因素分析[J].环境工程,2015,12(15):69-74.
    张玮,郭胜利,申付振,等.南京地区PM2.5和PM10浓度分布特征及与相关气象条件的关系[J].科学技术与工程,2016,16(4):124-129.
    尹延震,王苗,王静远,等.南阳市PM10、PM2.5污染特征及其与气象因子的关系[J].干旱环境监测,2018,32(1):12-18.
    王嫣然,张学霞,赵静瑶,等.2013-2014年北京地区PM2.5时空分布规律及其与植被覆盖度关系的研究[J].生态环境学报,2016,25(1):103-111.
    项佳娥,徐丽华,张方方,等.杭州城区PM2.5和PM10污染特征及其影响因子分析[J].中国环境监测,2016,32(6):36-42.
    胡稳,杨广斌,安宏锋,等.贵阳市冬季大气PM2.5和PM10浓度空间插值及分布研究[J].环境污染与防治,2019,41(5):579-583.
    范开放,单宝艳.山东省PM2.5浓度时空变化规律及其影响因素分析[J].山东建筑大学学报,2017,32(1):39-46.
    隋玟萱,王颢樾,唐晓,等.山东省2015年PM2.5和O3污染时空分布特征[J].中国环境监测,2019,35(2):59-69.
    环境保护部.环境空气质量标准:GB 3095-2012[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2012.
    郭高晶.空气污染跨域治理背景下府际空气生态补偿机制研究:以山东省空气质量生态补偿实践为例[J].资源开发与市场,2016,32(7):832-837.
    黄金果,徐鹏森.大气污染治理形势及其存在问题和措施分析[J].环境与发展,2018,30(10):63-64.
    刘传明.京津冀地区雾霾污染的城市间动态关联及其影响因素研究[D].济南:山东财经大学,2017:53-54.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (184) PDF downloads(17) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return