Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 1
Apr.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WAN Ling, XIANG Song, NIU Yong, HUANG Tian-yin, WANG Yong-tao, PANG Yan. DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND ORGANIC MATTERS IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF THE NIUGU RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 174-180. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101027
Citation: WAN Ling, XIANG Song, NIU Yong, HUANG Tian-yin, WANG Yong-tao, PANG Yan. DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND ORGANIC MATTERS IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF THE NIUGU RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 174-180. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101027

DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND ORGANIC MATTERS IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF THE NIUGU RIVER

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101027
  • Received Date: 2019-12-03
    Available Online: 2021-04-23
  • Taking 36 sampling points arranged along the Niugu River and Xihe River inlets as the research objects, SMT method, elemental analyzer and potassium dichromate method were employed to monitor the contents of TP, TN and OM, respectively. Spatial patterns and correlations of TN, TP and OM were examined. At the same time, comprehensive pollution index and organic pollution index was employed to evaluate pollution status. The results showed that the average contents of TN, TP and OM were 697.18 mg/kg, 920.31 mg/kg and 4.47%, respectively. The content of TN and OM in the middle reaches was higher than that in the upper and lower reaches(A,B>C,D), and the content of TP in the middle and lower reaches was higher than that in the upper reaches(A,B,D>C); C/N of each part indicated that the organic matter of C, A and D segments mainly came from external sources, and the internal and external sources of B segments were basically balanced. The average values of comprehensive pollution index and organic pollution index of surface sediment in Niugu River were 1.38 and 0.19, respectively. Both evaluation results showed that the surface sediment of Niugu River was slightly polluted, but the average pollution index of TP was 1.36, which was in severe pollution condition. The Pearson correlation analysis between indicators showed that TN, TP, and OM had significantly positively correlation with each other (P<0.01).
  • loading
  • XIE W. Analysis on the current status and regulatory measures of water pollution in the Xiang River Basin of China[J]. Nature Environment & Pollution Technology, 2016,15(4):1435-1440.
    李任飞,檀文炳,高如泰,等.洨河沉积物中有机物、氮、磷浓度分布特征[J].环境工程技术学报,2018,8(3):241-247.
    ZHANG Z B, LV Y F, ZHANG W, et al. Phosphorus, organic matter and nitrogen distribution characteristics of the surface sediments in Nansi Lake, China[J]. Environmental earth sciences, 2015,73(9):5669-5675.
    李高金,周杰.环境因子对南四湖沉积物中磷释放的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2006,25(增刊1):653-656.
    SPEARS B M, CARVALHO L, PERKINS R, et al. Sediment phosphorus cycling in a large shallow lake:spatio-temporal variation in phosphorus pools and release[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2007,584(1):37-48.
    李再兴,孙悦,张艺冉,等.白洋淀冰封期沉积物中氮赋存形态及分布特征[J].环境工程,2019,37(12):29-33.
    江辉煌,刘素美.渤海沉积物中磷的分布与埋藏通量[J].环境科学学报,2013,33(1):125-132.
    隋桂荣.太湖表层沉积物中OM、TN、TP的现状与评价[J].湖泊科学,1996,8(4):319-324.
    卢少勇,许梦爽,金相灿,等.长寿湖表层沉积物氮磷和有机质污染特征及评价[J].环境科学,2012,33(2):393-398.
    曾露,葛继稳,王自业,等.古夫河上覆水和表层沉积物中总氮和总磷空间分布特征及其相关性[J].安全与环境工程,2014,21(4):38-43.
    王育来,胡芸芸,杨长明,等.南淝河沉积物可转化态氮赋存形态及其对上覆水水质的影响[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(9):5057-5064.
    李云鹏,李致春,余宝宝,等.宿州市沱河沉积物氮磷和有机碳分布及评价[J].环境监测管理与技术,2017,29(5):25-28.
    ROY E D, NGUYEN N T, WHITE J R. Changes in estuarine sediment phosphorus fractions during a large-scale Mississippi River diversion[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2017,6(9):1248-1257.
    王少华.干旱半干旱区河流污染现状分析与治理对策[D].南宁:广西大学,2018.
    姜霞,王书航.沉积物质量调查评估手册[M].北京:科学出版社,2012:27-39.
    中华人民共和国水利部. 河流泥沙颗粒分析规程:SL 42-2010[S].北京:水利电力出版社,1992
    王翔,张炜.甘肃省武威地区土壤背景值地球化学特征[J].甘肃科技,2017,33(15):23-25

    ,45.
    YANG Y, LIU Q G, HU Z J, et al. Spatial distribution of sediment carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus and pollution evaluation of sediment in Taihu Lake Basin[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2014,34(12):3057-3064.
    LU H J, FU K D, DONG T, et al. Spatial distribution of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus within surface sediments in the lower Lancang River:pollution assessment related to dams[J]. Journal of Environmental Protection, 2018,9(13):1343-1358.
    李芬芳,黄代中,连花,等.洞庭湖及其入湖口表层沉积物氮、磷、有机质的分布及污染评价[J].生态环境学报,2018,27(12):2307-2313.
    孟博,刘静玲,李毅,等.北京市凉水河表层沉积物不同粒径重金属形态分布特征及生态风险[J].农业环境科学学报,2015,34(5):964-972.
    李辉,潘学军,史丽琼,等.湖泊内源氮磷污染分析方法及特征研究进展[J].环境化学,2011,30(1):281-292.
    魏伟伟,叶春,李春华.太湖竺山湾缓冲带内湿地表层沉积物氮、磷和有机质的分布特征及评价[J].环境污染与防治,2018,40(5):588-591.
    易文利.渭河宝鸡段表层沉积物营养盐分布特征及污染评价[J].河南科学,2014,32(4):616-619.
    郭掌珍,张渊,李维宏,等.汾河表层沉积物中营养盐和重金属的含量、来源和生态风险[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(3):95-99.
    王百群,刘国彬.黄土丘陵区地形对坡地土壤养分流失的影响[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(2):18-22.
    彭琳,王继增,余存祖.侵蚀旱作土壤氮素吸收利用与淋溶流失[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1996,2(2):9-16.
    王军,傅伯杰,邱扬,等.黄土高原小流域土壤养分的空间异质性[J].生态学报,2002,22(8):1173-1178.
    李青芹,霍守亮,昝逢宇,等.我国湖泊沉积物营养盐和粒度分布及其关系研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2010,29(12):2390-2397.
    王凡,臧淑英,肖海丰.东大海柱状沉积物营养盐沉积记录[J].环境工程,2014,32(3):22-25.
    BRYAN R B. Soil erodibility and processes of water erosion on hillslope[J]. Geomorphology, 2000,32(3/4):385-415.
    MACDONALD D D, INGERSOLL C G. A Guidance Manual to Support the Assessment of Contaminated Sediments in Freshwater Ecosystems[M]. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes National Program Office, 2002.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (256) PDF downloads(7) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return