Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 3
Jul.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HE Zhe-xiang, LI Lei. AN AIR POLLUTANT CONCENTRATION PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON WAVELET TRANSFORM AND LSTM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 111-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103016
Citation: HE Zhe-xiang, LI Lei. AN AIR POLLUTANT CONCENTRATION PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON WAVELET TRANSFORM AND LSTM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 111-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103016

AN AIR POLLUTANT CONCENTRATION PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON WAVELET TRANSFORM AND LSTM

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103016
  • Received Date: 2020-01-20
    Available Online: 2021-07-19
  • To solve the problem that current atmospheric pollutant prediction research has low accuracy of prediction and only pays attention to single pollutant type, a long short-term memory network atmospheric pollutant prediction model based on wavelet transform was proposed, to predict daily average PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2 and O3 concentration of the next day. First, the high-dimensional data was converted into low-dimensional data by wavelet decomposition, and subsequently, the long short-term memory network prediction model was established for low-dimensional data. Finally, the decomposition sequence was reconstructed into the pollutant time series by wavelet reconstruction. Based on the data collected from 10 national control stations in Changsha from 2015 to 2018, the model was verified. The results showed that for the prediction of atmospheric pollutants of the next day, compared with the LSTM, MLR, WT-MLR, the root mean square error and absolute mean error of WT-LSTM model decreased by 50%, and the accuracy of the pollution level predictions of the five air pollutants were all above 80%.
  • loading
  • [1]
    石佳超, 罗坤, 樊建人, 等. 基于CMAQ与前馈神经网络的区域大气污染物浓度快速响应模型[J]. 环境科学学报, 2018,38(11):4480-4489.
    [2]
    冯震, 李兴华. WRF-CMAQ模式在内蒙古本地化应用[J]. 内蒙古科技与经济, 2018(23):42-48,159.
    [3]
    赵文怡, 夏丽莎, 高广阔, 等. 基于加权KNN-BP神经网络的PM2.5浓度预测模型研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2019,9(1):14-18.
    [4]
    李晓理, 梅建想, 张山. 基于改进粒子群优化BP-Adaboost神经网络的PM2.5浓度预测[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2018,58(3):316-323.
    [5]
    孙宝磊, 孙暠, 张朝能, 等. 基于BP神经网络的大气污染物浓度预测[J]. 环境科学学报, 2017,37(5):1864-1871.
    [6]
    姚宁, 马青兰, 张晶, 等. 基于AGNES算法优化BP神经网络和GIS系统的大气污染物浓度预测[J]. 中国环境监测, 2015,31(3):113-117.
    [7]
    BAI Y, LI Y, WANG X X, et al. Air pollutants concentrations forecasting using back propagation[J]. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 2016,7(3):557-566.
    [8]
    宋国君, 国潇丹, 杨啸, 等. 沈阳市PM2.5浓度ARIMA-SVM组合预测研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(11):4031-4039.
    [9]
    HU Z, LI W, QIAO J. Prediction of PM2.5 based on Elman neural network with chaos theory[C]//201635th Chinese Control Conference (CCC). IEEE, 2016:3573-3578.
    [10]
    WANG P, LIU Y, QIN Z D, et al. A novel hybrid forecasting model for PM10 and SO2 daily concentrations[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015,505:1202-1212.
    [11]
    陈菊芬, 李勇. 基于多模态支持向量回归的PM2.5浓度预测[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(1):37,125

    -129.
    [12]
    李颖若,汪君霞,韩婷婷, 等. 利用多元线性回归方法评估气象条件和控制措施对APEC期间北京空气质量的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2019,40(3):1024-1034.
    [13]
    PAK U, KIM C, RYU U, et al. A hybrid model based on convolutional neural networks and long short-term memory for ozone concentration prediction[J]. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2018, 11(8):883-895.
    [14]
    曲悦, 钱旭, 宋洪庆, 等. 基于机器学习的北京市PM2.5浓度预测模型及模拟分析[J]. 工程科学学报, 2019,41(3):401-407.
    [15]
    WU L F, LI N, YANG Y J. Prediction of air quality indicators for the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,196:682-687.
    [16]
    LI X, PENG L, YAO X J, et al. Long short-term memory neural network for air pollutant concentration predictions:method development and evaluation[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 231:997-1004.
    [17]
    ZHOU Q P, JIANG H Y, WANG J Z, et al. A hybrid model for PM2.5 forecasting based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition and a general regression neural network[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 496:264-274.
    [18]
    QING T, FANG L, YONG L, et al. Air pollution forecasting using a deep learning model based on 1D convnets and bidirectional GRU[J].IEEE Access,2019,7:76690-76698.
    [19]
    陈国初, 王鹏, 徐余法, 等. 基于小波分解的风电场短期功率混合预测模型[J]. 上海电机学院学报, 2011,14(3):163-168.
    [20]
    黄婷婷,余磊. SDAE-LSTM模型在金融时间序列预测中的应用[J].计算机工程与应用,2019,55(1):142-148.
    [21]
    中国环境监测总站.全国城市空气质量实时发布平台[DB/OL]. http://106.37.208.233:20035/.
    [22]
    尹建光, 彭飞, 谢连科, 等. 基于小波分解与自适应多级残差修正的最小二乘支持向量回归预测模型的PM2.5浓度预测[J]. 环境科学学报, 2018,38(5):2090-2098.
    [23]
    李建新, 刘小生, 刘静, 等. 基于MRMR-HK-SVM模型的PM2.5浓度预测[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019,39(6):2304-2310.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (327) PDF downloads(16) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return